Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preparation of Zirconia Dental Crowns Via Electrophoretic Deposition
Preparation of Zirconia Dental Crowns Via Electrophoretic Deposition
DOI 10.1007/s10853-006-0621-7
Received: 17 January 2006 / Accepted: 26 June 2006 / Published online: 4 November 2006
Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006
123
J Mater Sci (2006) 41:81308137 8131
easier, but compacts with very high homogeneity are restriction is less important, because slower particles
needed to control precisely the shrinkage during cannot be passed by faster particles with higher surface
sintering. The price of these CAD/CAM systems is charge.
rather high. In this paper a selection of results of modifying the
An alternative to these CAD/CAM processing membrane method for the near net shaping of dental
might be the near net shaping of compacts. As the crowns from aqueous suspension of zirconia stabilized
shrinkage during sintering should be small high green with ceria (Ce-ZrO2) are presented. More details are
densities are needed. For that electrophoretic deposi- given in [13]. The influence of additions of nanosized
tion (EPD) is most suited because the highest green zirconia powders and submicron alumina powders on
densities compared to slip casting and other well- the properties of the suspensions, the EPD and final
known ceramic shaping methods could be obtained sintering of the deposited compacts was investigated.
with EPD [6]. Due to the high dielectric constant of The objectives were to optimize the green density to
water high deposition rates can be achieved with reduce shrinkage during sintering and to stabilize the
aqueous suspensions in contrast to suspensions based tetragonal phase of zirconia at a maximum of sintered
on organic liquids. Thus it was shown that deposition density.
rates up to 1 mm/s could be reached for clay suspen-
sions [7]. Unfortunately, problems arise with the
formation of gas bubbles (O2 and H2) at the electrodes Experimental set-up
during EPD of aqueous suspensions, if the applied
voltage lies above the decomposition voltage of water Aqueous suspensions were prepared with the starting
(typically 1.24 V). As these gas bubbles are incorpo- powders zirconia stabilized with 12 mol% ceria (Ce-
rated into the deposited compacts leading to unaccept- ZrO2) from Vita Zahnfabrik, Bad Sackingen, a nano-
able holes, they have to be avoided. The membrane sized monoclinic zirconia from Degussa AG, Hanau
method [8] is one possibility to surpass these problems (nano-ZrO2), and submicron alumina from Teimei
and has been applied for shaping of a lot of ceramic Chemicals (Al2O3). Typical TEM-pictures are shown
materials [911]. in Fig. 1. The particle size distribution plotted in Fig. 2
Another advantage of the EPD is that the deposi- shows medium particles diameters of 3.3 lm (BET sur-
tion is (nearly) independent of particle size. Thus even face area: 1 m2/g), 50 nm (BET surface area: 56 m2/g),
mixtures of powders with very different particle sizes and 0.15 lm (BET surface area: 14 m2/g), respectively.
(e.g., micron and nanosized particles) are not separated These powders were dispersed in pure water with a
[6]. Bi- or multimodal particle size distributions are dissolver Dispermat N1 and, additionally, with an
necessary to obtain very green densities above 74%, ultrasonic disperser. To increase the stability and
which is the theoretical limit for densely packed improve the solids loading at a minimum viscosity
monodisperse particles. These high green densities the surfactant CE64 Zschimmer & Schwarz) was
are needed to reduce the linear shrinkage during added. The pH-value was adjusted with tetramethyl
sintering below 10% [12]. Powder mixtures should ammonium hydroxide (TMAH). Although it is princi-
show similar zeta-potentials of all species to prevent pally possible to deposit positively charged zirconia
separation. But for concentrated suspensions this particles at low pH-values, all experiments were
123
8132 J Mater Sci (2006) 41:81308137
8
shape of the membrane to control the local electric
field. Thus the thickness of the deposited ceramic cap
6 can be adjusted. The EPD of the dispersed powders
takes place on the outside of the membrane, which has
4 the shape of the dental stump. In this work models
similar to typical crowns were chosen. The space
2
between the anode and the membrane is filled with a
compensation liquid of adjustable electric conductivity
0
0,01 0,1 1 10 100 (typically water and TMAH). Plaster is used as the
particle size (m) membrane material because it is a standard material
for dental modeling. There are also plasters on the
Fig. 2 Particle size distributions of starting powders
market, which expand during setting. Thus the shrink-
age during sintering can be compensated by over sizing
performed under basic conditions at high pH-values. the deposition mold. In Fig. 5 two commercially
The measured zeta-potentials of the monocomponent available plasters are shown.
