Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Text Final Revision
Project Text Final Revision
Brandon Thai
Professor Beadle
3 November 2017
A Monster Forever
Over time humans have changed but history will always remain the same much like
Godzillas purpose. The films Godzilla (1954) directed by Ishiro Honda and Shin Godzilla
(2016) directed by Hideaki Anno and Shinji Higuchi have shown to be similar in many ways but
also different in others. Shin Godzilla offers a unique perspective, an evolving monster with new
and powerful abilities, and a worldwide effort to help. Whereas the original 1954 version of
Godzilla is from the viewpoint of Japanese citizens, has a fully functioning monster throughout
and focuses on Japanese aid to stop Godzilla. Despite these differences both movies include a
radioactive monster that tears through Japan, created from nuclear tests.
The changes that Godzilla has gone through is to create a more fearful monster to account
for technological progression. As humans advance so must the monsters that they fear.
Differences in viewpoints also show how the time and what the audience wants effects the
directors choices. The advance from Godzilla to Shin Godzilla are definitely apparent, however,
these adjustments are simply to modernize the film and give new perspective. The monster has
changed but the purpose and core structure of Godzilla remains the same.
Thai 2
Times have changed and so has Godzillas place in the movie industry. There are many
changes that had to be made to make the creature fit into modern era. In Shin Godzilla when
Godzilla is first revealed it is a baby with limited abilities crawling its way through the city,
Godzilla then rises on its two legs and develops a large and powerful tail, along with deadly
lasers coming out of its back and mouth. In the beginning, when it emerged Godzilla was already
causing massive amounts of destruction, having it evolve shows just how much uncertainty and
lack of control humans have. The levity is a welcome addition as Gojira here, or God
Incarnate, is even more terrifying than his progenitor (Carlsbad). The irony of life is that as
time progresses and people become stronger, so must their monsters. This shows that evolution is
a part of life and is not necessarily a change, rather it is developing what is already there.
Godzilla did not change, it simply got stronger to coincide more with the audience. Monsters
such as Godzilla will never truly change, but will grow in strength as the people do.
The perspective of the film is seen through the eyes of the Japanese government, focusing
on their efforts to combat the creature and the lengths they go to do so. They face many
roadblocks along the way such as the evolving monster and American intervention at times of
distress. The Japanese are often at shock with nowhere to go. The government sits by and
watches, mostly helpless. (Aguilar). Shin Godzilla shows how many resources the government
has opposed to those of the Japanese citizens. Shin Godzilla also shows the Japanese reaching
out to other countries for help, such as the United States, and France. Without foreign aid
stopping Godzilla would be near impossible. At this point in the film Japan is at a crossroad
about what to do to save their country. Japanese and international laws take a much more
important role than human emotions as the government tries to figure out what to do (Espinosa).
The international laws play a much larger role in this film than the others by acting as a
Thai 3
countdown for the country if they cannot figure anything out to defeat Godzilla. In the end, the
Japanese government puts the best the country has to offer up to the task of defeating the
monster by any means possible. The movies reference the same issues but end up taking different
sides of the argument. The acceptance of foreign aid is a slight change, but in the end, it can be
seen to play a minor part in the outcome of the film. Much like the first film it is the Japanese
The 1954 Godzilla film had a major significance at the time it was made. The film was
something that many of the Japanese related to at the time therefore cementing its place in
history. Godzilla in this film is not seen to evolve. It starts the way it ends, a 50-meter-tall
monster that can breathe fire and destroy everything in its path. At the time the atomic bomb was
dropped there was no warning, just widespread destruction in an instant. The perspective of this
movie is seen through the eyes of the Japanese Citizens and reflects their experience during the
aftermath of World War II. Focusing mainly on Emiko, Ogata, and Dr. Serizawa, these main
characters work to find a solution to the monster rampaging through the city as they themselves
come up with the plan to destroy the monster with an Oxygen Bomb. This Godzilla film was
created at a tough time for the Japanese, therefore they do not ask for foreign aid in their fight
against the monster and take it on all by themselves, with the resources that they have. The cause
