: 1:

( )

\
%

1:

2009


: :

( )

2009


026000321814

, **

. *

. / .


....................................................................................................................6

Abstract....................................................................................................................... 7

1.

1.1. .............................................................................................................. 9

1.2. ........................................................................................... 11

1.2.1 ........................................ 12

1.2.2 ......................................................... 12

1.2.3 ................................................................. 13

1.3 ................................................................................................ 15

1.4 .................................................................................... 18

1.4.1 ............................... 21

1.5. ............................ 23

1.6. ...................................26

1.6.1

...................................................................................................................28

1.6.2

...................................................................................................................29

1.6.3

...................................................................................................................30

1.7. $ ........................................... 31

3
 2

2.1 ...............................................................................................................40

2.2 .......................................................... 43

23 ....................................44

2.4 ...............................................................46

2.5 ...................................................................................... 49

2.5.1 Boder................................................................................50

2.5.2 Bakker............................................................................. 50

2.5.3 .............................51

2.6 ......................................................................51

2.7 ...........................................53

3.1. ............................................................................. 55

3.1.1 .................................................................55

3.1.2 - ........................................ 57

3.2. .......................................... 58

33 . ..................................................................................60

3.4 -

............................................................................................63

4
 :

1.

1.1. ............................................................................................................. 79

1.2. ...............................................................................................80

2.

2.1. .................................................................................................81

2.2. .............................................................. 81

2.3. ..........................................................................................82

2.4. ...............................................................................................83

2.5. ...........................................................................................................83

3.

3.1. .....................................................................................................91

3.2. - ................................................................................. 101

3.3. .................................................................................. 109

........................................................................................110

5
 1

.. ., 15 ,

(,. , ).

, .

, .

, .

6
Abstract

A case study to investigate the effect of an intervention targeting the reading

difficulties of a student with dyslexia

Reading is the individuals ability to recognize the written symbols, to convert

these into words and to simultaneously comprehend the meaning of the notions that

are expressed. Mastering reading skills is one of the main challenges faced by

children with learning disabilities. The majority of these children have reading

difficulties.

This case study investigated the learning difficulties of a child diagnosed with

Dyslexia. X is fifteen years of age and is attending the second year of High school.

The aim of the educational intervention was to improve the students reading ability.

In order for this goal to be achieved, an intervention was designed which included

elements that concern all aspects of reading (fluency, accuracy, comprehension).

Thirty sessions were realized with the following objectives:

Firstly, to strengthen the students reading speed and to help him gain reading

fluency.

Secondly, to increase the students decoding accuracy.

Thirdly, to improve the students reading comprehension.

The results of the research showed that the objectives were achieved and that by

improving his reading fluency, the student also improved his reading accuracy as well

as his reading comprehension.

8
 1

1.1

- ,

9
 .

, .

. ,

, .

I S

10
 1.2

. .

(develop stage models) Marsh,

Friedman, Welch & Desberg (1981) Uta Frith (1985),

(dual foundation model)

Philip Seymour (1997)

(connectionist) Siedenberg & McClelland (1989).

1.2.1.

. ,

. ,

. ,

&
. ,

(.. ).

11
 Pityel.

(. 2002).

to

. '

. ,

, ,

1.2.2. (>

, Philip Seymour,

(, 2002). , ,

\ ,

. ,

12


, , ,

(, 2002). 0:

( 1)

, .

Seymour

. ( , 2002 ).

( 2 ).

( , 2002 ).

13


1.2.3.

(connectionist),

Seidenberg McClelland (1989).

(Snowling, 2000).

1: (Seidenberg McClelland, 1989)

. ,
t

14


1.3

, ,

. ,

. .

. ,

(, 2002).

15
 ,

(, 2002).

. Ehri (2000)

Seymour (2003),

12 .

(- ).

, :

1: ( Seymour, Aro & Erskine, 2003)

16
 . ,

(, 2002).

(, 2002)

(Katzir, Kim, Wolf, Kennedy, Lovet & Morris, 2006).

