Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mitchell Teacher Work Sample
Mitchell Teacher Work Sample
A. Narrative General Contextual Information for Community, District, and School (limited to 1 page)
District Information: The community where I am performing my professional semester is a small city. More specifically, a part of a larger Metro
area in Missouri. This community has three elementary schools, each of a relatively small size. These three fold into a single middle school for the
start of secondary education in the community. This then moves into a single junior high school, and from there to a single high school. The
community itself revolves around commerce and the district sports. Football, in particular, is a large draw for the district and community. Most
businesses are either small and local or chain restaurants such as McDonalds or Pizza Hut. Student population is currently around 4,300 in all grade
levels.
School Information: The High Schools current campus was completed in 1972 and periodically expanded over the years, with the most recent in
2015. The school itself has been in operation since the late 1800s. The current class size is around 1200 students, in grades 9-12. This is due to being
the only high school in the community, with the larger metro area school being larger. There is, as a result, a certain level of rivalry between the two
schools. As a graduate of the larger school, it is sometimes odd to see how strong that rivalry still is. It does not seem to affect the performance of the
students, however, as they tend to focus on lessons. With the occasional jab at the other sports team from both staff and students. For learning, the
students are given one chromebook to use. However, it depends on the teacher if they are allowed to use it for note taking or not.
Classroom Information: My classroom is made up of 17 students at a Freshman level. None of these students are on IEPs, however, one is required
to take her tests in a different room. These students sit in a seating chart spreading them throughout the room, to increase attention towards the board.
The classroom itself is an average size, with room to move around and instruct. Two white boards are available, though the one in the front is not in
good condition. Technology in the classroom amounts to a smartboard, an overhead projector, and my personal laptop.
Identified special needs categories _______ Specific Learning Disability _______ Speech/Language Impaired
represented (give numbers) _______ Hard of Hearing _______ Visually Impaired
_______ Deaf _______ Orthopedically Impaired
_______ Deaf-Blind _______ Emotionally Disturbed
_______ Other Health Impaired _______ Autism
_______ Multiple Disabilities _______ Mental Retardation
_______ Brain Injury _______Gifted
_______ Established Medical Disability (0-5 yrs) _______ Developmentally Delayed
_______ At risk for developmental disabilities _______ Other (Specify)_______________
Rationale for Selection: With no special needs students and a very uniform ethnic spread, this is the most notable division possible
in this class. Furthermore, I want to identify how- in this class -the difference in gender impacts grades. If it, indeed, has any effect
at all.
Provide appropriate charts/graphs to display demographic data for district, school, and classroom in Appendix A.
Personal Characteristics The boys are, on average, more talkative than the girls. This is mostly in the case of two who sit in the back and
- Including physical, social, enjoy gossiping with one another. The girls tend to focus better and talk less. There is not a noticeable split in the
individual experiences, class along social groups- though this may be due to the seating chart.
talents, language, culture,
family and community
values, etc.
B. Narrative: Implications for Whole Class Instruction Based on Information from Table 1.2 (limited to 1 page)
The largest implication for instruction is keeping the class on task. With the girls, this is a relatively simple process- I would bring attention to
me at the start of class by explaining the days journal, and setting the expectation that the class should be working quietly on it. This is both a school
expectation and one for the classroom itself. Students must be working on some form of journal or bell work at the start of class. This is somewhat
difficult with the boys in the back, as they like talking to one another instead of focusing on work.
To get around this, I typically have the bell work be a short worksheet that the class will go over together after a few minutes of work time. This
keeps the students more focused, rewards those who do the work, and allows for helping those who struggle a bit. For example, it allows for helping
one of the girls who does not focus as well on the work. This system allows for getting the material across to her, while also bringing the entire class
There was an almost even split in the boys between those who did well and
Boys those who did not. Those who did well did as well as some of the girls, both
This group was chosen on the map test and in their daily work. These boys paid close attention to
as there were fewer of the material and worked well on their daily assignments. The boys in the
them than the girls, back who preferred talking to one another struggled much more. They
and they tend to- on would only interact in the portion of the lesson going over the work, and
average -act out more. struggled on their Map test.
SUBGROUP I wanted to see how
or this impacted their Social
FOCUS learning styles. The boys typically required a bit more work to keep on task. The two in the
STUDENT back enjoy talking to each other, though it would only take a short verbal
command or proximity to bring them back on task. The other three boys in
the class tended to pay closer attention and even raise questions if the topic
interested them.
Personal
As above, the boys would be eager to interact if the topic interested them.
War, for example, got some talk. Talk that could drift into video games, but
it showed interest in the material. There was less interest in economic or
geographic topics, outside the political cartoon given in one lesson.
