ENTERS WITH- LIKE OR UNLIKE QUTAUTHORITY | DWELLING INTENT HOLDING OUR CASE Noauthortyto | Yes‘adweling of | No.intenttocom- | No bua intent | Dweling wasa enter mitcrime therein | element not met. | tent Clent knew it ‘though other et ements were met, boys did not enter teatwith meno | cele potogache commit a felony or | and prevent fiend theft from taking add tional shotos CASE NAME. FACTS Statev. Smith, | Two unarmed 201NE.2d673 | teenagers entered (Ohio Ct. App. | the home of one of 1973). thet friends, Statev.Jones, | Armed menen- | Yes Knew it was | No authority S1BN.E2d333 | tered vacation | dwelling of an-_| enter. Although (Ohio 1985). | home of their ac- | other they knew | they en stayed quaintances, = | Burglary dence showed he im had staked out the | frequented the hhouse todeter- | home, often for (0s of time, mine specific items | long periods of totale we and D planned to take valuables. Statev, Green, | Unarmed man en- | No, Did not know it | No authority 1 988NE2d901 | teredhome;did | was dwelling of | enter (Ohio Ct. App. | notknow whose | another: he ‘No burglary. Even | though another | like client's case. person owned the Green det thought 2000). home it was. thought home was unoccupied for 8 house was a abandoned (no ‘months. doned, sono bur- ‘one appeared to lary Here, have lived therefor accused knew that ‘Bmonths). someone was stay- abandoned, ing in tent and wanted 10 take item from him.