Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Volume 77 Issue 2015 (Doi 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.003) Kaya, Zulkuf Erken, Ayfer - Cyclic and Post-Cyclic Monotonic Behavior of Adapazari Soils
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Volume 77 Issue 2015 (Doi 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.003) Kaya, Zulkuf Erken, Ayfer - Cyclic and Post-Cyclic Monotonic Behavior of Adapazari Soils
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Volume 77 Issue 2015 (Doi 10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.003) Kaya, Zulkuf Erken, Ayfer - Cyclic and Post-Cyclic Monotonic Behavior of Adapazari Soils
art ic l e i nf o a b s t r a c t
Article history: The August 17, 1999 Kocaeli earthquake affected the city of Adapazari, which is located in the northwest
Received 23 December 2013 of Turkey, with severe liquefaction and bearing capacity failures causing tilting of buildings, excessive
Received in revised form settlements and lateral displacements. To understand the stress–strain behavior and pore pressure
25 March 2015
behavior of undisturbed soils during the earthquake, the cyclic and post-cyclic shear strength tests have
Accepted 3 May 2015
been conducted on soil samples obtained from Adapazari in a cyclic triaxial test system within the scope
of this research. Cyclic tests have been conducted under stress controlled and undrained conditions.
Keywords: Post-cyclic monotonic tests have been conducted following cyclic tests. The strength curves obtained in
Dynamic triaxial test the experiments showed that the dynamic resistance of silty sand was found to be 45% lower than those
Cyclic behavior
of high plasticity soils (MH). The strength of clayey soils with the plasticity index of PI ¼15–16% was
Post-cyclic monotonic behavior
lower compared to the strength of high plasticity soils. Also, it was observed that silty sand soils had the
Adapazari soils
Kocaeli earthquake lowest strength. The dynamic strength of the soils increased with the increase in plasticity.
& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.05.003
0267-7261/& 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
84 Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96
N
Tekeler
Ozanlar
Sakarya
Şeker Karaosman
Istiklal
Orta Güneşler
Cumhuriyet Yağcılar
Semerciler Tiğcılar
Yenigün
Serdivan Yenidoğan
Papuçcular
Erenler
Maltepe
Ankara
Istanbul
Sakarya Nehri
Hanlılar
Ankara
Organize
Main fault
Toyota
Istanbul : Locations of
Scale :1/50 000
Fig. 2. Map of the locations of SPT boring used in this study.
Table 1
Districts showing locations of SPT borings.
N E
o
BH1 Yenidogan 40 46.33 30o 23.55 PTT side
BH2 Papuccular 40o 46.24 30o 24.07 Turning building side (no liquefaction)
BH3 Yenigun 40o 46.38 30o 24.22 Bearing capacity loss
BH4 Tigcilar 40o 46.00 30o 24.00 Turning building side (liquefaction)
BH6 Cumhuriyet 40o 46.00 30o 23.70 in the face of Ataturk School (liquefaction)
BH7 Cumhuriyet 40o 46.00 30o 23.70 in the face of Ataturk School (liquefaction)
BH8 Semerciler 40o 46.00 30o 23.00 –
BH10 Record Station 40o 44.22 30o 23.04 Public Works and Settlement Directorate
BH11 Karaosman 40o 47.00 30o 23.00 –
BH12 Karaosman 40o 47.00 30o 23.00 –
86 Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96
S4 FC
4 Silt
T3
8
Silty Clayey Sand
12
Silt
16 Clay
20 Silt
24
Clay
Silty Sand
wn
28
LL
Silt
PL
32
Table 2
Physical properties of the samples used in the liquefaction experiments.
BH no. Test no. Depth (m) wn (%) FC (%) LL (%) PL (%) PI (%) Ic γs (g/cm³) N30 CSR Soil type
wn, water content; FC, fines content; LL, liquid limit; PL, plastic limit; PI, plasticity index; Ic, consistency index; γs, specific gravity; N30, SPT blow count value; and CSR, cyclic
stress ratio.
4.2. Laboratory tests of: wn ¼22–50%, FC ¼1–100%, PI¼ 0–40% and wn ¼22–50%, and SPT
values are in the range of N30 ¼ 4–44.
A series of laboratory tests, including index properties tests Consistency index (Ic) is useful in the study of the field behavior
(sieve analysis, specific gravity, liquid limit and plastic limit tests), of saturated fine-grained soils (Tables 2–3). If the Ic of a soil is
oedometer tests, cyclic and post-cyclic monotonic triaxial com- equal to unity, it is at the plastic limit. Similarly, a soil with an Ic
pression tests were performed using the SPT samples and undis- equaling zero is at its liquid limit. The consistency index changes
turbed Shelby tube samples to determine the properties and from 0.333 to 0.762 for I. Group test samples. In the II. Group tests,
strength characteristics of the soils obtained from boreholes also, Ic changes from 0.500 to 1.000 except for the six soil samples
drilled in Adapazari city. with Ic ¼ 0.217–0.462. Generally, the consistency of the second
group test samples is expressed as medium-stiff and stiff.
