Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Samantha Biskach STP Intermediate Group
Samantha Biskach STP Intermediate Group
Samantha Biskach, Janet Candy, Brandi Carrington, Jessica Mullen, Charlie Schultz, & Matt
Yerger
EDTC 630
Introduction
When it comes to schools in the 21st century, we want to create a learning environment
that affords students every opportunity available to be successful in life. To achieve this goal, a
team of educators has been formed with the task of focusing on identified school improvement
goals and devising an attainable school technology plan to be implemented over the next three
years. The team of educators will need to consider the current technology available, identify
school-wide areas of concern that need improvement based upon school data, and devise an
attainable plan for how we can integrate more effective use of technology to improve student
learning for all types of learners, including those with special needs accommodations that can
be successful through the accessibility features programmed into available technology. The
school technology plan will include a detailed budget that analyzes any new proposed
technology and professional development that will be needed to support the teachers and
students.
Description of School
a. Existing Technology: J.L. Simpson Middle School is equipped with a Promethean Board
and two Dell desktop computers in each classroom that are used by both the teacher
and student(s). In addition to the two Dell desktops, a limited supply of document
cameras and promethean slates are available from the library to sign out, but there are
not enough devices available to supply every classroom. Simpson has an open Wi-Fi
network for all devices to use. For the rest of the year the county is monitoring how
much bandwidth is being used so they can expand accordingly next year. Our school has
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 3
three computer labs with 30 Dell desktop computers that are available on a first
reserve, first serve basis. Additionally, our school has four laptop carts that hold 30 Dell
laptops each with the same reservation system being implemented. Due to improper
maintenance and care concerns, teachers have shared that approximately 25 of the 30
laptops are operating correctly on any given day when they reserve a cart for classroom
educational purposes.
b. Use of Existing Technology: Student use of the desktops in the classroom are limited
due to one of the Dell Desktops being connected to the Promethean Board for a
majority of the school day and the second desktop often being used for teacher
required duties, such as submitting attendance, checking e-mail, lesson planning, test
management, etc. Computer labs and laptop carts are often reserved to accommodate
these tests, they only need access to the Internet and Google Chrome browser. Due to
this county requirement, it is often difficult to reserve computer devices for non-
assessment purposes and any reservations need to be planned out far in advance to
accommodate all the teachers and 1000+ students. When a teacher is able to reserve
computers for classroom use, they may elect to use Web 2.0 tools to enhance their
curriculum. Common Web 2.0 tools integrated into the curriculum at our school include
IXL, Kahoot, Prezi, Google Drive/GAFE, Weebly, and Quizlet. These Web 2.0 tools are
Leesburg is located in Northern Virginia and boasts a current school population of 1,009
63% White, 20% Hispanic, 5% African American, and 12% identified as Other race. 20%
Individualized Education Plans (IEPs). We are a fully inclusive school and any student
who is capable of being placed in the general education classroom will be added to this
the student.
Table 1
Percentages of Passing Scores on Standards of Learning (SOL) Assessments 2014 2015
Population Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8
Passing (%) Passing (%) Passing (%)
All Students
School 83 81 84
Division 84 89 85
State 73 81 75
Students with Disabilities
School 56 45 55
Division 54 56 48
State 39 44 37
Economically Disadvantaged
School 57 52 48
Division 66 70 62
State 61 69 60
Limited English Proficient
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 5
School 46 26 14
Division 53 55 43
State 49 55 41
Adapted from Virginia Department of Education. (2015). School Report Card. Retrieved from
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/statistics_reports/school_report_card/index.shtml
Figure 1. Percentage of Passing Scores on SOL Reading Assessments for All Students (2014 2015)
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 6
Figure 2. Percentage of Passing Scores on SOL Reading Assessments for Students with Disabilities (2014
2015)
Figure 3. Percentage of Passing Scores on SOL Reading Assessments for Economically Disadvantaged
Students (2014 2015)
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 7
Figure 4. Percentage of Passing Scores on SOL Reading Assessments for Limited English Proficient
Students (2014 2015)
Figure 1. Note- Ec = Economically; LEP = Limited English Proficient. Percentage of Passing Scores
on 2015 Virginia Standards of Learning Reading Assessments for students attending J. L.
