Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Edu 210 Artifact 6
Edu 210 Artifact 6
Edu 210 Artifact 6
Artifact #6
Religion and Public Schools
Angel Gutierrez
College of Southern Nevada
25th of April 2015
ARTIFACT #6 Religion and Public Schools
Jehovahs Witnesses and decided she would not be able to participate in some projects
because they were religious in nature. Some of the things she would not participate in
anymore were decorating the classroom for the holidays, singing happy birthday and
even reciting the pledge of allegiance. Due to a parent protest and the school principle
Bill Ward, there was a recommendation for a dismissal of Karen White. They argued that
Karen White could no longer meet the needs of her students. The question to be asked
here is if Karen Whites dismissal was logical and justified? In the next few paragraphs I
will talk about what I believe will be the ruling made by the court.
In favor of Karen White, she could say that she has the right to worship as she
chooses under the free exercise clause of the First Amendment. Karen White could say
that being dismissed due to her religious exercises goes against her right to free exercise
of religion. In the court case of Wisconsin V. Yoder, the Supreme Court came to the
conclusion that enforcing a law against Amish children after the completion of eighth
grade went against their free exercise of religious rights. As noted in School Law for
teachers, The supreme Court said the state could not interfere with the free exercise of
religion unless it could show a compelling state interest in doing so. (Pg. 211).
The following will be used against Karen White. The school principle and parents
may argue that Karen White removing all of the holidays and pledge of allegiance
violates the Establishment Clause. They may argue that Karen White is involving the
students in her religious exercise because she does not celebrate holidays she is now
enforcing her religion in the classroom. As noted on page 210, The First Amendment
ARTIFACT #6 Religion and Public Schools
Establishment and Free Exercise clauses could mean anything from simply that the
public official or public school employee can make any reference to religion. Due to the
fact that she now became a Jehovah witness she made changes to her classroom to fit her
One more argument in favor of Karen White is the fact that Karen could
state that she was following the Establishment clause which ensures that the government
does not use coercion to support participation in exercises that may be religious in nature.
In the case of Lee V. Weisman the Supreme Court ruled that a prayer that was school
sponsored for graduation went against the Establishment Clause. The court stated that
Establishment Clause. (pg. 213). Karen White could say that due to the pledge of
allegiance stating the phrase, under God this phrase can be assumed to be in violation
Now to answer the question of whether the decision to have Karen White
dismissed was logical or not, I would have to assume that the dismissal of Karen White
was not logical at all. I do believe that Karen White should not have changed the
classroom setting due to her own religious practice. Karen White however, shouldnt be
dismissed because she did follow the Establishment Clause which limits the government
from encouraging participation in religious exercises. Some holidays and the pledge of
allegiance both include religious aspects so Karen White decided to pull these out of the
ARTIFACT #6 Religion and Public Schools
classroom could be seen as Karen ensuring that she is not encouraging religious
activities. This case was a very hard one to decide on because it is a very controversial
topic. In the end I do believe that Karen should not have been dismissed.
ARTIFACT #6 Religion and Public Schools
References
Underwood, J. & Webb, L. (2006). Teachers rights. In School Law for Teachers. Upper Saddle