Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 s2.0 S1878535213001639 Main
1 s2.0 S1878535213001639 Main
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Department of Chemistry, Hemchandracharya North Gujarat University, Patan 384 265, Gujarat, India
effect (Gursoy and Terzioglu, 2005). Additionally, rhodanine aureus (MTCC-96) and Streptococcus pyogenes (MTCC-442)
based molecules have gained much attention as small molecule and gram negative bacteria Escherichia coli (MTCC-443) and
inhibitors of various targets such as anti-diabetics (Murugan Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MTCC-1688). Antibacterial activity
et al., 2009; Momose et al., 1991), aldose reductase (Bruno was carried out by serial broth dilution method (Pier et al.,
et al., 2002; Fujishima and Tsuboto, 2002), b-lactamase (Grant 1997)|. The standard strains used for the antimicrobial activity
et al., 2000), cathepsin D (Whitesitt et al., 1996), PMT inhibitors were procured from the Institute of Microbial Technology,
(Orchard et al., 2004), PDE4 inhibitors (Irvine et al., 2008), and Chandigarh, India. Compounds (3ah) were screened for their
histidine decarboxylase (Free et al., 1971). antibacterial activity in triplicate against E. coli, S. aureus, P.
Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidines are of considerable chemical aeruginosa, and S. pyogenes at different concentrations of
and pharmacological importance as purine analogs (Ghorab 1000, 500, 250, 100 (Table 1). The drugs which were found
et al., 2009; Bhat et al., 1981; Zacharie et al., 1996). Various to be active in primary screening were diluted to obtain re-
compounds with related structures also possessed anti-tumor quired concentrations to get more close result. The growths
and antileukemia activities (Anderson et al., 1990; Avila of bacterial cultures were monitored after 24 and 48 h. The
et al., 1986). On the other hand, substituted pyridazines are of- lowest concentration, which showed no growth after spot sub-
ten used in medicine because of their pronounced bactericidal culture was considered as MIC for each drug. Also, the highest
and fungicidal effects (Contreras et al., 1999). dilution showing at least 99% inhibition is taken as MIC. The
We report here, the synthesis of a series of novel rhodanine test mixture selected for this assay contained 108 cells/ml. The
derivatives containing pyrazole moiety. The synthesized com- standard drug used for this study was ampicillin and it showed
pounds have been structurally established with modern analyt- MIC at 100, 100, 250, and 100 lg/ml against E. coli, P. aeru-
ical tools like IR, NMR and mass spectroscopy with an aim to ginosa, S. aureus, and S. pyogenes, respectively.
nd new and more potent antibacterial and antifungal agents.
2.2.2. Antifungal activity
2. Experimental section Same compounds were tested for antifungal activity in tripli-
cate against Candida albicans, Aspergillus niger, and Aspergil-
2.1. General lus clavatus at various concentrations of 1000, 500, 250, and
100 lg/ml as shown in (Table 1). The results were recorded
The melting points of the synthesized products were deter- in the form of primary and secondary screening. The synthe-
mined using Mettler Toledo FP 62 melting point apparatus sized compounds were diluted at 1000 lg/ml concentration,
(Metter Toledo-Switzerland) and were used without correc- as a stock solution. The synthesized compounds which were
tion. The FT-IR spectra were recorded on a Perkin Elmer found to be active in this primary screening were further tested
Spectrum GX FT-IR System (USA) in a KBr disk. 1H and in a second set of dilution against all microorganisms. The
13
C spectra (solvent DMSO-d6) were recorded on 200 MHz lowest concentration, which showed no growth after spot sub-
Bruker Avance DPX 200 NMR system. TMS was used as an culture and highest dilution showing at least 99% inhibition
internal standard. The mass spectra were scanned on a Shima- was considered as MIC for each drug. Antibiotic griseofulvin
dzu QP2010 spectrometer (equipped with a direct inlet probe) was used as a standard drug for antifungal activity study. It
operating at 70 eV. Elemental analysis was performed on Per- showed MIC at concentrations 500, 100 and 100 lg/ml for
kin Elmer CHNS (O) analyzer (PE-2400 Series II-USA). Ana- C. albicans, A. niger and A. clavatus, respectively.
lytical TLC was performed on silica gel GF 254.
