Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Second Earsel Workshop On Imaging Spectroscopy, Enschede, 2000
Second Earsel Workshop On Imaging Spectroscopy, Enschede, 2000
ESTIMATION OF CHLOROPHYLL
FLUORESCENCE UNDER
NATURAL ILLUMINATION
**
Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, York
University & Centre for Research in Earth
and Space Technology (CRESTech),
Toronto, Canada
jrmiller@yorku.ca
***
Ontario Forest Research Institute (OFRI),
Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources,
Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario, Canada
gina.mohammed@mnr.gov.on.ca
ABSTRACT
4 RESULTS
r1
r2 0.01
Difference
0.02 0.1
0.1
0.025
fleRe
0
0.015 0
ctance
0.3 0
0
600
0.02 650
r 700
400
ctance 500 750
600 800
700 0.3
800
Wavelength
Wave le n gth (nm ) (nm)
0.01
reDiffe
the RG695 filter (thick line) min) (r2)
and with no filter (thin line) in a
from a dark-adapted Acer time-
0.2
saccharum M. leaf sample 0.015 decay
(adapted from Zarco-Tejada experim
et al. (in press, a). ent
0.2 which
demonst
rates the
effect of
fluoresce
0.5 nce
emission bands spectra in the 600-800 nm
on the spectral region due to PSII
reflectance and PSI photosystems.
Second EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, Enschede, 2000
CASI canopy reflectance measurements in
the laboratory showed that changes in
canopy apparent reflectance from targeted
plant material are observed when the Schott
695nm blocking filter is used. This effect is
superimposed on the evident at 730-750 nm, and is most
reflectance when there is pronounced at 742 nm. When the maple-
no excitation. Results seedling canopy was kept in a fixed position
showed that variations in during 3 minutes of CASI data acquisition
Fv/Fm during the day are in the 72-channel (7.5 nm bandwidth) mode
captured in the leaf of operation, changes in the CASI
reflectance measurements reflectance bands affected by chlorophyll
even when the pigment fluorescence in this time-decay experiment
concentration is constant. were seen (Figure 4)
2
0.36
)2
Table 1. The
reflectance
difference
R=
spectra have A1 exp
been fit with a
double gaussian
1.1
Param
eters
Leaf_Ref
l. A2
Canopy_
Refl.
2.5
(
2
1
2.9
)2
(
3
Canopy_R
_Dif
2
1
52.9 nm
688.3 nm
81.1 nm
0
682.1 nm
Differe
nce
2.5
-0.5
700
750
800
R
2
1
650
0.94
29.5 nm
0.93 1.5
22.5 nm
Wavelength
(nm)
Figure 3.
%R_ The
1 measured
difference
reflectance
spectra
2 correspondin
_ g to Figures
3.5 2 and 4 have
746.1 nm been fitted
with a
double-
gaussian
752.2 nm
function.
Leaf_R_Dif
Leaf The fit
0.5 parameters
are
presented in
Table 1.
DifferenceR
eflectance
50
Start (0'')
End (3')
Difference
4
70
3
40
60 3.5 Reflecta
4.5 nce (%)
690)
2.5 calcula
0.64 ted
from
CASI
canop
10
y
0.8 R685 reflect
ance in
0.92
Fv/Fm laborat
0.72
0.5 ory
using
Acer
1.04
sachar
um M.
30
seedlin
0.98 gs.
The
behavi
2 our of
Fv/Fm CF
R685^ during
2/
(R675* the
690) day is
0 1.02
tracke
0.6 d by
the
optical
0.76
0 index
2
derive
d from
0.68 0.9
CASI
600 reflect
20 650
700 ance
750
800
achiev
ing
casi 8:00
10:30 r2=0.9
1.5 13:00
15:30 5.
18:00
0.96
/ 20:30 Maple
(R675*690) 23:00 seedlin
Wavelength (nm)
gs
were
Figure 4. Effect of dark-
the CF variation in a adapte
time-decay d for
experiment in the Time
(h) 15
600-800 nm canopy minute
(%) reflectance. CASI s prior
canopy reflectance to
measurements were readin
made from Acer Figure gs of
saccharum M. 5. Fv/Fm
seedlings in the Diurna (adapt
laboratory taken l ed
after dark adaptation variati from
1 and after 3 minutes ons of Zarco-
of illumination. Fv/Fm Tejada
Differences in and et al.,
reflectances at 680- 1 the in
690 nm and 730-750 optical press,
nm are observed due index a).
to changes in
0.94 R6852/
chlorophyll
(R675
fluorescence.
Second EARSeL Workshop on Imaging Spectroscopy, Enschede, 2000
0.01
R680/R630,
R685/R630,
R687/R630
and
R690/R630,
@ 8.20-13.3
0.005
-0.016
-0.021
Difference
-0.026
670
680
690
700
710
Reflectance
diurnal
changes in Fv/Fm,
i.e.
curvature
index
-0.005
-0.031
R6852/(R675690)
(Figure 5) yields r2=0.95.
-0.036
0.9-20.8@
Results Under Natural
Illumination Conditions
Effects of CF on apparent
reflectance were found in
canopy reflectance measurements with
-0.015
a fibre
-0.041
plot), shows that reflectance difference
spectrometer. Results of between 8.20h and
the diurnal experiments
over a
-0.02
-0.046
canopy of Acer
Saccharum M. seedlings
(Figure 6, upper
Wavelength (nm)
of CF is higher in the early morning than in
mid-day,
0.014
pm
0.012
0.01
afternoon:
Fv/Fm=0.574,
Ft=0.495
at
9:09h;
12.20
8.00 am
Rfl
0.006
Fv/Fm=0.524, Ft=0.418
at 11:22h; and
Fv/Fm=0.516,
0.008
diff
670
680
690
700
710
0.004
Wavelength (nm)
Subsequent experiments
with the airborne CASI
reflectance at 700nm due to the higher CF
effects in the
(upper
plot, early morning before photosystem
saturation. Ground
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Zarco-Tejada, P. J.,
Miller, J. R., Mohammed,
G. H., Noland, T. L., (in
press, a). Chlorophyll
Fluorescence Effects on
Vegetation Apparent
Reflectance: I. Leaf-Level
Measurements and Model
Simulation, Remote
Sensing of Environment.
Zarco-Tejada, P. J.,
Miller, J. R., Mohammed,
G. H., Noland, T. L and
Sampson, P.H., (in press,
b). Chlorophyll
Fluorescence Effects on
Vegetation Apparent
Reflectance: II.
Laboratory and Airborne
Canopy-Level
Measurements with
Hyperspectral data,
Remote Sensing of
Environment.