Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LS-DYNA-Intro 14.5 L01 Intro To Exp Dyn
LS-DYNA-Intro 14.5 L01 Intro To Exp Dyn
14.5 Release
Corporate Headquarters
2012 ANSYS, Inc. November 7, 2012 5
Canonsburg,Release
PA 14.5
Breadth of Technologies
Electromagnetics: To High-Frequency
From Low-Frequency Field Analysis
Windings
Systems: To Multi-Domain
From Data Sharing System Analysis
Workflow Modeling
Process Tracking
Hosted Applications
Build and run CAE workflows
LS-DYNA, a product of LSTC, the most widely used explicit dynamics solver,
has been integrated into the ANSYS environments since 1997
ANSYS Mechanical APDL
A separate introductory training course for ANSYS LS-DYNA in MAPDL
ANSYS Workbench
Covered in this introductory training course
ANSYS LS-DYNA provides explicit dynamics solutions for the structural
problems with:
complex contact
short duration events with severe loadings
ANSYS LS-DYNA in Workbench provides:
CAD connectivity
Automatic meshing
Automatic contact surface definition
Typical applications
Drop tests
Impact and Penetration
Elastic-Plastic (material
50 -1000 10-1 - 101
strength significant)
Response Time ms - s s - ms
Crashworthiness analysis
Full car crash
Car component analyses
Crash in ALL vehicle industries
Car
Truck
Bus
Train
Ship
Aircraft
Bird-strike simulation
Simulate an impact from
a moving bird to the blades
of a rotator machinery
0V0 m
V V
e
1
xx yy yy zz zz 2 xy xy 2 yz yz 2 zx zx
xx
For each time step, these equations are solved explicitly for
each element in the model, based on input values at the end of
the previous time step
Only mass and momentum conservations are enforced.
However, in well posed explicit simulations, mass, momentum
and energy should all be conserved.
To ensure stability and accuracy of the solution, the size of the time step
used in Explicit time integration is limited by the CFL (Courant-Friedrichs-
Levy[1]) condition.
This condition implies that the time step be limited such that a
disturbance (stress wave) cannot travel further than the smallest
characteristic element dimension in the mesh, in a single time step.
Thus the time step criteria for solution stability is
h
t f
c min
where t is the time increment, f is the stability time step factor, h is the
characteristic dimension of an element and c is the local material sound
speed in an element
[1] R. Courant, K. Friedrichs and H. Lewy, "On the partial difference equations of mathematical
physics", IBM Journal, March 1967, pp. 215-234
The time steps used for explicit time integration will generally be much
smaller than those used for implicit time integration
e.g. for a mesh with a characteristic dimension of 1 mm and a material sound
speed of 5000 m/s. The resulting stability time step would be 0.18 -seconds. To
solve this simulation to a termination time of 0.1 seconds will require 555,556 time
steps
The minimum value of h/c for all elements
h
in a model is used to calculate the time step. t f
c min
This implies that the number of time steps
required to solve the simulation is dictated
by the smallest element in the model.
h
Take care when generating meshes for Explicit
Dynamics simulations to ensure that one or two
very small elements do not control the time step
The maximum time step that can be used in explicit time integration is
inversely proportional to the sound speed of the material and therefore
directionally proportional to the square root of the mass of material in an
element
1 1 m
t
c Cii VC ii
The secondary elastic wave is the distortional or shear wave and its speed
can be calculated as
G
cS
Meyers M A, (1994) Dynamic behaviour of Materials, John Wiley & Sons, ISBN 0-
471-58262-X
1 0
e1 Us e0
1 0
u1 u0