Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter 8. Analyses of The Lateral Load Tests at The Route 351 Bridge
Chapter 8. Analyses of The Lateral Load Tests at The Route 351 Bridge
Chapter 8. Analyses of The Lateral Load Tests at The Route 351 Bridge
ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Thisreportisanarchivedpublicationandmaycontaindatedtechnical,contact,andlinkinformation
FederalHighwayAdministration>Publications>Research>Structures>ALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCompositePiles
forBridgeSubstructures
PublicationNumber:FHWAHRT04043
Date:March2006
Previous|TableofContents|Next
CHAPTER8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351
BRIDGE
8.1INTRODUCTION
Animportantobjectiveofthisresearchistodeterminewhetheraccurateanalysesofthelateralload
deflectionbehaviorofcompositepilescanbeperformedusingthesameprocedurestypicallyusedfor
prestressedconcretepilesandotherconventionalpiletypes.Iftheycan,thiswouldremoveoneofthe
impedimentstousingcompositepilesbyverifyingthatestablishedprocedurescanbeemployedfor
designtoresistlateralloads,atleastforthetypeofcompositepilesstudiedinthisresearch.
Thischapterdescribestheprocedureusedforanalyzingthelateralloadtestsofthethreetestpilesat
theRoute351Bridgeproject.Theresultsoftheanalysesarecomparedtothemeasuredresponses
presentedinchapter6.Abriefoverviewofthelaterallyloadedpileproblemandadescriptionofthe
methodologyusedinlateralpileanalysesalsoarepresentedinthischapter.
8.2GOVERNINGDIFFERENTIALEQUATIONFORTHELATERALLYLOADEDPILE
PROBLEM
Alaterallyloadedsinglepilepresentsasoilstructureinteractionproblem.Thesoilreactionisdependent
onthepilemovement,andthepilemovementisdependentonthesoilreaction.Thesolutionmust
satisfyanonlineardifferentialequationaswellasequilibriumandcompatibilityconditions.Thesolution
usuallyrequiresseveraliterations.
Elasticbeamrelationshipsthatareusedcommonlyinanalysisoflaterallyloadedpilesaresummarized
intable41.Thesequantitiesareobtainedfromdifferentiatingdeflectionywithrespecttothedistance
alongthepile(x).
Table41.Relationshipscommonly
Distancealongthelengthofthepile(measuredfrom
X [L]
pilehead)
Distancetoneutralaxiswithinpilecrosssection Z [L]
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 1/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Deflection Y [L]
Slopeorrotationofpilesection [Dimensionless]
Curvature [Radians/L]
Bendingmoment [FxL]
Shearforce [F]
Axialload Q [F]
Soilreaction(orloadintensity) [F/L]
Notes:EpIp=flexuralstiffnessofpile,whereEp=elasticmodulusofpilematerial,andIp=momentof
inertiaofpilecrosssectionwithrespecttotheneutralaxis.
Figure179showsaloadedpileandtypicalprofilesofnetsoilreaction,deflection,slope,andmoment.
Figure179.Laterallyloadedpileproblem
ThegoverningdifferentialequationfortheproblemofalaterallyloadedpilewasderivedbyHetenyi
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 2/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
(1946).Thedifferentialequationcanbeobtainedbyconsideringmomentequilibriumoftheinfinitesimal
elementoflength(dx)asshowninfigure179.
(58)
Neglectingquadraticterms,anddifferentiatingtwicewithrespecttox,weobtain:
(59)
Theterminvolvingtheaxialload,Q,canbeignoredforthetestpilesinvestigatedinthisresearchsince
theverticalloadpresentduringtestingwasmainlyfromselfweightandcanbeconsiderednegligible.
Themagnitudeofthebendingmomentactingatagivensectionofapilecanbecalculatedby
integratingthenormalstresses, (z),actingwithinthecrosssectionofarea,A,asfollows:
(60)
Ifweassumethatplanesectionsofthepileremainplaneafterloading,wecancalculatethestrains
acrossthepilecrosssectionifweknowtherotationofthesection, =dy/dx,andthepositionofthe
neutralaxis.Foragivenrotation, ,wehavethefollowing:
(61)
where
u(x,z)=isthedisplacementinthexdirectionacrossthepilecrosssection
e(z)=strainsinthexdirectionacrossthepilecrosssection
z=distancetotheneutralplane
Substitutingtheexpressionfor (z)fromequation61intoequation60,weobtain:
(62)
IfthepilematerialislinearelasticwithaconstantYoungmodulus,Ep,wewouldhave:
(63)
Substitutingequation63intoequation59andignoringtheaxialloadterm,Q,weobtain:
(64)
Fromconsiderationofthehorizontalforceequilibriumoftheinfinitesimalelementofthepileshownin
figure179,weobtain:
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 3/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
(65)
Substitutingequation65intoequation59,weobtainthefollowinggoverningdifferentialequation,which
iscommonlyusedtoanalyzepilesunderlateralloads:
(66)
Thevariable,p(x),inequation66correspondstotheresultantsoilresistanceforceperunitlengthofpile
thatoccurswhentheunitlengthofpileisdisplacedalateraldistance,y,intothesoil.Acrucialpointfor
solutionofthedifferentialequationshownaboveisadequaterepresentationofthesoilreaction,p.Ifthe
soilreaction,p,hasalinearrelationshipwithlateralpiledeflection,y,theequationhasaclosedform
solution.However,therelationshipbetweenthesoilreaction(p)andthepiledeflection(y)isnonlinear
andalsovariesalongthepiledepth.Inpractice,itiscommontosolvethisdifferentialequation
(equation66)usingnumericalmethodssuchasthefinitedifferencemethod,andbymodelingthesoil
reactionusingnonlinearpycurves.Theanalysespresentedinthischapterwerecarriedoutusingthis
approach.Thepymethodusedtomodelthesoilreactionisdiscussedinsection8.3.
