Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis of Politeness Principles in SpongeBob Movie Entitled Missing Identity
Analysis of Politeness Principles in SpongeBob Movie Entitled Missing Identity
Kharis Subkhan
Universitas Negeri Semarang
Authors note
This research was conducted to fulfill the final assignment of Pragmatics subject that is lectured
by Dr. Issy Yuliasri, M.Pd.
Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Kharis Subkhan, Department of
Education, Semarang State University, Semarang. E-mail: Khariss@live.com
Abstract
Language is a medium for us to communicate to others. There are some important aspects
in it that makes our communication runs well. One of them is the use of politeness principles. It is
important because it plays an important role in maintaining the relationship between the speaker
and the hearer. If the relationship among them are not good, it is sometimes found that the
communication get stuck because of the misunderstanding and losing connection between them.
To have a good communication, therefore the speaker needs to consider with whom he is talking
to, and then decide how he will use the language. The appropriate language will make him
understood and respected by others.
As an English teacher, we need to teach our students how to communicate well. There are
so many ways to teach it. One of them is by using movie as the teaching medium. The benefits of
using movie is that it use the language to communicate just as similar as the real conversation in
the real life. From this point of view, students may learn how to use the language properly in order
to avoid the misunderstanding and losing connection that makes the conversation get stuck.
However, not all movie apply politeness principles in its conversation, therefore the researcher
was interested to analyze the politeness principles in a SpongeBob movie entitled missing identity.
This paper would try to show what kind of politeness principles proposed by Leech (1983) used
in the movie.
Theoretical Framework
Politeness principle is minimizing (all thing being equal) the expression of impolite beliefs;
maximizing (all things being equal) the expression of polite beliefs (Thomas, 1995: 159). While
Leech (1983: 132) states that politeness concerns a relationship between two participants; self and
other. Self has to be more polite in referring to others spouse that in referring to selfs own spouse.
There are six politeness principles proposed by Leech (1983: 132). He asserts that, in
conversation, the politeness does not only concern with the relationship between two participants,
self and other, turn-taking but it also considers the existence of the third parties, who may or may
not be present in the conversation. The six maxims of politeness principles are briefly presented
in pairs as follows:
1. Tact Maxim
The tact maxim is defined as follows: minimize the expression of beliefs which imply cost
to other; and maximize the expression of beliefs which give benefit to other (Leech, 1983: 109).
This tact maxim is applied in directive and commissive categories of illocutions (Leech, 1983:
107). For example the utterance Wont you sit down?. It is the directive/impositive utterance.
This utterance is spoken to ask the hearer sitting down. The speaker uses indirect utterance to be
more polite and minimizing cost to the hearer. This utterance implies that sitting down is benefit
to the hearer.
2. Generosity Maxim
This maxim is used to minimize the expression of benefit to self and maximize the utterance
of cost to self. It is used in directive and commissive illocutionary act. If in the tact maxim the
focus is on other-centered, in generosity maxim, it focuses on self-centered (Leech, 1983: 133). In
the utterance You must come and dinner with us., it is actually an advice utterance that is
involved in directive illocutionary act. In this case the speaker implies that cost of the utterance is
to his self. Meanwhile, the utterance implies that benefit is for the hearer.
3. Approbation Maxim
The approbation maxim states that the speaker should minimize the expression of beliefs
which express dispraise of other; maximize the expression of beliefs which express appraisal of
other (Leech, 1983: 135). This maxim is used in an utterance that expresses the speakers feeling,
such as expressions of like, dislike, joy, sorrow or pleasure and is used in representative speech.
For instance, stating whether the speakers
4. Modesty Maxim
This maxim states: minimize praise of self as well as minimize dispraise of self. This
maxim is also used in expressive and representatives speech (Leech, 1983: 136). This utterance
for example Please accept this small gift as prize of your achievement.. In this case, the utterance
above is categorized as the modesty maxim because the speaker maximizes dispraise of himself.
The speaker notices his utterance by using small gift.
5. Agreement Maxim
6. Sympathy Maxim
Methodology
In this research, the writer used descriptive qualitative approach, which was intended to
give description on data obtained in utterance form. The method of collecting data used were
documentation method and non-participant observation because the writer did not include in the
conversation. The research subject in this study is the analysis politeness in SpongeBob movie
entitled Missing identity. While the object of the study is the conversation in the movie.
The analysis would be done step by step. The writer firstly watched the movie and then
transcribed conversation. After that, the transcription would be observed to explore its linguistics
element. The result of the observation would be the basic sources to be matched with the theories
used in this research, politeness principles.
Result and Discussion
The analysis shown that the all 6 maxims were found in the movie conversation. Here are
the examples of the findings of the politeness principles.
1. Tact Maxim
SpongeBob : Gary. Now that my horrific incident of terror is over, how about some breakfast?
After having some accidents before, SpongeBob offer Garry to have some breakfast asking
him using question strategy. This kind question can be included in tact maxim because SpongeBob
try to offer Garry some meal which mean it maximize benefits to others.
2. Generosity Maxim
Patrick : That is the stench of discovery. Come on, buddy. I'll give you a boost. Hop on,
pal.
SpongeBob : I'll give you a hint. Two words. First word: my. Second word: name tag.
3. Approbation Maxim
Squidward : SpongeBob, if you really want to find your name tag, just retrace your steps.
SpongeBob : Retrace my steps? Squidward, you're a genius.
Squidward gave a suggestion to SpongeBob to retrace his steps on the way to Krusty Krab.
Then SpongeBob praise the Squidward suggestion by saying that he was a genius. This utterance
matched with the approbation maxim that maximize the expression of beliefs which express
appraisal of other by saying that Squidward was a genius.
4. Modesty Maxim
SpongeBob : Oh, Squidward, it's terrible! It's the most terrible thing that's ever happened to me.
I lost my name tag. Pourquoi!
SpongeBob was losing his identity card and then he expressed his feeling to Squidward by
saying that it was the most terrible thing that had ever happened to him. This utterance imply that
he maximized dispraise of self because in fact, losing identity card was not the worst thing that
had ever happened to him.
5. Agreement Maxim
6. Sympathy Maxim
SpongeBob : Oh, Squidward, it's terrible! It's the most terrible thing that's ever happened to me.
I lost my name tag. Pourquoi!
Squidward : SpongeBob, take it easy! I'm sure you can get a new one.
SpongeBob was having terrible thing that he lost his identity card and he expressed his
feeling to Squidward. Then Squidward answer it by asking SpongeBob to calm down and take it
easy because he believed that SpongeBob will get the new identity card. This answer can be
included into sympathy maxim because he maximized the expression of sympathy to SpongeBob.
Conclusion
After analyzing the data taken from the utterances in SpongeBob movie entitled missing
identity, the researcher took a conclusion about the use of politeness principle the movie. There
are six maxims of politeness principle applied which consist of 12 utterances in total: 1 tact maxim,
3 generosity maxims, 2 approbation maxims, 1 modesty maxim, 3 agreement maxims, and 2
sympathy maxims. Generosity and agreement maxim are the most numerous maxim in the movie.
For the sake of learning language, it can concluded that this movie can be used as medium for
language learning because according to the findings, it had used the principles of politeness.
Reference
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London and New York: Long Man