Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kevin Rudd My 10 Principles To Reform The United Nations, Before It's Too Late
Kevin Rudd My 10 Principles To Reform The United Nations, Before It's Too Late
The United Nations is now 70 years old. And the world of 70 years ago was a
vastly different place to the world of today. Global geo-politics is in the middle
of its third great transformation since the last global war: from 40 years of
cold war, to what now seems to have been the 20 year temporary peace that
followed the fall of the Soviet Union, to the current period of growing geo-
political instability between the US and Russia, the US and China and the now
the deepening strategic engagement between China and Russia.
And against all this fundamental change in the deep underpinnings of the
order itself, the need for global collaboration is at an all-time high as we strive
to respond to the globalisation of everything, from global financial
instability, to the rise of global terrorism, the explosion in global people
movements and the planetary imperatives from climate change. The common
refrain from foreign ministries around the world is that at a time when the
demand for effective global governance is on the rise, the supply of such
governance appears to be in decline. Instead, we are beginning to see a
fragmentation of the order itself.
The question arises, therefore, whether this post-war institution called the UN
remains fit for purpose to meet the needs of the international community for
the century unfolding before us. And if not, what can be done in practical
terms to bring its mission, structure and resourcing up to date to meet the
formidable challenges ahead.
The bottom line is that despite its many detractors, the UN matters. In fact,
because it is such an embedded part of the post-war order, it matters a lot. So
much so that if it was to fail, falter or just fade away, it would further erode the
stability of an already fragile global order.
Advertisement
But as history reminds us, nothing is forever, least of all the durability of
global institutions whose history is recent and where the precedents are
fraught. If the UN one day disappears, or more likely just slides into neglect, it
is only then that we would become fully aware of the gaping hole this would
leave in what remained of the post-war order. Without the UN, we would be
left with increasingly brittle state-on-state relationships, with little
remaining to mediate, negotiate or resolve inter-state crises when they arise.
By which time it would simply be too late to lament the UNs demise.
Those of us who are proud to be life-long friends of the UN today will defend
the institution to the hilt. But The uncomfortable truth is that while the UN
today is not broken, it is in trouble. The danger is that it is starting to drift into
irrelevance as states increasingly walk around the UN on the most important
questions facing the international community, seeking substantive solutions
elsewhere, increasingly seeing the UN as a pleasant diplomatic afterthought.
We see this, for example on the Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs,
terrorism, cyber security, global pandemics, and refugees. There is a reason
for this. The UN, like many old institutions both national and international, is
being overwhelmed by the major systemic changes and challenges now
buffeting the international community at large. But this is compounded by the
fact that UN has a 20th century institutional structure and culture, struggling
to adapt to new 21st century realities. And the common concern for those who
care about the institutions future is that if it fails to adapt, the UN is likely to
slowly slide into the shadowlands.
This need not be the case. The UN is capable of re-inventing itself. All 21st
century institutions must do this in order to survive the pace and complexity
of change around them. There is no point dreaming utopian dreams that the
UN could be rebuilt from the ground up. But we can make what we already
have work much better.
These 10 basic principles are not exactly rocket science. Nor do they address
every institutional and policy challenge faced by the UN system today. They
do, however, provide some guide for the continuing reform of
the management of the UN system in the future. Many fine reform programs
have been launched in the past, including by the current secretary general. But
it is the responsibility of each generation to think afresh on the mega-changes
and challenges of our own time. And this responsibility will fall principally on
the shoulders of the next UN secretary general, whoever she or he may be.
This is also the task I have sought to address over the last two years as the
chair of the Independent Commission on Multilateralism, established by the
International Peace Institute in September 2014. Given the recent decision of
the current Australian prime minister to decline my nomination, it seems I
will not be a candidate myself for the position of UNSG. But I offer these
reflections, and more substantively the report I will soon release, to the next
SG, her or his staff, the UN secretariat, and most importantly the UN member
states, for their consideration.
The slow, but steady decline of the UN, and the wider multilateral system
which has the UN as its foundation, would be catastrophic for an increasingly
unstable world. The peoples of the world, in one way or another, are
increasingly asking the question: Is anybody in control anymore? when they
see growing disagreement among the great powers, the re-emergence of old
inter-state conflicts, terrorists on their streets, chaos in their markets, and jobs
disappearing with nothing to replace them. People are questioning whether we
are beginning to see the beginning of a deeper crisis in the foundations of the
overall post-war order itself.
I remain a life-long UN supporter, advocate and optimist. But the time for
deep UN reform is now. Otherwise, the UN will, in the decades ahead, not die,
but quietly fade away, the facade of a once grand building but where, on closer
inspection, little of substance actually happens anymore. And that would an
avoidable tragedy for us all, large states and in particular small, signalling the
end of what remains a core pillar of our post-world order.