8.2.1AssumptionsandLimitationsoftheGoverningDifferentialEquation
Implicitinthederivationofequation66isthefactthatthepileismadeofahomogeneous,isotropic,
linearelasticmaterialwiththesamemodulusofelasticityintensionandcompression.Hence,the
flexuralstiffnessofthepile,EpIp,isassumedtoremainconstantduringbending.Asshowninchapter
6,thisassumptionisnotvalidforthepilestestedinthisresearch.Thenonlinearityoftheelastic
propertiesofthepilescanbedealtwithduringthenumericalsolutionofthedifferentialequationby
meansofsuccessiveiterationstoaccountforthenonlinearpropertiesofthestructuralmaterialsofthe
pile(ReeseandVanImpe2001).
Anotherimportantassumptionusedinthederivationofequation66isthatshearstrains(or
deformations)aresmallthatis,normalsareassumedtoremainnormaltotheneutralaxis.Thisisa
commonassumptioninclassicalbeamtheoryorBernoulliEulertheory.TheMindlinbeamtheory,onthe
otherhand,assumesnormalstotheneutralaxisremainstraightandundeformed,butnotnecessarily
perpendiculartotheneutralaxis(Holzer,2001).Ifwedenotewith theangleofrotationofthenormal,
wehavethefollowingforbothbeamtheories:
BernoulliEulertheory: =dy/dx
Mindlintheory: =dy/dx+
Iftheshearstrain, ,iszero,thetwotheoriesareequal.TheMindlintheoryassumestheshearstrain
isconstantoverthecrosssection,thatis,independentofz.Inreality,theshearstrain(orstress)varies
overthecrosssection variesparabolicallyoverarectangularcrosssectionmadeofauniform
material.TheeffectofsheardeformationsonbeamdeflectionshasbeenstudiedbyStippes,etal.
(1961).Theyfoundthatthetotaltipdeflectionofacantileverbeamwithuniformlydistributedloadand
rectangularcrosssectionisasfollows:
(67)
wheretheadditionaldeflectionduetosheardeformationsisgivenbythesecondterminthebrackets.
TheeffectofsheardeformationsincreaseswithincreasingE/Gratiosanddecreasingslendernessratios
(L/D).ForthepilestestedattheRoute351Bridge,theslendernessratio(L/D)isabout15(considering
onlythelengthofthepilewherelateraldeflectionsaresignificant),andtheE/2Gratioisestimatedtobe
about1.3fortheprestessedconcreteandFRPpiles,andabout5fortheplasticpile.Therefore,theerror
associatedwithneglectingsheardeformationsisestimatedtobelessthan0.6percentforthe
prestressedconcreteandFRPpiles,andlessthan2.2percentfortheplasticpile.However,Han(1997)
pointedouttheimportanceofconsideringsheardeformationswhenstudyinglaterallyloadedFRP
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 4/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
compositepiles.ThisisbelievedtobeespeciallyimportantwhendealingwiththinwalledorhollowFRP
beams.Han(1997)reportedvaluesofE/2Gbetween4and15fortypicalFRPcompositesmaterials
(withnoconcreteinfill).TheseE/2Gratioswouldresultindeflectionerrorsbetween1.8percentto6.7
percentforaslendernessratioof15.
8.3METHODOLOGYUSEDTOANALYZETHELATERALLYLOADEDTESTPILES
Thepymethodiswidelyusedfordesignoflaterallyloadedpiles.Thismethodreplacesthesoilreaction
withaseriesofindependentnonlinearsprings.Thepycurvesrepresentthenonlinearbehaviorofthe
soilbyrelatingthesoilreactionandpiledeflectionatpointsalongthepilelength.Areviewofthepy
methodispresentedinsections8.3.1and8.3.2.
