Comparison of Process Anaerobic1

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

Comparison of process Anaerobic - aerobic Vs Only aerobic wastewater treatment system for 1000

KLD system .

S. No. Unit Aerobic Anaerobic Remark


Option 1 Aerobic
Option 2
A Equalization tank 275 Cu m 1.1 Kw Float 1.1 Kw Float Similar
Mixer @ 0.004 KwH/ CuM Type Submerged Type Submerged
/ Mixer/Pump Mixer/Pump
Pump required 20.83 Cu M/ hr 20.83 Cu M/ hr

B Aeration Unit (MBBR) 1542 Cu M/ hr. 429 Cu M/hr Option 2 takes


~ 1/3 Air qty.
Media 80 Cu M 18 Cu M ~ less media

Diffusers 172 approx. 53 approx. ~ No. (5.0 Lac less)

Civil Volume 402 CuM 160 CuM ~ 1/4 Civil

Power requirement 34 KwH 9.37 KwH ~ 1/3.5 Power


Requirement
Air supply Grid Yes Yes (* Detailed calculation
mentioned below)

C UASB Option 2 has 470 Cu M


Hydraulic Volume NA 354 Cu m more construction
volume
Civil Volume NA 470 CuM

Media Tube settler NA 27 Cu M

Distribution piping NA Yes

D Settling Zone Same for both system

E Sludge production Non-digested Digested from Option 2 needs less


anaerobic and sludge treatment
Non-digested
from Aeration
zone
F Odour Possible in case Possible in case
of power failure of poor
ventilation
G Stability of system Become unstable More stable in
in case of power such condition
failure due to only effect would
anoxic conditions be settlement of
in deeper part of granule sludge
reactor which would
again expend
due to upward
motion of water
in reactor
H Noise Upto 70-80 dB Upto 55 dB Option 1 needs large
Acoustic enclosures

I Final treated water As per SPB As per SPB


norms norms

*Calculation: -

1. Power Consumption: - (Considering Point No. B)

P = (Q X p) / (229 X )

Where, P = Power in hp

Q = Air Flow in CFM

p = Pressure in Lp/sq.In

= Efficient Coefficient

For Option 1: - P = (912.3 cfm * 7.97 lb/sq.in) / (229 * 0.7) = 45.35 hp = 33.81 KWh

For Option 2: - P = (253 cfm * 7.97 lb/sq.in) / (229 * 0.7) = 12.57 hp = 9.37 KWh

Difference between Option 1 & Option 2 = 24.44 KWh = 24.44*24 = 586.56 KW/Day

Considering INR 7 per KW, Cost Difference = 7*586.56 = 4105.92 INR per Day

= 1498660.8 INR Per Year.

Considering Life Span of STP = 30 Years

Total Cost of Energy = 44959824 INR = 4.5 Cr. INR approx. . 1

2. Diffusers: - (Considering Point No. B)


Price of Supply, installation and fixing of one Diffuser = 4228.5 INR (Inc. tax)
Difference = Option 1 Option 2 = 119 Nos.
Cost Difference = 503191.5 INR . 2
3. Media: - (Considering Point No. B)

Price of Supply, installation of Media per CuM = 29073.15 (Inc Tax.)

Difference = Option 1- Option 2 = 62 CuM.

Cost Difference = 1802535.3 INR . 3

4. Blower Cost: - (Considering Point No. B)

Difference of cost of Supply, Installation & Commissioning = 12 Lac INR approx. 4

5. Civil Construction: - (Considering Point No. B and C)

For Point B: - Difference Civil Structure: - 242 CuM. (Option 1- Option 2)

Considering Rs 10 per Liter Civil cost.

Cost Difference = 10*242000 = 24,20,000 INR.

For Point A: - Difference Civil Structure: - (-)470 CuM. (Option 1 Option 2)

Considering Rs 10 per Liter Civil cost.

Cost Difference = 10*(-)470000 = (-)47,00,000 INR.

Total Cost Difference = For Point B + For Point A = (-)22,80,000 INR. . 5

6. Media Tube Settler: - (Considering Point No. C)

Price of Supply, installation of Media per CuM. = 12356 (Inc Tax.)

Difference = Option 1- Option 2 = (-)27 CuM.

Cost Difference = (-)333612 INR . 6

Total Cost Difference at Time of Installation and Commissioning = Eq.2 + Eq. 3 + Eq. 4 + Eq. 5 + Eq. 6

= 503191.5 + 1802535.3 + 1200000 + (-) 2280000 + (-) 333612

= 8,92,114.8 INR Option 1 cost more than Option 2.

Total Cost Difference at Operation & Maintenance = Eq. 1

= 4.5 Cr. INR for 30 yrs. Option 1 costs more than Option 2.

You might also like