4.3. Soil properties
4.4. Sample preparation
The physical properties of the specimens tested and cyclic
stress ratios (CSRs) are presented in Tables 2 and 3. The grain size To minimize disturbance of fine-grained (clay, silty clay, silt
distributions of the samples tested for a group of SM, ML, and MH etc.) soils obtained from the districts of Adapazari city after Kocaeli
are shown in Fig. 4; and those of the other group of CL and CH are earthquake, Shelby tubes of approximately 7 cm in diameter and
given in Fig. 5. 80 cm in height were used. Sample preparation was performed in
In this paper, liquefaction tests are referred to as “I. Group”, accordance with the Japanese Geotechnical Standard [19].
cyclic loading tests and static tests following cyclic loading are Moreover, the soils (silt, silty sand, sandy silt, etc.), which had no
referred to as “II. Group”. In the I. Group tests, which are shown in potential to stand in original form after being taken from the Shelby
Table 2, the water content of the specimens is wn ¼29–50%, fines tubes, were kept in the freezer along with the Shelby tubes as the
content is FC¼ 39–98%, plasticity index is PI¼0–22%. The uncor- water was drained through holes made at the ends of the tubes.
rected SPT blow count of silty sand is 23 while the SPT value of soft Tubes were transversely divided into sections of about 12–15 cm.
low plastic silt is 5. In the II. Group tests, samples have the values Then, samples were retrieved from tubes which were split on both
Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96 87
Table 3
Physical properties of samples in which strain controlled monotonic tests were performed at the end of 20 cyclic loading application stages.
BH no. Test no. Depth (m) wn (%) FC (%) LL (%) PL (%) PI (%) Ic γs (kN/m³) N30 CSR Soil type
wn, water content; FC, fines content; LL, liquid limit; PL, plastic limit; PI, plasticity index; Ic, consistency index; γs, specific gravity; N30, SPT blow count value; and CSR, cyclic
stress ratio.
100
S3-1
4.5 m in Adapazari city is slightly overconsolidated. Such deter-
90 S3-2 MH mined overconsolidation ratios are compatible with the results of
80 S3-3
S3-4
(PI=31-37) the experiments conducted by Bray and Sancio [12], and Sancio
70
et al. [20], and Sancio [21], and Erken and Ulker [22].
Percent Finer
S3-5
60 S3-6
S4-1 It is reported by Sancio [21] that “The actual stress history
50
S6-2 profile in Adapazari somewhat uncertain; however, the shallow
40 S7-1
30 S7-2 SM-ML soil deposits tested in his study are believed to have OCRs between
S7-3
20 S8-1
(PI=NP-20) 2 and 4, due primarily to desiccation, which has an important
10 S8-2 effect on the stress state of the soil. Stresses in the pore water due
S8-3
0 to desiccation that have a magnitude beyond the in-situ over-
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 burden stress, as is believed to be the case of Adapazari, will
Particle Size (mm) induce hydrostatic (isotropic) consolidation. Therefore, the ratio
Fig. 4. Grain size distribution of test specimens (SM, ML, MH). between the horizontal and vertical effective stresses is equal or
closes to one (which corresponds to isotropic consolidation) at this
100 stage.” Therefore, in this study the samples were loaded under
90
T3-1
T5-1
isotropic confining pressure.
T5-2 PI=44
80 T5-3
T6-1
70
Percent Finer
T6-2
60 T6-3
T6-4
5. Conducting of cyclic tests
50 T7-1
T7-2
40 T9-1
T9-2
The cyclic triaxial test is one of the most reliable and useful
30 T9-3
T10-1
laboratory tests for determining the stress–strain characteristics of
20 T11-1
T11-2 PI=7 soils under dynamic loading. The test can simulate field conditions
10 T12-1 and permits excess pore water pressure measurement so its
T12-2
0
10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001
results can be accepted as more reliable than those of other tests
[23]. The cyclic triaxial compression tests were performed in
Particle Size (mm)
accordance with the Japanese Geotechnical Standard [24,25] with
Fig. 5. Grain size distribution of test specimens (CL, CH). the failure criterion defined as 5% axial strain.
The cyclic triaxial test systems located at the Istanbul Technical
sides equally by the planer in the longitudinal. The specimens were University Soil Dynamic Laboratory were used in this study. Cyclic
prepared so that the length was double the width. Therefore, the triaxial strength test results are used for evaluating the ability of a
diameter was 50 mm, and the length was 100 mm. The prepared soil to resist the shear stresses induced in a soil mass due to
test sample and testing apparatus are shown in Fig. 6. earthquake or other cyclic loading. The cyclic triaxial test is used
According to the results of oedometer tests, the overconsolida- mostly to determine cyclic soil strength.
tion ratios of soil samples taken from BH11 (2.0–2.5 m), BH11 If soils (silt, silty sand, sandy silt, etc.) had the potential to stand
(4.0–4.5 m) and BH12 (2.0–2.5 m) boreholes were determined as after being taken, the specimen was placed in the triaxial cell after
3.85, 2.75, 3.70, respectively. The top soil layer to the depth of trimming. Then, the effective stress value computed according to
88 Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96
Table 4
Dynamic data for the first series tests.
