Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8 17 Sen
8 17 Sen
14
Introduction
Prima facie priority of economic needs over political rights
Economic needs and Political Freedoms
Vienna conference as evidence of prevalence of above view
The Preeminence of Political Freedoms and Democracy
Basic nature of this simple dichotomy
Interconnections between political freedoms and fulfilling economic
needs (both instrumental and constructive)
Intensity of economic needs adds to the urgency of economic
freedoms:
(1) direct importance
(2) instrumental role
(3) constructive role
Arguments Against Political Freedoms and Civil Rights
3 lines of argument:
Lee Thesis: political freedoms hamper economic growth and
development
If poor people are given a choice between political freedoms and
fulfillment of economic needs, they will choose the latter
Asian Values objection to universal human rights
Democracy and Economic Growth
Very little general evidence that authoritarianism leads to economic
growth
Generally recognized causal factors in economic growth as not
inconsistent with democracy
Need for capability model of development, rather than GNP, etc.
Political rights allow citizens to direct attention towards general
needs
Do Poor People Care About Democracy and Civil Rights?
Insufficient evidence for the claim that poor people dont care;
paradoxical nature of trying to gather that evidence
Evidence against the claim (India under Indira Gandhi,
South Korea, Thailand, etc.)
Undermining of Lee Thesis undermines thesis that poor people should
favor economic growth over political rights
Instrumental Importance of Political Freedom
Fundamental importance of political freedom (as part of basic
capabilities)
Formation of values requires openness of communication/arguments
Incentive of rulers to listen in a democracy
Philosophy 338 | Summer 2009 Brandon Morgan-Olsen | 8.14