Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Reflection On Armona Union Academy Board Meeting
Reflection On Armona Union Academy Board Meeting
Reflection On Armona Union Academy Board Meeting
Andrews University
By
Dawn Peterson
11/21/2017
PETERSON AUA BOARD 2
I had the privilege of attending Armona Union Academys (AUA) board meeting on
September, 26, 2017. It was a fairly long agenda and the meeting lasted three hours. After a
short devotional and prayer, the principal gave the finance committee report on the revised
budget for the current school year. He followed that with his principal report and several old
According to Pacific Union Conference (PUC) Education Code (2017) the school board
is given the task of running the basic operations of the school (A17-112 A). This includes many
of the functions I observed during the board meeting. Although Seventh-day Adventist (SDA)
school boards function in many of the same ways a public school does, they are not vested by the
state in the same manner. Non the less, they do set guidelines to operate within many of the
same structures as public school boards. As we look at many of the agenda items I will attempt
to show the PUC education code that refers the agenda item references in the responsibilities of
The first item of new business was related to school safety concerns. Parents had
expressed concerns of the split campus (a public road splits the elementary and gym from the
Kindergarten, academy campus, and administration) with children needed to be crossing the
campus for music classes etc. Also, concerns were raised about student supervision prior to
school starting for the day. The principal explained the strategies employed to relieve these
concerns with coded gate locks that the students would use wen crossing from one side of
campus to the other and that they would tighten up the responsibilities for before school
supervision.
PETERSON AUA BOARD 3
Although home school policy was on the agenda, the principal chose to skip that due to
the longevity of the meeting. I was disappointed because I was interested to see what the school
Personnel approval was the next item discussed. The board discussed the need for
substitutes and other local-hires and voted to send names to CCC for further employment
documentation and approval. This is in accordance with PUC code that states,
The employment, changes in employment status, or termination, of school personnel are by authority of the
local conference board of education in consultation with the local school board. Thus, the
local conference board of education is the employing organization, referred to hereinafter as the employer.
(Pacific Union Conference, 2017, A17-112 4.a )
Along with Calif. Educ. Code 44237(a), (b), (c) which requires the fingerprinting of any new
non-certified personnel by the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigations
One board member asked if any of these new local-hires could volunteer instead of work
for pay or maybe they could reduce their students tuition. His question brought new
understanding of the California law regarding volunteerism for reduction of tuition fees.
The AUA Handbook previously stated that as a condition of enrollment, each family
agrees to contribute (15) hours of service to AUA. In the alternative, each family will donate
$10.00 per each hour not contributed (Armona Union Academy, 2016-2017). According to the
meeting, AUA handbook policy requiring parents to volunteer to save the $150 from being
applied to their tuition account falls outside of conference policy due to California Law. It was
immediately voted to make sure that the current school bulletin was within PUC policy and
complied to CA statutes for volunteers particularly in regards to the volunteerism policy. This
PETERSON AUA BOARD 4
action falls under the school board responsibilities of general operation and development of
student handbook and board policies (Pacific Union Conference, 2017, A17-112 3a 1 and 4).
The discussion then moved to suggesting that the schools booster club, which is a
separate organization from the school, would be in a better position to attach volunteering at the
school as part of its eligibility for scholarships it offers to students at AUA. Board voted to
experiment that would constitute a possibly new science curriculum. Because we live in an
agricultural community he thought this might be an interesting experience for his students. There
were numerous questions about the feasibility and costs of the program. It was voted to allow
the teacher to continue research on the possibility of the program and to speak with members at
large that have agricultural experience. This was brought to the board because the board has the
with CCC and PUC boards (Boring v. Buncombe County Board of Education, 1988; Pacific
There were numerous field trip requests for local one day trips that required only the
board approval (Pacific Union Conference, 2017, A24-108 C1) and a couple of international
trips (Seniors to Costa Rica and Mission trip to Honduras) that will need final approval from
conference, union and division prior to departure as per policy (A24-124 A, D).
This was an informative and educational board meeting to observe with the issues
relating to CA law and volunteers. I enjoyed the discussions that surrounded that issue. I also
found myself wanting to be a sponsor for the senior trip that was approved as it looks like it
References
U.S. Department of Education. (2009). State regulation of private schools. Retrieved from
https://www2.ed.gov/admins/comm/choice/regprivschl/regprivschl.pdf.
PETERSON AUA BOARD 6