, 2002).

(, 2005).

17
 1.4

. ,

(Nation & Angell, 2003).

, 2002 Hoover & Gough, 1990,

Tunmer & Hoover, (1986),

= x

18


(Vellutino, 2003).

, ,

, .

- , ,

- (Vellutino, 2003).

, ,

, .

, ,

, ,

(, 2002). ,

19


. (2002)

(Oakhill,

1993). ,

. ,

, , ,

. ,

(, 2002).

>

(, 2000).

20
 1.4.1 .

: ;, ;, ;, ;.

. ,

21


, ,

. :

;,

, .

(Kintsch, 1988),

(surface code), (text

base) (situation model).

, .

22
1.5.

, (, 2002, .217).

. (, 2002).

23
>

, . .

.. //-//-// //-//-//.

//-// (

) //-// .

//-//

//-// .

24
) .

// //-//

// //-//-//.

//

//-//-//.

//-//-/ /

//,

//-//-// //.

25
 )

//

// //,

//

//

//.

. //

// //

//.

(, 2002).

26
1.6

, ,

( ) .

, , ,

(, 2003). ,

(, 2000).

(, 2003). ,

(, 2002).

27


(, 2003).

. ,

(, 2002).

1.6.1

(, 2002).

(, 2003).

, ,

: ,

28
 -

(Backman .., 1984). ,

(Pace & Golinoff, 1976; Shankweiler & Liberman, 1972). ,

(Jom .., 1984)., ,

(Morais .., 1987).

(1991) (2003)

1.6.2

Morais et al.

(1979) .

Morais (1979)

. , 30

30 , .

29


(, 2002). ,

(, 1998).

1.6.3

(, 1998).

. ,

(, 2002).

30
1.7.

1:

(, 2000, 2007).

. ,

, '*

31


(, 2002).

. , ,

(, 2002).

(miscue analysis).

K.Goodman (1969)

.. Goodman

"miscue", "" ""

. , ,

" " (Goodman, 1969, . 123).

. , ,

^ .

32
 .

, ,

Goodman ,

/,

9
%
.

. , , ,

, ,

. Goodman

(Goodman, Watson, Burke, 2005).

33
 Goodman, Watson Burke (2005)

..

. ,

.
.
%

U t

. , ,

(Goodman, Watson, Burke,

2005).

(.. ,

).

34
 2 :

, ,

.
/ /

/ /

/ /

. ,

(, 2000).

^ . ,

3):

35
 3:

, .

, .

, .


, .

. , ,

.

%

(Brown, Goodman, & Marek, 1996).

Goodman

, ,

(Goodman, 1973, . 93).

Goodman -

(^transactional, socio- psycholinguistic theoiy).

38
 ,

. ,

/ , ,

. , ,

[
(Goodman, Watson,

Burke, 2005).
,

ft

it

39
 2

2.1

, ,

, ,

(,1999).

Samuel Kirk 1962

(, 2000).

Kirk (1969) :

, , ,

40
 , , .

, ,

, , .

, ,

(, 2001).

(2003) ,

, ... (
*
) ,

(National Joint Committee for Learning

Disabilities) ..., 1988. :

, , , ,

' .

, , ,

, .

( ,

, )

41
),

, , , , ,

, ,

, .

. , ,

( -, 2005).

42


-. , ,

( -, 2005).

2.2.

(, 1998).

( 1960-1970)

(, 2000).

1970

. , ,

, ,

, (.2003).
>

43


(Wagner & Torgesen, 1987; Vcllutino, 1991; Wagner, Torgesen &

Rasholtc. 1994). To

" "

, ,

, (phonemes).

(grapheme), .

2.3.

. 4-10%

, ,

44


, .

.. . 15%

...

(, 1999).

. 3.5:1 .

, Geschwind & Behan (1982),

(, 1998).

45
2.4.

19

. ,

(, 1992).

, ,

, .

46


( , .,)

(, 1997).

