Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Metroppt 040116reordered 160113001646
Metroppt 040116reordered 160113001646
06-01-16
The current Orange Line Metro Train Project destroys the possibility of the
integrated Lahore Mass Transport System as conceived in 2005-10
Impact:
Decreased Property Value, Loss to business,
alienation of users from built landscape. Increased
noise and hanging pollution.
LAHORE METRO: GREEN LINE
Lahore’s new mass transit system primarily consists of 4 transit corridors
LAHORE METRO
Lahore’s new mass transit system primarily consists of 4 transit corridors:
ORANGE LINE: 27.1km long
Ali Town to Dera Gujjran
Cost Comparison with other Cities: Lahore Metro cost per Km = $61.9million. Jakarta
MRT cost per Km = $7.5million. Financial Wastefulness: Transport studies conducted
via JICA reportedly cost between $1Million and $1Billion.Two transport studies
conducted: 2006-2008 Previous LRMTS Metro Proposal Vs. Current Metro Project:
Used tunnel technology and elevated tracks to minimize physical impact on ground.
Time line for completion for whole network (from 2005): 15-25 years. Timeline for
completion Metro network = Unknown. Orange line estimated cost 2006 = $1.9bn
Total Cost for Green, Orange, Purple and Blue Lines 2006 = $6billlion. Total Estimated
Cost of Current Metro Project = Unknown. Completion Orange Line: 27 months.
OLMT: CENTRAL STATION DESIGN
CENTRAL STATION under Mall Rd. at GPO Chowk Total Building Area = 8370sqm/ 90,093sft
Underground Station.
SHALIMAR BAGH: EXISTING
SHALIMAR BAGH: ORANGE LINE
CHAUBURJI STATION: EXISTING
CHAUBURJI: EXISTING
CHAUBURJI: ORANGE LINE
GENERAL POST OFFICE: EXISTING
PROJECT COST OLMT = $1.75B CHINESE LOAN = $1.6B @3% per annum
$1B + Interest rolling stock purchase goes
back to China via NORINCO . GOP will
receive $0.6B for civil works to be
executed by LDA+NESPAK contractors. All
payments will be made by the Chinese
directly.
(http://www. Brecorder.com/br-research/44:miscellaneous/4530:is-
orange-line-worth-the-cost/.
PERMANENT ENVIRONMENTAL & HEALTH IMPACT:
PC1 does not include cost of damage prevention to building stock 400 years old
& younger
Impact: Obstructed view, reduced access. Compromised environment in the garden, with garish
views of the concrete viaduct. Remains Shalamar Hydraulic Works will also be concrete pylons
with the viaduct wrapping itself around the remains of the monument. Elevated viaduct section
Chauburji circa 1646 Protected under: National Antiquities Act 1975
Impact: Endangered by Project during construction phase as well as further traffic & noise
stresses post construction. Possible Structural Damage compromised views, limited access.
Elevated viaduct section.
Projected impaired views of the monument from the road
Gulabi Bagh, Dai Anga’s Tomb, Saruwala Maqbara integrated site: Built between 1655 - 18th
century these sites make up a continuous heritage property. Protected under Antiquities Act
1975. Impact: obstructed views, reduced access, possible structural damage due to vibration
and extreme proximity. Elevated Viaduct Section.
Buddhu ka Awa: Built 17th Century, protected under Antiquities Act 1975. Impact: Possible
structural damage due to vibrations. Less than 30' away from the elevated track. Obstructed
view, restricted access. Elevated viaduct section
JANI KHAN'S TOMB: Built 1748, protected under Antiquities Act
1975. Impact: Restricted Access, Obstructed view, elevated
viaduct section.
MAHABAT KHAN'S GARDEN: Built in late 16th or early 17th
Century, protected under Antiquities Act 1975. Impact: Restricted
access, obstructed view elevated viaduct section.
ZEBUNNISA'S TOMB: Built in 1669, protected under Antiquities
Act 1975. Impact: Further obstructed view, compromised vistas,
reduced access. Elevated viaduct section.
SHAH CHIRAGH: Mughal era shrine and mosque, built 1627.
Protected under Antiquities Act 1975. Impact: Damage due to
vibrations in gestation period. Further impact un-assessed but
within 200' of underground Central Station.
MOMINPURA GRAVEYARD: Pre-Mughal graveyard of specific
importance to Lahore's Shia community. Impact: Losing
area/graves, compromised security and privacy, visual
impairment, added noise. Elevated Viaduct Section. After protests
the government has recently provided verbal reassurances to the
Shia Community that the graveyard will not be touched.
NAULAKHA PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: Built 1853, Punjab Special
Premises, 1985. Impact: Losing front wall and trees, compromised
viability due to proximity of elevated track.
CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF THE RESURRECTION: Built 1887, unique
"Early English“ architectural style buildings commissioned by the
British. Impact: Land being taken by Project Pumping Station.
LAHORE HIGH COURT: Built 1889, protected under Punjab Special
Premises Preservation Ordinance 1985. Impact: Losing front
parking lot due to underground Central Station and permanent
exit/entry and ventilation structures. Cut and Cover Section
Lakshmi Mansions: Built 1935, Punjab Special
Premises Preservation Ordinance 1985
DELHI MILESTONE ON MCLEOD ROAD: Punjab
Special Premises Preservation Ordinance 1985.
