Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Post Moterm BM t2

    Uploaded by

    nurul najihah
    61 views3 pages
    This document analyzes student performance in the 2017 mid-year Bahasa Melayu examination for Form 2 students. It provides statistics showing that 66 out of 66 students passed, with grades ranging from A to F. It then lists the students who passed with grades between 40-59%, followed by those who received grades between 60-79%, and finally those who achieved grades over 80%. The document concludes by identifying weaknesses and strengths in each grade category and proposing interventions to address the weaknesses.

    Original Description:

    bm

    Original Title

    Post Moterm Bm t2

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document analyzes student performance in the 2017 mid-year Bahasa Melayu examination for Form 2 students. It provides statistics showing that 66 out of 66 students passed, with grades ranging from A to F. It then lists the students who passed with grades between 40-59%, followed by those who received grades between 60-79%, and finally those who achieved grades over 80%. The document concludes by identifying weaknesses and strengths in each grade category and proposing interventions to address the weaknesses.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    61 views3 pages

    Post Moterm BM t2

    Uploaded by

    nurul najihah
    This document analyzes student performance in the 2017 mid-year Bahasa Melayu examination for Form 2 students. It provides statistics showing that 66 out of 66 students passed, with grades ranging from A to F. It then lists the students who passed with grades between 40-59%, followed by those who received grades between 60-79%, and finally those who achieved grades over 80%. The document concludes by identifying weaknesses and strengths in each grade category and proposing interventions to address the weaknesses.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 3

    ANALISA PEPERIKSAAN PERTENGAHAN TAHUN 2017

    TINGKATAN 2

    1. ANALISA MATAPELAJARAN BAHASA MELAYU PEPERIKSAAN PERTENGAHAN TAHUN 2017

    TING. CALON A B C D E F % GPMP


    1 66/66 5 28 26 6 1 0 100 2.55

    2. SENARAI PELAJAR LULUS (40-59):

    1. MUHAMMAD AIMAN BIN TAHAR


    2. MUHAMMAD FIKHRI HILMI BIN NORHISHAM
    3. ANWAR ZAKARIA BIN ABD RAHMAN
    4. ISMAIL RIFAEI BIN NOOR AZMAN
    5. ANWAR ZAKARIA BIN ABD RAHMAN
    6. MUHAMMAD IZZUL FITRI BON MOHAMMAD MUFID
    7. MUHAMMAD RADZUAN BIN AHMAD SAAD
    8. RADEN SITI NUR HAZIQAH BT NAHARUDIN