Test no. FC (%) γdnnn kN/m³ wn (%) PI (%) wn/wL Soil type B (%) CSR N ε¼ 7 2.5% Nn εn ( 7 %) run εnn ( 7%) runn
γd, dry unit weight; wn, water content; wL, liquid limit; B, the degree of saturation; CSR, cyclic stress ratio; N, the number of cycles; ε, axial strain; and ru, pore water
pressure ratio.
n
End of the test
nn
Values at the number of cycles, N ¼ 20
nnn
End of the consolidation
the depth of the sample taken was applied as an effective represent the August 17, 1999 earthquake with Mw ¼7.4 at differ-
confining stress for isotropic conditions in a gradually increasing ent cyclic stress ratios. Just after that, with no change in drainage
manner to the specimen. and stress conditions, strain-controlled monotonic tests with a
Test specimens (sandy soils) that had the potential to spread loading speed of 0.20 mm/min were performed at the end of cyclic
were firstly frozen and then placed in a test cell. In order to loading application stage.
prevent the specimens from spreading, a vacuum pressure of Relatively few equations for the prediction of the number of
10 kPa was applied to the specimens via the pipe at the top cap. cycles of motion have been published. Detailed studies were
Later, carbon dioxide (CO2) was applied to the soils that are gas performed for the dependency of Ncyc on Mw, Rrup, and the depth
permeable for duration of 1 h. For other soils that did not of soil and soil property. Liu et al. [27] developed predictive
permeate gas, this stage was not performed. models for the median and the aleatory variability of Ncyc as a
An undisturbed specimen of about 50 mm in diameter and function of distance, magnitude, for both deep soil sites and
100 mm in height was trimmed and set between the upper and shallow stiff soil/rock sites. Stafford and Bommer [28] reported
lower pistons. Next, it was consolidated by isotropic stress for 24 h that number of equivalent cycles, NRR(2.0) depends on magnitude
under the same effective confining stress (100 kPa). After the and distance from fault rupture. Haldar and Tang [29] proposed a
completion of consolidation, a back pressure of 200 kN/m2 was relationship between equivalent number of stress cycles, Neq and
applied to the sample. The measured B values of the coefficient of earthquake magnitude M expressed in Richter's scale.
pore water pressure were over 0.95 before cyclic loading. The According to Liu et al. [27], the equivalent number of cycles,
details of the cyclic triaxial test series are given in Tables 4 and 5. Ncyc, was approximately determined to be 21 for M¼ 7.5 and
For the determination of soil behavior by laboratory testing Rrup E7 km. Number of equivalent cycles was determined as
under cyclic loading conditions, two different sets of cyclic triaxial NRR(2.0)¼ 23 using the curves which were developed by Stafford
tests were conducted on undisturbed soil samples. The definition of and Bommer [28] depending on Mw and rupture distance. Based
liquefaction for clayey cohesive soils and sandy or silty soils is given on the approach proposed by Haldar and Tang [29], Neq was
as the degradation of strength with the number of cycles and with determined approximately to be 18 for M¼ 7.4. Erken and Ulker
the corresponding accumulated strain and pore water pressure [22], in view of their test results, suggested that N ¼20 cycles is
ratios reaching ru ¼1.0 (¼ Δu/σ'c) with the number of cycles, suitable for an earthquake with the magnitude of 7.5. Therefore, in
respectively [26]. The first set of tests, in which cyclic loading had this study, the choice of Ncyc ¼20 cycles corresponding to Mw ¼7.4
been applied regarding the failure criterion of the axial strains earthquake is consistent with the literature.
reaching ε ¼ 72.5% (double-amplitude axial strain attains 5%) or The frequency value for this study was 0.1 Hz. The earthquake
pore water pressure ratios reaching ru ¼1.0 (¼ Δu/σ'c), were con- in Kocaeli lasted approximately 45 s in the outcrop rock zone at
ducted on non-plastic silty sands or very sandy silts and soils having Sakarya Station (Fig. 1. Soil cross section at Sakarya Station). It was
a plasticity index at different cyclic stress ratios (CSR¼ σd/2σc). anticipated from measurements made during the earthquake
The second set involved tests with a constant frequency applied aftershocks in rock and soft soils that the duration would have
(f ¼0.1 Hz) for a specific number of cycles, i.e. N ¼ 20 was chosen to been longer in the soft soil. In this study, the frequency of 0.1 Hz
Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96 89
Table 5
Dynamic data for the second series tests.
Test no. Borehole no. FC (%) End of cons. γd (kN/m³) PI (%) Soil type B (%) σc (kPa) CSR N ε¼ 7 2.5 (%) At the N ¼ 20 σds ε ¼10% (kPa)
ε ( 7%) ru
FC, fines content; PI, plasticity index; B, the degree of saturation; σc, confining pressure; CSR, cyclic stress ratio; N, the number of cycles; ε, axial strain; ru, pore water pressure
ratio; and σds deviator stress for ε¼ 10%.
was chosen and time was taken as 200 s for the number of cycles which reach the initial confining pressure in 15 cycles of loading
of N ¼20. The reason for choosing the frequency value as 0.1 Hz and reach a double-amplitude strain of 5% in 19 cycles of loading.
was because there was no time to measure the pore water At a high CSR of 0.45 and initial effective confining stress of
pressure, which might occur in a higher frequency. However, if 100 kPa, the clay specimen slowly generates positive pore pres-
higher frequencies were chosen, there would be timing and sures, which are approximately constant after 16 cycles of loading
continuity problems in measuring the pore water pressure. Sud- and reach a double-amplitude strain of 5% in 5.5 cycles of loading.
den change in pore water pressure is important. This is supported The static tests were terminated at the displacement value
in the literature; for example, Zergoun and Vaid [30] demon- corresponding to 10% of axial strain because of the limitation of
strated that pore pressure measurements were generally not the cyclic triaxial testing apparatus (the maximum value of axial
reliable during cyclic loading tests conducted rapidly (e.g., 1 Hz) strain measured is 720 mm).
because of the inability of water pressure to equilibrate through- The S8-3 test sample, which was taken close to the surface
out the soil specimen and measurement system. (3.0–3.5 m), was non-plastic, low plasticity silt classified as ML.
