Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Thoreau and Banksy - Civil Disobedience
Thoreau and Banksy - Civil Disobedience
Thoreau and Banksy - Civil Disobedience
Students Name
Professors Name
Course
Date
demands, and laws of the either the government or any other international power. Forms of
exercising civil disobedience are often nonviolent or passive means. One of the notable
incidences that civil obedience was witnessed is when the United States reputable figure
Mahatma Gandhi organized a defiant march to protest against the British governments rule in
United States that saw the monopolization of salt (Thoreau 1). Thoreau's Civil Disobedience
ideas regarding civil disobedience insist on the need for the prioritization of humanity over the
dictates of the government and the law. In particular, Thoreau criticizes the American policies,
social institutions, the Mexican versus American war, and slavery (Thoreau 1). It is worth noting
that the main purpose of civil disobedience is to influence different government policies and
Henry Thoreau put it forth so succinctly that the American Civil Rights movement that
was formed by Americans 1960s is a notable example of a course that employed civil
disobedience (Thoreau 1). Through this, Thoreau becomes an icon to be remembered for his art
in protesting. Through the acts of people like Gandhi, we openly see the true definition of being
a triumphant civil disobedience activist. However, Banksys importance in civil disobedience has
been robustly disputed; since he does very little in trying to become an activist through street
Surname 2
artistry. Such prosecuted treatment gave a footstool for the rise of graffiti artists like Banksy
whose desire was to see to it that the commoners attain salvation from the governments
mistreatment. The only thing he lacks is an unwavering conscience to sustain him through the
robust phase of civil disobedience. Despite being pessimistic about the whole idea, Banksys
works can be seen throughout walls where he criticizes government actions in both images and
text. For some substantial time to come, Banksys works are expected to rival political overtones
As an underground artist, Banksy is renown globally for his protesting arts which he
utilizes less effectively in changing a state he considers to be a contentious social climate. The
art he projects on walls across numerous streets can only amuse masses in the form of social
awareness with no other tangible benefits being felt. Due to his ironic fame, the ethical messages
that are left anonymously become overshadowed and this affects his support over particular
potency within the nation. So far, Banksy has done very little to try and alter the state of things;
he only projects the obvious in his art. He ought to emulate the likes of Gandhi and Martin
Luther King Jr. in their struggle of championing civil disobedience in acts if triumphant activism.
In recent years, civil disobedience against the republican candidate in Kansas capitol,
Brownback has been one of the longest acts of civil disobedience. His agenda sought to spend on
education and social services, privatization of the entire Medicaid system, abolition of art
funding, scrapping teachers unions, a move that was expected to engender significant draconian
cuts and torpedo the entire budget. These move evokes the question regarding the state of
democracy in the United States with regard to campaign promises and other agendas that have
often been employed by politicians. The purpose of this paper is to explore United States
Discussion
Even as the United States celebrates the achievements in the separation of powers to
exercise checks and balances, this system has created allowance for some powerful groups to
influence the government; hence, safeguarding their interests. Here, the participation of interest
groups has been dominant. Interest groups are the organization of people having policy goals and
work in the political process in promoting such goal. Examples of such groups are powerful
financial institutions and individualistic groups such as N.K.A and the A.A.R.P (Curray 2). The
interest groups work in lobbying the government by hiring representatives that advocate on
behalf of the interest of the groups. Whereas the interest groups were traditionally considered
pivotal in separating powers, this does not hold any longer. Interest groups now influence
policies in leadership, in many ways, especially ensuring that their self-vested interests are
The House has been considered as a mere approver to the regulations by the executives,
instead of exercising checks and balances. A Substantial amount of power has been delegated to
the executive. Indeed, the eventuality has been the creation of the unlimited prerogatives that are
exercised in the name of people when the real situation is that most decisions are made to protect
the self-vested interests of those in power. Yet, even as United States celebrates achievements in
democracy, it is still undisputable that the president continues to wield a lot executive powers. In
particular, this has been depicted by Obama administration (Curray 3). For instance, Obama has
often been argued to interrupt the white house meeting by introducing an issues that have never
been on the agenda, citing that the administration required the aggressive utilization of executive
The president has been criticized for striving to implement decisions without the approval
from the congress. Some of the policies that Obama has adopted include creation of jobs for the
veterans, preventing the shortage of drugs, raising the standards of fuel economy and preventing
domestic violence. Obama has often emphasized that he bypasses the law makers, asserting that
he would continue implementations by himself even when the congress declines to approve.