.
*
1968

( Critchey, 1970, . II),

(1998)

, ,

, .

(1997) tfcta :

47
 {(

, ,

. ,

. ,

(Jacobson, 1997, .33).

(, )

(, 1998). ,

, ,

.
*
, 1999

, .

48
2.5.

(, 1998).

2.5.1. Boder

(Dysphonetic dyslexia)

-.

(Dyseidetic dyslexia)

(Mixed dyslexia)

- .

49
 OQbo^o e>\^j

2.5.2. Bakker

Bakker

. Bakker :


- L- .

- (Perceptual-type)

(, 1998).

.
*
%

L-

, L-

. '

<*

50
2.5.3 "

(1998), Castles & Coltheart (1983) Manis

et al. (1993)

I.

II.

2.6.

. , ,

51


, -

(, 2002).

(, 1999).

Stothard (1992),

( ) .

, .

. (, 1999).

, .. .

52


(, 2002).

2.7.

(, 1998). , ,

. ,

. ,

. ,

(, 2008).

, , ,

53
...

(-, 2005).

1.

, -

, ,

2.

, , .

3.

(..

, ,

... ).

4.

(-, 2005).

...

( ,

). .... ,

(-, 2005).

54
 3

3.1.

(, 2005).0

: ' -^} ,

(Gough, Ehri & Treiman,

1992).

3.1.1

1932

O.Decroly

< .

, ,

55
 .

(, 2002).

Goodman &

Smith

. ,

, ,

(, 2002).

(Gough, Ehri & Treiman, 1992). ,

(,

2000). (2002),

56
3.1.2. -

19 Otto Kramer Lehmensick Kat

, (balanced

literacy),

. ,

'*
(, 2000).

57
3.2.

, ,

, ,

. ,

. ,

, .

, .

(, 2000).

58


.,

, ,

(, 2000).

, ,

59
3.3.

axttyxtucn). . , ' .

\* *

\* |

. ' , ,

, *.

.. , *

**

(, 2002).

, Bradley & Bryant (1985)

Lundbcrg .. (1988) .

Bradley & Bryant (1985)

'.

,
.VN
, , ' .

60
 .

, ,

. ,

(, 2002).

Bradley & Bryant

: ,

, ,

(, 2002).

' . Lundberg

..

. 8 400 , 6 ,

. ,

61
 ,

Lundberg ..

: ,

, ,

. ,

. ,

. ,

, .

3.4. -

,
t

6 2
. ,

, ,

(, 2003). ,

(, 2003).

(,

1999).

, ,

(, 2003).

63


. ,

, ,

(, 1999).

, ,

, ,

(, 1999).

64
 .

(1999)

(..

: /, / ...)

. , ,

(, 1999).

, ,

, , ,

(.. -, -, -).

(Snowling, 1987).

, , ,

, ,

65


(, 1999).

(2000).

Montessori.

, .

,
*
,

, .

'

, **

, ,

(Montessori, 1980).

, .

, ,

66


(, 2000).

, . ,

. Montessori ,

. ,

, (, 2000).

Montessori

(, 2000).

Fernald. Grace Femald

, ,

(Roberts, 1989). Fernald

, ,

67
 . Fcmald

(Chnll. 3), ,

(,

2000).

Fcmald

, ,

, ,

, .

(,

2000).

68
 H Fcmald

- (, 2000).

Orton-Gillingham

() (),

, .

,

. ,

: .

, . ,

, . ,

(, 2000).

- .

Kat .

, ,

69


- .

. , .

, .

, .

, .

(, 2000).

(DISTAR: Direct Instruction Systems for Teaching)

Carl Bereiter Siegfried Engelmann 1964.

- .

70
 .

, .

- .

, .

71
 DISTAR ,

(,

2000 ).

(Reading Success) Lovitt

Hansen 1976.

, ,

(.. , , ).

. ,

(, 2000).

72


(Reading Recovery).

( & , 2001). ,

. Clay,

( & , 2001).

, ,

12-15 .

