Nguyen Quang Vinh The vice-director of the Ministry's Building contruction Management Department ( Ministry of Agriculture and rural development) 02/09/2006 TTCT- The institution will be delivered to the management, exploitation, using of investment projects as an investor that is neccessary .But if you say all the construction investment projects have to do that , I think that should be considered. Because this is the fact that Ministry of agriculture and rural development has encountered in the management of invested capital from budget , ODA for projects in infrastructure investment . -To clarify management and investment activities -Investors must be user works -To rent a project management consultant organization -To hire counsellor will avoid taking a rake-off on the worker's wages In many cases, for projects of medium and small size ,the organization will be assigned to manage and use the building which is reasonable .But if it is applied to the projects of large size,related to many provinces and many local will procedure a problem whether the ability's investor were met. In the field of agriculture, investment management for large scale irrigation projects is one of the problems of this type . The investment in the construction of large water reservoirs, water conservancy project in state of completion that no local and province project of management team can endure.For example,Cua Dai of water reservoirs, construction with the moistness up to 1,5 billion cubic meters ,the barrage over 100metres high, we assigned the director of Department of Agriculture and rural development to the director of project management team . Because the issues related to the scale of this construction are very complex. If they don't specialize in this problem, they will not make. UNIT 10
Why are state enterprises ineffective?
There have been widespread and inconclusive discussions about the ineffectiveness of State-owned enterprises (SOE) in Vietnam. Report of the State Audit has shown that SOEs are very inefficient ,even prolonged losses, four-nineteen units are audited business losses in 2004; eleven-nineteen units have accumulated losses with the total accumulated loss up to the end of 2004 is 1.058 billion dong. The pre-tax profit margin of audited firms was very low (from 0.18% to 0.8%), of which the group appeared to be very strong such as 0.42% Shipbuilding Industry, Textile 0, 8%... Reports of previous years also showed a similar situation with corporations , with corporations having completely lost all its capital without paying off debts such as Seaprodex, a trump card. Lam Dong announced five members of Corporation Mulberry Silk VN bankruptcy. Why are SOEs so inefficient? There are many reasons, there are several main causes mentioned here. Firstly, people often think encourages owners are not important, so owners do not have effective measures to govern. Everyone knows that a private owners bring own money going business concern vital to their capital, because it is their property, they have the right to dispose, use, manage and benefit (or loss). This is extremely encouraging. When the ownership and management rights are split apart, the incentives are weakened to a certain degree. Encouragement of people who share capital in a weaker company than the owner of a private company. Encouraged of small shareholders in a joint stock company's weaker than the major shareholders and and owners of limited liability companies or private companies.The incentives of the (ultimate) citizens for SOEs are the weakest, and they often refer to it as "the temple". The State should not be too emphasized the "whole people" of SOEs which should really be considered as their own, by the state organization? But in any case, the incentive of the owner is not as strong as that of the private This state incentive is only effective where there are clear laws, healthy competition, competent managers, hard budget constraints, and an overview of all SOEs. Make up a small part (eg less than 15% of the economy)
There are efforts in that direction,but at present certainly
these conditions are not good, so the State should sell its businesses at reasonable prices to increase the efficiency of the economy and thus increase competitiveness of the country. Secondly, the budget constraints of SOEs is soft. State still behave favorably not forcing SOEs to strict fiscal discipline. The budget restriction is the total amount of money or property that can guarantee a loan that a household (or household) has to pay within that range. Soft budget constraints when external circumstances make businesses think that the limit is not hard and pass without being punished. Do not allow budget constraints to be softened by priority measures, subsidies, exemptions, credits, or tolerance payments. SOEs have to understand: to take care of, and if the constant losses must be bankrupt, no one stood out for help. Private enterprises obviously have hard budget constraints. Tax debts, debts of the State, debt mutual giant has forced the State to take measures to postpone debt re in recent years, the concessional loan giants are expressions blatant of binding soft budget. Soft budget constraints that businesses are not sensitive to profit, with savings, increased performance, and cause other harm. This is probably the weakest point makes inefficient SOEs. Many people doubt the audit data. Maybe, but having audited and publicized is a big step forward. Businesses can be more efficient, but managers want to cut back on profits to make them easier to share, so they can be sold at cheaper prices, easier to sell when equitized. It could also be the reason to pay attention to. Thirdly, non-competitive environment of equality and mismanagement. SOEs remains a priority openly without being concealed ,even if they are considered a national policy and in the past there were separate laws regulating them Why Singapore SOEs are quite effective? There is a healthy competitive environment, SOEs are treated like other businesses, strict law, and management team are trained,qualified (they hired many foreign operator) and occupancy rates are not high in the economy. Currently the SOE sector generates 38% of GDP, accounting for over 60% of total credit ,the majority of land resources and minerals of the country. If these resources and resources are allocated to other sectors that are more efficient than using them, it will be much more profitable for the country to contribute to creating conditions for SOEs to effectively operate