Simpson middle school. Adapted from Virginia Department of Education. (2015). School
Report Card. Retrieved from
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/statistics_reports/school_report_card/
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 8
For J.L. Simpson Middle School, the percentage of passing scores is comparable to
division and state levels. The percentage of passing for all students is consistently at or
above state levels, and slightly below division levels, as seen in Figure 1. However, Table
1 reveals that when broken down into specific populations, achievement gaps are
disabilities, tends to be above division percentage and well above state percentage,
averages are low in comparison to total student data as well. Figure 3 shows that the
district and state levels. Limited English proficient passing percentage is significantly
below district and state levels, as seen in Figure 4. Particular areas of struggle in
comparison to division and state data, exist with the limited English proficient students
It is clear that Limited English Proficient, Economically Disadvantaged, and Students with
Disabilities are populations greatly affected by the achievement gap. Figure 5 illustrates
that the most interventions is needed with Limited English Proficient students.
For significant improvement, students must have increased access to various forms of texts.
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 9
The text must be level - appropriate and engaging for each individual. Using the UDL
functionality of digital devices and digital literacy programs is an efficient and effective means
educational reading apps and web-based vocabulary resources that support our
students growth, our school will need to acquire Chromebooks to achieve a desired 2:1
ratio in the school. Achieving a 2:1 ratio will provide quality access and availability to
technology that can be implemented during the school day on a daily and consistent
basis. Our teachers and students will need training on multiple Reading/Literacy Apps
device.
Vision Statement
We believe that technology can provide opportunities for students to work individually
and collaboratively to engage in purposeful reading and writing opportunities. At J.L. Simpson
Middle School, technology will be used by students and teachers to improve on current reading
levels and writing skills. Technology will allow for students to receive immediate feedback on
their current level of performance and provide strategies for improvement based upon
recommendations from the software program and their teacher in real time. Technology will be
Goal 1
The general school population will increase proficiency with new technology devices through daily
use in instruction in English and Reading content areas.
Student Objective Using one to one devices students will improve Success and interventions
ability to utilize technology for assessment by will be determined
increasing scores on statewide assessments in through analysis of School
Reading and Writing by 10%. English SOL performance
scores
International Society for Technology in Education
(ISTE) Alignment (Student):
- ISTE 3a, 3d
VDOE English SOL Alignment:
- SOL 6-8.3
Note - Virginia has not adopted Common Core
State Standards (CCSS)
Teacher Objective Teachers will increase student Reading and Writing Data from Instructor
1 assessment scores to the next level using one to created formative
one devices to facilitate digital assessments or assessments and digital
assignments twice a week. literacy programs will be
used to track student
ISTE Alignment (Teacher): performance and apply
- ISTE 2b, 3a appropriate interventions.
Teacher Objective Teachers will use digital tools to provide Real time data from
2 immediate feedback for students, and use data MyOn, and diagnostic
from digital programs to provide strategies for testing and progress
improvement on Reading and Writing assessments monitoring from
twice a week. MobyMax will be used to
track progress and plan
ISTE Alignment (Teacher):
appropriate interventions.
- ISTE 2c, 2d
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 11
Goal 2
Digital literacy tools with embedded UDL supports will be used to address and enhance English and
Reading Standards of Learning for all learners
Student Objective 1 Using adaptive lessons from Myon, MobyMax, and Observational notes and
other various software, students will read three data collection
times a week for at least 15 minutes and increase (frequency, duration,
Lexile level by one grade level. and level of
engagement, in digital
ISTE Alignment (Student): literacy tools) will be
- ISTE 3c, 3d recorded.
VDOE English SOL Alignment:
- SOL 6-8.5; 6-8.6; 6-8.4
UDL Guidelines
- 1.1, 2.4, 7.1, 9.1, 9.2
Student Objective 2 Using assistive technology and accessibility features MobyMax continuous
of MobyMax and MyOn, students with IEP goals will data updating and IEP
reach reading fluency and comprehension goals reporting, along with
85% of the time on assessments. supplemental data
collection will be used to
ISTE Alignment (Student): track progress.