. ,

. ,

73
 ,

( & , 2001).

(Banegji, 1987).

(Restle, 1962).

: ) , )

, ) , ) , )

(, 2000).

. ,

74
 ,

(, 2000).

. , ,

(,

2000).

...,

. ( )

( )

(.. , , ),

, ,

75
>

, (Brown &

Palinscar, 1989).

, . ,

(, 2000).

, ,

. , ,

, (, 2003).

76


77
 1

1.1.

, ,

, , -.

. -

(-, 2001).

, ,

. , ,

(Reading Recovery).


1.2.

, *

* ft

79
 2

2.1.

2.2.

., 15 ,

. ,

. ,

. .

mo .

80
 ...

, . ,

, ,

. ,

. ,

2.3.

(...):

(..):

(..):

. (-

). *

81
2.4.

(1992)

- .

: 30

15 15

. ,

. 200-250

62 63 ,,

: Goodman Miscue analysis

Reading Miscue Inventory (2005)

82
2.5.

..

( ,. , ). ,

2007-2008.

. ... ..

.. 2007

, .

. ,

, , ,

. , , ,

. 2008

, . ,

^ .

83


. ,

Goodman

. , , :

( )

- , .

, ,

^, .

84
 ,

, .

. , ,

..

, , ,

85
 (1992) - .

. (,

...) (, ...).

(, , , ...).

(, ...),

(,

, ...). .

, , I, , , , ,

... ,

, , , ...

, , ...

. , ---,

. , ,

- () ,

(, 1992).

, .

. ,

86
 . ,

. , , ,

..

, , ,

(1992)

15

15 . ,

200- 250 .

(2000).

: 1. 2.

87
 .

: ?, ? ? ?, ?,

?, ?

. ,

, ,

, (2000)

. ,

88


. ,

. ,

, Goodman,

. ,

. ,

. ,

. ,

89
 3

3.1.

.., ,

. ,

..

. ,

90
 3.1: ..

253 169 84 33%

264 175 89 34%

33%

34%

3.2: .*

249 182 67 27%

255 183 72 28%

' ,

27% 28% .

91
 3.3: .

254 206 48 18%

252 210 42 17%

'

.. 18%

17% .

3.4: .

266 244 22 8%

268 242 26 9%

92


8% 9% .

( 3.1)

1 2 3 4

-------------------------- # --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3.1.:

93
 ( 3.3)

1 2 3 4

3.2.x

94
 3.5: .

A 1 .3 0 1 .0 2 28

1 .4 1 1 .1 7 24

1 .3 6 1 .0 4 32

1 .5 8 1 .2 3 35

1 .1 8 59 19

1 .3 2 1 :1 5 17

1 .2 4 - 1 .0 8 16

1 .2 1 1 :0 1 20

1 1 .1 8 56 22

1 .2 9 5 9 .7 32

1 .4 0 1 :1 3 27

1 .1 8 19
59

1 .3 4 26
1 :0 8

=
1 .4 1 1 .2 6 15

0 ^ 1 .5 7 1 .2 2 35

1 .1 5 58 17

95
 3.6: .

4 1 3 25%

4 1 3 25%

..

25% .

3.7: . '

4 2 2 50%

4 2 2 50%

'

^ , ..

50% .

96
 3.8: .

4 4 0 100%

4 3 1 75%

'

.. 100%

75% .

3.9: .

4 4 0 100%

4 4 0 100%

..

100%.

97
 3 .3 ,

*>

1 2 3 4

3.3.

98
 3 .4 ,

1 2 3 4

3 .4

99
 3.2. -

..

..

Oakhill & Yuill (1991),

(Gough & Tunmer, 1986).

(Perfetti, 1986; Stanovich, 1981).

100


(Katzir, Kim, Wolf, Kennedy, Lovet & Morris, 2006).

(Wimmer, Mayringer & Landerl, 2000).

..

. ,

, ,

, (, 1999).