8.3.1PyCurves
8.3.1.1Introduction
Thepredictionofthesoilresistanceatanypointalongthepileasafunctionofpiledeflectionisperhaps
oneofthemostcriticalfactorsinsolvingtheproblemofalaterallyloadedpile.Thedistributionof
stressesagainstacylindricalpilebeforeinstallationisshowninfigure180(a).Atagivendepth,the
stresseswillbeuniformandnormaltothepilewall(assumingthepileisinstalledverticallyandwithout
inducingbending)(ReeseandVanImpe2001).Afterthepileissubjectedtolateralloading,thepilewill
deflectandthesoilstressesactingonthepilewouldhaveadistributionsimilartothatshowninfigure
180(b).Itisimportanttopointoutthatsomeofthestresseswillnotbeperpendiculartothepilewalldue
todevelopmentofshearstressesattheinterfacebetweenthepileandthesoil.Thenetsoilreaction,
p(x),isobtainedbyintegratingthestressesaroundthepilecrosssection.Theunitsofp(x)areforceper
unitlength.
Figure180.Illustration.Distributionofstressesagainstapilebeforeandafterlateralloading
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 5/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
(adaptedfromReeseandVanImpe2001).
Ingeneral,pycurvesarenonlinearandtheyareafunctionofdepth,soiltype,andpiledimensionsand
properties.Atypicalpycurveisshowninfigure181.Importantelementsofthepycurveincludethe
initialslope,Epymax,andtheultimatesoilresistancevalue,Pult.Atanypointofthepycurvethesoil
reaction,p,isrelatedtothepiledeflection,y,throughthepymodulus,Epy(ReeseandVanImpe2001).
Thepymodulusisalsoknownasthereactionmodulusandithasunitsofforce/length2.Reeseand
VanImpe(2001)proposeusingthenomenclaturegivenaboveinsteadofthemodulusofsubgrade
reaction,whichwasoriginallydevelopedtodescribesettlementoffootingsandrelatesthefooting
pressure(unitsofforce/length2)tothefootingsettlement(unitsoflength).Theseauthorsalsopointout
that,althoughthesubgrademodulusandEpyarerelatedtothevaluesoftheYoungmodulusofthesoil,
Es,theyarenotonlyafunctionofthesoil,butratheraresultofthesoilstructureinteractionprocess
betweenthesoilandthefootingandpile,respectively.
Figure181.Graphs.Typicalpycurveandresultingpymodulus(ReeseandVanImpe2001).
Ideallypycurvesshouldbegeneratedfromfullscalelateralloadtestsoninstrumentedtestpiles.Inthe
absenceofexperimentallyderivedpycurves,itispossibletouseempiricalpyformulationsthathave
beenproposedintheliteraturefordifferenttypesofsoils.Table42liststhesourcesforsomeofthepy
expressionscommonlyusedinpractice.
Table42.Recommendedcriteriaforpycurvesindifferentsoils(adaptedfrom
Reese,etal.,1997).
SoilTypeandCondition Reference
Softclaybelowthewatertable Matlock(1970)
Stiffclaybelowthewatertable Reese,etal.(1975)
Stiffclayabovethewatertable WelchandReese(1972),ReeseandWelch(1975)
Sands Reese,etal.(1974)
Sands API(1993)
Soilswithcohesionandfriction EvansandDuncan(1982)
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 6/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Weakrock Reese(1997)
Strongrock Nyman(1980)
Thepycurvesarenotdefinedsolelybysoilcharacteristics(AshourandNorris2000).Inadditiontothe
propertiesofthesoilsurroundingthepile,thepycurvesareinfluencedbyseveralotherfactors,such
as:pilecrosssectionalshapeanddimensions,interfacefrictionanglebetweensoilandpile,pile
bendingstiffness,andpileheadconditions(AshourandNorris2000,ReeseandVanImpe2001).
AshourandNorris(2000)usedthestrainwedgemodeltostudyanalyticallytheinfluenceofsomeof
thesefactorsonpycurves.Theyfoundthatforuniformsanddeposits,astifferpileresultsinstifferpy
curves.Theyalsofoundthatiftwopileshavethesamewidth,butonehasacircularcrosssectionand
theotherhasasquarecrosssection,theresultingpycurveswillbedifferent.Thesquarepileinsand
showedasoilpileresistancehigherthanthecircularpile.ThefindingsfromAshourandNorrisarebased
onanalyticalstudies,andtothebestofourknowledgenofullscaleexperimentshavebeenreportedto
confirmtheirfindings.ReeseandVanImpe(2001)alsopointedouttheinfluenceoftheshapeofthepile
crosssectiononthesoilresistance,p,asillustratedinfigure182.
Figure182.Illustration.Schematicshowingtheinfluenceofshapeofcrosssectionofpileonthe
soilreactionp(adaptedfromReeseandVanImpe2001).
Themajorityofthemethodslistedintable42consideronlytheinfluenceofthesoilpropertiesandthe
pilewidth.Ifotherfactorssuchaspileshapeandsurfacetexturemustbeconsidered,pycurvesshould
beobtainedexperimentallybasedonfullscaletests.
Thepyanalysescarriedoutinthisresearchusedpublishedrecommendationsforpycurves.The
recommendationsbyReese,etal.(1974),wereusedforthesandysoilsatthetestsite.Abrief
descriptionoftheserecommendationsisprovidedbelow.