2.3. General synthetic method
2.2. Biological assay
2.3.1. Synthesis of 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one
2.2.1. Antibacterial activity (1)
The newly synthesized compounds were screened for their anti- Synthesis of 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (1)
bacterial activity against gram positive bacteria Staphylococcus was carried according to the procedure reported earlier
S1592 H. BBhatt, S. Sharma
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g 3h
166.943
3.1. Chemistry
O
N
N
N
The synthetic route followed for the preparation of the novel S 154.557
3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-((1-phenyl-3-aryl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl) meth- S
ylene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (3ah) derivatives is illustrated
193.837
in Scheme 1. The compound 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxothiaz-
olidin-4-one (1) was synthesized from the reaction of carbon
disulde, ammonia, and chloroacetic acid (1) (Redemann, CH3 21.369
1947). The ketones on treatment with phenyl hydrazine formed
In 13 CNMR (ppm)
required Schiffs bases. The Schiffs bases of ketones on treat-
ment with dimethyl formamide and phosphorous oxychloride 13
Figure 2 C NMR chemical shift (d) representation for com-
underwent cyclization reaction forming pyrazole derivatives
pound 3b.
and got formylated on to the pyrazole ring (2ah) (Fieser et al.,
1940). The nal compounds 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-((1-phenyl-
3-aryl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one
Compd.
(3ah) were synthesized with 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxothiaz- 500
Ampicillin
olidin-4-one (1) and 1-phenyl-3-(p-substituted phenyl)-1H-pyr-
azole-4-carbaldehyde (2ah) (Scheme 1). All the synthesized
400
compounds were characterized by FT-IR, 13C and 1H NMR
MIC / (g mL )
and GCMS. The expected IR spectra were assigned to the
-1
synthesized compounds (3ah). The band observed around 300
13501320 cm1 was attributed to CS stretching vibration
of the thiazole ring. Bands at about 16001560 cm1 were
attributed to CN stretching vibration of pyrazole moiety. 200
Strong bands in the region 17401700 cm1 was due to
CO stretching of the amide group. 1H and 13C NMR and
100
mass spectral data of compounds (3ah) are shown in Sec-
tion 2. The 1H NMR spectra showed the most characteristics
olenic proton CCH deshielded at d = 8.98.6 ppm in the 0
pyrazole ring (Fig. 1). 13C NMR spectra show chemical shift 3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g 3h
around 193190 due to the presence of CS in the rhodanine Compound Code
ring. Chemical shift at 168166 represents the CO in the
rhodanine ring and at 154150 represents the CN in the Figure 3 Graphical representation of MIC values comparison
pyrazole ring (Fig. 2). All these compounds were subjected of synthesized compounds 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-((1-phenyl-3-aryl-
to C, H, N and S analysis. 1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (3ah) for
the Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacterial strain.
3.2. Antimicrobial activity
1000 Compd.
Antimicrobial study of synthesized compounds was performed
900 Griseofulvin
against two gram negative bacterial strains namely E. coli, and
P. aeruginosa and two gram positive bacterial stains namely S. 800
aureus, and S. pyogenes and against three different fungi e.g. C.
700
MIC / (g mL )
-1
600
Cl 500
8.88
400
O 300
N
N
N 200
S S
100
0
3a 3b 3c 3d 3e 3f 3g 3h
Compound Code
CH3 2.41
Figure 4 Graphical representation of MIC values comparison
In 1 HNMR (ppm) of synthesized compounds 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-((1-phenyl-3-aryl-
1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (3ah) for
Figure 1 1H NMR chemical shift (d) representation for com-
the Candida albicans fungal strain.
pound 3b.
Synthesis and antimicrobial activity of pyrazole nucleus containing 2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one derivatives S1595
MIC / (g mL )
as the minimum inhibition concentration (MIC).
-1
The results of antibacterial screening of newly synthesized 600
compounds are presented in (Table 1) (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4).
