Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gurkov Interfacial Rheology
Gurkov Interfacial Rheology
Theodor D. Gurkov
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Chemistry,
University of Sofia, Bulgaria
Lecture at COST P21 Student Training School
Physics of droplets: Basic and Advanced Topics
12 – 13 July, 2010, Borovets, Bulgaria
Contents:
Description of surface deformation (strain)
Types of surface rheological behavior (elastic,
viscous, plastic; combinations thereof)
Examples of measurements, methods
Sofia University
Training school 2010, p. 1
Motivation – Dispersion Stability
Driving force: ΔΠ
δβ = u : q U s = e1e1 + e 2e 2 ; q = e1e1 − e 2e 2
1
Shear (A = const.)
u= (δα)U s + 1 (δβ) q
2 2
Training school 2010, p. 3
Surface Deformation – Curvature
b = −∇ s n = HU s + D q
In the basis of principal curvatures:
1 1
H = (c1 + c2 ) , D = (c1 − c2 )
2 2
δws = γδα + ξδβ + BδH + ΘδD
where B = M 1 + M 2 , Θ = M1 − M 2
⎛ ∂w f ⎞
then B = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = B0 + 2(2k c + k c )H
⎝ ∂H ⎠D
⎛ ∂w f ⎞
Θ = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = −2k c D (and B0 = −4k c H 0 )
⎝ ∂D ⎠H
kc ~10-20 kBT
for lipid bilayers
Training school 2010, p. 4
Dilatational Surface Elasticity – Low MW Surfactants
Lucassen & van den Tempel, Chem. Eng. Sci., 27 (1972) 1283.
Sinusoidal oscillations of a barrier in the plane of the interface –
compression/expansion
⎛ dσ ⎞ d ln Γ
For small deformations ε=⎜ ⎟
⎝ d ln Γ ⎠ eq d ln A
Training school 2010, p. 6
Diffusional Exchange Model
1
ζ=
ωτ D
2
2 ⎛ ∂Γ ⎞
τD = ⎜ ⎟
D ⎝ ∂c ⎠ eq
Visco-elastic behavior
The elasticity and viscosity depend on frequency, ω
”Apparent” viscosity, due to the mass exchange
Training school 2010, p. 7
Harmonic Oscillations
ΔAm iωt
Δσ m ei (ωt + ϕ ) = τ = E *γ = E * e
A0
Δσm
E * = E '2 + E ' '2 = = ratio of amplitudes
ΔAm / A0
Δσ m , ϕ = measured quantities
Oscillating deformable drop
36 60
34
modulus, E’, and the loss
50
modulus, E”, can only be made
33
in terms of rheological models.
32 45
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
time, s
Training school 2010, p. 8
Linear Visco – Elasticity (Maxwell)
0
1.E-03 1.E-01 1.E+01 1.E+03
angular frequency, ω (rad/s) Training school 2010, p. 9
A More Complex Linear Visco-Elastic Model
165
21 160
155
Π, dyn/cm
Area, cm2
20 150
145
19 140
135
18 130
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Time, s
Training school 2010, p. 11
Linear viscoelasticity – Extended Maxwell Model
-1
dγ/dt = 0.00247 s
3 G2
τ = Δσ, dyn/cm
2
3.5
3.0
1
2.5
τ, dyn/cm
measured
2.0
G1+G2 fit
1.5
0
1.0 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25
expansion
0.5 compression
fit compression
α = ln(A / A0) = γ
0.0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30
α = ln( A /A 0 ) Training school 2010, p. 13
Oscillatory Stress
Area change in the trough
0.10
0.08
Alternative way to analyse data:
0.06 The oscillatory strain γ(t) is inserted
0.04 into the constitutive equation, and
Strain, γ = ln(A / A 0 )
0.02
the solution for τ(t) is found in the
0.00
-0.02-0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 form of Fourier series.
-0.04
-0.06
Dynakoll 0.01%, Solvitose 0.1%, 40oC
-0.08
2.0
-0.10 Experiment
Model function experiment
-0.12
1.5 model fit
time/ T
1.0
τ = σ(γ)−σ(0)
0.5
0.0
-0.5
σ(γ=0)= 23.4 dyn/cm
-1.0
G1 = 12.8 dyn/cm
G2 = 13.6 dyn/cm -1.5
η= 206.4 dyn.s/cm
-2.0
It is impossible to fit the results -0.10 -0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
with only one G and η. γ = ln(A / A 0 )
Training school 2010, p. 14
Shear Elasticity – Entangled Gel-Like Layers
Proteins,
Polymers,
…
dσ|| dσ ⊥
K +μ = ; K −μ = (3)
d ln A d ln A Training school 2010, p. 17
Anisotropic Stress Method
1.4
1.2
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015 0.020
log(A(t)/A0)
Figure 2. Elastic stress response of the surface, as a function of the relative area de-
formation during expansion for two different orientations of the Wilhelmy plate:
collinear (squares), and perpendicular (circles). The system contains 1×10-4 wt%
BLG and 0.15 M NaCl (at the "natural" pH, 6.2). The interface was aged overnight.
