Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Department of Business: Forman Christian College
Department of Business: Forman Christian College
(FALL 2016)
Group Members:
Muhammad Adeel Rana
Nawazish Mehdi
Shahzaib Ali
Sana Shahid
Asad Khan
Submitted To:
consultancy organization. Its international stature is well established and it enjoys the reputation
of being one of the top engineering consultancy organizations in Asia and Africa and is ranked
amongst the world’s top 200 consulting firm. NESPAK was established in 1973 as a private
limited company by the Government of Pakistan. The objective of its creation was to create a
pool of talented engineers, attain self-reliance in engineering consultancy and replace foreign
consultants. The company has achieved these objectives to a large extent. NESPAK is registered
with a number of international funding agencies such as IBRD, ADB, IDB, etc. Todate NESPAK
has undertaken 3642 projects out of which 3116 are domestic and 526 are overseas projects.
The Company’s success lies in the hard work of its highly skilled employees and commitment to
quality in every facet of its operation. It was this commitment that led it to become the first
engineering consultancy organization in Pakistan to obtain ISO 9001 QMS certification in 1998.
Another landmark has been achieved by NESPAK in its endeavors towards quality, through
conversion of the existing ISO 9001 Quality Management System to the latest version of the
standard viz. ISO 9001:2000 and subsequent award of Evergreen Certificates in December 2003.
2. Habib Construction Services (HCS):
Habib Construction Services [HCS] is one of the fastest growing and most admired infrastructure
infrastructure projects. The company is driven to deliver projects ‘On-Time without Cost
Overrun’ using world class project management techniques and has uncompromising standards
specialization in highways, motorways, flyover & bridges, buildings, power & energy, airports,
dams etc. The Company is responsible for landmark projects that have defined the country’s
progress. Today, the company stands tall in the construction industry of Pakistan as the pioneer
of ‘Fast Track’ project execution culture. Transforming challenges into opportunities has been
the hallmark of the company, ever since its inception. Every HCS initiative hopes to empower
the lives of the people connected to it. The progress of our people powers the progress of our
company. Every accomplishment becomes a foundation for us to do better, to dream bigger, and
Top Manager:
Middle Manager:
Top Manager:
Middle Manager:
Research was conducted based on questionnaire and interview question to analyze how managers
Personality, Motivation and Organizational Commitment were observed from the questionnaires
consisting of few questions. Scores were carefully observed to know manager has which
personality trait, MPS was calculated to find motivation and similarly organizational
Interview questions were asked to know if Quantative result matches with the Qualitative.
Further key elements like Workplace Diversity, Power and Leadership style were also observed
from interview questions. Some of the interview questions which were asked are:
What are some of the main features in your personality like you are friendly, caring etc?
Do you face any difficulty in leading diverse (difference in age, gender, race, education)
employees?
What action do you take when your employees do not meet the work deadline?
TOP MANAGER COMPARISON:
1. PERSONALITY
2. MOTIVATION
He is highly motivated i.e. MPS 266 This manager has good motivating
and enjoys doing his job; he finds his potential i.e. MPS 192.
3. ORGANIZATIONAL
COMMITMENT:
organization.
4. WORKPLACE DIVERISTY
5. POWER
compensation. them.
6. LEADERSHIP STYLE
Both managers seem to be equally good. They have their own different personality traits. Both
are highly motivated and have moderate organizational commitment. They can deal with diverse
workforce as well. However good use of power and leadership style makes HCS manager better
since he uses soft tactics and goes out with employees occasionally.
Improvement Suggestions:
NESPAK manager needs to improve the last two key elements by not being so harsh and should
good at top manager level but still he should take opinions from employees.
MIDDLE MANAGERS COMPARISON:
1. PERSONALITY TRAITS
This means that he is more people- stability. This indicates that he is task-
oriented; he trusts his employees and oriented, no matter what the situation;
doesn’t speak badly about them. he is calm and tackles most of his
2. MOTIVATION:
This person has a very low motivating This person has a moderate motivating
3. ORGAANIZATIONAL
COMMITMENT
This manger doesn’t face any problems This manger faces difficulty while
while managing diversity. This managing diverse force, especially with
workforce.
5. POWER
job.
6. LEADERSHIP STYLE
believes in good relations with his seldom goes out with colleagues, which
subordinates and goes out with them. shows that he is basically task-
oriented.
NESPAK manager is People oriented, whereas HCS manager is task oriented. Both have their
own different personality traits. NESPAK manager is slightly lacking the motivational level and
NESPAK manager better since he uses soft power tactics and he interacts with his employees
regularly.
Improvement Suggestions:
For the improvements both managers need high motivation, which can be done by offering them
of HCS manager can be improved by correlating goal setting, employee engagement, and work
place optimism in a positive way. Similarly for overcoming workplace diversity he should
1. PERSONALITY TRAITS
People oriented, she trust them and agreeableness and emotional stability.
under stress.
2. MOTIVATION
She has a low motivational level i.e. He has an extremely low motivational
MPS 110. level i.e. MPS 36.
3. ORGANIZATIONAL
COMMITEMENT
4. WORKPLACE DIVERSITY
efficient manner.
5. POWER
6. LEADERSHIP STYLE:
She is totally task oriented and doesn’t He is employee oriented and interacts
It’s really hard to conclude which manager is better. Both managers are slightly better then each
Improvement Suggestions:
Both these managers needs a lot of improvements in there organizational behavior. Both have
low motivation which can be improved by offering those incentives, promotions, appreciation
correlating goal setting, employee engagement, and work place optimism in a positive way. In
this case the NESPAK manager can be provided with day care facility. Whereas in case of HCS
manager in this case, Organization can give him recreational facilities and monitory rewards to
increase commitment. NESPAK manager should slightly interact more with her employees to