Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(14.0.1) Taxation of Companies Engaged in Manufacturing Trades, Certain Trading Operations Carried On in Shannon Airport and Certain Trading Operations Carried On in The Custom House Docks Area
(14.0.1) Taxation of Companies Engaged in Manufacturing Trades, Certain Trading Operations Carried On in Shannon Airport and Certain Trading Operations Carried On in The Custom House Docks Area
(14.0.1) Taxation of Companies Engaged in Manufacturing Trades, Certain Trading Operations Carried On in Shannon Airport and Certain Trading Operations Carried On in The Custom House Docks Area
Important Note
The scheme of manufacturing relief expired on 31st December 2010. The relief
was only available to companies which commenced a manufacturing trade before
23rd July 1998 or companies which concluded a grant agreement with an
industrial development agency on or before 31st July 1998. The scheme expired
for other manufacturing companies on 31st December 2002 and for licensed
operations in the IFSC and Shannon on 31st December 2005. This master
document reflects how the relief operated under the relevant TCA when it was
available.
Summary
Part 14 TCA 1997 governs the 10% scheme for manufacturing industry generally.
The relief applies to income derived by companies from sales of goods manufactured
by them in the State, whether that income arises from domestic or export sales and to
income from the rendering in the State of manufacturing services (the subjecting of
goods, not owned by the company providing such services, to a process of
manufacture). Retail sales and sales into intervention are excluded.
Section 443
Section 443 defines the “goods” the profits from the sale of which may qualify for
relief under this Part. Broadly, the goods must be goods manufactured in the State in
the course of a trade by the company claiming the relief in respect of that trade. In
addition to this general definition of goods in subsection (1), subsections (2) to (4)
expand on the definition to include certain specific commodities while subsections (5)
to (7) exclude certain goods from this basic definition. Subsections (8) to (19) treat for
the purposes of the relief certain services and activities as being the manufacture of
goods and receipts from the sale of such services and activities as amounts receivable
from the sale of goods. This mechanism ensures that such services and activities are
brought within the ambit of the relief.
“Manufacture” or cognate words are not defined for the purposes of this Part. The
words thus have their normal and natural meaning (that is, manufactured goods are
goods subjected to a process of manufacture as normally understood). Whether or not
a given trading activity constitutes manufacturing for the purpose of relief under this
Part is a question of fact to be determined by the inspector to whom a claim for relief
under section 448 is submitted or, in the event of an appeal against his/her decision,
by the Appeal Commissioners. Guidance as to what constitutes manufacturing for the
purposes of relief under this Part may be obtained from the considerable body of case
law which has arisen on the subject.
1
Tests and guidelines to be applied in determining whether an activity is or is not
manufacturing have been laid down by the Courts in a large number of decided cases,
including the following cases:
Many of the decided cases relate to the legislation prior to the insertion by Finance
Act 1990 of subsection (5) into section 39 Finance Act 1980 which is now section
443(6) TCA 1997.
Meaning of goods
“goods” are goods manufactured within the State in the course of a trade by the
company which is claiming relief under this Part in relation to that trade. The explicit
references in the definition to the trade in respect of which the relief is claimed are
made for the purpose of excluding from the meaning of “goods” for the purpose of the
relief any goods manufactured by the company in the course of a separate trade in
respect of which it may continue to claim export sales relief until the end of its span of
such relief. Such goods are not therefore “goods” for the purpose of the relief
provided by section 448.
Where a manufacturing company supplies its products to another company which then
sells the goods and one company is a 90% subsidiary of the other or both are 90%
subsidiary of a third company, then, sales by the selling company of the other’s
manufactured goods are regarded as sales of goods manufactured by the selling
company. A “90 per cent subsidiary” of a company is defined in section 9 as meaning
a company not less than 90 per cent of the ordinary shares of which are owned by the
other company.
If the inter-company sales show a mark-up over the production costs of the
manufacturing company, that company qualifies in the normal way for relief under
section 448 in respect of the income from the sale of the goods to the selling
company. Accordingly this provision can result in both companies qualifying for the
relief. This is justifiable because, in effect, the companies are a single entity divided
into separate manufacturing and sales units.
2
meat processed in the State in premises approved and inspected under
the European Communities (Fresh Meat) Regulations, 1987 (S.I. No.
284 of 1987) (it should be noted that where meat processing is carried
on in any other premises it may still qualify for relief if it satisfies the
general tests applied to any process to determine whether it constitutes
the manufacture of goods),
Excluded from the definition of goods are goods sold by retail by the manufacturing
company. Sales of goods which would constitute wholesale selling, the direct selling
of goods to a trade for use in the trade or to some other corporate person for use in the
undertaking of that person (for example, a sale of furniture to a church or Government
Department) are not caught by this exclusion.
Goods are not to be regarded as manufactured if the process from which they derive
consists primarily of—
repairing / reconditioning.
This provision does not affect the provisions of subsections (2) to (4) which extend
the meaning of goods or the provisions of subsections (8) to (15) which deem certain
activities to be the manufacture of goods. In all such cases manufacturing relief is to
be available.
This provision is without prejudice to the generality of the existing tests and
guidelines laid down by the Courts to determine whether goods are manufactured.
Accordingly, in determining whether goods are manufactured, it is necessary to
examine both the product sold by the company and the process from which the
products resulted. The product is to be examined to consider what it is, how it
appears, what qualities it possesses, what value it has. The process is to be examined
to identify the extent to which it conferred on the product the characteristics that it
possesses. If the income from the sale of the product is to qualify for relief, the
changes in the product and the extent to which these changes were conferred on the
product by the process must be of sufficient degree to regard the goods as
manufactured.
3
This provision emphasises the nature of the process so that in the case of certain
products the nature of the process may be decisive in taking a company outside the
scope of the relief, even if the product test is otherwise satisfied.
It is not possible within the terms of the legislation to analyse a manufacturing activity
into its component parts and to suggest in relation to each part that it could be
excluded by one of these five categories. The activities by which the goods are
produced should be viewed as a single process and no attempt should be made to
break this single process into its component parts. The process carried out by a
company should be looked at in its totality and is only taxed at the standard rate if it
falls primarily into one only of the specified categories.
In addition, a company cannot qualify for the low rate by arranging for some other
person to carry out a manufacturing process on its behalf. A company only qualifies if
it carries out a manufacturing process itself. This exclusion does not apply to closely
connected companies which structure themselves so that one company manufactures
the goods and the other company sells them. In such cases, both companies qualify for
the 10 per cent rate in respect of the manufactured goods by virtue of subsection
(1)(b). That arrangement does not apply, of course, to goods sold by retail.
A company may subcontract part of the work. In such a case the activities of that
company should be examined to see whether, taken together, they are sufficient to
constitute the manufacture of goods.
Intervention sales (normally of butter, milk powder or processed beef) are excluded
from relief under this Part. An anti-avoidance provision relating to indirect sales into
intervention is incorporated so as to ensure that a company which sells goods to a
subsidiary at a normal profit does not get the benefit of the low rate of tax where the
subsidiary on-sells the goods into intervention at the price it paid for them (thus
earning no taxable profit). However, the rendering of manufacturing services (for
example, de-boning) to meat owned by the intervention agency is not to be regarded
as a sale into intervention and, therefore, such a service is not disqualified for the
relief.
The rendering of certain services and activities in the State are treated for the purposes
of relief under this Part as the manufacture in the State of goods. As the rendering of
such services/activities does not involve the selling of any actual goods provision is
made to ensure that the receipts from such activities are regarded as amounts
receivable from the sale of goods for the purposes of applying the relief under this
Part. The following are the services/activities concerned.
4
dams or harbours. Moveable entities are not regarded as works (for
example, ships or aircraft). Certain fixed oil rigs may, however, qualify
as “works”.
- the provision by the company using the qualifying ship for the purposes
just described of on-board services such as the operation of ships cinemas,
bars or restaurants ancillary to the carriage of passengers and cargo,
5
cooking, smoking, quick freezing and packaging. Each claim should be
examined by reference to the details of the process involved,
- the “wet leasing” of a qualifying ship for use for the purpose of the
carriage of passengers or cargo for reward or the subjecting of fish to a
manufacturing process aboard a qualifying ship. Under a “wet lease” or
“non-demise” charter the lessor provides the ship, crew, fuel, provisions,
etc and is responsible for the direction and control of the ship and the crew
throughout the period of the charter. This is in contrast to a “dry lease” or
“bare-boat” charter under which the lessor provides the ship only and the
lessee is responsible for the provision of the crew and the direction and
control of the vessel and crew. The lease payment in this instance would
be chargeable at the standard rate of corporation tax but if the lessee was
carrying on a qualifying shipping trade the income from that trade would
be chargeable at the 10 per cent rate of corporation tax,
Excluded as qualifying ships whether or not they satisfy any of these criteria are
fishing trawlers (other than a factory ship which would otherwise be treated as a
fishing vessel), tugs (other than certain ocean-going tugs), dredgers and floating rigs
and working platforms of any kind and vessels used for servicing offshore
installations such as oil-rigs, platforms, factory ships and the like.