, (1999)

(Breznitz, 1987a, 1987b, 1988, 1990a, 1990b),

. , (

101


( ),

(Breznitz & Share, 1990).

, ,

(Lesgold, 1983).

()

(Seymour & Porpodas, 1980). Moseley

(1990),

, ,

(,

1999).

, ,

(,1992).

(1992), ,

102
 .

. ,

.. 33%

34%

8% 9% , .

(/)

. ,

(Torgensen, 2002).

103
 ,

. ..

25%

100%.

(Hoover & Gough, 1990;

Shankweiller et al., 1999; ; 2002).

(, 2002, , 1992).

(2000) ,

(Adams & Bruck, 1993; Castles & Colheart, 1993; Manis,

Custodio & Szeszulski, 1993; Rack, Snowling & Olson, 1992; Snowling, Hulme,

Smith & Thomas, 1994; Stanovich & Siegel, 1994; Vellutino & Scanlon, 1987).

(Connors & Olson, 1990; Perfetti,1985).

104


(, 2000).

(Adams &

Bruck, 1993; Foorman, Francis, Fletcher, Schatschneider & Menta, 1998; Torgensen,

Wagner & Rashotte, 1997; Vellutino, Scanlon, Sipay, Small, Pratt, Chen & Denckla,

1996) (Beminger & Abbot, 1996;

Perfetti, Bell & Delaney, 1988).

(Mercer & Mercer, 1993).

, .

(, 2000).

105
 (2000)

(Pressley, Johnson, Symons, McGoldrick & Kurita, 1989)

. ,

, .

. , .

. ,

106


. ,

..

, , .

ft
 3.3.

. ,

, ,

( Hawthorne).

ft

108
 %

, . (2001).// . ,

, .., (2000). .

, 17(5): 506-517 ^

. (1998). : , .

., (1992).

. : .

, . (2008). . (

). . Gutenberg

. & . (2003). . , '

, . :

I. (2003).

, 2003, 8, . 113-127.

A. . (1997) : . :

, . & , . (1990). .

- . 5, ,

, 3010-3014

109
-, A. (2005). .

. ,

, . & , . (1991). .

. ,

, . (2000). . .

, . & , . (2007). .

. ,

- , . (2000). . ,

- , ., & , . (2004).

. , .

, I (1993). . 1, .

, . (2003). .

. \

, . (2002). .

, .(1992). .

( ).

, .(2003). ( ). .

, . (2001).-. .

, . (1993). (

).

, . (199^). . .

Gutenberg, .

110
, . (1985). .

, (1992). . ,

Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read. Thinking and learning about print.

Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Badian, N. (1994). Do dyslexic and other poor reader differ in reading- related

cognitive skills? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6: 45-63

Bast, J. & Reitsma, P. (1998). Analysing the development o f individual differences in

terms o f Mathew effects in reading: Results from a Dutch longitudinal study.

Developmental Psychology, 34(6), 1373-1399

Cain, K. (2007). Syntactic awareness and reading ability: is there any evidence fo r a

special ability? Applied psycholinguistics, 28,679- 694

Carroll, Snowling & Hulme (2003/ The Development o f Phonological Awareness in

Preschool Children. Developmental Psychology, 5. 913-923

Chard, D.J. & Shirley, V. (1999). Phonological awareness: Instructional and

Assessment guidelines.

Ehri (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides o f a coin. Topics in

Language Disorders, 20 (3), 19-49

Frith (1985). Beneath the Surface o f Developmental Dyslexia. In K. Patterson, J.C.

Marsall & M. Coltheart (eds.) Syrface Dyslexia: Neuropsychological and

Cognitive Studies o f Phonological Reading London: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates

111
Goodman Y. M., Watson D. J., & Burke C. L. (2005). Reading Miscue Inventory.

From Evaluation to Instruction. New York

Gonzalez, J. & Gonzalez, M. (1994). Phonological Awareness in Learning Literacy.