SUBGROUP Intellectual
or The girls were a more The girls are more divided than the boys, in terms of intellect. Part of this is
FOCUS Girls varied group than the because it is a larger group with more variations, part is that the student
STUDENT boys, and I wanted to who struggles the most is a girl. Overall, however, the girls score better than
see how this impacted the boys on tests.
on their scores.
The girls and the remaining boys were, with one exception, not any problem. The only major adaptions that needed to be made here were to help the individual
students who struggled. Specifically the need to help the one girl who preferred to be on her chromebook instead of doing the work. For her, there was more effort
put into keeping an eye on if she was doing the work and in helping if it became needed.
Beyond these small issues, the class itself behaves itself well and listens well. If there is any improvement to be made, it is in keeping them working quietly for the
entire work time and in providing better personal lessons. There is little I know about their personal lives to use in the lessons.
A. Narrative Description of Range of Objectives and Rationale for Selection (limited to 1 page)
In designing this unit, I followed a specific set of objectives. Vocabulary, background knowledge, political cartoons, physical geographyamong
others. These objectives were designed to show the students what they needed to know about Europe, while keeping them interested in what they
were doing. As such, the starting objectives focused primarily on the vocabulary and physical geography. By starting with this, the students were
given a bit of background knowledge for the rest of the unitwhile also working with the background knowledge they may have already had.
Furthermore, it gave them the material they would need for the rest of the unit.
Secondly, there was a large effort placed into the cultural geography of Europe. This is where most of the remaining objectives came into play. First,
there was a focus on the European history. How Rome spread culture throughout Europe along with the Christian religion. How these have impacted
Europe to this very day. In focusing on this, the students were able to relate to what they may have learned in church. The political cartoon, based on
the Brexit vote, provided a window into current events. Going over Catalan Independence and migration into Europe further emphasized these points,
giving the students background knowledge they will need in World History.
Finally, there was a strong focus throughout the unit on giving the students the knowledge and experience they would need for future classes.
European culture will be very important for World History, and understanding physical geography will help in any future classes like geology. As
well as this, understanding current events and how to write constructed responses will give a firm grounding for future history courses. Where they
will be expected to understand how to research and write about news articles.
Level(s)
Obj.
Unit Objectives (e.g. Blooms
No.
Taxonomy)
Students will know how the Alps were formed and how this has impacted European physical geography.
1
Understanding
Students will be able to understand how rivers have changed and shaped European cultures, and the spread of
2
these cultures to other areas. Understanding
3
Students will be able to analyze and understand how cultures and religion have caused wars in Europe. Analysis
Students will be able to analyze how immigration from the Middle East is causing problems in the European
4
Union today. Analysis
Students will be able to identify how the Brexit has weakened the European Unions authority and how it has
5
influenced similar movements. Synthesis
Students will be able to take current events in Europe and explain how these could cause problems in the United
6
States as well as Europe. Evaluating
C. Identify State Standards Benchmarks Addressed by Unit Objectives How do objectives address these standards? (limited to 1 page)
Objective 4:
Analyze major patterns and issues with regard to physical and human Geography in Europe (5Dc)
Indicators:
1. Locate states, major cities, bodies of water and topographic Features in the region (3Sa)
2. Explain the physical processes and characteristics that shape the region and make it unique (5Da)
systems in the region, human resources, capital resources (4A), (5Dc), (3Ua)
Pre-Assessment: The Pre-Assessment was the Unit Test given at the end of the previous test for the students to work on.
Table 2.2: Narrative Description of Pre-assessment, Formative Assessments, and Summative Assessment (limited to 2 pages)
II. D, H, and K Describe the assessment to be Explain rationale for choosing Which Identify how the assessment will be
used this assessment objectives scored and/or the criteria to be
does this used for evaluation.
Summative Reflect growth over the unit 20 Multiple Choice- One point each, Two
1-4
Assessment Unit Test compared to the Pretest Constructed Response- 9 points each
Day 1: For the first lesson of the unit, the students were given two major activities. First, they were given a larger journal than usual- identifying the
major mountains in Europe using their textbooks. This was intended to introduce them to one of the largest defining factors of Europe, namely how
mountainous the continent is. In this unit, I had to cover both physical and cultural geography, and I believed the best way to introduce this was with
mountains. As the mountains of Europe were the feature that influenced a large part of the migration of peoples and the borders in Europe. Some of
the students appeared to understand this- about half of them were able to answer questions about how mountains can change cultures and borders.
The other half appeared bored, with a couple complaining about using the book for a journal. I believe this is due to the work, more than the actual
subject matter.
However, more of the students complained when I moved into the main part of this days lesson. Not at first, as the main subject was watching a
video- specifically an episode of How the Earth Was Made focusing on the Alps -and they clearly expected a free day. Once I handed out a video
guide they were required to fill out, that could only be done if they watched the video and payed attention to it, they grouched about that. Most of the
class was spent watching this video, and most of the students did pay attention to it. A couple attempted to sleep during it, however, I walked around
and tapped on desks if they dozed off. Only a couple really seemed invested in it or the assignment, however. In fact, when the class ended, most of
the students had not completed the assignment.
