Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Krugman Vs The People Essay
Krugman Vs The People Essay
Krugman Vs The People Essay
Janna alanis
Period 7
12-15-17
2+
Today in America,there are many problems within the United States which prevent our
nation from becoming the American Dream.Currently,there are varying stances about these
issues and their solutions.However,it can be agreed that without proper actions,our nation may
never be equal.
In the text 50 Essays author Paul krugman argues that class trumps grit.A piece of
evidence that compliments this statement is the study conducted by the National Center for
Education Statistics.In this study, success was measured by economic status and apparent
talent. According to Krugman the study showed rich dumb kids,..were more likely to finish
college than students who scored in the top fourth quartile but whose parents were in the
bottom fourth.What this shows us is that even though you have grit and determination you can
be trumped by someone due to their wealth and class.This proves that the idea of meritocracy
being rewarded in America, is a fantasy. However,in the Ted talk called The power of passion
and perseverance by Angela Lee Duckworth she states that success is reached by having
grit.During her speech she mentions that in many different situations she had studied, grit was
always a significant predictor of success.She then continues to states grittier kids were
significantly more likely to graduate,even when I matched them on every characteristic I could
measure, things like family income, standardized achievement test scores, even how safe kids
felt when they were at school. What this tells us is that class or talent didnt matter,those who
have grit were proven more likely to succeed. Nevertheless, I believe that author Paul Krugman
is right when he states that class trumps grit.I believe he is right because there are many
examples of this in our society today.A great example of this resides in the current modeling
business.Kendall Jenner is featured on a reality show which centers around her and her famous
Kardashian siblings.In the recent years,she has modeled for many high end brands and has had
great success from this.However, she has also faced great backlash because her familys status
and wealth helped her acquire her modeling career.This shows that even though many other
models have worked hard for their careers,someone like Kendall jenner can get their career
handed to them due to her class.Because of examples like this, I agree with Paul Krugmans
corrupt.In the article,Krugman explains that looking to our political leaders to fix our nations
issues is a not a good solution because of the corruption.Krugman begins to talk about the
influence money has on our government.In the article he says hardly a week goes by without
the disclosure of a case in which the influence of money has grotesquely distorted U.S
government policy. He provides hedge funds and tax loopholes as examples of policies made
by rich politicians to only benefit the rich.This means that our government leaders are willing to
sell our laws at the expense of the publics equality. On the other hand,author Tim Roemer
believes that we should look to our government for help.In America remains the worlds beacon
of success Roemer states Addressing these issues will require leadership to meet the times,as
happened during the Civil War,the Great Depression,World War II and the civil rights era.What
this means is that Roemer suggests that our government leaders are a solution to the inequality
residing in our country.However,I believe Paul Krugmans idea of a corrupt government is right.I
corruption.Very recently,the United States government voted to repeal Net neutrality, a policy
which requires internet service providers to allow equal access to all content and applications
provided us with privacy while surfing the internet.But on December 14, our government
repealed this policy and ,in a sense, sold our privacy and rights to the highest bidders. The
government repealed this act because it not only benefits them, but it also benefits corporate
giants,who are all wealthy people.This is corruption brought by inequality because it will only
further extended the wage gap between the middle class,who will not be able to afford full
access to internet,and the wealthy who now own full access to the web.
America.Author Krugman believes that the current state Americans reside in is a poor one
riddled with many economic and social problems. Krugman starts of by saying that Over the
past generations,..., the country has returned to Gilded Age levels of inequality.What he means
by this is that in the recent years, Americas society has become an unequal
one.However,author Tim Roemer believes differently. Roemer believes America Remains the
worlds beacon of success. In the article he says I learned that America is still deeply admired
around world and the place where many people want to live out their dreams. Per contra,I
believe Krugmans stance about the current condition in America is correct. I do not believe
America is in good conditions for many reasons.In the recent years, the United States has
created policies that widen the gap between the rich and the poor, meaning this hurts our
equality and economy. There have also been an increase of social conflicts ever since the
Presidential Election in 2016. All in all, the current condition has led me to believe our country
In conclusion, our country has many problems that create social inequality. And although there
are many opposing views, it can be mutually agreed that action must be taken so that our nation