8.3.1.2PycurvesforsandsbasedonrecommendationsbyReese,etal.,1974
Thetypicalshapeofapycurveforsands,asrecommendedbyReese,etal.,1974,isshowninfigure
183.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 7/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure183.Graph.Elementsofacharacteristicpycurveforsandbasedonrecommendationsby
Reese,etal.(1974).
Asshowninfigure183,themainelementsthatdefinethepycurvesforsandsrecommendedby
Reese,etal.(1974),are:
Initialpymodulus,Epymax,thatdefinestheinitialportionofthecurveuptopointA.
Ultimatesoilresistance,pult,whichdefinesthecurveatpointCandbeyond.
TransitionzonebetweenpointsAandC.
ThecoordinatesofpointCarey=3b/80,andp=pult,wherebisthepilewidth.Thetransitionzone
consistsoftwoparts:aparabolicsectionbetweenpointsAandB,andastraightlineportionbetween
pointsBandC.ThecoordinatesofpointBaredefinedas:
(68)
whereAbarsubscriptsandBsarecoefficientsobtainedfromchartsprovidedbyReese,etal.,1974
TheequationoftheparabolaisobtainedknowingthatitpassesthroughpointBandthatitmustbe
tangenttothestraightlinebetweenpointsBandC.ThecoordinatesofpointAareobtainedbyfinding
theintersectionpointoftheinitialstraightportion,withslopeEpymax,andtheparabola.
TheLPILE4.0Mprogramincludesthistypeofpycurveasadefaultpycurveforsands.Thepy
curvesaregeneratedautomaticallybytheprogram.Theuserneedstospecifytheinitialslopeofthe
curve(Epymax)andthesoilpropertiesofthesand(effectiveunitweightandfrictionangle)todefinethe
ultimatesoilresistance(pult).
Reese,etal.(1974),recommendusingavariationofEpymaxthatincreaseslinearlywithdepth,
accordingto:
(69)
where
k=aconstantgivingthevariationofEpymaxwithdepth
x=depthbelowgroundsurface
Typicalkvaluesforlooseandmediumdensesandsbelowthewatertableare5.4and16.3MN/m3
(34,403and103,847lbf/ft3),respectively(Reese,etal.,1974).
Beforepresentingtheanalysesresults,abriefdescriptionofthepymethodofanalysisispresentedin
thefollowingsection.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 8/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
8.3.2PyMethodofAnalysis
ThepymethodofanalysisoflaterallyloadedpilesisanalogoustotheTZmethoddescribedinchapter
7toanalyzetheaxiallyloadedpiles.Inessence,themethodconsistsofdividingthepileintoaseriesof
incrementsofequallength.Thegoverningdifferentialequation(equation66)issolvedusingthefinite
differencetechnique.Thesoilisidealizedasaseriesofindependentnonlinearspringswhose
characteristicsarerepresentedbythepycurvesdescribedintheprevioussection.Theidealization
usedinthepymethodisshowninfigure184.
Figure184.Illustration.Schematicshowingpymodelusedforanalysisoflaterallyloadedpiles.
Theremainderofthischapterwilldealwithlateralloadanalysescarriedoutforthetestpilesatthe
Route351project.
8.4NUMERICALANALYSESRESULTS
TheanalysesperformedinthisresearchusedthepymethodandthecomputerprogramLPILEPlus
4.0M(2000).Thisprogramemploysafinitedifferenceformulationtosolvethedifferentialequation
presentedintheprevioussection,withnonlinearpycurvestomodelthesoil.LPILEPlus4.0Mallows
computationofthepileresponsewithuserspecifiednonlinearpileflexuralstiffness,EpIp.
Theprogramcontainsdefaultpycurvesthatcanbeusedfordifferenttypesofsoils.Asanalternative,
theprogramalsoallowstheusertoinputpycurvesdevelopedusingotherformulations.Forthe
analysescarriedoutinthisresearch,thepileswerediscretizedinto300elementsthemaximumnumber
ofincrementsallowedintheLPILE4.0Mprogram.
8.4.1GeneralInputInformation
8.4.1.1Pileinformation
Table43summarizesthepilepropertiesusedintheanalyses.Thenonlinearflexuralstiffness
relationshipspresentedinchapter6wereusedforthethreetestpiles.
Table43.Propertiesoftestpiles.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 9/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Notes:EpIp=flexuralstiffnessofpile,M=bendingmoment.1m=3.28ft
1kNm2=2,421lbfft2
8.4.1.2Uppersoilstratigraphyinformationforpyanalyses
Thesoilstratigraphynearthetopofthepileisthemostimportantwhenstudyinglaterallyloadedpiles
(Duncan,etal.,1994).Typically,thesignificantlateraldeflectionsofpilesoccurwithintheupper8to10
diameters.Theuppersoilstratigraphyofthetestpilesitewasfoundtobesomewhatdifferentatthe
northandsouthendsofthesite.
