Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pogil Ecological Relationships
Pogil Ecological Relationships
Why?
All living organisms need each other in some way to survive. This can include the interactions between
predators and their prey, the close associations between and among living things (symbiosis), or the com-
petitive relationships between and among species. All of these relationships may be equally advantageous
to the parties involved, or they may be more beneficial to one organism over the other.
140
Number of hares (103)
100
80 6
60 4
40 2
20
0
1845 1850 1855 1860 1865 1870 1875 1880 1885 1890 1895 1900 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935
Year
Ecological Relationships 1
3. What was the approximate population of lynx in 1865?
4. When the number of snowshoe hares is high, what happens to the number of lynx? Use actual
data from the graph to support your observation.
5. What happens to the population of lynx as the number of snowshoe hares decreases? Use actual
data from the graph to support your observation.
6. Propose an explanation for the apparent cause and effect relationship between the populations of
lynx and hares.
8. What other factor would influence the size of the hare population in addition to the size of the
population of lynx?
Dog Flea The flea feeds on blood from the dog. There
is no benefit to the dog and the itching and
bites may lead to infection.
Cattle Cattle egret The cattle egret follows herds of cattle and
eats the insects that the cattle stir up as they
move through the grassland. The cattle
appear to be unaffected by the egrets.
Ecological Relationships 3
10. Refer to the fungus and algae relationship in Model 2.
a. Is there a benefit for one of the organisms or for both?
b. Is either the fungus or the algae harmed by this relationship?
c. Which other relationship in Model 2 is similar to that between the fungus and the algae?
11. Refer to the shark and remora relationship in Model 2.
a. In the shark and remora relationship, is there a benefit for one of the organisms or for both?
b. Is either the shark or the remora harmed by this relationship?
c. Which other relationship in Model 2 is similar to that between the shark and the remora?
Read This!
Symbiotic relationships are identified by how they affect the organisms involved. The three types of sym-
biotic relationships are listed below.
Mutualism: Both organisms benefit from the relationship.
Parasitism: One organism benefits and the other is harmed.
Commensalism: One organism benefits and there is no effect on the other.
12. Using the information from the Read This! box, label each of the relationships in Model 2 as
mutualism, parasitism or commensalism.
13. With your group, choose one of the organism pairs from Model 2 and justify why you catego-
rized the relationship as you did.
P. coudatum
P. coudatum
0 20 0 20
Number of Days Number of Days
Graph C
Rate of growth of R. tigrina tadpoles in populations of different sizes.
1.0
0.8
Minimum mass needed
Mean Body Mass (g)
for metamorphosis
0.6 to occur.
0.4 5 individuals
40 individuals
0.2 60 individuals
160 individuals
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Time (weeks)
14. What are the names of the species in graphs A and B in Model 3?
15. Which graph shows competition between two different species?
16. Which graph in Model 3 shows population growth for only one species?
17. What is the difference between the growing conditions in graph A and graph B?
Ecological Relationships 5
18. P. caudatum and P. aurelia are both species of Paramecium, a microscopic protozoan. P. caudatum
is the larger of the two species. When grown separately, which of the two species reaches a larger
relative population size after 20 days?
19. When grown separately is there a substantial difference in the relative population size of the two
types of paramecia after 20 days?
b. Considering that P. caudatum is 50% larger in size than P. aurelia, develop a hypothesis with
your group to explain why interspecific competition has an effect on the relative population
size of P. caudatum.
Ecological Relationships 7
Extension Question
29. An investigation was carried out into competition between two species of grass, Bromus madri-
tensis and B. rigidus. Equal numbers of seeds of B. madritensis were sown in a number of different
pots. In each pot, an equal number of seeds of B. rigidus was then sown a different number of
days after B. madritensis. The results are shown in the graph below.
Given that the total dry mass of plant material was the same in each pot, summarize the main
conclusions that can be drawn from this investigation. Suggest an explanation for the results
when the delay before sowing B. rigidus was 30 days.
100
80
Percentage
contribution of
60
B. madritensis
to total dry mass
after 45 days 40
20
0
0 10 20 30
Delay before planting B. madritensis/days