Also, Sancio et al. [20] and Bray and Sancio [12] reported that The water content of this sample was wn ¼44%, the fines content
“the calculation and comparison of the effective stress path in the was FC ¼97.3%, and the plasticity index was non-plastic, PI ¼0.
1 Hz and 0.005 Hz cyclic tests provided evidence of the limitations The T5-3 test sample, which was taken close to the surface
of the measurements of pore water pressure changes on clayey (5.0–5.5 m), was high plasticity clay classified as CH. The water
silts and clays during a 1 Hz cyclic triaxial test. For this reason, it is content of this sample was wn ¼41%, its fines content was
unclear if these soils reach a state of zero effective stress during FC ¼97.5%, and the plasticity index was PI ¼40.
undrained cyclic loading at 1 Hz”. In the clay sample subjected to a cyclic stress ratio of CSR¼0.450,
Furthermore, Boulanger and Idriss [31] concluded that the term pore pressures accumulated rapidly during the first 5 cycles and the
slow means that the tests are performed sufficiently slow to sample experienced a large cyclic axial strain at the end of 20 cycles.
ensure reliable measurements of pore water pressure, as opposed Although the pore pressure ratio was also obtained for the S8-3 test
to the more common seismic loading rate of 1 Hz at which pore sample with ML and PI¼ NP, the PWP ratio did not reach the value of
pressure measurements are unreliable for clay samples. The axial ru ¼1.0 for CH soil with a plasticity index of PI¼40. However, axial
strain and excess pore water pressure responses with loading strains remained limited due to the overconsolidation of surface soils.
cycles representatively are shown in Fig. 7 for non-plastic silt and The results obtained for CH soils are consistent with pore water
clay. It can also be seen that the axial strain and pore water pressure behavior in the laboratory as described by Zehtab [13].
pressure increased monotonically with the number of loading
cycles. Pore water pressure increases with increasing number of
loading cycles until it becomes equal to the total confining stress, 6. Cyclic stress–strain-pore pressure behavior of undisturbed
and axial strain increases with increasing number of loading cycles soils
reaching up to number of the cycles of N ¼20.
At a high CSR of 0.400 and initial effective confining stress of Soils were considered in two separate groups as silty sands (sand-
100 kPa, the silt specimen quickly generates positive pore pressures, like soils) and fine-grained soils (clay-like soils). The stress–strain
90 Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96
0.5 0.5
0.4 0.4
Stress Ratio, σd /2 σ c
0.3 0.3
0.2 0.2
0.1 0.1
0.0 0.0
-0.1 -0.1
-0.2 -0.2
-0.3 -0.3
-0.4 -0.4
-0.5 -0.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
4.0 8.0
3.0 6.0
Axial Strain, ε (%)
2.0 4.0
1.0 2.0
0.0 0.0
-1.0 -2.0
-2.0 -4.0
-3.0 -6.0
-4.0 -8.0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
1.0 1.0
0.8 0.8
Pwp Ratio, r u
0.6 0.6
0.4 0.4
0.2 0.2
0.0 0.0
-0.2 -0.2
-0.4 -0.4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22
Number of Cycles, N Number of Cycles, N
Fig. 7. Results of the cyclic triaxial tests on the S8-3 (left hand side) and the T5-3 (right hand side) samples in which properties are given in Tables 2 and 3: (a) deviator stress
versus number of cycles; (b) axial strain versus number of cycles; and (c) excess pore water pressure versus number of cycles.
behavior of soils was investigated by taking into account such 6.2. Stress–strain behaviors of fine-grained soils
parameters as wn/wL, which provide information on the consistency,
saturation degrees (B), fines content (FC), and overconsolidation The effect of the plasticity index on the behavior of axial strain
ratio (OCR). and pore pressure versus number of cycles of soils at almost the
same stress ratio are shown in Figs. 9 and 10. The effect of
plasticity index on the behavior of stress–strain of non-plastic silt
6.1. Stress–strain behaviors of silty sands and low-medium plastic clay with a stress ratio in the range of
0.360–0.380 is shown in Fig. 9.
The effects of cyclic stress ratio on the behavior of axial strain As can be observed from Fig. 9, the largest axial strain
and excess pore water pressure versus number of cycles are shown (ε ¼ 75%) and pore water pressure ratio (ru ¼1.0) occurred in the
in Fig. 8 for non-plastic silty sand and silt soils with fines content non-plastic silt sample (T7-2). Axial strains and pore water
varying from 39% to 53%. pressures at the end of testing were reduced by increasing the
As can be observed from the response patterns given in Fig. 10, plasticity index. The pore water pressure value of the T6-2 test
the increased cyclic shear stress ratio causes it to reach the failure sample (PI¼ 16) was lower than that of the T9-2 test sample due to
limit of double-amplitude shear strain of 5% in lower cycles of low plasticity. Also, due to high plasticity, the lack of complete
loading. Although the cyclic stress ratios of the S3-2 and S3-3 saturation and stiff consistency (wn/wL ¼0.554) in the S7-1 sample,
samples were approximately the same, the S3-2 sample had 7% which was slightly overconsolidated due to its being a surface
more fines content than the S3-3 sample, and it reached the value sample obtained from 3.0 m depth, the axial strains and pore
of ru ¼ 1 in 146 cycles of loading. water pressures remained limited (Fig. 9).