Figure185showsrepresentativeinsitutestinformationfortheupper10.0m(32ft)ofstratigraphyatthe
northernendofthetestpilesite.Theuppermostlayeratthenorthernendofthetestpilesiteissiltyfine
sandfillapproximately1.0m(3.2ft)thick.Thefillisunderlainbyloosetomediumdense,siltyfinesand
toadepthof13.0m(42.6ft).
Thestratigraphyoftheupper10.0m(32ft)atthesouthendofthetestpilesiteisshowninfigure186.
Thestratigraphyatthesouthendconsistsof0.5m(1.6ft)ofsiltysandfill,whichoverliesamedium
stiffsandy,silty,claylayerthatextendstoabout1.8m(5.9ft)depth,whichoverliesloosetomedium
densesiltysand.Theextentoftheclaylayerwasdeterminedprimarilybasedonthevisual
classificationoftheretrievedsplitspoonsamplesfromboringSPT2.Thepresenceoftheclaylayer
wasconfirmedindirectlyviainterpretationoftheCPTandtheflatdilatometer(DMT)testinformation
availableforthesouthendofthetestsite.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 10/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure185.Graphs.Insitutestdatafortheuppersoilsatthenorthernendofthetestpilesite.
Figure186.Graphs.Insitutestdatafortheuppersoilsatthesouthernendofthetestpilesite.
8.4.2PyAnalysesResults
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 11/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
AseriesofpyanalyseswerecarriedoutusingthedefaultpycurvesembeddedintheLPILEprogram
fordifferenttypesofsoils.Asshowninsection8.4.1.2,thepredominanttypeofsoilatthetestsite
consistedofsiltysands.ThedefaultpycurvesrecommendedbyReese,etal.(1974),wereselectedto
modelthesesoils.
Theuppermostsoillayeratthetestsiteconsistsofmanmadefills,withanaveragethicknessofabout1
mand1.8m(3.3ftand5.9ft)atthenorthandsouthendsofthetestsite,respectively.Sinceallthree
testpileswereinstalledinpitsapproximately1.0m(3.3ft)deep,themajorityofthefillmaterialswere
consideredtoberemoved.Therefore,thepyanalyseswerecarriedoutusingasoilmodelconsistingof
predominantlysiltysands.However,itisrecognizedthattheclayeyfilllayerpresentinthesouthernend
extendsabout0.9m(2.9ft)beyondthepitbottomoftheprestressedconcretepile.Thisremnantfill
wasnotspecificallyincorporatedintheLPILEmodelforthetestpileinthesouthsideinstead,itwas
assumedtobepartoftheunderlyingsiltysanddeposit.Thisapproximationwasconsideredreasonable
giventhesandyandsiltynature,andthethickness,ofthelowplasticclayfilllayer.Theresultsofthep
yanalysesforthethreetestpilesaresummarizedinthefollowingsections.
8.4.2.1Analysesfortheprestressedconcretetestpile
Theprestressedconcretepileislocatedatthesouthernendofthetestpilesite.Thesurface
stratigraphyforthispileisshowninfigure186.Thepitexcavatedforthispileis0.79m(2.6ft)deep.
Theoriginalgroundsurfaceandthepointofloadapplicationare1.24mand1.34m(4ftand4.4ft)
belowthetopofthepile,respectively.
TheLPILEanalyseswerecarriedoutusingatwolayermodelconsistingofalayerofloosetomedium
densesandapproximately10m(32.8ft)thick,underlainbymediumtodensesand.TheLPILEmodel
wasconstructedtotakeintoaccountthe0.79m(2.5ft)deeppitexcavatedbeforeinstallationofthis
pile.Asmentionedearlier,thesiltysandsweremodeledusingthepycurvesrecommendedforsands
byReese,etal.(1974).Themaininputinformationrequiredtodefinethesecurvesistheinitialpy
modulusandthefrictionangleofthesand.Theinitialpymodulusforsandscanbeadequatelymodeled
asincreasinglinearlywithdepth(Reese,etal.,1974).Therateofincreaseofthepymoduluswas
selectedbasedontrialanderroruntilabestfitwasobtainedbetweentheLPILEresultsandthefield
measurements.Thepyparametersthatprovidedthebestmatcharesummarizedintable44.Theinitial
pymodulusvaluesusedintheanalysesareshowninfigure187.
Table44.ParametersusedtodefinedefaultpycurvesinLPILEforthe
prestressedconcretepile.
',Submergedunitweight(kN/m3) 10 11
c,Cohesion(kPa) 0 0
,Frictionangle(degrees) 33 35
1kN/m3=6.36lbf/ft3
1kPa=0.145lbf/inch2
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 12/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure187.Graph.InitialpymodulusprofileusedtodefinepydefaultcurvesforLPILE
analysesontheprestressedconcretepile.
Thepredicteddeflectedpileshapesarecomparedtothemeasuredshapesinfigures188through190.
Figure188.Graphs.Predictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforprestressed
concretepile(lowlateralloads).
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 13/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure189.Graphs.Predictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforprestressed
concretepile(mediumlateralloads).
Figure190.Graphs.Predictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforprestressed
concretepile(highlateralloads).