I will admit to feeling discouraged. This was one of the assignments I was prouder of creating, as it was something simple and that I would have
enjoyed as a student. I felt that I needed to improve on student interaction, though I wasnt sure how. This was something that would need work.
Perhaps I needed to work with the students who did finish and figure out how it kept their attention? Maybe a more entertaining video?
Day 2: With a new idea in mind, I moved into the second lesson of the unit. This lesson was focused more on European countries, and identifying
them on a map, than on physical features. In operating on a unit made by the department, I had to get the students working on their map skills for the
map test. This was how I began the class. Informing the students that the map test would be quick in this unit, quicker than the previous one, as there
was less time to go over everything about Europe than there had been for Latin America- the previous unit. The assignment for this day reflected this
fact, as it was focused on identifying European countries and what region they are located in.
The idea in this lesson was simple, in this regard. The students were expected to be able to identify countries by region, giving them a study guide
they could then use on their map test. If they could understand that Germany was in Central Europe or that Belarus was in Eastern Europe, it would
give them a basis on the rest of the countries. Knowing where to look on the map to identify countries. It was my hope that, in doing it this way, the
students would have a greater understanding of the subject matter and at least some basis in map skills. It is one thing to identify Russia, it is another
to find Slovakia.
This was because I had to spend a large part of the lesson moving into European climates and river systems. This unit was so short on time that I
could not focus on one point in each class. I feel that this made it much more difficult on me teaching, and on the students absorbing the information.
They were required to learn so much in one day that, when I checked for understanding at the end of the class, few of them could still list the proper
regions for countries or identify the rivers. I am unsure of what I could have done better, as the need to give them all the information almost required
cramming the lesson. Even the most invested of the students struggled to keep up.
Day 3: In the rush to get all the information to the students, the next lesson was focused on something touched on in the previous one- European
cultures. I worried about getting this to the students, probably more than any other lesson in this unit. European culture is a very wide and difficult
subject to cover in a single class, even a single unit. How to explain the differences between Germany and France, for instance? Or why the English
were forever apart from continental Europe? What made this much more difficult was the need to review for the Map Test in the next lesson and the
fact this would take at least half of the class.
In the interest of student engagement and time management, I focused on the big divisions in the start of the class. The lecture for the class was a
powerpoint focused mostly on the major differences in culture between European countries. How languages were the dividing line in many cases. I
made a bit of a joke about how Germany speaks German, how England speaks English and how Russian speaks Russian. Joking with the kids about
how Europe has as many different cultures as they do languages. A few laughed at this, but I believe the joke fell a bit flat for most of the students
who seemed bored with the lesson. Even bringing in the spread of Roman culture and how it was basically Greek culture with a fresh coat of paint
only got a couple laughs.
I feel this may be because I told them in advance that most of the class would be review for the map test in the next lesson. Several of the students
complained about how fast we were moving into the tests, and wanted more time. This may have made them less inclined to cooperate for the lesson
itself.
Certainly as I taught about how European cultures make any union difficult, they were unwilling to provide examples of their own. Even when
directly asked why German and French dislike for one another would make the European Union weaker did little to get interest. I continued to ask
questions of the students and to teach about the cultures, however, it was clear to me that they were not getting the material as well as they should
have. This was feeling like a repeat of the previous lesson now.
To counter this, I moved into the review for the map test. The transition was smooth, moving from culture into political boundaries. By doing this, I
Pittsburg State University Teacher Work Sample 14
was able to connect the two parts of the lesson. Culture and language to country borders. This seemed to work, at least, as the students began to sit
up a bit more. Possibly because of the need to review for the test, to be honest, though at least partially because they seemed more interested in
talking about how borders have changed. Recognizing that I had their attention, I stood a little straighter and began to talk easier. The students were
willing to take their maps out and study for the test, and were certainly more invested in the lecture now.
Maybe that was what helped. That I interacted better when I saw they were paying more attention. Regardless, I finished the lesson with a reminder
to study for their test.
Day 4: Map Test day. Initially, I had planned on spending half (or even three-quarters) of the class on the test, and then rounding out the European
lectures so the class could review for the test itself on the next lesson. This plan did not pan out. When I taught all the classes, not just this one, they
needed the entire class to do the map. A few finished before the others, but a few also barely finished. I had known going into this that the map test
was long. Had it been my test, I would have made it shorter. However, as it was, the test was seventy-one questions and many students struggled to
finish that in a timely manner, even with a block schedule class.
I spent most of the class walking among the students, answering questions as I could. A few of them seemed to have retained the material better than
others, as they had no questions and worked hard and quietly. A few others, notably the boys, complained about the length. I reminded them that if
they studied they already knew most of the material, and that the test would not harm their grades too badly as long as they answered the best they
could.
