Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Measuring Employees Value With Reference To BHEL and SPIC in Tamilnadu
Measuring Employees Value With Reference To BHEL and SPIC in Tamilnadu
2
www.aeph.in
AEIJMR Vol 5 Issue 03 March 2017 ISSN - 2348 - 6724
developing the capability of employees provides benefits for a long period. There is a genuine
need for reliable and complete information that can be used in improving and evaluating
human resource management. HRA is an actually a part of social accounting in which
accountants need to apply their specialized abilities to help find solutions to our social
problems. Generally, accounting is a science of measurement, analysis and communication.
The designing of proper accounting system for providing information to the stakeholders is
also a difficult task. Capitalizing human resources costs is conceptually more valid than the
expensing approach. The information concerning human assets is more relevant to a great
variety of decisions made by external and internal users. Accounting for human assets
constitutes an explicit recognition of the premise that people are valuable organizational
resources and an integral part of a mix of resources. This study will be helpful of the different
users of accounting information for their day to day decision making.
Measurement of Human Resources
There are several methods developed over a period of time for individuals, groups and
for valuation of expense center groups. The lists of popular methods used all around the world
are enlisted in table-1 as under:
Table 1 Methods to measure Human Resources
Individuals Value Group Value Expenses Centre Group
Cost Methods The Likert & Bowers Capitalization of
Model Compensation
Historical Cost Method
Brummet, Flamholtz & Replacement Cost Valuation
Replacement Cost Method
Pyles economic value Original Cost Valuation
Opportunity Cost Method
model
Standard Cost Method
Hermansons
Economic Value Approach unpurchased goodwill
Flamholtzs model of determinants model
of individual value to formal Human organizational
organization dimensions method
Flamholtzs stochastic rewards
valuation model
Lev & Schwartz Model
Hekimian & Jones Competitive
bidding Model
Skills Inventory
Performance Evaluation
Assessment of potential
Out of the above methods the most common used by Indian companies is Lev &
Schwartz Model which uses the present value of future earnings of the employees.
Data Analysis
As per the research objective of the paper the secondary data were collected from 5
companies. To identify that whether the difference between selected companies in disclosing
human resource value is significant or not, following hypothesis were developed in step first:
H0: There is no difference in HRV of selected companies.
H1: A significant difference exists between the values of HRV of BHEL and SPIC.
To analyse the data and significant of the hypothesis one sample ANOVA Analysis of
were conducted by taking data of HRV from sample companies and by using SPSS- 19
software. The results have shown table 2 as under:
3
www.aeph.in
AEIJMR Vol 5 Issue 03 March 2017 ISSN - 2348 - 6724
4
www.aeph.in
AEIJMR Vol 5 Issue 03 March 2017 ISSN - 2348 - 6724
Stanko, Brian. B., Zeller, Thomas. L., & Melena, Matthew. F. (2014). Human Asset
Accounting And Measurement: Moving Forward. Journal of Business & Economic Research,
12 (2), 93-104.
Sharma, Dr. C. S., & Lama, Sameer. (2014). A Critical Evaluation of Measuring the
Immeasurable: Human Resource Accounting (HRA). The International Journal Of Business &
Management, 2 (3), 22-28.
Sharma, N., & Kumar, M. (2014). A comparative study of human resource discloser and
reporting practices of selected public and private sector banks. Abhinav , III, 78-86.
Theeke, Herman, & Mitchell, John. B. (2008). Financial implications of accounting for
human resources using a liability model. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting,
12 (2), 124-137
5
www.aeph.in