Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 1

Evidentiary Consequences of Extrinsic evidence is * The UCC is agnostic

the Parol Evidence Rule Yes inadmissible for any purpose about ambiguity but
Professor Rowley - Spring 2011 instructs courts to admit
unless an exception applies or
usages of trade, course of
the UCC governs* dealing, and course of
performance to explain or
Is the fully supplement even integrated
integrated terms. Additionally, if the
K unambiguous? contract is not fully
Extrinsic evidence may explain, integrated, the UCC also
but may not contradict, an allows evidence of
Yes integrated term unless an consistent additional terms
No
to explain or supplement
exception applies
the writing.

Who decides?: Judge


How?: Matter-of-law Yes
Is the contract
What may TJ consider?: Extrinsic evidence may explain
fully integrated?
Same as before, plus Is the partially or supplement, but may not
Rules of C&I integrated alter or contradict, an integrated
K unambiguous? term unless an exception applies

Who decides?: Judge


No No
How?: Matter-of-law Yes Who decides?: Judge Extrinsic evidence is freely
What may TJ consider?: How?: Matter-of-law
(1) Objectivist approach: Is the K partially admissible with respect to an
What may TJ consider?: unintegrated term, and may
K only (four corners) integrated?
Same as before, plus explain or supplement, but not
(2) Modified Objectivist Rules of C&I
approach: K + surrounding alter or contradict, an integrated
circumstances, etc. No term, unless an exception applies
Yes
(3) UCC approach: K plus, at a
minimum, trade usage,
course of dealing, and Is the unintegrated
course of performance K unambiguous?
Extrinsic evidence is admissible
No for all purposes

You might also like