In fact, that was something I told the class at large- that so long as they gave it their best shot, they would not lose many points on their grades. What
I could not tell them was that anything not a country on the test was actually extra credit. I believe that this may have helped. Had the students
known there was extra credit, they may not have put as much work in that part. Or the countries themselves, if they believed the extra credit was
enough to get them through.
In the end, however, most of the students passed the test. Two girls in particular came very close to getting perfect scores, and even the rowdiest of
the boys managed to scrape by. If I am being honest, it was a very gratifying feeling to have- seeing the students happiness at passing the test when I
gave them the graded papers.
Day 5: This lesson was a breather, if one wants to use that terminology. Recognizing that I needed more time, I was able to convince the cooperating
teacher to give me an extra day on the unit test. I used this day to talk about European current events with the class. There was only a short lecture,
since I knew the students were still burnt out from the map test. I covered the importance of Catalan independence and of the Brexit vote on the
European Union, asking the students a pointed question. What sort of precedent does a country leaving the EU set for the central authority? One girl
recognized what I was asking, and pointed out that it meant the central authority had limited power. What was stopping a country from just leaving if
they did not like what was being done?
A couple students turned this into a bit of a joke, trying to come up with ways on how they could get past regulations by threatening to leave. I
played along, smiling as I turned that into a question of how they could try that in a classroom. The students laughed a bit when they realized it did
not quite work that way in most situations. More importantly, I believe, it helped build a bit more of a rapport with the students that I was willing to
Pittsburg State University Teacher Work Sample 15
play along with their jokes. It showed to them that I was easy-going enough to not crack down on them if they got a bit uppity. So long as they
remained on topic.
As for the rest of the lesson, it was standard fare. Once the lecture was complete, the students were given a short homework assignment. Using the
BBC news website to look up a current event in their own country- the class has a County Research Project for the semester project -and writing a
paragraph about it. So they can see how current events impact a country.
Day 6: This day was set aside for the Unit Test Review. With the previous lessons in mind, I had changed my original plan and made this a lesson for
the entire day- a game day. When I was in school, my teachers had put a Jeopardy powerpoint up for test review. The students would split into
groups, and answer the questions. This turned what may have been a boring review, into a friendly competition. My intention in this lesson had been
to mimic that feeling. In practice, it might have gone better. The students split into two groups easily enough, though there was some good-natured
ribbing about how one team had a girl who knew most of the material while the other had a couple of the rowdy boys. I smiled at the students and
made a bit of a joke about it. They seemed to appreciate this willingness to joke.
The actual game, however, could have gone better. With this being the first time I have done this in the teachers shoes, I did not have the rules
firmly down. Flipping a coin to pick the first guess worked well enough. The problem came from switching teams- how much time should I give
them to answer before moving? This was a problem throughout the experience. Just as much of a problem was when a team consistently got the
answers correct, and the point lead became very large. I attempted to balance this by switching to the other team when possible, but the students
noticed how I was inexperienced and tried to play this against me. Mostly in jokes, thankfully, about how I was favoring the other team. I kept a
smile up and joked around with the students just as much, though, making this probably the most fun day the class had in the unit. Certainly there
was a much moreeasy going rapport with the class this time. Ease of jokes and ease of interacting with them was better than it was in any other
lesson.
Day 7: After the success of the review, there is little to say about the Unit Test. After a final review period, the students were given the test to work
on and many of them finished it quickly. There was some struggle on the constructed response, as I did not have time in the unit to go over this in
great detail. However, many of them managed to pass the test in the end. And when they finished the test, they were quiet when given the pretest for
the next unit and the map to study for the next unit. There were no real problems, to be honest.
And I feel, in the end, this was good sign. Despite the struggles of teaching the unit, at the end of the day, the students understood the material and
worked on it well. Most of them passed the test with flying colors.
Compared to the pretest from the previous unit and the test from the previous unit, I could tell they had learned better in this unit. No matter how
much cramming had to be done to get them the material they had needed.
To enforce this plan, I would walk around the room during the lecture and assignments. The understanding with the students was that, if there was
any off-topic talking or actions being taken, I would stop by their desk. Most students did not like the attention they gained and would stop talking. In
the event they did not, I would tap the desk or talk with them quietly to bring them on task. This was not needed often, as the worst misbehavior in
the class was the occasional off-topic discussion and raised voices. Or the misuse of the given technology. Both of these problems were corrected
easily if the students were asked to stop, and often without the need to even ask.
Furthermore, to keep interest in the lesson, I would use guided discussion often. Students would be asked questions at various points in the lectures,
in order to keep attention on the lesson and check understanding. I would work with the class, not just teach at them. The students would be asked to
the front on occasion, to interact with the lesson on a more personal level. This was intended to involve them in their learning, not just have them
focused on grades and homework.
