Mexico in Crisis

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 2

cipamericas.org http://www.cipamericas.

org/archives/13396

Mexico in Crisis: U.S. Drug War Funding, Ayotzinapa and Human


Rights Violations
By CIP Americas

Note: This Fact Sheet, prepared by the CIP Americas Program,


was delivered at a Congressional Briefing hosted by the office of
Representative Hank Johnson (D-Georgia) on October 29 and
co-sponsored by the Center for Economic and Policy Research,
the Guatemala Human Rights Commission, Just Associates,
CISPES and CIP-Americas. The video, by CEPR, can be viewed
here (original Spanish not translated).

Mexico in Crisis: U.S. Drug War Funding,


Ayotzinpapa and Human Rights Violations
On Sept. 26, Iguala police opened fire on students from the rural teachers college of Ayotzinapa, followed by more
attacks throughout the night. Six persons were killed and 43 students are missing. The Ayotzinapa disappearances
have triggered massive protests throughout the country.

Mexico is facing its worst political crisis in decades. U.S. policy has contributed to the crisis by funding
corrupt security forces responsible for crimes against their own population.

1. The vast majority of U.S. aid to Mexico is focused on fighting the war on drugs. This aid comes primarily
through two channels: the Merida Initiative (MI) administered by the State Department and Department of
Defense counternarcotics funds. The Merida Initiative, launched as a three-year plan by the Bush
Administration in 2007 and funded in 2008, supports Mexican security forces, primarily in counternarcotics
efforts to dismantle drug cartels. The Obama administration extended the MI indefinitely.

The Merida Initiative has already cost taxpayers $2.4 billion dollars. The Department of Defense has spent $214.7
million on the Mexican drug war just since 2011, when figures are available. Additional public funds for Mexicos drug
war come through the Department of Justice for extensive Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and Alcohol,
Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) operations in Mexico. This means that:

The U.S. government has spent approximately $3 billion dollars on the war on drugs in Mexico alone.

What are the results?

* 100,000 murdered in drug war-related violence

* More than 25,000 disappeared, tens of thousands forced to flee their homes, thousands of orphans and
incalculable psychological trauma

* Mass graves in Guerrero, Tamaulipas, Chihuahua and other states with unidentified bodies

* Rise in violations of the rights and physical safety of transmigrants in the country

* Rise in violations of the rights of women and sexual crimes, including femicides

* Increase in torture and extrajudicial executions


Mexican security forces routinely violate human rights and murder youth: Two CasesTlatlaya, Mexico State
and Ayotzinapa, Guerrero

1. AYOTZINAPA: 6 DEAD AND 43 STUDENTS MISSING IN ATTACK BY POLICE

On September 27, three busloads of students from the Rural Teachers College were stopped by local police of
Iguala, who opened fire on the students without warning. Hours later, an armed commando shot at the unprotected
group of students and there was also an attack on a youth soccer team and taxi on the road nearby. Three students
and three other people are dead, and another student is reported brain dead after being shot in the head.
Eyewitnesses show police taking the missing students into custody. Testimony from members of the criminal gang
Guerreros Unidos picked up by police and video footage indicates that the local police delivered the students to the
organized crime group, which says they killed them. The students have not been found, dead or alive, and their
families still hope for the best but are frustrated by the governments lack of response and results

Youth, educators, human rights activists and citizens are protesting throughout the nation. They call this a crime of
the state. Although it is clear that organized crime controlled the Iguala mayor, much of his government and the local
police force, the state and federal governments knowledge of the situation and failure to respond have led to the
governors resignation under pressure and widespread calls for the president to step down. The search for the
students has revealed more than ten clandestine mass graves containing unidentified bodies in the area.

2. TLATLAYA, ARMY ACCUSED OF EXTRAJUDICIAL EXECUTIONS IN DEATH OF 22 YOUTH

On June 30, the 102 Battalion of the Mexican Army confronted an alleged delinquent gang in San Pedro Limon,
municipality of Tlatlaya, Mexico State, leaving 22 young people dead and no casualties on the side of the army. This
sparked the interest of the press, which began to investigate the case. Later, local witnesses came forth who stated
that the army executed the majority of the youth after they gave themselves up. Witnesses say 21 were executed,
while the National Commission on Human Rights recognizes 15 victims with clear signs of execution. The crime
scene was altered to reinforce the pretext of an armed confrontation. The unit was under the command of Lt.
Ezequiel Rodrguez Martnez.

General Jos Luis Snchez Len, commander of the 22nd Military Zone responsible for Tlatlaya, was subsequently
removed from his post without explanation. One officer and seven soldiers are under arrest and currently being
investigated. A Mexican Congressional Committee has been formed to investigate. The State Department confirms
that 5 members of the 102nd Battalion were trained by U.S. agencies, but neither government has released names
to indicate whether those trained in the U.S. are directly implicated in the killings.

These cases are the most recent and among the most egregious cases of crimes by Mexican security
forces, but they are not the only ones. U.S. aid to these forces, far from improving the situation is increasing
abuses. It should be halted immediately.

Resources:

Comisin Nacional de Derechos Humanos, SOBRE LOS HECHOS OCURRIDOS EL 30 DE JUNIO DE 2014 EN
CUADRILLA NUEVA, COMUNIDAD SAN PEDRO LIMN, MUNICIPIO DE TLATLAYA, ESTADO DE MXICO Oct.
21, 2014

http://www.cndh.org.mx/sites/all/fuentes/documentos/Recomendaciones/2014/REC_2014_051.pdf

You might also like