Also excluded by means of a catch-all provision, is any other vessel, not specified
above, which is of a type not normally used for “qualifying shipping activities”.
6
Area as they are entitled to the 10 per cent rate by virtue of section
445.
Advertising services
7
Manufacturing services
Where transactions take place at artificial prices between associated persons for the
purpose of inflating the amount of a company’s profits to which the relief would
apply and of reducing the profits of the other party to the transaction which would be
liable to tax at the normal rate, the income or losses of both parties fall to be
recomputed for tax purposes on the basis of an arms-length price so as to negative any
tax advantage which would be involved in shifting profits from one party to the
transaction to the other - (section 453).
Relief is not available under this Chapter in respect of corporation tax referable to
income from mining operations or construction operations even where such
income arises in the course of manufacturing activities. Mining operations are as
defined in section 444(1)(a); construction operations are as defined in Chapter 2 of
Part 18 - (section 444).
Section 448 is the substantive relieving provision for the 10 per cent scheme. It
provides for a reduction by a specified fraction in the corporation tax referable to the
income from the sale of goods manufactured in the State by the company claiming the
relief.
8
1/5th in the case of such corporation tax which is referable to the
financial year 2003 or any subsequent financial year.
The reduction is, in effect, from the standard rate of corporation tax to 10 per cent.
Relief may be given, subject to the making of a claim before the assessment for the
relevant period has become final and conclusive, as respects income from sales of
such goods which arises in an accounting period or part of an accounting period
ending—
It is to be noted that in the case of sections 445 (Shannon) and 446 (IFSC) the relief
given by virtue of these sections is not available in respect of income arising after 31
December, 2002, except in the case of income arising from operations approved for
carry on in Shannon before 31 May, 1998, or approved for carry on in the IFSC
before 31 July, 1998, where title to the 10 per cent rate expires on 31 December,
2005. The section lays down rules for the computation of the relief under this Part.
The principal rule is that the corporation tax referable to income from the sale of
qualifying goods – this is the tax which is to be reduced by the specified fraction – is
to be quantified as the same proportion of the corporation tax referable to the
company’s income (“the relevant corporation tax”) as the income from the sale of
“goods” (quantified by reference to sales) bears to the total income brought into
charge to corporation tax.
“relevant corporation tax” is the corporation tax which would be chargeable for the
relevant accounting period before any deduction from that tax under —
this section,
sections 22A, 239, 241, 440, 441, 449, 644B and 827, and
The resulting corporation tax is then subject to a further exclusion, namely, the
exclusion of the corporation tax chargeable on the part of the company’s profits
attributable to chargeable gains for that period. [See also note on subsection (5A).]
The part of the company’s profits attributable to chargeable gains for that period is
taken to be the amount brought into the company’s profits for the relevant accounting
period for the purposes of corporation tax in respect of chargeable gains before any
deduction for charges on income, expenses of management or other amounts which
can be deducted from or set against or treated as reducing profits of more than one
description (such other amounts would include section 396(2) losses, excess “Case V”
capital allowances (section 308(4)), and group relief (section 420)).
9
The purpose of this provision is to enable the relief under this Part to be applied to the
corporation tax referable to the income from the sale of qualifying goods before the
granting of reliefs which are not set against that income but against the tax on that
income. Any relief due under these provisions of the Corporation Tax Acts is, of
course, given in addition to relief under this Part.
The relief
The corporation tax referable to the income from the sale of qualifying goods is
defined as the amount which bears the same proportion to “the relevant corporation
tax” as the income from the sale of qualifying goods bears to the total income for
corporation tax purposes of the relevant accounting period. In other words, the
amount of tax to be reduced by the specified fraction can be determined by the
application of the following formula —
The sales of goods must be made in the course of carrying on a trade which consists
of or includes the manufacture of goods.
A company must claim and prove its entitlement to the relief for each relevant
accounting period.