In the event there was a need to enforce a higher discipline level, the strategies went in order:
Proximity, moving to a different seat, moving to a different room, and referral to the office. The goal of this system was to keep the students on task
and in the room as much as possible. This was something the district used, though I would put my own spin on it by only moving if the problem
became too difficult to handle. Instead of a first option, it was a last option. The students appeared to recognize this and they would stop with simple
redirection, more often than not.
Finally, I made an effort to congratulate good behavior and good work. I would praise the students when they behaved, and when they answered
questions correctly. I would not call out names, but if a student did exceptionally well on an assignment, I would congratulate them privately when
handing the paper back.
Furthermore, it can increase interest in the subject while also giving a healthy classroom environment. Any and all questions will be answered, so
long as they are appropriate. Students are encouraged to put their own views into the subject, and discuss it in a neutral environment. Bullying over
opinions- bullying in general -is not allowed in this classroom. Everyone has the right to their own opinion on history, so long as they do not force it
on others. Students are also provided feedback on their work as they do it, and on tests, feedback as soon as they are handed back. Prompt and helpful
feedback motivates a student to work harder, to see if they can improve.
I believe that this system keeps interest in the subject high and focus on the history higher. Students are allowed to interact with both the teacher and
each other, in a safe discussion environment. They are given their feedback as quickly as possible and as helpful as it can be made. This will increase
both engagement and motivation, while showing the students that I care about their future.
D. Student Communication (detailed description of appropriate strategies to encourage student to student communication) (limited to 1 page)
To encourage communication between students, I put a large focus on group discussion and group work. The first involves many discussions on
lecture material, with the students guiding it as much as the instructor. This allows students to feel as if they are in charge of their learning, while also
keeping the discussion from going off track. This encourages discussion as the students feel they can say what they want on the subject, within
reason. I model this in instruction, by sharing opinions and how to discuss them without dismissing them. In addition, I encourage students to discuss
with me as well. This brings them closer to the instruction and lets the students know they can interact freely with their fellow students and the
instructor.
It also helps if the students feel they are being misgraded or that they are being punished unfairly. As they know they can work with the teacher to fix
whatever problem may have risen up, such as the above or missing work.
Based on the pretest results, I knew that a heavier focus would be needed on critical thinking. As such, I planned on
Describe how pre-assessment data
putting more time into these questions than in previous units, to provide the students a knowledge base to work with.
was used to proceed with instruction The remainder of the objectives would be more focused on building a knowledge base using the same techniques as
for all students. previously used in class.
Students with IEPs have the option of taking their tests in the resource room, if they need the extra help. For students
What is the plan to differentiate for with different learning styles, I will vary the lessons between traditional lecture and videos. Furthermore, the review
all learners? will be a more physical game to help body-kinesthetic learners.
F. Formative Assessment
The results of the formative assessment appear to indicate that the students are learning the material. A couple of
students still struggled, however, the majority of the students were able to understand the material. As well as keep
pace with the instruction.
Overall analysis of results.
However, the assessment was primarily a review, so it did not test the students as much as see what information they
had retained.
Discuss the results in reference to Based on the review, the students appear to be learning the objectives. They are showing increased understanding of
the learning objectives. physical geography and of the specific features in Europe.
Are students learning what was They are learning what they need to learn. There is a marked improvement in critical thinking and how to formulate
constructive answers.
intended they learn?
As above, the only major adaptation needed is allowing IEP students to take their tests in the resource room. On a
Discuss any adaptations based on the smaller scale, I will help students who are missing assignments- or many questions on their assignments -by giving
results of formative assessments. them time during study hall to work on these lessons.
G. Summative Assessment
The data of the Unit Test showed a marked increase in student grades. The class average on the test rose to 78%, a
difference of 37% on the scores. The percent gain was 88.8% for the entire class, a large- if not spectacular -increase.
In addition, the median and mode for the entire class were 73%. The single lowest grade on the test was 57%, itself an
increase over the 10% on the pretest. The highest grade was a perfect, 100%, paper. Most of the grades in the class
were above 70%, with a handful in the A range. Between the subgroups, there was a noticeable improvement in
both.
What did the disaggregated data of
the assessment reveal? The girls average was 78%, with a median of 73% and a mode of 71%. This is a percentage increase of 73% over the
pretest.
There was even more improvement from the boy group. Here the average on the Unit Test was 76.2% with a median
of 81%. While the lowest test grade of 57% came from a male student, the overall percentage increase was 124%.
This is a surprising increase from the pretest, compared to the more moderate increase the girls group presented.