From the results, it has been revealed that all the tested com-
pounds possess moderate to good antimicrobial activity 400
against selected bacteria strains (E. coli, S. aureus, P. aerugin-
osa, and S. pyogenes). On the basis of zone of inhibition test 200
against test bacterium, E. coli, compound 3c (R0 = 4-OH)
was found to have very good activity and compound 3f
(R0 = 4-Br) possessed good activity, while compound 3d 0
(R0 = 4-NO2) showed moderate activity when compared with E.C P.A S.A S.P C.A A.N A.C
the standard drug ampicillin. In case of P. aeruginosa, com- Microbial strains
pounds 3a (R0 = 4-H), 3c (R0 = 4-OH) and 3g (R0 = 4-Cl)
Figure 5 Graphical representation of MIC values comparison
possessed moderate activity as compared to the standard drug
of synthesized 3-(4 chlorophenyl)-5-((3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-phe-
ampicillin. For, S. aureus, compound 3d (R0 = 4-NO2) was
nyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)methylene-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one) (3c)
potent as it showed very good activity while other compounds
with 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (1) and (3-(4-
like 3b (R0 = 4-CH3), 3c (R0 = 4-OH), 3f (R0 = 4-Br) and 3h
chlorophenyl)-5-((3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)
(R0 = 4-OCH3) possessed only good activity when compared
methylene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one (2c) for said bacterial and
to the standard drug ampicillin. For, S. pyogenes, compound
fungal strain.
3d (R0 = 4-NO2) revealed good activity and compounds 3a
(R0 = 4-H), 3b C and 3g (R0 = 4-Cl) showed moderate activity
in comparison to the standard drug ampicillin. It is also con-
cluded that compounds 3c (R0 = 4-OH) and 3d (R0 = 4- (R0 = 4-Br) represented as moderately potential molecule as
NO2) showed better antibacterial activity in comparison with compared to the standard drug griseofulvin.
their parent compound (Fig. 5 and Fig. 6). The reason for dif-
ferent sensitivities between gram-positive and gram-negative 4. Conclusions
bacteria could be ascribed to the morphological difference be-
tween these micro-organisms. Gram-negative bacteria have an
outer phospholipidic membrane carrying the structural lipo- A series of compounds 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-5-((1-phenyl-3-
polysaccharide components. This makes the cell wall imperme- aryl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl) methylene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-one
able to lipophilic solutes, while porins constitute a selective
barrier to the hydrophilic solutes with an exclusion limit of
about 600 Da (Nikaido and Vaara, 1985). The Gram-positive Compd.(1)
1000
bacteria had been found to be more susceptible since they have Compd.(2d)
only an outer peptidoglycan layer which is not an effective per- Compd.(3d)
meability barrier (Scherrer, 1971). 800
MIC / (g mL )
-1
(3ah) have been synthesized from 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thi- Dixit, R.B., Bulsara, A.P., Mehta, H.B., Dixit, B.C., 2010. J. Saudi.
oxothiazolidin-4-one (1) and 1-phenyl-3-(p-substituted phe- Chem. Soc.. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2010.12.007.
nyl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carbaldehydes (2ah). Analytical and Fieser, F.L., Hartwell, J.L., Jones, J.E., Wood, J.H., Bost, R.W., 1940.
spectral data (FT-IR, 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR, GCMS) of all Org. Synth. 3, 98.
Free, C.A., Majchrowicz, E., Hess, S.M., 1971. Biochem. Pharmacol.
the synthesized compounds are in full agreement with the
20, 14211428.
proposed structure. Comparison of the antimicrobial results Fujishima, H., Tsuboto, K., 2002. Braz. J. Ophthalmol. 86, 860863.
of synthesized compounds (3ah) has revealed that the addi- Ghorab, M.M., Ragab, F.A., Noaman, E., Heiba, H.I., Aboulmagd,
tion of pyrazole derivatives in 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-thioxo- S.A., 2009. Arzneimittelforschung 59, 96103.
thiazolidin-4-one (1) has improved their antimicrobial Grant, E.B., Guiadeen, D., Baum, E.Z., Foleno, B.D., Jin, H.,
activities. The series of compounds synthesized as 3-(4-chlo- Montenegro, D.A., Nelson, E.A., Bush, K., Hlasta, D., 2000.
rophenyl)-5-((1-phenyl-3-aryl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl) methylene)-2- Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 10, 21792182.
thioxothiazolidin-4-one (3ah) exhibited moderate to very Gursoy, A., Terzioglu, N., 2005. Turk. J. Chem. 29, 247254.
good antimicrobial activities. The reason for different sensi- Habib, N.S., Rida, S.M., Badawey, E.A.M., Fahmy, H.T.Y., Ghozlan,
tivities between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria H.A., 1997. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 32, 759762.
