Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Uw RT Draft 1026017
Uw RT Draft 1026017
Uw RT Draft 1026017
UWRT 1202-011
October 23 2017
As a current student at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte I have asked myself
a number of time the reasoning behind our need to follow general education curriculum. Could
higher education in the United States do away with general education? Over the time as a student
as a requirement I have taken course based outside of my majors boundaries. I have come to
understand that students outside of the United States also follow a different approach in their
higher education. There is a reason why our country decided in its time to incorporate this liberal
perspective into its education, but what was its reason? Have students over the time in this
country benefited to this difference? In which ways have students in the United States have felt
that they have been affected by this curriculum in comparison to students outside of this country?
In approach to this situation I will be following to perspectives from professors in the United
We approach our higher education by choosing our major based on interest. This decision
will indefinitely determine the future of your education by deciding the classes you will be
enrolled in. Based on the curriculum that students in the United States follows he or she will also
tale part of general education courses that have been labeled as requirements for the students.
These courses stated by Dr. Cynthia A.Wells, from Messiah College, historically have had
turning points that have entitled both new theoretical interpretations of general education as well
a specific curriculum innovations (Wells). Education has had significant change due to a change
to institution involvements and demands in the social world. These courses were included into
the American curriculum a number of years ago which creates the question does education still
need these courses to be included? And Can we do any with these courses? [Look up
references to students in the United States that have a saying in the question (for or against)] As a
current student I have felt both in a positive and negative form towards these courses. That is
because in a way they teach [included research history on why they were brought in], but they
also take away the focus from the students major courses, that is significant to their education.
Professors in our higher education has a significant impact on how the student ends up
preforming throughout their educational career. Therefore, I believe that the professors in our
higher education in the United States have an idea of what courses would benefit the students. In
the Harvard Magazine, John S. Rosenberg states that students and faculty are often unable to
articulate the grounding principles of General Education (Rosenberg). This creates the thought
upon one of what is the reasoning through these courses? It is understood that whenever students
come in from high school to the end of their general education they do not have a complete
that prepared students for their professions(Boning). Stating that the students where place in
that time for preparation, but later it was understood that professions in the United States
changed. Revolution in these new jobs appeared to create it to become a difficulty for professors
to keep up with and have the ability to teach these students appropriately.
Erick Martinez
UWRT 1202-011
October 23 2017
The reason why I decided on this topic for my inquiry was due to my recent connections
to foreign exchange students. They informed me that the curriculum in their countries are
followed differently. There are a number of majors that can be completed outside of the United
States in a shorter time span. Reasoning to the fact that their curriculum does not include general
education (India, china, statistically higher educators around the world)]. As a student, also in the
United States curriculum I have heard from my peers that they do not put the same amount of
effort into these courses, because they find them to being insignificant towards their future. They
see these courses as easy As for their GPA instead of their educational purposes. Ive noticed as
a student in the American curriculum also that drop out within two years of their educational
career and in my perspective, these are the years that you are placed in these general education
courses which make me ask myself if these courses werent involved could a number of these
students have continued their education? As if these courses affected the students in a negative
form or was it beneficial because they would have not been able to complete courses in their
majors future?
CONCLUSION
[Reasoning why foreigners decide to come to the United States for their education? Also
why does it appear to have been the cause to students not having apparent interests into general
education]
Erick Martinez
UWRT 1202-011
October 23 2017
RESOURCES
Boning, Kenneth. "Coherence in General Education: A Historical Look." JGE: The Journal of
General Education, vol. 56, no. 1, Jan. 2007, pp. 1-16. EBSCOhost,
librarylink.uncc.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com.librarylink.uncc.edu/login.asp
x?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=25178934&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Rosenberg, John S. General Education under the Microscope. Harvard Magazine, 26 May
2015, harvardmagazine.com/2015/05/harvard-college-general-education-criticized.
Pregitzer, Michael and Susannah N. Clements. "Bored with the Core: Stimulating Student
Interest in Online General Education." Educational Media International, vol. 50, no. 3,
Sept. 2013, pp. 162-176. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1080/09523987.2013.831517.