Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Educ 3316-Article Review Ortizmabel
Educ 3316-Article Review Ortizmabel
INTRODUCTION
METHODOLOGY
Participants: The subjects for this study were three hundred ten principals from
a metropolitan area in the southwest region of the United States, consisted in
one hundred twenty-six males and one hundred eighty-four females, Also, with a
range of experience, one hundred four having 0-3 years of experience, eighty-
two having 4-7 years of experience, fifty-five having 8-11 years of experience,
thirty-two with 12-15 years, and thirty-one having greater than 15 years.
Procedures:
a specific number of Public schools' principals have to answer a questionnaire
administered by graduate students in the Educational Leadership program at a
major, urban doctoral-granting university located in the south-central region of
the U.S.
Data Analysis:
Analysis of the interview data began with a process of data reduction. The
participants responses were read several times to become familiar with the data.
The data was then coded into meaningful categories. Once the categories were
established, another researcher independently coded a 10% sample of
responses to determine the consistency of the coding. The inter-coder
reliability results revealed a high level of agreement (Cohens kappa = .94).
RESULTS
Findings or Results:
Conclusions/Implications:
According to this study, principals give more importance to the use of technology
for communication, and less for the student learning. I think the implementation
of technology for the teaching and learning should be greater than that. This
study is very informative; however, it leaves outside suggestions and problems
that principals and professionals at school have in the use of technology. I think
the principals and teachers should literate in the new technology and the different
programs, software and equipment for teaching purposes, also constantly
training in that matter.
REFLECTIONS
Students Reflections: