Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Serena Hotel Walk Test Report
Serena Hotel Walk Test Report
Serena Hotel Walk Test Report
Serena Hotel
Walk Test Report
Page 1 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Contents
1.1 CS Testing ..........................................................................................................................3
1.2 Summary ............................................................................................................................3
1.3 Faisalabad Meeting Hall ...................................................................................................4
1.4 Baltit Hall ...........................................................................................................................7
1.5 Hunza Hall .......................................................................................................................10
1.6 Kehakashan Mehal..........................................................................................................13
1.7 Kaplu Meeting Hall .........................................................................................................16
1.8 Main Lobby Ground Floor .............................................................................................19
1.9 Quetta Hall .......................................................................................................................22
1.10 Sheshmall Hall .................................................................................................................25
1.11 Shigar Hall .......................................................................................................................28
1.12 Zaman Restaurant...........................................................................................................31
1.13 Almaghrab Resturant .....................................................................................................34
1.14 Dawat................................................................................................................................37
1.15 Altit Hall ...........................................................................................................................40
1.16 Gilgit Hall .........................................................................................................................43
1.17 Gulmit Hall ......................................................................................................................46
1.18 Shamdan Hall .................................................................................................................49
1.19 Nazara Resturant ............................................................................................................52
2 PS TESTING.....................................................................................................................55
3 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................76
Page 2 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
1.1 CS Testing
1.2 Summary
Walk test (Indoor) was conducted on 25 November in Serena Hotel, Islamabad.
Purpose of the walk test was to ensure good coverage & quality for the areas where PTML Staff
conference is being held.
Walk test results are good with no drop calls & bad quality patches.
Page 3 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
Page 4 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 5 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 6 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Page 7 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 8 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 9 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Page 10 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 11 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 12 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Page 13 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 14 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 15 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
Page 16 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 17 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 18 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
Page 19 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 20 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 21 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
Page 22 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Idle Rxlevels(dBm)
SQI
Page 23 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 24 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality;
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 25 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 26 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 27 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 28 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 29 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 30 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 31 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 32 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 33 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 34 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 35 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 36 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
1.14 Dawat
RxQuality
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 37 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 38 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 39 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 40 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 41 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 42 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 43 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 44 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 45 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 46 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 47 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 48 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 49 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 50 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 51 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
RxQuality
RxLevels (dBm)
Page 52 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
SQI
Page 53 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Cell ID
C/I Worst
Page 54 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
2 PS Testing
2.1 Summary
2.2 18344
RLC ThroughPut
RLC Throughput 0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
RLC Throughput
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40
20
0
0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
% Samples 20.71 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.29
Page 55 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
C/I Worst
C/I for Worst ARFCN -5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
Samples 0 0 0 5604
80
60
40
20
0
-5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Page 56 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Samples 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5604
Current MCS DL
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40
20
0
MCS 1 MCS 2 MCS 3 MCS 4 MCS 5 MCS 6 MCS 7 MCS 8 MCS 9
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.0
Page 57 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
80
60
40
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Samples 24.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 75.89
Page 58 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
2.3 18362
Serving Cell ID: 18362
RLC ThroughPut
RLC Throughput
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
% Samples 23.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 76.11
Page 59 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
C/I Worst
C/I for Worst ARFCN -5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
Samples 0 0 0 9853
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
-5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Page 60 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Samples 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9853
Current MCS DL
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40
% Samples
20
0
MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.
Page 61 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
80
60
40 Samples
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Samples 26.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.16
Page 62 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
2.4 18365
Serving Cell ID: 18365
RLC ThroughPut
RLC Throughput 0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
RLC Throughput
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
% Samples 21.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.45
Page 63 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
C/I Worst
C/I for Worst ARFCN -5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
Samples 0 0 0 9401
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
-5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Page 64 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Samples 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9401
Current MCS DL
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40
% Samples
20
0
MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.
Page 65 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
80
60
40 Samples
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Samples 22.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 77.39
Page 66 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
2.5 18369
Serving Cell ID: 18369
RLC ThroughPut
RLC Throughput 0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
RLC Throughput
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
% Samples 26.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 73.79
Page 67 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
C/I Worst
C/I for Worst ARFCN -5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
Samples 0 0 0 5449
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
-5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Page 68 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Samples 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5449
Page 69 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
80
60
40 Samples
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Samples 28.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 71.71
Page 70 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
2.6 18370
Serving Cell ID: 18370
RLC ThroughPut
RLC Throughput 0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
RLC Throughput
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
0 to 10 10 to 30 30 to 60 60 to 120 120 to 254
% Samples 21.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 78.66
Page 71 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
C/I Worst
C/I for Worst ARFCN -5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
Samples 0 0 0 6033
80
60
40 % Samples
20
0
-5 to 9 9 to 12 12 to 18 18 to 35
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00
Page 72 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Samples 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6033
Current MCS DL
100
Percentage Samples
80
60
40
% Samples
20
0
MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS MCS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% Samples 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.
Page 73 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
80
60
40 Samples
20
0
0 1 2 3 4
Samples 20.86 0.00 0.00 0.00 79.14
Page 74 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
Page 75 of 76
Doc # 1 Issue # 1
3 Conclusion
No issues were observed during the walk test on any of the floor during the walk test.
Page 76 of 76