    3. SENARAI PELAJAR KEPUJIAN (60-79):

    1. AHMAD HARIS ANWAR BIN MOHD AZIZAN


    2. AIMAN HAKIM BIN MAZLAN
    3. ALYAA IFFAH IZZAH BINTI ABDULLAH
    4. AMRIL KHAIRULNAS BIN YA’AKOB
    5. ASMA RISYA AKHTAR BINTI MAHPUZ
    6. AYUNI HANYSAH BINTI ROSLY
    7. BALQIS BINTI MOHAMAD MOKHTAROM
    8. IZZAH NADHIRAH BINTI HAMDAN
    9. MOHAMAD HAIQAL BIN MOHAMAD ISHA
    10. MOHAMMAD FAIZ BIN MOHAMMAD ZAIDI
    11. MUHAMAD NORHAFIZAL BIN MUHAMAD ROSHISHAM
    12. MUHAMMAD ADIB RIDHWAN BIN MOHD RAZEE
    13. MUHAMMAD ARIF ARSHAD BIN MOHD AMRI
    14. MUHAMMAD FAIQ SYABIL BIN MAZLAN
    15. MUHAMMAD RIFQY SHAZID BIN YASID
    16. MUHAMMAD WAIL BIN SAIFULLAH
    17. NUR ALIFAH SAHIRA BINTI AHMAD KAMIZIN
    18. NUR FARIESHA HUDA BINTI ZAIHAN
    19. NUR SUHAILA BINTI SAZALI
    20. NURUL ASYIQIN BINTI MOHD YANI
    21. PUTERI NORSOLEHAH BINTI ABDUL HALIM
    22. SITI NURAMIRAH BT MD KADIR
    23. WALID SUFI BIN ABDUL MAJID
    24. AHMAD IMMANUL MIKHAEL BIN MOHD NOOR NIZAM
    25. AHMAD SYAKIRIN BIN SANI
    26. ALIF AZRI BIN ISKANDAR KAMIL
    27. AZ ZUBAYR BIN KHAIRUL ABIDIN
    28. FARHAH IDAYU BINTI ZAI EFFENDY
    29. HANI INFITAH BINTI ABD HALIM
    30. MUHAMMAD AIMAN BIN SHAHIZAN
    31. MUHAMMAD ANNUR ROYYAN BIN MD SADAKAH
    32. MUHAMMAD AZFAR FARHAN
    33. MUHAMMAD FATHI IQBAL BIN MOHD FADHLULLAH
    34. MUHAMMAD HAKIMY AZRIE BIN MOHD SHAH RIZAL
    35. MUHAMMAD HAZIQ BIN HARON
    36. MUHAMMAD ILHAM BIN IRWAN
    37. MUHAMMAD NAJMI BIN MUHAMMAD RAZI
    38. MUHAMMAD SYAZWAN BIN MOHD RAJAK
    39. NUR DINIE QISTINA BINTI M YAZID
    40. NUR IZZAH HUMAIRA BINTI BADZRUL HISHAM
    41. NUREEN IMANINA BT HASNIRI
    42. NURELLISYA HUMAIRA BT HAIRONI
    43. NURUL ATIKAH BT MOHD YAMIN
    44. NURUL HAIFA HIDAYAH BINTI SHAMSUDDIN
    45. NUSKHOTUN NASIHAH BT MACHFURIN
    46. SITI NURKHAIRUADIBA BINTI MD KHAIRULIDZAM
    47. SYAIDATUL INSYIRAH BINTI SHAHRULAZHAR
    48. TENGKU ANIS MASHITAH BINTI TENGKU AB RAHMAN

    4.SENARAI PELAJAR CEMERLANG(80-100) :

    1. AIN AFFARIHA BINTI KHAIR RUSMAN


    2. ASMAAQ BINTI ANUAR
    3. MUHAMMAD AMIRUL IRFAN BIN ZULKIFLI
    4. NISA IRDINA BINTI MOHD RADZI
    5. SITI NUR ATHIRAH BT HAMZAH
    6. ALYA MAISARAH BINTI MD ROSLE
    7. AMIRAH SUHAIL BINTI MAHUSSAIN
    8. NIK NURSHAHIRA BINTI MASRUM
    9. NUR EMYLIA NATASHA BINTI RAZALI
    10. SITI NURLIYANA BT NASRUDIN

    BIL KATEGORI POST MORTERM INTERVENSI


    1 PELAJAR LULUS KELEMAHAN:
    1. Pelajar lemah dari aspek Memastikan pelajar
    tatabahasa. membuat kamus
    2. Pelajar tidak membaca novel tatabahasa.
    walaupun telah diberi tajuk.
    3. Pelajar kurang pengetahuan Menyediakan modul
    berkaitan isu semasa. bimbingan berfokus

    2 PELAJAR KEPUJIAN KELEMAHAN:


    1. Pelajar lemah dalam Menyediakan modul
    menjawab soalan subjektif. bimbingan berfokus
    2. Kurang menguasai soalan
    KBAT. Kelas bimbingan
    berfokus

    3 PELAJAR KELEMAHAN:
    CEMERLANG 1. Pelajar cuai ketika menjawab Modul bimbingan
    soalan. berfokus.

    KEKUATAN: Program GMT2


    1. Pelajar dapat menguasai isu
    semasa dan dapat membuat
    huraian dengan baik.

    You might also like