of the monster in the film is due to the nuclear tests of the United States. Godzilla was created to
appease the Japanese citizens after all the terrible things they went through. The first Godzilla
film is a representation of how the Japanese felt in the few years after the bomb was dropped,
whereas Shin Godzilla was made for more recent events. In March of 2011 the earthquake and
tsunami in Fukushima impacted Japan by striking fear into the hearts of the hundreds of
thousands of civilians. Godzillas nuclear radiation and destruction of buildings draw strong
Thai 4
parallels to these incidents. Due to these catastrophic events that devastated the Eastern coast of
Japan a new influence for Godzilla was born. Both versions of Godzilla represent and
There are differences between the two films, however, there are also numerous
similarities that the films share. Both films revolve around a nation coming together to combat a
giant monster whose only goal is to destroy and kill. Godzilla in both films shows the destruction
that the Japanese had to endure during World War II. Even after all the terror and destruction
caused by Godzilla Japan the monster does not have any dialogue but is rather a symbol for the
nuclear bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The monsters lack of speech demonstrates
its purpose, destruction and fear, much like those of the nuclear bombs. Godzilla has had many
adaptations but they all show its symbolism and importance in history. Some do a better job at
focusing on these than others. Both films depict the monster to give off countless amounts of
Although Godzilla has evolved from one film to another its symbolism remains the
same. Shin Godzilla and Godzilla defeat the monster using science, whether it be by oxygen
bomb, or freezing. The films both show that the brightest minds can always find a solution to
even the biggest problems. Even if we defeat this monster however a new threat will just be
around the corner. Sophia Espinosa of Brookhaven college states In the end, the threat of
Godzilla is still present. Man must learn to live with, and evolve with, the monster or succumb to
its immense power (Espinosa). In Shin Godzilla, the monster is frozen in the middle of the city
as a remembrance of what happened to the country, which is destruction at the hands of the giant
monster, Godzilla. Espinosa reminds the audience that though Japan defeated the monster, the
fight for humanity is not over and they must remember what happened to prepare for the future
Thai 5
for the inevitable return of the monster. The destruction of Godzilla in the first film shows that
the director did not think into the future of the monster. Shin Godzilla gives more uncertainty as
to what will happen in the future, making the monster into a memorial of what happened. Despite
the differences in the fate of the monster both films manage to convince the audience that the
Critics of the film Shin Godzilla may say that the movie is completely different from the
1954 version. They state that Godzilla received a new meaning alluding from the events of
Fukushima in 2011. This new meaning is that the monster from Shin Godzilla focuses more on
the government and political aspects rather than its original meaning of atomic fear. It has also
been argued that the Shin Godzilla is just another sequel in a long line of films that stray from the
original source material. Though these critics do provide a valid argument, the new film still
alludes back to where it all started. Both of these films allude to the fact that the monsters
creation was due to the irresponsibility of the people. Whether it be from dumping waste into the
ocean or nuclear tests, the influence of the monster may have changed, but the meaning is still
the same. Nuclear radiation is and will always will be the underlying meaning of Godzilla. These
changes between films are subtle artistic choices that do not affect the overall connotation of the
movies. The director may change from one movie to the next, but Godzilla will always have its
Wherever Godzilla resides there will be havoc and chaos, and its roots and historical
significance will never change. Directors can adapt the monster any way that they want but in the
end the meaning behind the monster Gojira will always have its ties to Japan. Godzilla through
the years has shown that even if things change, the meaning of something can still say the same.
Shin Godzilla and Godzilla are both great films in their own respect and each bring something
Thai 6
different to the table. The movies have differences in the monsters strengths and its appearance,
the perspective from which the fight is fought from, and its acceptance of foreign aid. But they
are similar in Godzillas purpose, its symbolism, and the use of science to prevail. To stay
relevant, it is important to change things up, but you dont always have to revise everything to
Works Cited
Espinosa, Shin Godzilla propels Gojira into the 21st century. (2017, August 20). University