The results demonstrated that the objectives were learned, and in some cases, that they were learned well. However,
the fact that the average grade was a C also shows that the students did not learn the objectives entirely. While there
Discuss the results in reference to were large increases- one boy in particular went from a 26% on the pretest to an 80% on the Unit Test -these were not
the learning objectives. as large as they could be. Or as spread out through the entire class as they could be. I encouraged the students to study
and made the review as interesting as possible, so I know I helped them succeed. However, it is equally clear that
more work was needed to learn the objectives- time constraints likely harmed the work.
With the exception of one student who failed the test, the students learned what they needed to learn. It is clear they
Did all students learn what was did not learn it entirely, however, they did pass the test. With more time to study and to teach to the objectives, they
intended they learn? Explain. may have done better.
Provide a copy of pre-assessment document and the corresponding scoring key/rubric in Appendix C.
Provide a copy of one formal formative assessment document and the corresponding scoring key/rubric in Appendix C.
Provide a copy of one informal formative assessment document and the corresponding scoring key/rubric in Appendix C.
Chart/Table/Graph of disaggregated data for the Summative Assessment should be included in Appendix C.
Due to the varied nature of data collected by the teacher candidates, each candidate is asked to create a chart/table/graph that includes data for
the Whole Class, Subgroup, and Focus Students. Title the table/chart/graph and use labels to accurately portray the data.
Discuss at least TWO things to do differently in the future to extend these successes to continue students academic growth.
First, I plan to give the students more time to work on current events during the unit. This is intended to allow them more time to absorb how immigration is such a
major issue in European politics. Understanding current events, most of which are related on some level to the Middle Eastern crisis, will give the students greater
background knowledge and further their growth. As it will increase the ability to research topics, something very useful in more classes than one. Secondly, I plan
to give the students group projects to work on. One of the issues in the Alps work was that it was done individually. I believe that, by giving the students group
work, they will be able to understand the lesson more. Creating presentations of their own will have the students thinking more on the topic, and how to tie it to
their own knowledge base. For example, in the future, I would give the students a project to create a presentation about life in the Alps, to understand the way
people live in that area.
Discuss at least TWO things to do differently in the future to improve students performance.
In the future, I would devote more time to these two objectives. There would be much more focus placed on how rivers have changed migration patterns and how
the Brexit vote has weakened the European Union. I would likely create activities for both of these objectives, based on critical thinking and not just on repeating
lecture notes. Creating connections to the students own lives is also a must, as it would increase motivation to study the material.
Follow Up
Method of Result or Impact on (if
Date Person Contacted Contact Reason for Contact Instruction necessary)
There was little communication between the school and parents. With the advent of PowerSchool, parents are able to keep up on student work online and without
needing to call the school. If they had any questions about grades, the parents could check themselves or ask their children to explain the assignments.
PowerSchool shows all the grades and all the information on missing assignments that the parents may need. A couple of students would come to me and ask about
missing assignments after being prompted by their parents, however, the parents themselves never contacted me directly. Nor did I ever have reason to contact the
parents directly, as the students rarely misbehaved and when they did, it was minor and easily redirected. Not once did a student misbehave badly enough to
require parental contact, or even a referral to the office.
In that regard, there was little need to contact the office either. The only time there was any need to leave the room or contact any officials outside of fellow
teachers was when the projector overheated. In terms of student behavior or lessons, there was no need to contact anyone outside of the classroom.
"Building Demographic Data." Missouri Comprehensive Data System. Accessed November 21,
2017. https://tinyurl.com/yc3skmd5
"District Demographic Data." Missouri Comprehensive Data System. Accessed November 21,
2017. https://tinyurl.com/y8wuj4zo
"Quick Facts; Webb City RVII School District" Missouri Comprehensive Data System.
Accessed November 21, 2017.
https://mcds.dese.mo.gov/quickfacts/SitePages/DistrictInfo.aspx?
ID=__bk8100030043009300130043004300.
Overall Students: 17
Males: 5
Females: 12
African-American: 1
Hispanic: 1
White: 15
Legend
Objectives:.
1. Understanding how physical geography can change a cultures development.
2. Explaining how the Alps were formed and are still developing.
3. Identify where mountains have influenced European culture and religion.
Materials Needed: Notebook and pencil. Textbook. The Alps video guide.
Anticipatory Set:
1. The Alps were formed millions upon millions of years ago.
2. These mountains are still developing to this day, changing and shifting with the times.
3. Of course, the Alps are not the only mountains in Europe. There are several other ranges of note.
4. The Alps create the single largest dividing line in European culture, between North and South.
5. Understanding European physical geography means understanding how the Alps were formed and how
they are still changing.
Objective: Students should be able to follow along with the notes, either on their own or with the guide. While
doing so, students should be able to identify at least two major European mountain ranges. These could be the
Alps, the Scandinavian or the Pyrenees as examples. There should be at least these two, preferably more, named
by the end of the lesson. Students should also be able to explain where these ranges are located. And how they
have influenced European culture and geography. Lastly, the students should be able to explain how these
mountains- specifically the Alps -were formed. And how this influenced the physical geography of the regions
they are located in.