Figures188190showthatthedeflectedshapesofthepilearepredictedreasonablywellusingthepy
modulus(Epymax)valuesfromfigure187andthepycurveequationsrecommendedbyReese,etal.,
(1974).However,thepredictionsoverestimatethelateraldeflectionsforthetwofirstloadsof51.2and
97.3kN(11,520and21,893poundforce),andslightlyunderpredictthelateraldeflectionsforthehigher
loadlevels.ThiscouldberelatedtothecharacteristicsoftheReese,etal.,(1974)pycurvesthatmay
beonthe"soft"sideatlowloadlevelsand"stiff"athighloadlevels.Asillustratedinfigure183,the
Reese,etal.,(1974)curvesuseaparabolaandastraightsectiontoconnectthePultwiththeinitialpy
modulusline.Sincethereareseveralpossiblewaystoconnectthesetwostates,itisconceivablethat
othershapesoftransitionzonewillresultindifferentpredictionresults.Atransitionzoneshapethatis
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 14/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
stifferatlowloadlevelsandsofterathighloadlevelsmaybebettersuitedtocapturethebehaviorofthe
soilsencounteredatthissite.However,theapproachwastousethedefaultpymodelthatwould
producethebestlevelofpredictionpossible.
UsingtheLPILEsoilmodeldescribedabove,thepilelateraldeflectionsandheadrotationsatground
surfacewerecalculated.Theresultsareshowninfigures191and192.
Figure191.Graph.Calculatedloaddeflectioncurvefortheprestressedconcretepile.
Figure192.Graph.Calculatedloadslopecurvefortheprestressedconcretepile.
Thepredictedvaluesoflateraldeflectionandpileheadrotationatthegroundsurfaceshowreasonably
goodagreementwiththefieldmeasurements.Thesefiguresalsoshowthepredictedvaluesifthe
flexuralstiffnessofthepileismodeledasbeingconstant,thatis,independentofthelevelofapplied
moment.Thepredicteddeflectionsusingconstantpileflexuralstiffnessareapproximately7percent
lowerthanmeasuredatthepileunderlargelateralloads(>200kN(45,000lbf)),andtheagreementis
closeratlowerlateralloads.Thisfindingisreasonablesincetheflexuralstiffnessoftheprestressedpile
isapproximatelyconstantuptoamomentofabout400kNm(295,028lbfft)(seefigure113(b),chapter
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 15/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
6).Beyondthismoment,theflexuralstiffnessofthispiledecreasesalmostlinearlywithincreasing
appliedmoment.Asimilarbehaviorwasobservedfortheheadrotations.
8.4.2.2AnalysesfortheFRPpile
TheFRPpileislocatedatthenorthernendofthetestpilesite.Thestratigraphyinformationforthispile
isshowninfigure185.Thepitexcavatedforthispileis1.06m(3.5ft)deep.Theoriginalgroundsurface
andthepointofloadapplicationare1.09m(3.6ft)and0.79m(2.6ft)belowthetopofthepile,
respectively.
Forthispile,theLPILEmodelusedintheanalyseswasconstructedusingtwolayers:anupperlayerof
loosetomediumdensesand,andalowerlayerofmediumtodensesand.Thepyparametersthat
providedthebestmatcharesummarizedintable45.Bothsandlayersweremodeledusingthepy
curvesofthetyperecommendedbyReese,etal.(1974).
Table45.ParametersusedtodefinedefaultpycurvesinLPILEfortheFRP
pile.
',Submergedunitweight(kN/m3) 10 11
C,Cohesion(kPa) 0 0
,Frictionangle(degrees) 33 35
1kN/m3=6.36lbf/ft3
1kPa=0.145lbf/inch2
Theinitialpymodulusvaluesthatprovidedthebestfitwiththefieldmeasurementsareshowninfigure
193.Thepredicteddeflectedpileshapesarecomparedtothemeasuredshapesinfigures194through
196.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 16/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure193.Graph.InitialpymodulusprofileusedtodefinedefaultpycurvesforLPILE
analysesontheFRPpile.
Figure194.Graphs.PredictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforFRPpile(low
lateralloads).
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 17/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure195.Graphs.PredictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforFRPpile(medium
lateralloads).
Figure196.Graphs.PredictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforFRPpile(high
lateralloads).
Thesefiguresshowthatthepiledeflectionsarepredictedreasonablywellusingthepycurves
recommendedbyReese,etal.(1974),forsandsandthepymodulus(Epymax)valuesfromfigure194.
Forthefirstlateralloadof51.6kN(11,610lbf),thepredictionoverestimatesthelateraldeflections.This
couldberelatedtothepycurveshapecharacteristics,asfortheprestressedconcretepile.
Usingthepycurvesgivenabovetomodelthesoil,lateraldeflectionsandpileheadrotationswere
computedfortheFRPpileatthegroundsurface.Theresultsareshowninfigures197and198.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 18/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure197.Graph.CalculatedloaddeflectioncurvefortheFRPpile.
Figure198.Graph.CalculatedloadslopecurvefortheFRPpile.