zirconia suspensions without dispersing aid are shown Typical deposition parameters were applied voltages
in Fig. 3 (Acoustosizer IIs). At acidic conditions of 6 V/cm and a ratio of 1:50 for the conductivities of
Ce4+-ions would be solved and CE64 acts better suspension rsusp and compensation liquid rcomp. After
under basic conditions. deposition the caps were dried on the plaster. The cap
The ratio of Ce-ZrO2, nano-ZrO2 and Al2O3 was was released from the mold by a controlled heating up
varied and the influence on the rheological properties to 500 C, in doing so the plaster shrinks from the cap.
of the suspension and green density of the EPD The pore sizes and the green density of deposited
compacts studied. Furthermore, the addition of CE64 green bodies were measured by mercury porosimetry
was changed. The viscosity of the suspension was (Pascal 140 and 440) and the Archimedes method,
measured with a rotational viscosimeter (Haake Rheo- respectively. Finally, these caps were sintered in air
stress). with different temperatures and dwelling times. The
The modified membrane apparatus for EPD is total shrinkage was measured and the phase composi-
shown in Fig. 4. The anode (positive pole of the tion of the ceramics analyzed with x-ray diffraction
applied DC voltage) is located in the center of a drilled (XRD, Siemens D500). The green and sintered com-
pacts were observed with a high-resolution scanning
electron microscope (HRSEM, JEOL JSM-6400) on
80
fractured surfaces.
60 nano-ZrO
2
Ce-ZrO
40 2
zeta potential (mV)
20
anode (+)
0
plaster mould
-40
deposited cap
-60 suspension
cathode (-)
-80
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH value
Fig. 3 Zeta potentials of the starting powders measured in Fig. 4 Longitudinal section (schematic) of the EPD cell (left)
aqueous suspensions and photograph of a deposited cap on the plaster mold (right)
123
J Mater Sci (2006) 41:81308137 8133
77 dissolver
400 1,6
CE64 0.3 % CE64 0.3 % 76 ultrasonic disperser
green density (%)
1,4
75
conductivity (mS/cm)
300
74
1,2
250 73
1
200 72
0,8 71
150
70
100 0,6 8 % nano-ZrO 2 +1% +7% 16 %
9,5 10 10,5 11 11,5 Al O Al2O3 Al2O3
2 3
pH value
Fig. 7 Influence of alumina additions to the Ce-ZrO2/8% nano-
Fig. 6 Viscosity and conductivity of suspensions (92% Ce- ZrO2 suspension on green density (8,3 V/cm, t = 2 min,
ZrO2 + 8% nano-ZrO2 + CE64 + TMAH) rcomp = 50 mS/cm)
123
8134 J Mater Sci (2006) 41:81308137
95 80 220
solid loading suspension (wt.-%)
density 0 min
85
76 200
70 170
65 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Al O content (%)
2 3
nano-ZrO content (wt.-%)
2
Fig. 10 Influence of the Al2O3 addition on the viscosity of the
Fig. 8 Correlation of solids loading in suspension and obtained zirconia suspensions and green density of the EPD compacts for
green density of the content of nano-ZrO2 (6 V/cm, two kinds of dispersing
rcomp = 0.2 mS/cm, t = 2 min)
As it was observed that pure zirconia compacts the Ce-ZrO2/Al2O3 compact has a unimodal pore size
showed transitions to the monoclinic phase during distribution with a maximum at 40 nm.
sintering due to grain growth, alumina had to be added For all pure zirconia samples with all compositions a
to stop the growth of crystallites. Therefore the complete sintering to theoretical density (6.1 g/cm3)
influence of Al2O3-additions to the zirconia suspension was not possible. In all cases a at least partial transition
on the viscosity of the suspension and the green density to the monoclinic phase was observed. Only with the
of the EPD compact was measured. The results are addition of Al2O3 the tetragonal phase could be
shown in Fig. 10 for short dispersing by stirring (0 min) stabilized at sintering temperatures up to 1,700 C
and extended dispersing in the dissolver at 2000 rpm and dwelling times of 3 h. This can be seen in the XRD
(20 min). The advantages of the improved dispersing diagram shown in Fig. 12. At longer dwelling times a
with the dissolver can clearly be recognized. The complete transition to the monoclinic phase was
viscosity of 210 mPa s measured at a shear rate of 50 1/ observed again. In Fig. 13 the sintering of two different
s for an addition of 20 wt.-Al2O3 is still acceptable. At Al2O3/Ce-ZrO2 compacts is shown by plotting the
the maximum green density of 78% with an Al2O3- linear shrinkage as a function of temperature. Addi-
addition of 16 wt.% a homogeneous compact is tionally, the grain structure can be seen from the SEM
obtained, see Fig. 11. In contrast to the compact of pictures corresponding to 1700 C (12 wt.-Al2O3) and
Ce-ZrO2 and nano-ZrO2 shown on the left hand side 1600 C (16 wt.-Al2O3). In both cases the total linear
shrinkage is below 10%. At least at 1700 C all pores
have disappeared.