- ISTE 3c
VDOE English SOL Alignment: Note: Data tables will
- SOL 6-8.5; 6-8.6 include type of assistive
UDL Guidelines technology used, date,
- 5.1, 5.2, 5.3, 8.1,8.2,8,4 activity, prompt number
and type; including but
not limited to IEP goals
and accuracy scores.
Teacher Objective Using digital literacy tools and software, teachers Teacher portfolios will
will incorporate multiple means of expression, be used to track and
representation, and engagement into Reading and improve instructional
Writing instruction in order to improve student uses of digital literacy
Lexile levels by one grade level. tools.
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 12
ISTE Alignment:
- ISTE 2d, 4b
promote an increase in student achievement scores with students of all learning abilities. In
order for this to be successful, we have developed a budget that takes into consideration the
learning needs of our students, the access of available technology, and developed a plan for the
next three years to help our students and teachers to be able to fully implement. Our goal is to
increase student achievement in reading and vocabulary comprehension, but we also want to
provide learning opportunities for teachers and students to work collaboratively inside a
To assist in achieving our goal, a detailed budget has been created in Table A below
devices, we chose to purchase the Toshiba Chromebook 2 which provides a 13.3 inch display,
16 GB of storage, and up to 11 hours of battery life. These features would be perfect for
allowing students to work together and engage in collaborative experiences. The Chromebooks
will be housed in mobile units so that they can be easily shared across classrooms. The headsets
are an added way to differentiate learning and the larger screen will help accommodate
students with special needs more efficiently compared to similar Chromebook choices that only
offer a smaller 11.6 inch viewing display. The proposed budget in Table A will give the school
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 13
the added technology it needs in order to successfully promote the goals outlined in the school
technology plan.
Budget:
Table 2
and assign to
students based
upon current or
upcoming
readings.
Creates
opportunities
for students to
learn key terms
prior to reading
and promote
student success.
MyOn E-Book program All Students & Paid for by $0
that provides Teachers School District
leveled material Funding
with
comprehension
assessments at
end of reading.
Able to be used
with or without
Internet
connection.
Moby Max Software All Students & Paid for by $0
program that is Teachers School District
used for Lexile Funding
reading levels
and provides
appropriate
interventions.
Total Estimated Budget for Hardware and Materials: $145,457.56
The proposed budget in Table 2 was created based upon the recommendations of the
school technology planning team. As noted in the introduction, access to available technology
was very limited within the school building. In order to effectively implement the school
technology plan and meet the outlined goals/objectives, there needs to be better access to
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 15
reliable devices that are dedicated to classroom use for educational purposes on a daily basis
learning day before requiring the battery to be charged. Its larger than average monitor
display will help schools follow UDL guidelines while allowing students to use the device more
effectively with built-in accessibility options for students who require additional assistance.
Security charging carts were added to ensure devices remain safe and remain secured while
charging in designated locations. Assistive devices such as quality headphones with storage
cases were added since many of the software programs and tools that students will be required
match every Toshiba Chromebook in the secured cart and all equipment is designed to travel
among classrooms as a total set. To assist with the final proposed budget, teachers and
administrators may consider grant funding agencies to help finance the budgetary costs or
speak with the Parent Teacher Student Association (PTSA) regarding fundraising opportunities
School Implementation:
When the computers are purchased they will be housed in each grade in the Language
Arts classrooms. There are three Language Arts classrooms in each grade that are general
education classrooms. These classes range from 20-30 students per class. Each room will get a
cart with 36 laptops totaling 324 computers accounted for. Each grade also has a self-contained
Language Arts classroom. The self-contained classroom has less than 15 students per class. Two
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 16
of the self-contained classes will have carts with 25 computers, while the third will have 26
totaling the remaining 76 computers. The extra laptops will account for issues with laptops,
The English teachers will use the laptops on a daily basis to meet their goals, and
improve literacy and scores on the end of the year Reading and Writing SOL tests. Students will
be working individually on different apps and programs as well as working in pairs and in groups
to collaborate using GAFE. Teachers of other contents who want to utilize the cart for a lesson
can sign up on a school wide sign up list in Google Drive for availability.
Professional Development:
In order for all teachers, educators, and staff to use the technology effectively, Professional
Development (PD) will be necessary for the School Technology Plan (STP) to be successful.