Intellectica, 18, 155-181

Goswami, U. (2002). In the beginning was the rhyme? A reflection on Hulme,

Hatcher, Nation, Adams, and Stuart

Gough, Ehri & Treiman (1992). Reading acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

Goyen, J. (1992). Diagnosis o f Reading Problems: is there a case? Education

Psychology, 12 225-237

Gustafson & Samuelsson (1999/ Intelligence and dyslexia: Implications fo r diagnosis

and intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 40, 127-134

Hoien, Lundberg, Keith, Stanovich & Bjeelid (1995). Components o f phonological

awareness. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 7, 171-188

Hoover & Gough (1990). The simple view o f reading. Reading and Writing: An

Interdisciplinary Journal. 2: 127-160

Lyon, G.R., Fletcher, J.M. & Barnes, M.C. (2002). Learning Disabilities. Handbook

of Behavioural Disorders, Guilford, 2-93

Miersa, Katzir, Wolf & Poldrack, (2004). Neural Systems o f Rapid Automatized

Naming in Skilled Readers: Unraveling the RAN - Reading Relationship.

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 8 (3): 241-256

Oakhill, J.V. (1993). Childrens Difficulties in Reading Comprehension. Educational

Psychology Review, Vol.5, No. 3

Oakhill, J.V., Cain, K. & Bryant, P.E. (2003). The dissociation o f word reading and

text comprehetision: Evidence from component skills. Language and cognitive

processes: 18 (4) 443-468

112
Pumfrey, P. & Elliot C. (1990). Children's difficulty in reading, spelling and writing.

The Falmer Press

Seymour, P. . K., Aro, M. & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition

in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174

Seymour, P. . K. & Evans, H.M. (1994). Levels o f Phonological Awareness and

learning to read. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6:221-250

Seymour, P. . K (2001/ Longitudinal study o f foundation literacy. Working Paper

presented to the partners of the European project Foundation Literacy.

University of Dundee, Great Britain.

Shankweiler et al. (1999). Comprehension and Decoding: Patterns o f Association in

Children With Reading Difficulties. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 3(1), 69-

94

Siegel (1989). IQ is irrelevant to the definition o f learning disabilities. Journal of

Learning Disabilities

Silver, A.A, & Hagin, R.A. (1990) Disorders o f learning in childhood. New York,

John Wiley

Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia. Blackwell Publisher

Stanovich, K.E., (1985). Explaining the variance in reading ability in terms o f

psychological processes: what have we learned? 67-96

Treiman, R. (1991). Learning to read. Erlbaum Associates, 152-153

Velluntino, F.R., Fletcher M.J., Snowling J.M. & Scalon D.M. (2004). Specific

reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?

Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 45,1 2-40

113
Velluntino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M. & Lyon, G.R. (2000). Differentiating between

difficult-to- Remediate and Reading Remediated Poor Readers. Journal of

Learning Disabilities, 33,223-238

Velluntino, F.R., Scalon, D.M. & Tanzman, M. (1998). The case o f early intervention

in diagnosing reading disability. Journal of School Psychology, 36, 367-397.

Velluntino, F.R (2001). Further analysis o f the relationship between reading

achievement and intelligence. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(4), 306-310

Vukolic, R.K. & Siegel, L.S. (2006). The double-deficit Hypothesis: A

Comprehensive Analysis o f the Evidence. Journal of learning disabilities.!, 25-47

Wagner, R.K. & Torgesen, J.K.(1987). The nature of phonological processing and its

casual role in the acquisition of reading skills. Psychological Bulletine, 101, 192-

212.

Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K. & Rashotte, C.A (1994). The developmental o f reading

related phonological processing abilities: New evidence o f bi-directional

causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology,

30,73-87

Wolf, M., Bowers, P.G. & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming - Speed Processes, Timing, and

Reading: A Conceptual Review. Journal of learning disabilities. 33, 387-407

Wolf, M. & Bowers, P.G. (1999). The double deficit hypothesis fo r the developmental

dyslexia. Journal of educational psychology, 91 (3), 415-438.

114