Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Work Instruction For Error Proofing
Work Instruction For Error Proofing
Kiran Walimbe3
During the third phase of advanced product quality planning (APQP), the CFT shall identify
the processes, where, due to avoidable human errors, the rating of “occurrence” and/or
“detection” have increased thereby increasing the risk priority number (RPN) for the process.
Poka-yoke techniques of mistake proofing are applied to these processes in order to lower the
ratings of occurrence and/or detection.
Analysis of customer complaints also reveals activities which are in need of mistake
proofing, in order to achieve a zero defect level of working. CFT will undertake application
of poka-yoke techniques to these processes.
3. The selected mistake proofing technique should qualify the following criteria:
Inexpensive
Based upon common sense, preferably of the operator or the first line employee
It MUST eliminate occurrence/detection of the problem at the source itself
After having classified the source, apply one of the following techniques, as appropriate, to
prevent the occurrence:
Use of 100 percent prevention devices such as fouling pins; contoured locators or
templates; proximity or photo-electric sensors; limit- or micro-switches; warning
lights or buzzers; or pressure transducers.
Design to modify to ensure that in assembly the parts shall not join if aligned
wrongly. The machine will not run if operators’ hands or feet are not outside, or if the
job and tooling are not in right position.
These techniques should be integral part of the process. The devices are placed sufficiently
close to where the mistakes occur, providing fast feedback to the operator, of mistakes
occurring.
5. Detection oriented poka-yoke should use one of the following techniques for ensuring 100
percent detection of the mistake:
It should be autonomous inspection occurring without intervention.
It should be 100 percent inspection which occurs without intervention.
It should determine before-the-fact whether the conditions for 100 percent quality
exist or not.
It should make the error visible to the operator.
Consider supply of exactly made kits of components to the assembler, so that any
balance part will signal error in assembly.
Consider use of electronic sensors to activate warning lights or buzzers.
Use color coded parts or graphics.
Make use of contact devices (e.g., fixtures, limit switches, probes or non-contact
devices such as LEDs and pressure transducers).
6. Effectiveness of the applied poka-yoke technique should be judged after observing the
performance, for a period on minimum one month.
1. Start with a list of lessons learned or root-cause analysis. If neither is available, start with a
list of issues
2. When approaching a problem, develop a process map such that there is only one factor or
motion is involved. (i.e: Steps involve in mating 2 connectors: direction of motion,
alignment, angle of approach, self alignment features, line of sight, number of opportunities
for mating (presence of insertion key), self locking, etc.
3. Use FMEA (Failure Mode Effect Analysis) to quantify and prioritize risk for each of
process step
4. Ensure balance between defect cost vs. defect cost avoidance. This is one area that at
times, a $1 is spent in design corrections to save a dime in manufacturing process.
B) After having classified the source, apply one of the following techniques, as
appropriate, to prevent the occurrence:
5. Detection oriented Poka Yoke should use one of the following techniques for
ensuring 100% detection of the mistake:
o It should be autonomous inspection occurring without intervention.
o It should be 100% inspection which occurs without intervention.
o It should determine 'before the fact' whether the conditions for 100%
quality exist or not.
o It should make the error visible to the operator.
o Consider supply of exactly made kits of components to the assembler,
so that any balance part will signal error in assembly.
o Consider use of electronic sensors to activate warning lights or
buzzers.
o Use color coded parts or graphics.
o Make use of contact devices e.g. Fixtures, Limit switches, probes or
Non-contact devices e.g. LEDs, Pressure transducers etc.
6. Effectiveness of the applied Poka Yoke technique should be judged after
observing the performance, for a period on minimum one month.