20
Finally, in Fig. 14 photographs of 3 different sin-
tered zirconia caps are shown from 2 view positions,
0%
which are uniform along the deposition direction.
relative pore volume (%)
6%
15 10 %
100 %
10 Discussion
123
J Mater Sci (2006) 41:81308137 8135
electrosteric stabilization of the suspension was supe- The highest solids loading at acceptable viscosity
rior to the pure electrostatic stabilization because (<200 mPa s) led to EPD compacts with the highest
higher solids loading could be obtained. As this is green density. Pure Ce-ZrO2 suspensions show an
generally correlated to higher green densities of the optimum solids loading at 87 wt.%. The addition of
deposited compacts, it was essential for reaching the 8 wt.% nano-ZrO2 shifts this maximum to 90 wt.% in
objectives. For all suspensions an optimum amount of spite of the significantly increased total particle sur-
0.2 wt.% of CE 64 was found. This is a little bit face. A close look to the HR-SEM pictures let assume
surprising because replacing Ce-ZrO2 powder by nano- that the small particles partially adsorb shell-shaped on
ZrO2 or Al2O3 powders should increase the total free these bigger Ce-ZrO2 particles. The other small par-
surface. One explanation might be that that the fine ticles remain in the suspension. Thus it is easier for the
particles are adsorbed on the bigger Ce-ZrO2-particles bigger particles to move under shear stress, the
and, consequently, the surface area is only slightly viscosity decreases and higher solid loadings are
increased. This can be assumed from the HR-SEM possible. Above 10 wt.% of nano-ZrO2 the amount
pictures. The optimum range of the pH value between of free particles increases drastically, leading to an
10.3 and 11.3 can be explained by increasing amount of increase of the total free surface. Therefore the
dissociated adsorbed molecules with increasing addi- maximum solids loading decreases with an increase of
tion of TMAH. Thus the surface charge on the viscosity. During deposition these small particles can
particles grows and, consequently, the repulsion fill up the pores between bigger particles, thus increas-
between particles. From a certain pH value all mole- ing the green density. But a complete filling of all pores
cules are dissociated. Further addition of TMAH leads is not possible, at least not for a bimodal system. This
now to a destabilization of the suspension according to was shown by the measurements of the pore size
the DLVO theory. distribution in the green compact.
The properties of the suspension (e.g., maximum Similar to nano-ZrO2, the addition of Al2O3 also
solids loading, viscosity) depend significantly on the increases the maximum solids loading of the suspen-
amount of added submicron or nanosized powders. sion up to 91 wt.% with a still acceptable viscosity. But
2 104
1,5 104
in tens i ty (co unts )
1 104
5000
0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
2 theta (degree)
Fig. 13 Linear shrinkage during sintering of Ce-ZrO2/Al2O3
Fig. 12 XRD measurements of sintered Ce-ZrO2/Al2O3 com- EPD compacts with different compositions. Inserted are grain
pacts (88:12) structures to for two temperatures
123
8136 J Mater Sci (2006) 41:81308137
123
J Mater Sci (2006) 41:81308137 8137
3. Setz J, Schwickerath H (1999) In: Koeck B (ed) Kronben- 9. Oetzel C, Clasen R (2003). Ceram Eng Sci Proc 24:69
und Bruckenprothetik. Urban & Fischer, p 410 10. Clasen R, Tabellion J (2003). cfi/Ber DKG 80:E40
4. Green DJ, Hannink RHJ, Swain MV (1989) Transformation 11. Oetzel C, Clasen R., Tabellion J (2004). cfi/Ber DKG 81:E35
toughening of ceramics, 232nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 12. Zhang C, Liu D, Mathews SA, Graves J, Schaefer TM,
Florida Gilbert BK, Modi R, Wu H-D, Chrisey DB (2003) Micro-
5. Witkowski S (2003) Zahntechn Mag 6:696 electronic Engin 70:41
6. Tabellion J (2004) Herstellung von Kieselglasern mittels 13. Oetzel C (2005) Herstellung vollkeramischer Zahnkronen
elektrophoretischer Abscheidung und Sinterung, Disserta- aus Zirkonoxid und Zirkonoxid-Aluminiumoxid mit Hilfe
tion, Universitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrucken der elektrophoretischen Abscheidung, Dissertation, Univer-
7. Hector I, Clasen R (1997). Ceram Eng Sci Proc 18:173 sitat des Saarlandes, Saarbrucken
8. Clasen R (1988) In: Hausner H, Messing GL, Hirano S (eds)
2nd Int. Conf. on Powder Processing Science, Berchtesga-
den, 1214. 10. 1988: Deutsche Keramische Gesellschaft,
Koln, p 633
123