Input: Students are expected to know at least one way mountains can be formed.
Model: To demonstrate this subject, a powerpoint will be provided. This will focus on how the Alps have
developed, along with how it has influenced European history. After the powerpoint, the students will watch a
documentary on the Alps. How the Earth Was Made will give a firm background knowledge base on how the
mountains were formed. As well as how it has changed the geography of Europe around the Alps.
During the video, students will be expected to follow along with the video guide. This will show they are paying
attention and gaining the background knowledge. As well as keeping them focused on the video instead of
sleeping or talking with their neighbors.
Check for Understanding: Students that have understood the lesson will be able to identify the major
European mountains. In addition, they will be able to show which ranges are in which region. In so doing, they
can understand how European physical geography has developed, and how that has changed cultural barriers.
All questions will relate in some way to mountains and their impact on Europe.
Guided Practice: Students will watch the How the Earth Was Made video and discuss with the class when it is
complete.
Closure: There will be a review of the days lesson in the form of a guided discussion.
Independent Practice: Students will have the Alps video guide to work on, in addition to working on their
Country Research Projects.
Objectives:.
4. Understanding how physical geography can change a cultures development.
5. Explaining how European cultures have caused warfare between countries.
6. Identify how language divisions mark cultural divisions.
Materials Needed: Notebook and pencil. Textbook. Europe Map Study Guide.
Anticipatory Set:
6. European civilization descends from the Greeks and Romans.
7. Language is the defining factor in European culture. Germans speak German and French speak
French.
8. Some of these cultures have mixed together with others, taking on parts of both.
9. The largest division in European culture is between Western and Eastern Europe.
10. To understand European history it is very important to understand and identify where the divisions in
culture have caused conflict.
Objective: Students should be able to follow along with the notes, either on their own or with the guide. In
addition, the students should be able to identify major European cultures. Examples can include the French, the
English or the Germans. Furthermore, there should be an understanding of where these cultures are located in
Europe. Students should be able to explain these differences, such as Russia being the major Eastern culture
while French is a major Western culture. Finally, they should understand how these cultures have changed
Europe over the centuries.
Input: It should be expected that students at least know the major European cultures and which language they
correspond to.
Model: To demonstrate this subject, a powerpoint will be provided. This will focus on political borders in
Europe with several maps provided. First, a map of Europe prior to World War One. Then a map of modern
Europe, circa-the early 1990s. These are intended to show how the borders have changed. With the intention of
giving the students and example of how European cultures shape European countries. And how wars can erupt
from the differences in these cultures.
During the review for the Map Test, a short game will be played. A ball will be tossed back in forth between the
instructor and the students, with the students naming a country and identifying it on a blank map when they
catch the ball.
Check for Understanding: Students that have understood the lesson will be able to identify the major
European cultures. Furthermore, they should be able to show how these cultures have created countries around
them. By doing this, the students will be able to understand how Europes borders have changed and use it on
their Map Test. Questions on the subject will focus on studying for that test.
Guided Practice: At the end of class, the Review for the Map Test will consist of throwing around the ball.
This will be done to help aid the students on studying for the test.
Closure: There will be a preview of the next lesson, after the review has been completed.
Independent Practice: Students will be given Guided Practice 13-1 to do as homework. This will give them
something to work on and to help prepare for the Unit Test without being a major project.
Name: ______________
Hour: _______________
Directions: Choose the best answer for each question. (1pt each)
2. The ______ Mountains are generally considered the dividing line between Europe and Asia.
a. Atlas
b. Alps
c. Ural
d. Carpathian
6. The Pyrenees Mountains separate the ____ Peninsula from the rest of Europe.
a. Apennine
b. Iberian
c. Scandinavian
d. Balkan
9. The English Channel is the narrow strip of water that separates southern England from the northern
part of what country?
a. Denmark
b. France
c. Germany
d. Spain
11. The Alps, a mountain system of Central Europe, stretches across most of which of the following
countries?
a. Spain
b. Norway
c. Switzerland
d. Poland
13. What economic and political organization of 27 countries unites most of Europe?
a. the Common Market
b. NATO
c. the Maastricht Treaty
d. the European Union
14. Due to its carefully guarded neutrality, which of the following cities has been selected as headquarters
for a wide array of governmental and nongovernmental organizations, like the United Nations?
a. Paris, France
b. Copenhagen, Denmark
c. Brussels, Belgium
d. Geneva, Switzerland
15. Historically and in modern times, what commercial waterway of Central Europe flows through 10
European countries and empties into the Black Sea?
a. Danube River
b. Rhine River
c. Elbe River
d. Volga River
16. What is the smallest independent state in the world and residence of the spiritual leadership of the
Roman Catholic Church?
a. Rome
b. Vatican
18. Current members of the European Union, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, were under the iron curtain
of what former regional superpower?
a. Soviet Union
b. Holy Roman Empire
c. Nazi Germany
d. Imperial Russia
20. The 21st Century has seen a rise in European immigration rates. The majority of the immigrants to
Europe come from which of the following regions?
a. North Africa and the Middle East
b. North and South America
c. East Asia
d. Sub-saharan Africa
Directions: Choose 2 out of the 5 prompts and compose a constructive response for each.