Most PD will be held at the school where the technology is based with various leaders
presenting on topics related to the digital tools. Since those involved with technology in the
county are salary based, no additional costs will be necessary to the STP budget. Topics and
Chromebooks (functionality and guidance for usage): various school officials within the
technology department will conduct these tutorials throughout the school year.
Additionally, any updates needed will be performed on each Chromebook during the
end of the spring semesters. If technical issues or needs should arise sporadically during
the school year, the schools Media Specialist/ Instructional Technologist will be able to
Data Collection and Analysis for Instruction: since the purpose of the STP is for
educators to track data and analyze the data for instruction, PD will be provided by
content supervisors within the county, as well as through the countys technology
department. When it comes to content supervisors, they will aid teachers in reading the
data found using the digital tools implemented. The technology department
representatives will also attend PD opportunities to help guide educators through the
Google Apps for Education (GAFE): GAFE is a digital program for schools that allow all
users to interact and complete assignments online. Due to its complexity and numerous
features, educators will need PD on each program within GAFE. According to Google for
Education (2016), users may use GAFE with a consistent experience from any
computer, tablet, or phone, making the technology useful for using with the
Chromebooks (Google for Education, 2016). Educators will be given access to GAFE
during the spring semester of 2017 and various opportunities for PD will be presented at
the school. The Technology Resource Teacher will provide professional development
Using Digital tools to implement Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in the classroom:
miscellaneous tools and information needed for the School Technology Plan to be
successful. Teachers will meet with the schools Technology Resource Teacher as a
whole to discuss the new tools becoming the norm at the institution for learning.
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 18
Professional Development will also include interaction sessions with the tools so that
teachers may use these supplements with direct guidance from the technology
facilitator. From these interact and play sessions, teachers will become more aware
MyOn- eBook program that allows student to download books for free and take
assessments based at their Lexile level. Unlimited and concurrent access to all
books are a feature of this site that will be a positive addition to the classroom
the capability of creating word lists that tie into curriculum or current/upcoming
classroom readings. By using this digital tool, lessons will combine the world's
smartest dictionary with an adaptive learning game that will have you mastering
Moby Max- Assessment software tool that provides data on student reading
simultaneously ensuring that remedial students get the extra instruction they
informative Professional Development must be provided. In order for the presenter to know
just how effective the Professional Development session was for educators, evaluations will be
sent to attendees of the sessions. Through the school-based email system, each presenter will
send a Google Form that allows teachers to provide their own anecdotal accounts of using the
technology in their classrooms and identify what additional support they may need in order to
implement the technology more effectively for themselves and with their students.
PD Timeline:
June 2016 At the end of the 2015-2016 school year, teachers will receive one
Chromebook to interact with over the summer. Each user will take
part in an informational session for basic knowledge. This will give
each user a chance to navigate through the technology before
implementation occurs in the classroom during the upcoming school
year.
Fall 2016 Teachers all meet at the beginning of the school year to be informed
of the changes and additions when it comes to school-wide
technology. Teachers will be told of the digital tools that will be
available for implementation in their classrooms. Any questions will
be asked and answered during this back-to-school technology
meeting. This will take place during the first week of September.
9th.
Spring 2017 Google Apps for Education (GAFE) Professional Development will
begin this semester. Teachers will be given a tutorial on how to use
all components of GAFE. Each content area will meet in order to
plan for a GAFE based lesson in their classroom.
At the end of the school year, educators will meet and evaluate the
technology used throughout the year. Teachers will be able to
discuss the successes and challenges, as well as analyze data
collected for each tool used in the School Technology Plan. Then,
the decision will be made to either change instruction or
implementation for the future. They will be able to use the
breakdown from the SOL test to decide what parts of the
implementation was effective, and what needs to be added or
adjusted.
Summer 2017 Administration leaders will look at the evaluations that teachers
have discussed and create professional development opportunities,
differentiated on teachers specific needs and concerns.
Fall 2017 Chromebook Professional Development for any new teachers to the
school. Teachers would like additional PD on the Chromebook
technology may attend.