One of the important parameters controlling the cyclic stress– The variation in stress–strain behavior of the soils close to the
strain characteristics of soils is the number of cycles. This para- surface (3.5–5.0 m), with a plasticity index of between NP and 40,
meter plays a crucial role especially in analyzing the behavior of is given in Fig. 10 for stress ratios ranging from 0.400 to 0.420.
soil layers under earthquake loads. As shown in Fig. 8, in the S3-1 The applied cyclic axial stress levels were approximately the
soil sample subjected to cyclic shear stress ratio of CSR ¼0.280, same but the plasticity index changed within a large range of NP to
axial strain rapidly reached the value of ε ¼ 72.5% in N ¼8 cycles 40% (Fig. 10). As can be observed from the response patterns given
of loading. in Fig. 10, more axial strain and pore water pressure occurred in
Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96 91
8
S3-3, CSR=0.210, PI=NP, FC=39%
6.3. Plasticity index effect on axial strain
S3-2, CSR=0.205, PI=NP, FC=46%
S3-1, CSR=0.280, PI=NP, FC=53%
6 In this part of the study, the variations in axial strains which
Axial Strain, ±%
0.8
Pore Pressure Ratio
6
T7-2, CSR=0.360, PI=NP, FC=86%
T9-2, CSR=0.380, PI=7, FC=74% 1
T6-2, CSR=0.380, PI=16, FC=96%
S7-1, CSR=0.370, PI=33, FC=98%
Axial Strain, ±%
0
0 5 10 15 20 25
2
Number of Cycles, N
1.0
0 0.8
Pore Pressure Ratio
0.8
Pore Pressure Ratio
0.2
0.6
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
0.4
Number of Cycles, N
T7-2, CSR=0.360, PI=NP, FC=86%
0.2 T9-2, CSR=0.380, PI=7, FC=74% Fig. 10. Stress–strain behavior of samples, which have CSR values ranging from
T6-2, CSR=0.380, PI=16, FC=96% 0.400 to 0.420.
S7-1, CSR=0.370, PI=33, FC=98%
0.0
0 5 10 15 20 25
4
Number of Cycles, N
CSR=0.240-0.255
Fig. 9. Stress–strain behavior of samples, which have CSR values ranging from CSR=0.315-0.330
0.360 to 0.380. 3
Axial Strain, ε (±%)
CSR=0.346-0.370
CSR=0.400-0.450
2
the fine-grained soils with low plasticity index. As the pore water
Sancio, 2003
ε ¼ 70.75–1.5–2.5% for resultant pore water pressure according to 6.5. Dynamic strength
the chosen plasticity index.
The relationship between CSR and PWP ratio is given in The first set of tests were conducted on non-plastic silty sands
Figs. 12–14 for different strain levels depending on plasticity. or very sandy silts and soils with plasticity index values of PI ¼
Induced pore water pressure is affected by the plasticity index 15–22, respectively. Information about the first series of tests,
and particle size and properties. If soil is non-plastic silt, pore which were performed at different stress ratios using the physical
water pressure increases even at low strain level. In Fig. 12, the properties of soil samples given in Table 2, is presented in Table 4.
PWP ratio did not reach the value of 1 due to the lower CSR at the Fig. 15 shows the relation between the number of cycles causing
axial shear strain of ε ¼ 70.75% for non-plastic soils. In this figure, 5% double-amplitude strain cyclic stress ratio. It is seen in this
the PWP ratio is ru ¼1.0 for the plasticity index of PI¼10–20 and figure that the cyclic strength decreased generally as the number
CSR of σd/2σc ¼ 0.500 or greater. The PWP ratio remained at the of cycles increased. According to the strength curve obtained by
levels of ru ¼0.80 and 0.55, respectively, for plasticity index of using the results of these tests, the cyclic strength of silty sands-
PI¼ 30–40 at maximum CSR level. As shown in Fig. 12, PWP sands (FC ¼39–53%) is 45% less than the cyclic strength of high
becomes ru ¼0.85, even though CSR is as low as 0.205. ru will plasticity soils (MH, PI ¼15–22%). It was also determined that the
reach a value of 1.0 rapidly when CSR is greater than 0.205. cyclic strength of soils with a plasticity index of PI¼ 15–16% was
The relationship between CSR and PWP ratio is given in Fig. 13 less than that of high plasticity soils.
depending on the plasticity index of PI¼NP and 40 for the axial The results of the second set of tests indicate that the strength
shear strain of ε ¼ 70.75–1.5–2.5%. The PWP is about 0.13, 0.22 curves belonging to the low-plasticity silts (ML) and clays (CL)
and 0.48 at the axial shear strain of ε ¼ 70.75–1.5–2.5%, respec- together with the high-plasticity silts (MH) and clays (CH) take
tively, when the CSR for high plasticity soils with PI¼ 40 is 0.40. It place above the strength curve of silty sands (SM) on the graph of
is seen from this figure that PWP increases as axial strain becomes number of cycles versus cyclic stress ratio. In other words, the
ε ¼ 70.75%. When CSR equals 0.45 for non-plastic soils, the PWP strength increases.
ratio becomes 1. It is about 0.80 when the CSR for high plasticity
soils with PI¼40 is 0.500. In the same graphics, PWP is about 0.50,
0.75 and 0.90 at the axial shear strain of ε ¼ 70.75–1.5–2.5%, 6.6. Effects of soil plasticity
respectively, when the CSR for non-plastic soils is 0.25.