Irvine, M.W., Patrick, G.L., Kewney, J., Hastings, S.F., MacKenzie,
could be ascribed to the morphological difference between
S.J., 2008. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 18, 20322037.
these micro-organisms. Momose, Y., Meguro, K., Ikeda, H., Hatanaka, C., Oi, S., Sohda, T.,
1991. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 39, 14401445.
Murugan, R., Anbazhagan, S., Narayan, S.S., 2009. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 44, 32723279.
Acknowledgments Nikaido, H., Vaara, M., 1985. Microbiol. Rev. 49, 132.
Orchard, M.G., Neuss, J.C., Galley, C.M.S., Andrew, C., Porter,
Authors are thankful to Micro Care laboratory and TRC, D.W., Smith, P., Scopes, D.I.C., Hydon, D., Vousden, K.,
Surat, India for carrying out microbial studies. Stubbereld, C.R., Young, K., Page, M., 2004. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 14, 39753978.
Pachhamia, V.L., Parikh, A.R., 1991. Acta Cienc. Indica Chem. 17C,
6778.
Appendix A. Supplementary data Pier, G.B., Barbara, C., Giampiero, S., Romeo, R., Giovanni, B.,
Abdel, N.Z., Maria, J., de las, I., 1997. Synthesis 10, 11401142.
Prakash, O., Hussain, K., Kumar, R., Wadhwa, D., Sharma, C.,
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, Aneja, K.R., 2011a. Org. Med. Chem. Lett. 1 (5), 15.
in the online version, at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc. Prakash, O., Hussain, K., Kumar, R., Wadhwa, D., Sharma, C.,
2013.05.029. Aneja, K.R., 2011b. Org. Med. Chem. Lett. 1 (1), 19.
Ramkumar, K., Yarovenko, V.N., Nikitina, A.S., Zavarzin, I.V.,
References Krayushkin, M.M., Kovalenko, L.V., Esqueda, A., Odde, S.,
Neamati, N., 2010. Molecules 15, 39583992.
Abdel-Halim, A.M., Abdel-Aziz, R.M., El-Dein, H.S., 1994. Indian J. Redemann, I.A., 1947. Org. Synth. 27, 74.
Heterocycl. Chem. 4, 4550. Scherrer, R., Gerhardt, P., 1971. J. Bacteriol. 107, 718735.
Anderson, J.D., Cottam, H.B., Larson, S.B., Nord, L.D., Revankar, Song, M., Zheng, C., Deng, X., Wang, Q., Hou, S., Liu, T., Xing, X.,
G.R., Robins, R.K., 1990. J. Heterocyclic. Chem. 27, 439453. Piao, H., 2012. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 54, 403412.
Avila, J.L., Polegre, M.A., Avila, A.R., Robins, K., 1986. Comp. Todar, K., 2011. Textbook of Bacteriology. Madison, WI.
Biochem. Physiol. 83C, 285289. Tomasic, T., Zidar, N., Mueller-Premru, M., Kikelj, D., Masic, L.P.,
Bhat, G.A., Montero, J.G., Panzica, R.P., Worting, L.L., Towsend, 2010. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45, 16671672.
L.B., 1981. J. Med. Chem. 24, 11651172. Whitesitt, C.A., Simon, R.L., Reel, J.K., Sigmund, S.K., Phillips,
Bruno, G., Costantino, L., Curinga, C., Maccari, R., Monforte, F., M.L., Shadle, J.K., Heinz, L.J., Koppel, G.A., Hundel, D.C., Lifer,
Nicolo, F., Ottana, R., Vigorita, M.G., 2002. Bioorg. Med. Chem. S.L., Berry, D., Ray, J., Little, S.P., Liu, X., Marshall, W.S.,
10, 10771084. Panetta, J.A., 1996. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 6, 21572162.
Chen, Z.H., Zheng, C.J., Sun, L.P., Piao, H.R., 2010. Eur. J. Med. Zacharie, B., Connolly, T.P., Rej, R., Attardo, G., Penney, C.L., 1996.
Chem. 45, 57395743. Tetrahedron 52, 22712278.
Contreras, J., Rival, Y., Chayer, S., Bourguignon, J., Wermuth, C., Zhen-Hua, C., Chang-Ji, Z., Liang-Peng, S., Hu-Ri, P., 2010. Eur. J.
1999. J. Med. Chem. 42, 730741. Med. Chem. 45, 57395743.
Desai, K.G., Desai, K.R., 2006. J. Sulfur Chem. 27, 315328.