Professional Documents
Culture Documents
" Tension Test ": T.C. İzmir Institute of Technology Faculty of Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering
" Tension Test ": T.C. İzmir Institute of Technology Faculty of Engineering Department of Mechanical Engineering
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
ME 409
“ TENSION TEST ”
Özge A.
2009, December 14
İZMİR
1
1. Objective
2. Apparatus
3. Materials
6063 Aluminum or 304 stainless steel.
4. Analysis of Results
EXCEL TABLES AND CALCULATIONS
Table 1
Gauge Length Wo
Sample Code to(mm) Wf(mm) tf(mm) Lf(mm)
(Go) (mm)
2
Figure 1 Engineering stress-strain curve of Al
3
c. Calculation of the Modulus of Elasticity (E).
In the early (low strain) portion of the curve, many materials obey Hooke’s law to a reasonable
approximation, so that stress is proportional to strain with the constant of proportionality being the
modulus of elasticity or Young’s modulus, denoted E:
𝜎𝑒 = 𝐸. 𝜖𝑒
90
80
70
Engineering Stress , e (MPa)
60
50
0,001215; 50,4677
40
y = 42159x - 0.1198
30
20
0,0003797; 16,1950
10
0
0 0.001 0.002 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.009 0.01
Engineering Strain, (elongation)
As can be seen in
Figure 3 , I specified two points on the elastic region which are not at either the top or bottom and
these points are (0,001215; 50,4677) and (0,0003797; 16,1950). Also I use excel to draw a linear line of
these specified data region, the line equation is y = 42159x - 0,1198, y is the engineering stress and x is
engineering strain. The slope of this line is ⁄ 𝑑𝑥 , its value gives us the Modulus of Elasticity, E.
𝑑𝑦
= 42159
𝑑𝑥
4
𝐸 = 42159 𝑀𝑃𝑎
Furthermore, Modulus of Elasticity, E can be calculated from the two specified points from the
relation given below,
𝜎1 − 𝜎2
𝐸=
𝜖1 − 𝜖2
With this relation we find a closer value of E that was calculated from the slope of the line.
𝜎1 − 𝜎2 50,4677 − 16,1950
𝐸= =
𝜖1 − 𝜖2 0,001215 − 0,0003797
𝐸 = 41030 𝑀𝑃𝑎
I think the first method is more reliable because the line includes much more than two data points.
“0-strain” location on the strain axis is the x value when y=0 in the equation of line, y = 42159x - 0,1198.
If y=0
0 = 42159x - 0,1198
𝑥 = 2,84 ∗ 10−6 is the “0-strain” location.
5
0.2% OFFSET METHOD
76
72
68
64
60 data points
56 between
52
48 specified
44 interval
40
36
32 Linear (data
28
24 points
20 between
16
12 specified
8 interval)
4
0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8
Engineering Strain, (% elongation)
The stress-strain curve does not remain linear all the way to the yield point. The proportional
elastic limit (PEL) shown in Figure 4 is the point where the curve starts to deviate from a straight line. The
elastic limit (frequently indistinguishable from PEL) can be seen in Figure 4 is the point on the curve
beyond which plastic deformation is present after release of the load. If the stress is increased further,
the stress-strain curve departs more and more from the straight line. This curve is typical of that of many
ductile metals like Al that we used in our experiment.
49,5908 − 13,3081
%𝑅𝐴 = 100. ( )
49,5908
%𝑅𝐴 = 73,7%
6
f. Sketch of the fracture surfaces of ductile materials
As can be seen in Figure 6 ,it shows the macroscopic differences between two ductile specimens (a,b)
and the brittle specimen (c).
Figure 7 sequence and events in necking and fracture of a tensile test specimen: (a) early stage of necking; (b) small voids
begin to form within the necked region; (c) voids coalesce, producing an internal crack; (d) rest of cross section begins fail
at the periphery by shearing; (e) final fracture surfaces, known cup and cone fracture.
On the microscopic level, ductile fracture surfaces also appear rough and irregular. The
surface consists of many microvoids and dimples. Figure 8 and Figure 9 demonstrate the
microscopic qualities of ductile fracture surfaces.
7
8