Thepredictedvaluesoflateraldeflectionandpileheadrotationatthegroundsurfaceshowgood
agreementwiththefieldmeasurements.Thesefiguresalsoshowthecalculatedvaluesassumingthat
theflexuralstiffnessofthepileisconstant,thatis,independentofthelevelofappliedmoment.The
predicteddeflectionsusingconstantpileflexuralstiffnessareapproximately30percentlowerthan
measuredunderlargelateralloads(>150kN(33,750lbf)),andtheagreementiscloseratlowerlateral
loads.ThisfindingisreasonablesincetheflexuralstiffnessoftheFRPpileisapproximatelyconstant
uptoamomentofabout200kNm(147,514lbfft)(asshowninfigure113(b),chapter6).Beyondthis
moment,theflexuralstiffnessofthispiledecreaseswithincreasingappliedmoment.Asimilarbehavior
wasobservedforthepileheadrotations.
8.4.2.3Analysesfortheplasticpile
Theplasticpileislocatedatthecenterofthetestpilesite.Theextentofthesurficialfillatthislocation
wasnotdetermined,butisexpectedtobesimilartotheconditionsfoundatthesouthandnorthendsof
thesite.Thepitexcavatedforthispileis0.91m(3ft)deep.Theoriginalgroundsurfaceandthepointof
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 19/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
loadapplicationare1.02mand1.21m(3.3ftand4ft)belowthetopofthepile,respectively.
Forthispile,liketheotherpiles,thetwolayerLPILEmodelconsistedofalayerofloosesandextending
10m(32.8ft)deepandanunderlyinglayerofmediumtodensesand.Thepyparametersthatprovided
thebestmatcharesummarizedintable46.Bothsandlayersweremodeledusingthepycurvetypes
recommendedbyReese,etal.(1974).
Table46.ParametersusedtodefinedefaultpycurvesinLPILEforthe
plasticpile.
',Submergedunitweight(kN/m3) 10 11
c,Cohesion(kPa) 0 0
,Frictionangle(degrees) 33 35
1kN/m3=6.36lbf/ft3
1kPa=0.145lbf/inch2
Theprofileofinitialpymoduluswiththedepththatprovidedthebestmatchisshowninfigure199.The
predicteddeflectedpileshapesarecomparedtothemeasuredshapesinfigures200through202.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 20/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure199.Graph.InitialpymodulusprofileusedtodefinedefaultpycurvesforLPILE
analysesontheplasticpile.
Figure200.Graphs.Predictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforplasticpile(low
lateralloads).
Figure201.Graphs.Predictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforplasticpile
(mediumlateralloads).
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 21/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure202.Graphs.Predictedversusmeasuredlateraldisplacementprofileforplasticpile(high
lateralloads).
Figures200202showthatthepiledeflectionsarepredictedreasonablywellusingthepycurves
recommendedbyReese,etal.(1974),forsandsandthepymodulus(Epymax)valuesfromfigure199.
Thelevelofagreementbetweenthecalculationsandmeasurementswassimilarforthedifferentload
levels,suggestingthattheReese,etal.,(1974)pycurvesadequatelycapturetheresponsemeasured
inthefield.
UsingtheLPILEsoilmodeldescribedabove,pilelateraldeflectionsandheadrotationsattheground
surfacewerecomputed.Theresultsareshowninfigures203and204.
Figure203.Graph.Calculatedloaddeflectioncurvefortheplasticpile.
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 22/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
Figure204.Graph.Calculatedloadslopecurvefortheplasticpile.
Thecalculatedvaluesoflateraldeflectionandpileheadrotationatthegroundsurfaceshowgood
agreementwiththefieldmeasurements.Forthispile,thepredictedvaluesusingvariableandconstant
flexuralstiffnessofthepilearethesame.Thisfindingisreasonablebecausetheflexuralstiffnessofthe
plasticpileisprimarilytheresultofcontributionsfromthesteelrebarcage.Therefore,asshowninfigure
113(b)(chapter6),theflexuralstiffnessforthispileisapproximatelyconstantuptoamomentofabout
650kNm(479,421lbfft).Thismomentwasnotexceededduringfieldloadtesting.
8.4.3ComparisonoftheInitialpyModulusCurvesfortheThreeTestPiles
Theinitialpymodulusforthethreetestpileswasassumedtoincreaselinearlywithdepth.This
assumptionwasconsideredreasonableforsanddepositssuchasthoseencounteredatthetestsite.
Therateofmodulusincreasewithdepthwasselectedtoprovidethebestmatchbetweentheanalytical
predictionsandthefieldmeasurements.Usingthisapproach,weobtainedratesofmodulusincrease
withdepthof1.7,5.5,and2.2MN/m3(10,831,35,041,and14,016lbf/ft3)fortheprestressed,FRP,and
plasticpiles,respectively.Thesevariationsarenotinagreementwiththetrendexpectedbasedonthe
resultsoftheaxialloadtests,forwhichtheaverageunitshaftcapacitieswere61.8,46.9,and48.9kPa
(8.96,6.80,and7.09(lbf/inch2)fortheprestressedconcretepile,theFRPpile,andtheplasticpile,
respectively.