Impact: Recently removed or destroyed
Kapurthala House, Anarkali: To be demolished for
Anarkali interchange station. Impact: Destruction of
the Art Deco Kapurthala estate. Loss of an
underprivileged community living here since
decades in some cases since and prior to Partition.
AIWAN-E-AUQAF: Built in the 19th Century. Impact:
Uncertain, but in very close proximity to the Central
underground station.
AIWAN-E-AUQAF BAGH: Being demolished to make
way for Central Station.
SUPREME COURT BUILDING LAHORE: Punjab Special
Premises Preservation Ordinance, 1985. Impact:
Uncertain, but Cut and Cover section of Project
Alignment abuts next to it.
25 properties include sites protected under the National Antiquities Act 1975 and/or
The Punjab Special Premises (Preservation) Ordinance 1985 which state that no new
construction can happen within 200ft of a listed site. At Shalimar Bagh the World
Heritage Convention 1972 mandates a 250’ distance. The OLMT alignment from
Chauburji to Shalimar passes through the most historic areas of the city oblivious to
the specified distance on these locations. Key heritage sites being affected are listed
as:
Circa 1849. Protected under Punjab Special Premises Preservation Ordinance 1985.
GPO circa 1849. Nabha Road Veranda being cut where marked. Front Garden being
taken.
20.5 m
19.9 m 10.2 m
Building Line of
Building Line of
Supreme Court
GPO
Building Building
Boundary Wall
of Supreme 2.3 m
Court Boundary Wall
1.6 m of GPO
Top Slab
Pile Wall
Base Slab
St Andrew’s
Presbytarian Church
Nabah Rd
Circa 1860S
Baba Mauj Darya: Built in 1591 by
Emperor Akbar, and the saint
interred in 1604 is an active
religious site. Protected under
Antiquities Act 1975.
ANARKALI STATION
G.P.O Chowk
http://epd.punjab.gov.pk/system/files/Section-3-Project%20Description.pdf
LOAD SHEDDING IN LAHORE: 6-12 HOURS/DAY
Pakistan has been facing substantial shortages in the power sector and the
province of Punjab is no exception. In Punjab, at present, there is a demand-
supply gap of about 4000 MW which is increasing at a rate of 6% per annum.
Punjab with 68% of the consumption of generated power and gas is worst
affected and has to endure both power and gas load shedding with adverse
social and economic consequences.
http://energy.punjab.gov.pk/
Security, Privacy & OLMT:
• 25.4 km of the track is elevated at a height of a 2.5-6 story building.
The track is at points very close to buildings on either side
• 250,000 passengers will be able to see into 100,000s of homes
• Current Security measures will be rendered ineffective.
• Churches, mosques, schools, hospitals and public buildings will be
vulnerable to terrorist attack
Lahore Metro Cost/km = $61.9million (2015-17)
Source: Transport Development in Asian Megacities, Shigeru Morichi, Surya Raj Acharya editors, Springer Books, 2013)
THE LARGER QUESTION: WATER + SANITATION/ EDUCATION VS.
ALLOCATED FUNDING FOR TRANSPORT & ROADS + TRANSPORT SUBSIDIES 2015-16
PUNJAB'S DEVELOPMENT BUDGET FOR 2015-
16: Education $0.55B including School
Education, Higher Education, Special
Education, Literacy, Sports and Youth Affairs.
Education, 55.564
Health & Family
Orange Metro Line Planning, 30.725
Water Supply &
Loan, 166.4
Sanitation, 24
Industries, 7.33
Livestock, 5.065
Agriculture , 10.725
Roads, Public
Building & Urban
Transport, 28.03 Development, 95.106
NORINCO Technical Proposal forms the basis for the OLMT Project. Not the JICA study.
LACK OF INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT
Public Hearing in June 2015. Concerns were raised about land acquisition, the threat to heritage
sites and the environment, none were sufficiently addressed. Not disclosed. The exact route,
exact land to be acquired, detailed plans, the EIA report. 3 sections of the EIA were placed on line by the
GOPb only
The LDA, TEPA, P and D dept , NESPAK, the Lahore Commissioner, and the current DG
archaeology have been asked for information/public documents in writing no information has
been forthcoming
The EIA was prepared by NESPAK, the same company hired as consultants to monitor the
build.
The PC1 was also prepared by NESPAK. Checked and Approved by General Manager
Operations, Punjab Metrobus Authority. Approved by Housing, Urban Development & Public
Health Engineering Department (HUD & PHED)-
DDEMANDS: STOP CONSTRUCTION IMMEDIATELY,
CONDUCT A FULL PUBLIC REVIEW OF
THE PROJECT
For long term planning (next 25-100 years), use Tunnel Boring
Machine (TBM) with specific focus on heritage and human costs with
regards to station exit entry positions. TBM spread over decades will
not put a huge pressure on the economy as this is doing. London
Underground started being built in the 19th century, it is still being
built.