2016 1 No.

1 2016
343 MISSILES AND SPACE VEHICLES Sum No.343

1004-7182(2016)01-0092-06 DOI10.7654/j.issn.1004-7182.20160122

AMESim FLUENT
1 2 1 1
1. 1000762. 100076

AMESim FLUENT
AMESim FLUENT

AMESimFLUENT
TP311.52 A

Approach Method and Engineering Application of Co-simulation between

AMESim and FLUENT
Chen Shi-qiang1, Fan Rui-xiang2, Huang Bing1, Huang Hui1
(1. Beijing Institute of Aerospace Systems Engineering, Beijing, 100076; 2. China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, Beijing, 100076)

Abstract: Some background materials about simulation platforms, AMESim and FLUENT are introduced, which includes their
application fields, advantages and disadvantages. The developing trend of numerical simulation and the meaningful effect of
co-simulation to engineering research are analyzed. Main steps of approach method of co-simulation between AMESim and FLUENT
are presented on typical engineering issue, particularly the basic operation mode, interface variable analysis, simulation modeling
approach, user defined secondary developing code, compiling and running co-simulation model. Engineering application of
co-simulation is approved for the research field of liquid launch vehicle technology. The simulation results are validated based on
experimental data and the effectiveness of co-simulation method is approved, which would be a choice for multi-disciplinary
optimization design.
Key words: Co-simulation; AMESim; FLUENT; Secondary developing; Engineering application

0




AMESim FLUENT
AMESim FLUENT

1 AMESim FLUENT
1.1 AMESim
[1] AMESim

2014-12-052015-04-28
1986-
1 AMESim FLUENT 93

2 AMESim FLUENT
2.1
1 AMESim FLUENT
AMESim
FLUENT AMESim
Windows XP
AMESimFLUENT Microsoft
[1~4] AMESim Visual StudioFLUENT
UDF .dll
AMESim .dll
1.2 FLUENT
FLUENT CFD Microsoft Visual Studio
FLUENT

[5~7]FLUENT

FLUENT

1
1.3
AMESim 2.2
AMESim FLUENT
6 AMESim 2
a
b
c
de
AMESim

FLUENT

2
UDF

AMESim

FLUENT

A
FLUENT AMESim
94 2016

B FLUENT
d UDF
DEFINE_ON_ DEMAND

AMESim A e

FLUENT
AMESim f
FLUENT B
g FLUENT


FLUENT Microsoft
Visual Studio AMESim

2.3
AMESim FLUENT
AMESim Scheme
UDF 3
2.3.1 AMESim
AMESim
AMESim A
A
AMESim
AMESet
3 Scheme

AMESet LMS AMESim

Fortran 77 C 2.3.3 UDF
Microsoft Visual Studio [1] UDF FLUENT
2.3.2 Scheme
Scheme LISP
FLUENT 3 UDF 5 udf.c
FLUENT helper_functions.chelper_functions.h
import_dll_utils.c import_dll_utils.h
AMESim .dll [1]
udf.c a
Scheme 7 a Scheme udf.c
intinteger-list bFLUENT
DEFINE
FLUENT DEFINE_PROFILE DEFINE_PROPERTY
b DEFINE_SOURCE cFLUENT
C
c Scheme d Scheme

1 AMESim FLUENT 95

DEFINE_ON_DEMAND
eAMESim
FLUENT DEFINE_EXECUTE_
AT_END
2.4
Scheme udf.c
3.1
Scheme
4 0.5 m 0.16 m
Scheme 3 m 0.11 m 0.2 m
udf.c 300 K 450 kPa
FLUENT Compile 9 Hz
0.34 kg/s
450 kPa

UDF

a FLUENT
b AMESim
Simulation Temporal analysis mode 4

cFLUENT AMESim 3.2

.cas .dat .dat A AMESim
FLUENT B FLUENT
d UDF UDF AMESim FLUENT
eFLUENT UDF
FLUENT AMESim
fFLUENT Scheme
3.3
AMESim FLUENT
g FLUENT AMESim

2.5 5 0.75 m1.5 m
AMESim 2.25 m FLUENT
FLUENT AMESim

3.4
5 1.5 m
3
6 1.5 m

96 2016

a c 1.5 m
6

5 6a 6b

9 Hz
9 Hz

b 1.5 m

450 kPa

9 Hz 1.5 Hz

6b 6c 1.5 m
7~10 Hz

c
1~3 Hz
5




7 8 FLUENT

b 1.5 m 7 t=2 s
6
1 AMESim FLUENT 97

LMS

8 t=2.22 s
[1] LMS Image SA. AMESim help demos Rev12[R]. BelgiumLeuven2013.

7 8 [2] , , . [J]. , 2008,

34(1): 23-25.

[3] , , , .

AMESim [J]. E : , 2009, 39(3): 474-481.

[4] , , , , . AMESim

[J]. , 2015(5):14-19.

[5] FLUENT Inc. FLUENT 6.3 Users Guide[M]. NH: Lebanon, 2006.

[6] Marchetta J G, Benedetti R H. Simulation of jet-induced geysers in reduced

4 gravity[J]. Microgravity Science Technology, 2010(22): 7-16.

[7] . [J].

AMESim FLUENT , 2010(5):51-55.

AMESim FLUENT

91

4 Spacecraft & Rockets, 1998, 35(5): 690-694.

[2] Johnson C D, Wilke P S. Whole-spacecraft vibration isolation system for

the GFO/Taurus mission[J]. SIPE, 1999(3672): 175-185.

[3] Rittweger A, Beig H. Active payload adaptor for Ariane 5[C]. Fukuoka,
Japan: 56th International Astronautical Congress, IAC-05-C2-4-02, 2005.

a [4] , , . [J]. , 2005,

21.4% 39.5% 24(5): 35-38.

[5] , , .[J]. , 2007, 28(2):

b 439-441.

[6] , , .

[J]. , 2011, 30(10): 173-176.

c [7] , , . [J].
, 2006, 27(3): 323-331.

[8] , , . [J].
, 2002, 19(3): 10-13.
[1] Wilke P S, Johnson C D. Whole-spacecraft passive launch isolation [J]. J of