Thedifferencesinthebackcalculatedrateofincreaseoftheinitialpymoduluswithdepthcanbedueto
severalfactors,suchas:
Differencesinsoilstratigraphyatthelocationofeachtestpile.Forexample,athinclaylayer
wasencounteredatthesouthernendofthetestpileareaneartheprestressedconcretetestpile.
Thislayerwasfoundtoextendabout0.9m(2.9ft)belowthepitattheprestressedconcretepile
location.
Differencesinpilepropertiessuchascrosssectionalshape,pilewidth,pilestiffness,surface
roughness,andinterfacefriction.
Althoughthemethodologybasedondoublederivationofthebendingmomentversusdepthcurves
(ReeseandVanImpe2001)ismoreappropriatefordetailedbackcalculationofpycurves,eventhis
methodwouldnothaveproducedpycurvesinaccordancewithexpectationsbasedonthepile
characteristics.Itseemsmostlikelythatthedifferencesinpycurvesareduelargelytodifferencesin
subsurfaceconditions.
8.5LIMITATIONSOFPYANALYSES
ThepymethodwasselectedtoanalyzethelateralloadtestscarriedoutattheRoute351Bridge.This
methodologywasselectedbecauseitiscommonlyemployedinpractice.Forthisresearchproject,it
wasdesirabletoverifywhetherestablishedprocedures,suchasthepymethod,couldbeemployedto
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 23/24
3/25/2015 FHWAHRT04043Chapter8.ANALYSESOFTHELATERALLOADTESTSATTHEROUTE351BRIDGEALaboratoryandFieldStudyofCo
analyzecompositepiles.Despitethepopularityofthismethod,ithaslimitationsasdescribedbelow:
Thesoilisidealizedasaseriesofindependentnonlinearspringsrepresentedbypycurves.
Therefore,thecontinuousnatureofthesoilisnotexplicitlymodeled.
Theresultsareverysensitivetothepycurvesused.Theselectionofadequatepycurvesisthe
mostcrucialproblemwhenusingthismethodologytoanalyzelaterallyloadedpiles(Reeseand
VanImpe2001).
Selectingappropriatepymodulusandpycurvesisadifficulttask.Whiletheselectionofvalues
oftheinitialpymodulus(Epymax)isrelatedtothesoilmodulus,itisalsorelatedtothe
interactionbetweenthepileandthesoil.ReeseandVanImpe(2001)pointoutthatpycurves
andmodulusareinfluencedbyseveralpilerelatedfactors,suchas:
Piletypeandflexuralstiffness.
Typeofloading(monotonicorcyclic).
Pilegeometry.
Pilecapconditions.
Pileinstallationconditions.
8.6SUMMARY
Numerouspyanalyseswerecarriedouttodeterminetheadequacyofthismethodtoanalyzelaterally
loadedcompositepiletypessuchastheonesstudiedinthisresearchproject.
Aderivationofthegoverningdifferentialequationforthelaterallyloadedpileproblemwaspresented,
andpossiblelimitationsincompositepilesanalysiswerediscussed.
Theimportanceofconsideringsheardeformationsinlateralpileanalyseswasdiscussed.Theimpactof
sheardeformationsincreaseswithincreasingE/Gratios,anddecreaseswithincreasingslenderness
ratios(L/D).Forthetestpilesassessedinthisproject,theerrorassociatedwithneglectingshear
deformationsisestimatedtobelessthan2.5percent.
Theimportanceofincludingthenonlinearityoftheflexuralstiffnesswasdiscussedandillustratedwith
theanalysesresults.
TheresultsofthepyanalysesusingpublishedpycurvesthatareembeddedintheLPILE4.0M
computerprogramshowedreasonablygoodagreementwiththefieldmeasurements.
TheinitialmodulusofthepycurveswasfoundtoincreasewithdepthatthehighestratefortheFRP
pile,atanintermediateratefortheplasticpile,andatthelowestratefortheprestressedconcretepile.
Previous|TableofContents|Next
PageOwner:OfficeofResearch,Development,andTechnology,OfficeofInfrastructure,RDT
ScheduledUpdate:ArchiveNoUpdate
TechnicalIssues:TFHRC.WebMaster@dot.gov
Topics:research,infrastructure,structures,pavements,concrete,design,jointed,fiberreinforcedpolymer,FRP,dowels
Keywords:research,structures,Compositepiles,drivenpiles,dynamicanalysisofpiles,FRPpiles,recycledplasticpiles,
CAPWAP
TRTTerms:research,infrastructure,Facilities,Structures,Piling(Civilengineering)Testing,BridgesFoundationsand
piersTesting,Lateralloads,Bridgedecks,Piles(Supports),Dynamicstructuralanalysis
Updated:04/23/2012
UnitedStatesDepartmentofTransportationFederalHighwayAdministration
http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/04043/08.cfm 24/24