Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modern Teacher Evaluation - Google Slides
Modern Teacher Evaluation - Google Slides
edu
Modern Teacher Evaluation
Something went wrong. Please reload.
Unable to load
File Edit file Insert
View Slide Format Arrange Tools Table Add-ons Help Present Comments Share
Try to load it again or send an error report. Background... Layout Theme... Transition...
1
Reload
Education
Chris Weber
2
Getting Started
- Teacher Evaluation: The process of judging whether or not an educator is
doing an eective job, it is the measurement of their job performance.
Click to add speaker notes
- Issue: Not so cut and dry, depends on a multitude of factors.
3
Lesson Review
- A review or analysis of a teachers class session or the lesson plan itself,
normally by a chairperson, principal, or administrator.
- Purpose: Making sure the teacher is covering the correct material and doing
so in a clear and coherent manner.
4
Impact of Student Assessment
- Mixed reviews, is this a clear or accurate indication of teacher performance?
- Race to the Top Initiative 2009: Goal was to improve teacher eciency, giving
grants to states who are performing well.
- Pros: 2005 in Louisiana- The state takes student test scores in grades 4-9
and traces them back to their teachers, who are then traced back to whatever
institution gave them their training and certication(Navarette, 2011, para. 8).
5
Student Polls/Surveys
- Course Evaluations: Students are aorded the opportunity to give feedback
to their school on their educators and classes(Molloy is an example of this).
- This feedback must be carefully considered but is a valuable tool, given the
students are the main recipient of the educators teaching, and the focus of
the education system
6
Colleague Review
- Teacher to teacher, much like peer review, where co-workers guide and assist
each other in their eorts.
- The PAR program requires all new teachers to work with a consulting, or
mentor, teacher. Struggling teachers can enter the program either voluntarily
or through administrator recommendation(Hertling, 1999, para. 8).
- Results: Eighty percent of new teachers are still on the job ve years later,
while in other urban districts without peer review, 50 percent of new hires
leave after ve years(Hertling, 1999, para. 8).