Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 4

Deviations in structure proposal

Sl No Design ch Prop. span Proposal Remarks


missing in new structure required on
1 188+210 1x6.0 schedule-B realignment
retained with
2 188+975 2 row 1200 reconstruction required
repair
retained with new structure required on
3 192+750 2 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with
4 193+300 2 row 1200 reconstruction required
repair
retained with new structure required on
5 196+455 1x6.0 repair realignment
retained with new minor bridge required on
6 197+325 6 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
7 201+350 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
8 201+550 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
9 201+630 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with new structure required on
10 202+390 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new minor bridge required due
11 203+350 1 row 1200 repair to realignment
retained with new slab culvert required on
12 203+500 2 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new slab culvert required on
13 203+650 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new slab culvert required on
14 203+880 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new slab culvert required on
15 204+100 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new slab culvert required on
16 204+200 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new structure required on
17 204+280 1 row 1200 repair realignment
missing in new minor bridge required on
18 204+370 1x5.0 schedule-B realignment
retained with new structure required on
19 206+830 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
20 207+620 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
21 207+640 2 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
22 208+890 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with new structure required on
23 209+240 1 row 1200 repair realignment
Deviations in structure proposal
Sl No Design ch Prop. span Proposal Remarks
retained with new structure required on
24 209+340 1x3.0 repair realignment
retained with new structure required on
25 209+500 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
26 209+690 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
27 209+770 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
28 209+900 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
29 210+280 2 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
30 210+460 1 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with new structure required on
31 210+590 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new structure required on
32 211+110 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with new structure required on
33 211+380 1 row 1200 repair realignment
New slab structure &
retained with
34 212+300 1 row 1200 underpass required on
repair realignment
new structure required on
35 219+000 2 row 1200 widening realignment
retained with new structure required on
36 222+030 1 row 1200 repair realignment
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
37 223+460 2 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
38 223+745 2 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
39 228+420 2 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
retained with wideing reqd. due to curve
40 229+850 2 row 1200 repair improvement/widening
missing in new structure required on
41 234+800 1 row 1200 schedule-B realignment
From (Km)To (Km) From (Km)To (Km) Length (Km)
Various Other Issues
Sl no Design Chainage Remarks
Existing alignment followed and cutting avg. 5.5m, but
1 202+260 to 203+180 widening is proposed
Realignment in cutting section but according to site
2 203+180 to 204+00 avg. 10m filling required
3 206+800 to 207+100 Filling shown but as per site cutting required
Existing alignment followed and cutting avg. 3.0m, but
4 209+500 to 210+300 widening is proposed

5 211+900 to 212+000 Cutting shown in profile but as per site filling required

no new structure proposed on realignment. Proposed


6 215+600 to 216+300 FRL matches existing ground level but raising in profile
required on realignment
Existing alignment followed and cutting avg. 2.0m, but
7 220+720 to 221+000 widening is proposed

226+980 to 227+500 & Existing alignment followed and filling avg. 2.0m
8 227+500 to 228+380 proposed by cutting avg. 5.0m, but widening is
followed

Status of Forest Clearance


Status of LA
Major portion falls under hilly terrain where hill road
mannual should be adopted

You might also like