Training school 2010, p. 18
Anisotropic Stress – Visco-Elastic Behavior
τ11, el = ( K + μ ) u11, el τ 22, el = ( K − μ)u11, el
τ11, visc = ( ζ s + ηs ) D11, visc τ 22, visc = ( ζ s − ηs ) D11, visc
u11,el u11,visc
u11
In the frames of the Maxwell model:
τ11 = τ11, el = τ11, visc τ 22 = τ 22, el = τ 22, visc τ τ τ
u11 = u11, el + u11, visc D11 = D11, el + D11, visc
u22 =0
d d
where u11, el = D11, el ; u11, visc = D11, visc is the rate of strain.
dt dt
The displacement is a linear function of the x-coordinate, and u11, D11
do not depend on x. In such a case the rate of total deformation is
dα A
D11 = , where α = u11 = ln .
dt A0
dα 1 d τ11 τ11 dα 1 d τ 22 τ 22
= + ; = + Surface
dt K + μ dt ζ s + ηs dt K − μ dt ζ s − ηs Tension
Sensor
Investigated
Wilhelmy Plate Monolayer
(sand-blasted glass)
Barrier
PC Analogue-
Digital
Converter Vibration-Free Training
Tableschool 2010, p. 19
Anisotropic Stress – Visco-Elastic Behavior
In the Langmuir trough, we carry out deformation with constant rate
(fixed d α / d t ). Then,
⎡ dα ⎤ ⎛ ⎞
τ11 (t ) = ⎢ τ11 (0) − (ζ s + ηs )⎥exp⎜⎜ − K + μ t ⎟⎟ + d α (ζ s + ηs )
⎣ dt ⎦ ⎝ ζ s + ηs ⎠ d t
⎡ dα ⎤ ⎛ ⎞
τ 22 (t ) = ⎢ τ 22 (0) − (ζ s − ηs )⎥exp⎜⎜ − K − μ t ⎟⎟ + d α (ζ s − ηs )
⎣ dt ⎦ ⎝ ζ s − ηs ⎠ d t
Data fit ⇒
Values of the material parameters
K, μ, ζs , ηs
(see the Table below).
Determined
Type of rheological
No. System parameters
behavior
(expansion)
K= 83.2 dyn/cm
BLG 0.01 wt% Full dilatational and shear μ= 16.2 dyn/cm
4
+ 0.15 M NaCl visco-elasticity ζs = 1654.8 dyn.s/cm
ηs = 113.9 dyn.s/cm
E
After the plastic element is
activated, the behavior is elastic.
2. K.D. Danov, P.A. Kralchevsky, I.B. Ivanov, Equilibrium and dynamics of surfactant
adsorption monolayers and thin liquid films, Chapter 9 in: G. Broze (Ed.),
Handbook of Detergents. Part. A: Properties, Marcel Dekker, 1999, pp. 303–418.
3. J.C. Slattery, Interfacial Transport Phenomena, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1990;
Momentum, Energy, and Mass Transfer in Continua, R.E. Krieger Publishing Co.,
Huntington, New York, 1978.
4. L.E. Scriven, Dynamics of a Fluid Interface, Chem. Eng. Sci. 12 (1960) 98-108.
5. J. Hunter, Foundation of Colloid Science Vol. I, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987; Vol. II,
Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.
7. T.D. Gurkov, J.T. Petkov, B. Campbell, R.P. Borwankar, Dilatational and Shear
Rheology of Protein Layers on Water/Air Interface, In: "Food Colloids,
Fundamentals of Formulation" (E. Dickinson, R. Miller, Eds.), Royal Soc. Chem.,
Cambridge, UK, 2001, 181-190.
8. J.T. Petkov, T.D. Gurkov, B.E. Campbell, R.P. Borwankar, Dilatational and Shear
Elasticity of Gel-Like Protein Layers on Air/Water Interface, Langmuir 16 (2000)
3703-3711.
9. J.T. Petkov, T.D. Gurkov, B.E. Campbell, Measurement of the Yield Stress of Gellike
Protein Layers on Liquid Surfaces by Means of an Attached Particle, Langmuir 17
(2001) 4556-4563.
10. J.T. Petkov, K.D. Danov, N.D. Denkov, R. Aust, F. Durst, Precise Method for
Measuring the Shear Surface Viscosity of Surfactant Monolayers, Langmuir 12
(1996) 2650-2653.
11. J. Lucassen, and M. van den Tempel, Longitudinal Waves on Visco-Elastic Surfaces,
J. Colloid Interface Sci. 41 (1972) 491-498.
13. K.D. Danov, R. Aust, F. Durst, U. Lange, Influence of the Surface Viscosity on the
Hydrodynamic Resistance and Surface Diffusivity of a Large Brownian Particle, J.
Colloid Interface Sci. 175 (1995) 36-45.
14. J.T. Petkov, N.D. Denkov, K.D. Danov, O.D. Velev, R. Aust, F. Durst, Measurement of
the Drag Coefficient of Spherical Particles Attached to Fluid Interfaces, J. Colloid
Interface Sci. 172 (1995) 147-154.
15. T.S. Horozov, P.A. Kralchevsky, K.D. Danov, I.B. Ivanov, Interfacial Rheology and
Kinetics of Adsorption from Surfactant Solutions, J. Dispersion Sci. Technol. 18
(1997) 593-607.
16. T.S. Horozov, K.D. Danov, P.A. Kralchevsky, I.B. Ivanov, R.P. Borwankar, A Local
Approach in Interfacial Rheology: Theory and Experiment, Proceedings of the First
World Congress on Emulsions, Vol. 2, Paris, 1993, paper 3-20-137.
17. A.M. Poskanzer, F.C. Goodrich, Surface Viscosity of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate
Solutions with and without Added Dodecanol, J. Phys. Chem. 79 (1975) 2122-2126.