Spring 2018 During a spring Professional Development Day teachers across the
county will be given the opportunity to meet and collaborate by
content and/or grade level. This session will be ran by the
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 21
At the end of the school year, educators will meet and evaluate the
technology used throughout the year. Teachers will be able to
discuss the successes and challenges, as well as analyze data
collected for each tool used in the School Technology Plan. Then,
the decision will be made to either change instruction or
implementation for the future.
Fall 2018 Chromebook Professional Development for all teachers at the
school. The sessions will be differentiated for the various interest
and skills of teachers. Sessions will be taught by members of the
staff with high levels of experience.
Spring 2019 As an entire school instructional staff will meet to review over
assessments from 2016-2019 to analyze what goals and objectives
were met. Staff will discuss gains and shortfalls in all goals and
objectives. Staff will be asked to give input for what the vision
moving forward should encompass.
Implementation Timeline:
Spring 2016 Chromebooks and various technologies will be purchased for use
according to the School Technology Plan. Though programs such as
Vocabulary.com and Google Apps will be available immediately
online after purchase, the Chromebooks will be ordered this month
and will be delivered to the school by June 2016.
June 2016 At the end of the 2015-2016 school year, teachers will receive one
Chromebook to interact with over the summer. This will give each
user a chance to navigate through the technology before
implementation occurs in the classroom during the upcoming school
year.
Summer 2016
The Technology Resource Teacher will take the end of the year and
the beginning of next year to make sure the Chromebooks are
updated and connected to the network and Wi-Fi at school.
Fall 2016 Teachers will use MobyMax, Myon, and teacher created formative
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 22
Based on data from each program, along with any other online
program teachers use, the teacher will continue to guide
instruction for each individual child.
Spring 2017 Along with MobyMax, Myon, and online programs, teachers will
start using Google Apps for Education to increase literacy levels, and
have more data.
Teachers will adjust accordingly for the rest of the school year until
the SOL.
At the end of the school year, educators will meet and evaluate the
technology used throughout the year. Teachers will be able to
discuss the successes and challenges, as well as analyze data
collected for each tool used in the School Technology Plan. Then,
the decision will be made to either change instruction or
implementation for the future. They will be able to use the
breakdown from the SOL test to decide what parts of the
implementation were effective, and what needs to be added or
adjusted.
Summer 2017 Teachers will adjust curriculum and tweak the use of MobyMax,
Myon, and GAFE, to implement more effectively during the next
school year.
Administration will use the post assessment data to show student
improvement on all of the goals and objectives identified.
Fall 2017 On top of their adjusted curriculum from the previous year, teachers
will add Vocabulary.com to their list of tools to increase literacy in
the school.
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 23
Spring 2018 Teachers will continue to use all apps and programs, and data from
those apps and programs to guide instruction for the rest of the
school year until the SOL test.
At the end of the school year, educators will meet and evaluate the
technology used throughout the year. Teachers will be able to
discuss the successes and challenges, as well as analyze data
collected for each tool used in the School Technology Plan. Then,
the decision will be made to either change instruction or
implementation for the future.
Fall 2018 School instructional staff will meet to discuss and analyze scores,
assessments and data from 2017. Professional Development will be
provided regarding the baseline data assessment for reading levels
and comprehension. Teachers will use this data to plan for their
curriculum for 2018-2019.
Spring 2019
Input and evaluation will be in the form of anecdotal conversations,
as well as a Google Forms survey that will be sent to all staff
personnel associated with the technology plan. Teachers will have
until the end of the school year to submit the Google Survey of
information.
SCHOOL TECHNOLOGY PLAN 24
References
Cast. (2011). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.0. Wakefield, MA: Author.
Google for Education. (2016). Chromebooks. Retrieved from
https://www.google.com/edu/products/productivity-tools/
Moby Max. (2016). For every k-8 subject. Retrieved from
http://www.mobymax.com/curriculum/overview
Myon. (2016). Home: magic inside, metrics included. Retrieved from https://www.myon.com/
Virginia Department of Education. (2010, January). English standards of learning for Virginia
public schools. Retrieved from
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/testing/sol/standards_docs/english/2010/stds_all_english.
pdf
Virginia Department of Education. (2015). School Report Card. Retrieved from
http://www.doe.virginia.gov/statistics_reports/school_report_card/
Vocabulary.com. (2016). Welcome to vocabulary. Retrieved from https://www.vocabulary.com/