In Fig. 14, at a level of ε ¼ 72.5%, which is the failure criterion, The undrained cyclic stress–strain responses of non-plastic
the development of PWP is displayed depending on plasticity (S4-1 and T7-2) and plastic (S3-4 and S3-6) specimens, as
index and CSR. For non-plastic soils, ru equals 1.0 when the CSR compared in Fig. 16, exhibit the characteristics expected from
is equal to or greater than 0.45, for soils with plasticity index of
PI¼ 10–20–30, ru equals 1.0 when the CSR is equal to or greater
0.6
than 0.50.
0.5
0.6
Cyclic Stress Ratio
0.4
y = 0.495x 0.221 y = 0.43x0.821
R2 = 0.98 R2 = 0.84 PI=0 0.2
0.3
PI=10%
0.1
y = 0.27x1.3082 PI=20%
0.2
R² = 1 PI=30%
0
0.1 PI=40% 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2
Sand Pore Pressure Ratio
0
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 Fig. 14. Relationship between cyclic stress ratio and pore pressure ratio based on
Pore Pressure Ratio plasticity index corresponding to ε ¼ 7 2.50% in the cyclic test.
Fig. 12. Relationship between cyclic stress ratio and pore pressure ratio based on
0.6
plasticity index corresponding to ε¼ 7 0.75% in the cyclic test.
0.5
MH PI=27-31
Cyclic Stress Ratio, σ /2σ
0.4 CH PI=38-40
MH PI=15-22
0.3 CL PI=15-20
ML PI=NP
0.2 SM FC=39-46%
0.1
0.0
1 10 100 1000
Fig. 13. Relationship between cyclic stress ratio and pore pressure ratio for high Number of Cycles, N
plasticity soils with PI ¼40 and non-plastic soils corresponding to ε ¼ 70.75–1.50–
2.5% in the cyclic test. Fig. 15. Dynamic strength curves of the samples used in this study.
Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96 93
sand-like and clay-like soils, respectively. S3-4 and S3-6, with their Sand-like behavior was observed for silty sand, low plasticity
higher plasticity, had broader hysteretic loops. silt samples and high plasticity silt samples with a B value greater
Maximum deviator stress of 62 kPa was applied to the samples than 95%. Clay-like behavior was observed for soils classified as CL,
given in Fig. 16a. More axial shear strains were observed in the CH and MH with a B value less than 92%. The undisturbed soil
region of compression for the S4-1 and S3-4 samples. An inclined specimen with PI¼ 7 (T9-2) presented intermediate behavior
loop of the non-plastic soil including FC ¼56% was higher than that which is found to be in line with the results of Boulanger and
of the sample with plastic characteristics and a high fines content. Idriss [32].
In Fig. 16, it can be seen that the energy dissipation property (loop
area) of the soil sample with a higher plasticity (S3-4) is more than
about 20%. However, as the plasticity index increases, the number 50
of cycles required to reach the failure limit (ε ¼ 7 2.5%) increases.
Clay-like behavior (Boulanger et al., 2004)
Transition of sand-like to clay-like behavior (Boulanger et al., 2004)
Maximum deviator stress of 70 kPa was applied to the samples 40 Sand-like behavior (Boulanger et al., 2004)
given in Fig. 16b. More axial shear strains occurred in the
80 80
S3-4, N=1
S4-1, N=1
60 S3-4, N=27
60 S4-1, N=19
40 40
Deviator Stress (kPa)
20 20
0 0
-20 -20
-40 -40
-60 -60
-80 -80
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
80
80 S3-6, N=1
T7-2, N=1 S3-6, N=15
T7-2, N=2.5
60
60
40
Deviator Stress (kPa)
40
20
20
0 0
-20 -20
-40 -40
-60 -60
-80 -80
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
Axial Strain (%) Axial Strain (%)
Fig. 16. Stress–strain relationship for the first cycle of loading (fine line) and the cycle at which 7 2.5% axial strain or ru ¼ 1.0 is reached (thick line) for four specimens of
increasing plasticity. The tests were performed on soils initially consolidated to an effective stress of 100 kPa.
94 Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96
The effects of fine grained soils with different fines content and found as a result of the static test. The results of static tests
plasticity on dynamic behaviors are observed to be inconsistent. performed after dynamic tests are given in Table 5.
The plasticity index can rightly recognize fine-grained soils'
behavior either “clay-like” which is expected to have cyclic soft-
7.1. Plasticity index effect on post-dynamic behavior
ening or as “sand-like” which is liquefiable. Therefore, for both
dynamic behavior and bearing capacity loss determination, it
The behavior of soils, which have a CSR of 0.42 and two soil
becomes very important to utilize laboratory cyclic tests to
groups (MH and CH) with high plasticity as the result of the
eliminate the influence of such factors.