Obama has stated that executive actions would limit the possibilities for his election for the
second term. One of the decisions that elicited sharp reaction was to use his recess appointment
powers to install officials that had been objected by the congress (Curray 5). Obama has been
widely criticized over his approaches of concentrating many powers in his presidential office.
Others have contended that the move by Obama to exercise presidential powers in passing
decision is not new in history. It had been used by his predecessors on various occasions, yet it is
legally bound by the constitution. Regardless of these, such a situation negates the reason for
democracy.
Crown it all, United States law and its foreign policies have found itself in conflict with
the international law. For instance, in 2003, in the in the invasion of Iraq, United States was
labeled as a country that was above the international law. The question is whether democracy has
to do with the violation for the international law. The answer is simple, a desirable democracy is
that which is bound by the external and internal laws, creating allowance of the perpetuation of
power not only within its boundaries, but also across within the global contexts, and that includes
leading by example.
disapproved. Occupy Wall Street reveals that the US and the countries it criticizes for lagging in
democracy, such as protest prone Egypt and Syria are not any different. Secondly, even as the
Surname 5
United States celebrates the achievements in the separation of powers to exercise checks and
balances, this system has created allowance for some powerful groups to influence the
government to safeguard self-vested interests at the expense of the powerless majority. House of
supports the executive. Even worse, the president wields a lot power in the executive processes.
Lastly, what is the position of liberal, democratic America if its foreign policies do not reflect
Several authors have supported this finding. For instance, the United States elections are
always never fair. They are marred with incidences of political corruption involving suppression
of civil right activists to support and protect the interest of the government and other elite
members in government. The author notes that elections have been unable to address issues of
civil disobedience through elections as powerful politicians would recruit a few individuals to
bribe voters to lure them to support them. The operations are always networked operations that
The elite groups successfully achieve their political goals by muting the opponents.
Ideally, this group of people owns the media and it is able to gate-keep, and censor the voices of
the opponents so that the audience does not hear them. In doing so, they are able to use the same
media to their advantage by popularizing their ambitions to the public (Ross 12). The manifestos
the parties provide rarely represents the will of the people instead, it results from concessions
of the elite groups in United States and beyond the borders, the special interest groups.
Therefore, by virtue of this position, they are able to influence the developments in governance
It also happens that the powerful employee different tactics to whitewash the voters to support
them in protecting their vested interested. The powerful elite groups who have access to
resources are able to manipulate the media and spread negative propaganda against certain, less
Conclusion
In conclusion, this research paper sought to inquire why it is still difficult to get rid of the
caste system in democratic republics such as United States. Many elections, however transparent,
have often served to fortify and serve the interests of a few, powerful classes of people at the
expense of the majority. While the literature relevant to the subject existed, it did not adequately
answer the subject question. Nevertheless, it brought into light various themes that are crucial in
extending the discussions and helping conceptualize the challenge of democratic systems. The
relevant literature notably touched on the areas such as the nature democracy and challenges, and
the accounts of the challenge. In the end, literature presented some significant theoretical and
empirical discussions that happen to be critical in unearthing the gap in knowledge and providing
Works Cited
http://www.sparknotes.com/philosophy/civildisobedience/section2.rhtml
Curray, Marin. How Can Power Be Limited By The Constitution? 2012. Web. December 1, 2017.
<http:// www.ourcivilisation.com/cooray/btof/chap174.htm>
Ross, Dorothy. The Origin of American Social Sciences and Exceptionalism. Cambridge