Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Stratification by Tumor Type and Grade: HER2/ Neu Amplification in Breast Cancer
Stratification by Tumor Type and Grade: HER2/ Neu Amplification in Breast Cancer
Stratification by Tumor Type and Grade: HER2/ Neu Amplification in Breast Cancer
Clinical Samples
The files of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation were searched
for all cases of invasive breast carcinoma that were diagnosed
between July 1999 and July 2000, on which fluorescent in situ
Image 3 Typical high-grade (Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade Image 4 Fluorescence in situ hybridization image of a high-grade
3) invasive ductal carcinoma demonstrating lack of tubule (Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade 3) carcinoma showing presence
formation, high nuclear grade, and prominent mitoses (H&E, of amplification of the HER2/neu gene. The large green signals
400). represent the blurring of signals that occurs when large numbers
of copies are present in proximity to each other (400).
while the remaining 2 (33%) had only 5 to 10 copies per Because only 2 of 68 invasive lobular carcinomas
nucleus. The single SBR grade 1 invasive ductal carcinoma demonstrated HER2/neu amplification, the lobular carci-
that demonstrated HER2/neu amplification had 19.4 copies nomas were reexamined to exclude the possibility of a
per nucleus. The 2 lobular carcinomas that had amplification misclassification. One of these cases was a pleomorphic
of the HER2/neu gene both had 5 to 10 copies per nucleus. variant of lobular carcinoma, with a nuclear grade of 3/3.
The mean and range of HER2/neu copy numbers for cases The other case was reexamined by 3 pathologists with exper-
with gene amplification are given in Table 1. tise in breast pathology and determined to represent not an
Table 1
HER2/neu Amplification Stratified by Tumor Type and Grade
SBR, Scarff-Bloom-Richardson.
* Reexamination of the histopathologic features of the 2 cases of lobular carcinoma that demonstrated HER2/neu amplification revealed one to be a pleomorphic variant of
lobular (nuclear grade 3/3), while the other had been misclassified; it was determined to be an invasive ductal carcinoma, SBR grade 2. Therefore, 1/67 (1%) of invasive lobular
carcinomas demonstrated HER2/neu amplification. A recalculation because of the reclassified case was not performed, since significant differences already had been
established.
invasive lobular carcinoma but rather an invasive ductal grade of invasive ductal carcinomas, and the HER2/neu
HER2/neu amplification (13% compared with 48%). The reexamination of the morphologic features of the neoplasm
lobular carcinomas they tested, however, demonstrated a should be performed to confirm the tumor type and grade
much higher frequency of amplification than the lobular as a matter of quality assurance.
carcinomas in the present review: 13% compared with 1%
(1/68). Rosenthal et al12 also found HER2/neu amplifica- From the Departments of Anatomic and Clinical Pathology,
tion to be as significant an adverse prognostic factor among Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH.
the lobular carcinomas as it was among the ductal carci- Address reprint requests to Dr Procop: Dept of Pathology,
nomas. Other investigators also have reported similar MailStop L40, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Ave,
differences in rates of HER2/neu amplification between Cleveland, OH 44195.
ductal and lobular carcinomas.13-16 In contrast, however,
Rosen et al,17 in a study of HER2/neu expression and tumor
phenotype, reported HER2/neu amplification in ductal and
lobular carcinomas, and they found almost equal rates of References
amplification in these groups: 49% in ductal carcinomas 1. American Cancer Society. Facts and Figures, 2000 [pamphlet].
Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins; 2000.
and 43% in lobular carcinomas. These authors did not find
2. Ross JS, Fletcher JA. Her2/neu (c-erbB-2) gene and protein in
a relationship between the grade of tumor differentiation breast cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 1999;112(suppl 1):S53-S67.
and HER2/neu expression. The reason for the higher
15. Parkes HC, Lillycrop K, Howell A, et al. C-erbB2 mRNA 19. Tsuda H, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y, et al. Correlation
expression in human breast tumours: comparison with c-erbB2 between histologic grade of malignancy and copy number of
DNA amplification and correlation with prognosis. Br J c-erbB-2 gene in breast carcinoma: a retrospective analysis of
Cancer. 1990;61:39-45. 176 cases. Cancer. 1990;65:1794-1800.
16. Allred DC, Clark GM, Tandon AK, et al. Her-2/neu in node- 20. Suzuki M, Okuyama T, Yoshikawa K, et al. Overexpression of
negative breast cancer: prognostic significance of p53, c-erbB-2 and epidermal growth factor receptor in human
overexpression influenced by the presence of in situ breast carcinomas. Pathol Int. 1996;46:46-53.
carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:599-605. 21. Rilke F, Colnaghi MI, Cascinelli N, et al. Prognostic
17. Rosen PP, Lesser ML, Arroyo CD, et al. Immunohisto- significance of Her2/neu expression in breast cancer and its
chemical detection of Her2/neu in patients with axillary relationship to other prognostic factors. Int J Cancer.
lymph node negative breast carcinoma: a study of 1991;49:44-49.
epidemiologic risk factors, histologic features, and prognosis. 22. Schimmelpenning H, Eriksson ET, Falkmer UG, et al.
Cancer. 1995;75:1320-1326. Prognostic significance of immunohistochemical c-erbB-2
18. Wang S, Saaboorian MH, Frenkel E, et al. Laboratory proto-oncogene expression and nuclear DNA content in
assessment of the status of Her-2/neu protein and oncogene in human breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1992;18:530-537.
breast cancer specimens: comparison of immunohisto-
chemistry assay with fluorescence in situ hybridization assays.
J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:374-381.