Be sure to include a topic sentence, 2 supporting details and a concluding sentence. This must be in
paragraph format.
Paragraph Format Paragraph contains all Paragraph contains 2 of Paragraph does not
(Contains topic required elements. the required elements. follow the required
sentence, minimum 2 format. No topic
supporting details, and sentence, no
concluding sentence.) concluding sentence.
Answer Key
1. B
2. C
3. B
4. D
5. A
6. B
7. C
8. A
9. B
10. B
11. C
12. C
13. D
14. D
15. A
16. B
17. A
18. A
19. D
20. A
Formative Assessment:
Pittsburg State University Teacher Work Sample 34
Unit Three Test Review
Instructions: Complete and review for the Test.
Indicator 1:
1. Vocabulary
a. Sirocco-
b. Europe-
c. Ural Mountains-
d. Pyrenes Mountains-
e. English Channel-
f. European Union-
2. The Alps are a mountain chain in Central Europe. Which countries do they stretch through?
3. These two ancient cultures are the source of Western European culture-
a.
b.
7. The Iron Curtain separated Western and Eastern Europe. Which country ruled in the East?
8. Immigration is an issue in Europe today. Where do these immigrants come into Europe from?
C. How has the interaction between humans and the environment affected a region?
k. English Channel-
Body of water dividing England and France.
l. European Union-
Multinational union of 27 European countries
10. The Alps are a mountain chain in Central Europe. Which countries do they stretch through?
Germany, France, Switzerland, Slovenia, Italy, Austria, Liechtenstein
b. The Alps divide which regions of Europe?
Northern and Southern
OR
11. These two ancient cultures are the source of Western European culture-
c. Greek
d. Roman
17. Immigration is an issue in Europe today. Where do these immigrants come into Europe from?
The Middle East and North Africa
Name: ______________
Hour: _______________
Directions: Choose the best answer for each question. (1pt each)
3. The ______ Mountains are generally considered the dividing line between Europe and Asia.
e. Atlas
f. Alps
g. Ural
h. Carpathian
7. The Pyrenees Mountains separate the ____ Peninsula from the rest of Europe.
e. Apennine
f. Iberian
g. Scandinavian
h. Balkan
10. The English Channel is the narrow strip of water that separates southern England from the northern
part of what country?
e. Denmark
f. France
g. Germany
h. Spain
12. The Alps, a mountain system of Central Europe, stretches across most of which of the following
countries?
e. Spain
f. Norway
g. Switzerland
14. What economic and political organization of 27 countries unites most of Europe?
e. the Common Market
f. NATO
g. the Maastricht Treaty
h. the European Union
15. Due to its carefully guarded neutrality, which of the following cities has been selected as headquarters
for a wide array of governmental and nongovernmental organizations, like the United Nations?
e. Paris, France
f. Copenhagen, Denmark
g. Brussels, Belgium
h. Geneva, Switzerland
16. Historically and in modern times, what commercial waterway of Central Europe flows through 10
European countries and empties into the Black Sea?
e. Danube River
f. Rhine River
g. Elbe River
h. Volga River
17. What is the smallest independent state in the world and residence of the spiritual leadership of the
Roman Catholic Church?
e. Rome
f. Vatican
g. Holy Roman Empire
h. Crete
19. Current members of the European Union, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia, were under the iron curtain
of what former regional superpower?
e. Soviet Union
f. Holy Roman Empire
g. Nazi Germany
h. Imperial Russia
Directions: Choose 2 out of the 5 prompts and compose a constructive response for each.
Be sure to include a topic sentence, 2 supporting details and a concluding sentence. This must be in
paragraph format.
Paragraph Format Paragraph contains all Paragraph contains 2 of Paragraph does not
(Contains topic required elements. the required elements. follow the required
sentence, minimum 2 format. No topic
supporting details, and sentence, no
concluding sentence.) concluding sentence.
Answer Key
1. B
2. C
3. B
4. D
5. A
Pittsburg State University Teacher Work Sample 40
6. B
7. C
8. A
9. B
10. B
11. C
12. C
13. D
14. D
15. A
16. B
17. A
18. A
19. D
20. A
All
Boys:
Mean 45 78 33 73%
Median 47 73 26
Mode No Mode 71
Class Scores
Boys Scores
Girls Scores
Pittsburg State University Teacher Work Sample 42
Pittsburg State University Teacher Work Sample 43