dynamic loading and static test performed after dynamic loading,
is shown in Fig. 20, which depicts the relationship between shear
6.7. Determination of critical deformation level stress and pore water pressures based on axial shear strain. As can
be seen in Fig. 20, the shear strains and pore water pressures
Because of soil softening, the axial strain increased when increase steadily with the increasing number of cycles. Therefore,
dynamic shear stress has sufficiently high magnitude to constitute the inclination of loops will decrease toward the x-axis due to
axial strain and pore water pressure. There is a critical level of strain softening. The axial strain level and pore water pressure
deformation when the effective stress decreases along with the following a cyclic shear stress level application of σd ¼ 7 85.0 kPa
rapidly increasing axial shear strain. We aimed to define the level were approximately γc ¼ 72.06–1.36% and 100–87 kPa at these
of the critical deformation for each soil specimen in the scope of strain levels for S6-1 and T6-3, respectively.
this research. Therefore, the relationship between mean effective When maximum deviator stress reached nearly 151 kPa for the
stress and deformation was examined. Effective stress is defined as S6-1 test sample in the static test, the pore water pressure
σ 0c ¼ σ c Δu ð1Þ decreased to 52 kPa. However, while the maximum deviator stress
was obtained as 87 kPa for the T6-3 test sample, the pore water
where σc is consolidation pressure (σc ¼100 kPa) and Δu is the
pressure decreased to 45 kPa at the end of the test (Fig. 20).
excess pore water pressure during the dynamic loading.
The mean effective stress (p') is calculated by the following
formula: Axial Shear Strain (±%)
σ 01 þ σ 02 þ σ 03
p0 ¼ ð2Þ
3
The relationship between mean effective stress and axial shear
strain is shown in Fig. 18. As indicated in the figure, the level of
critical deformation is defined as the point of intersection of the -2
tangents.
The critical level of deformation for the specimens of silty sand
-4
(SM) and low plasticity normally consolidated silt is εcritic ¼ 70.50%, 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
as shown in Fig. 18. The axial shear strains increase rapidly and Mean Effective Stress, p' (kPa)
exceed the critical failure level (ε ¼ 72.50%) after this level of
Fig. 19. Axial strain–effective stress behavior of samples exhibiting clay-like
critical deformation. The obtained critical deformation levels, behavior under dynamic loading.
εcritic ¼ 70.50%, are compatible with the level of deformation stated
in the study conducted by Ansal and Erken [33] for kaolin clay with
200
PI¼ 40% and in the study conducted by Erken and Ulker [22] for silt
with PI¼5%. The critical deformation level of soils with plasticity 150
index values of PI¼ 15–16 and overconsolidation ratio (OCR) values
Deviator Stress (kPa)
ranging from 2.75 to 3.85, is determined as εcritic ¼ 71.0% in Fig. 19. 100
50
7. Results of the static tests after dynamic tests
0
The second set involved the dynamic tests for number of cycles -50
of N ¼20 at different cyclic stress ratios and just after that, with no
change in drainage and stress conditions, the strain-controlled -100
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
monotonic tests (0.20 mm/min) were performed. Deviator stress
(σds) corresponding to an axial strain of 10% or failure point was Axial Strain (%)
120
8 100
Pore Water Pressure (kPa)
80
Axial Shear Strain (±%)
4 60
40
0 20
0
-4 -20
-40
-8 -60
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
Mean Effective Stress, p' (kPa) Axial Strain (%)
Fig. 18. Axial strain–effective stress behavior of samples exhibiting sand-like Fig. 20. The variation among the deviator stress and pore water pressure versus
behavior under dynamic loading. axial strain of the S6-1 and the T6-3 test samples.
Z. Kaya, A. Erken / Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 77 (2015) 83–96 95
400 400
250 300
200
Static Strength
250
150
100 200
50
150
0
-50 100
-100
50
-150
0
Axial Strain (%) 0.1 1 10 1 00
Strain at the end of Dynamic Test, εc (±%)
120
100 Fig. 22. Relationship between axial strain at the end of the dynamic test and
Pore Water Pressure (kPa)
80
deviator stress corresponding to ε¼ 10% in the monotonic test.
60
40
20 If deformations occurring during earthquakes are equal to or
0 less than the critical deformation level, the shear strength losses of
-20 soil are not significant. If deformations occurring during earth-
-40 quakes increase, the post-cyclic strength of fine-grained soils
-60 decreases depending on the deformation levels.
-5 0 5 10 15 20 25
Fig. 21. The variation among the deviator stress and pore water pressure versus
axial strain of the T6-1 and the T6-3 test samples. 8. Conclusions
8. It is concluded that clayey soils with high plasticity (PIr30) [13] Zehtab KH. An assessment of the dynamic properties of Adapazari soils by
and low consistency index (Ic r0.433) exhibited softening cyclic direct simple shear tests. Turkey: METU, Department of Engineering
Sciences, Ankara; 2010 M.S. thesis.
behavior at the end of the number of cycles of N ¼ 20. [14] Yılmaz MT, Zehtab KH. Practical method for utilization of commercial cyclic
testing apparatuses for computation of site response in central Adapazari. Soil
Dyn Earthq Eng 2014;63:203–16.
[15] Onalp A, Arel E, Bol E. A general assessment of the effects of earthquake on the
Acknowledgments soil–structure interaction in Adapazari 1999. Istanbul, Turkey: XV ICSMFE;
2001. p. 76–89.
[16] ASTM, Standard practice for determining the normalized penetration resis-
The authors would like to thank Japan International Coopera- tance of sands for evaluation of liquefaction potential. ASTM D 6066-98.
tion Agency for the financial support provided by the Turkey– Annual book of ASTM standards 04.09; 2000.