Where the income of a trade which is the subject of a claim for relief under this Part
arises not only from sales of goods but also from sales of merchandise (that is, goods
other than goods defined in section 443) or from sources other than sales of goods and
merchandise (for example, fees for services rendered) it is necessary to isolate the
income of the trade which arises from the sale of goods.
Income from the sale of goods is after deducting relief in respect of charges, losses,
and excess charges as defined in subsection (1). (An effective 10 per cent rate of
corporation tax is achieved by reducing corporation tax referable to income from
manufacturing described in legislation as income from the sale of goods. Corporation
tax referable to income from the sale of goods is calculated by apportioning
corporation tax for the accounting period between income from the sale of goods and
other income. If income from the sale of goods was not net of the ringfenced losses,
etc. the income from the sale of goods would be overstated, corporation tax referable
to income from the sale of goods would be overstated and, consequently, the
reduction in corporation tax would be excessive so as to result in an effective rate
lower than 10 per cent.)
The company’s income from the sale of goods is to be taken to be the same proportion
of its income for corporation tax purposes from sales of goods and merchandise as the
amount receivable (that is, sales revenue) from the sale of goods bears to the total
amount receivable from the sale of goods and merchandise. The only sales receipts to
10
be taken into account for this purpose are those of the trade which is the subject of a
claim for the relief provided by this Part. Effectively, “income from the sale of goods”
is determined by the formula —
[For any accounting period ending on or after 18th February 2008 trading charges
under S.243A, trading losses under S.396A and group relief under S.420A must be
deducted from the above figure where they have been allowed against the company’s
income for the relevant accounting period from the sale of those goods – see Section
448(3) (b).
Note also that for the purpose of calculating 'total income brought into charge to
corporation tax' as referred to in subsection (2), any amounts allowed under Sections
243A, 396A or 420A and any excepted trade profits (S.21A) must be deducted from
the sum determined by S.4(4)(b)]
The trading income from the sale of goods and merchandise to be so apportioned is a
company’s “income from the sale in the course of the trade of goods and
merchandise” if the receipts of the trade arise from sales of goods and merchandise
only. Where the receipts of a trade include amounts in addition to receipts from sales
of goods and merchandise the trading income referable to sales of goods and
merchandise is to be adjusted to whatever amount the inspector or, on appeal, the
Appeal Commissioners consider to be just and reasonable.
This later provision may apply to a wide variety of receipts such as fees for services
rendered, receipts from insurance against loss of profits or loss of stock-in-trade, or
subsidies which are to be regarded as revenue receipts. Generally the amount to be
deducted from the income for corporation tax purposes of the trade is the total of such
receipts less any attributable expenses. The balance of the income of the trade after
such a deduction is the income of the trade from sales of goods and merchandise.
The company’s income from the sale in the course of its trade from goods and
merchandise” is the amount before any deduction for any of the ringfenced losses,
charges or group relief.
Any distortions which might arise, in determining the income from the sale of goods,
because of the impact of variable levels of duties or VAT on the sale prices of the
various goods and merchandise included in the amounts receivable from the sale of
goods and the amount receivable from the sale of goods and merchandise is
eliminated by allowing the deduction from the amount received from the sales of
goods and merchandise of any amount of duty or VAT paid or charged in respect of
goods or merchandise.
Duty or VAT may increase the cost of raw materials used in the manufacture of goods
or the sale price of goods sold on the home market as opposed to goods exported. By
11
eliminating all such variables from amounts receivable from sales of goods or from
sales of goods and merchandise, a more accurate figure for income from sales of
“goods” is obtained.
The inspector, by notice in writing, may call for the furnishing of such information or
particulars as may be necessary to given effect to this provision. The furnishing of
such information or particulars as is required by the inspector is essential if a claim for
relief under this Part is to be admitted.
the “total income brought into charge to corporation tax” for the
accounting period, calculated in accordance with section 4(4)(b), is
reduced by so much of the profits of the company for the accounting
period as is charged to the higher rate of corporation tax under section
21A. This provision is necessary because, without it, if the corporation
tax of a company included tax charged at the higher rate under section
21A and its total income included income underlying that charge, the
formula used in subsection (2) to calculate manufacturing relief would
not result in the desired effective rate of 10 per cent on manufacturing
income.
Time limit
A claim for relief under this Part must be submitted before the assessment for the
appropriate accounting period becomes final and conclusive.
12