Evaluation of Curriculum Change in Junior Cycle

A new framework for the Junior Cycle was released in 2012. This poster outlines the reformed
framework and also highlights the difficulties with implementing such a drastic change to how the
junior cycle is delivered.

AIMS Secondary Research

- Identify and assess the proposed JC reform.
- Examine how schools differ in implementing reform efforts.
- Examine who/what impacts on bringing about significant curricular change.

FINDINGS
Wellbeing
- Junior Cert to Junior Cycle.
Learning to
Quality
Learn - Supports the transition from primary to
post primary.
- Greater student engagement and
Inclusive The Principles of the
Choice and learning.
Education Junior Cycle
Flexibility
Education
- Provides a broader assessment of
students knowledge.
Continuity &
Engagement &
Development
Participation
Creativity &
Innovation

- Schools in more prosperous

areas may have more funds for Funding Opposing
Unions (ASTI &
resources. Imbalance
TUI)

Why do schools differ?

- Different unions may oppose
or be in favour of the changes.

Schools with non-

practical subjects
may suffer

Teachers Students - Teachers will need to be behind the

changes. They fear it will impact badly on
an already busy schedule.

Who/what impacts - Students will have less pressure on them

curricular change?
to perform in a terminal exam.

- Society still needs a skilled workforce to

be produced.
European
Society
School Net

CONCLUSION
The changes that are to be put in place should impact the students in a positive way. The idea of this
reform is to allow students to build upon their interests. Students will be the leaders of their own
learning. They will also be assessed throughout their school life so there is less focus and pressure on
a final exam.

By Stephen M. Gary W. Mark F. Fiach MacC. Darragh P. & Stephen D.