[17] ASTM, Standard test method for penetration test and split barrel sampling of
Japan Earthquake Disaster Prevention Center Project (1993–2002).
soils. ASTM D 1589-99. Annual book of ASTM standards 04.09; 2000.
[18] Youd TL, Idriss IM, Andrus RD, Arango I, Castro G, Christian JT, et al.
References Liquefaction resistance of soils: summary report from the 1996 NCEER and
1998 NCEER/NSF workshops on evaluation of liquefaction resistance of soils.
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2001;127(10):817–33.
[1] Barka A, Akyuz S, Altunel E, Sunal G, Cakir Z, Dikbas A, et al. August 17, 1999 [19] JGS, Preparation of soil specimens for triaxial tests. JGS-0520-2000.
Izmit earthquake, M ¼7.4, Eastern Marmara region, Turkey: study of surface [20] Sancio RB, Bray JD, Riemer MF, Durgunoglu T. An assessment of the liquefac-
rupture and slip distribution. The 1999 Izmit and Duzce earthquakes: tion susceptibility of Adapazari silt. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Pacific
preliminary results. Istanbul Technical University; 2000. p. 15–30. Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Christchurch, New Zealand; 13–15
[2] Sancio RB, Bray JD, Stewart JP, Youd TL, Durgunoglu HT, Onalp A, et al. February 2003a. Paper No. 172.
Correlation between ground failure and soil conditions in Adapazari, Turkey. [21] Sancio RB. Ground failure and building performance in Adapazari, Turkey. Ph.
Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2002;22:1093–102. D. thesis. Berkeley, California, USA: University of California; 2003.
[3] Bakır BS, Sucuoglu H, Yılmaz T. An overview of local site effects and the [22] Erken A, Ulker MBC. Effect of cyclic loading on monotonic shear strength of
associated building damage in Adapazari during the 17 August 1999 Izmit
fine-grained soils. Eng Geol 2007;89:243–57.
earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2002;92:509–26.
[23] Thammathiwat A, Chim-oye W. Behavior of strength and pore pressure of soft
[4] Beyen K, Erdik M. Two-dimensional nonlinear site response analysis of
bangkok clay under cyclic loading. Thammasat Int J Sci Tech 2004;9(4):21–8.
Adapazari plain and predictions inferred from aftershocks of the Kocaeli
[24] JGS, Method for cyclic undrained triaxial test on soils. JGS-0541-2000.
earthquake of 17 August 1999. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2004;24:261–79.
[25] JGS, Method for cyclic triaxial test to determine deformation properties of
[5] Mollamahmutoglu M, Kayabali K, Beyaz T, Kolay E. Liquefaction-related
geomaterials. JGS 0542-2000.
building damage in Adapazari during the Turkey earthquake of August 17,
[26] Ishihara K. Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics. 1st ed.. Oxford: Claredon
1999. Eng Geol 2003;67:297–307.
Press; 1996.
[6] Komazawa M, Morikawa H, Nakamura K, Akamatsu J, Nishimura K, Sawada S,
[27] Liu AH, Stewart JP, Abrahamson NA, Moriwaki Y. Equivalent number of
et al. Bedrock structure in Adapazari, Turkey – a possible cause of severe
uniform stress cycles for soil liquefaction analysis. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng
damage by the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2002;22:829–36.
[7] Rathje EM, Karatas I, Wright SG, Bachhuber J. Coastal failures during the 1999 2001;127(12):1017–26.
Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2004;24(9):699–712. [28] Stafford PJ, Bommer JJ. Empirical equations for the prediction of the equivalent
[8] Bray JD, Sancio RB, Durgunoglu HT, Onalp A, Youd TL, Stewart JP, et al. number of cycles of earthquake ground motion. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng
Subsurface characterization at ground failure sites in Adapazari, Turkey. 2009;29:1425–36.
J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2004;130(7):673–85. [29] Haldar A, Tang WH. Statistical study of uniform cycles in earthquakes.
[9] Cetin KO, Youd TL, Seed RB, Bray JD, Sancio R, Lettis W, et al. Liquefaction- J Geotech Eng Div 1981;107(GT5):577–89 [Proceeding Paper 16239, ASCE].
induced ground deformations at Hotel Sapanca during Kocaeli (Izmit), Turkey [30] Zergoun M, Vaid YP. Effective stress response of clay to undrained cyclic
earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 2002;22:1083–92. loading. Can Geotech J 1994;315:714–27.
[10] Cetin KO, Isik N, Unutmaz B. Seismically induced landslide at Degirmendere [31] Boulanger R, Idriss I. Liquefaction susceptibility criteria for silts and clays.
Nose, Izmit Bay during Kocaeli (Izmit) – Turkey earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2006;132(11):1413–26.
Eng 2004;24:189–97. [32] Boulanger RW, Idriss IM. Evaluating the potential for liquefaction or cyclic
[11] Yılmaz MT, Pekcan O, Bakır BS. Undrained cyclic shear and deformation failure of silts and clays, Report No. UCD/CGM-04/01, Center for Geotechnical
behavior of silt–clay mixtures of Adapazarı, Turkey. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng Modeling. Davis, California: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineer-
2004;24:497–507. ing University of California; 2004.
[12] Bray JD, Sancio RB. Assesment of the liquefaction susceptibility of fine-grained [33] Ansal AM, Erken A. Undrained behavior of a clay under cyclic shear stresses.
soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 2006;132(9):1165–77. J Geotech Eng Div 1989;115(7):968–83.