Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tugas 5 - Ryan Tri Ra - 25017069
Tugas 5 - Ryan Tri Ra - 25017069
Tugas 5 - Ryan Tri Ra - 25017069
Dosen :
SEKOLAH PASCASARJANA
PROGRAM STUDI MANAJEMEN REKAYASA KONSTRUKSI
FAKULTAS TEKNIK SIPIL DAN LINGKUNGAN
INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG
2017
Que: Observed cycle times for a concrete finishing operation are given in Figure P4.5. What would you
estimate as the productivity of this system using MPDM? How much does each delay source
contribute to the loss in production? If you were in charge of this operation how would you
improve i
1 103 v
2 72
3 65
4 140
5 82
6 134 v
7 85
8 220 v
9 128 v
10 66
11 440 v
12 75
13 305 v
14 155 v
15 72
Ans:
Environment Equipment Labor Delay Minus Mean
Production Cycle Time Non-Delay Remarks
Cycle (seconds) Delay Delay Time
1 103 v 20.88
2 72 -10.13 NDC
3 65 -17.13 NDC
4 140 57.88 NDC
5 82 -0.13 NDC
6 134 v 51.88
7 85 2.88 NDC
8 220 v 137.88
9 128 v 45.88
10 66 -16.13 NDC
11 440 v 357.88
12 75 -7.13 NDC
13 305 v 222.88
14 155 v 72.88
15 72 -10.13 NDC
(Cycle
Total Number of Mean Cycle time)-(Non-
UNIT Production Cycles Time Delay Cycle
Time Time)/n
A) Non-
Delayed
Production 657.00 8 82.13 15.19
Cycles
B) Overall
Production 2142.00 15 142.80 68.78
Cycles
B) Overall
Production 2142.00 15 142.80 68.78
Cycles
DELAY INFORMATION
DELAY
Environment Equipment Labor
C)
Occurrences 2 3 2
D)Total added
time 243.75 482.63 183.75
E) Probability
of 0.13 0.20 0.13
occurences*
F) Relative
severity** 0.85 1.13 0.64
G) Expected %
delay time per
production 11.38 22.53 8.58
cycle
1
Ideal productivity =
mean non delay cycle time
60 min/hr 60 sec/min
= = 43.83562 unit/hr
82.13
By using MPDM technique, we can measure, predict, and improve construction method productivity.
It was quite obvious that there were a large areas for work improvement in this process.
Ass seen from calculation, the final results for each delay source contribute to the loss in production are
listed below: Environtment 11,38% , Equipment 22,53 %, and Labor 8,58%
The calculation show the bigest delay of 22,53% in equipment area. With this information, it was
suggested to contractor that the following items, if corrected could raise the productivity method:
- Have all equipment for this finishing concrete operating (assume floor concrete operating)
stand by before concrete step in initial setting. The equipment for this operation are trowel
for finishing concrete floor and treated with a chemical densifier (to fill in the holes/pores).
- Add extra trowel for improve productivity
Assume that those suggestion can be done, so the productivity should increase from 0-22,53%, choose
5% delay remain. In the end, the new overall method productivity would be:
1 130
2 166
3 114
4 126
5 120
6 134
7 258 v
8 192
9 218 v
10 120
11 133
12 122
13 112
14 116
15 142
16 140
17 124
18 194
19 186
20 258 50% 50%
21 232 50% 50%
22 230 50% 50%
23 340 50% 50%
24 176
25 252 v
26 282 v
27 306 v
28 168
29 290 v
30 182
31 192
32 200
33 230 v
34 206
Ans
A) Non-Delayed
Production 3495.00 23.00 151.96 29.78
Cycles
B) Overall
Production 6391.00 34.00 187.97 56.16
Cycles
B) Overall
Production 6391.00 34.00 187.97 56.16
Cycles
DELAY INFORMATION
DELAY
C) Occurrences 2 6 7
D)Total added
time 476.00 1018.00 1402.00
E) Probability of
occurences* 0.06 0.18 0.21
F) Relative
severity** 1.27 0.90 1.07
G) Expected %
delay time per
production 7.45 15.93 21.94
cycle
1
Ideal productivity =
mean non delay cycle time
60 min/hr 60 sec/min
= = 23.690987 unit/hr
151.96