2ow iil el ®&-40 8 2 tat 7 Oiaem 1 (30%): Suppose that 2 MMSCF/d of gas is being injected through a tubing (LD. = 2.250 and a ielined well The wellbore canbe ideally divided into two segments: a vertical segmnon ine am inclined segment with angle of 30°, as shown in the Figure. The length of sores st crennae Segments ae the same, 5000 R Assume that two well segments have the same seorne Fey ly fiotor 095, average viscosity 0.01 ep and fiction factor f; = 0.0044, Gas sear tine svetase temperature for the vertical segment is 620 °R, Average temperature ee the inclined segment is 640 °R inate the bottomhole flowing pressure (pu) from the wellhead pressure (py = 600 psi). The kinetic eneray pressure drop is negligible. fv a A lenapvajilre ¥ Dam cal fa Ad, injcutn P= 600 pal Van ” opr or - PoP,Bea ° — | Alte! Shoal. plo / Problem 2 (20%): Well Deliverability A well has IPR for the reservoir performance of q=5072-1.5p,,, and VLP for tubing performance of Pwe - Rete euers oy Py ~ Py =2600+0.09g , 7a Both equations are in oil field units. E a. Find the deliverability of the well (calculate the bottomhole pressure and the flow rate) if the wellhead pressure (py) is 100 psi. (10%) b. If well stimulation doubled the production rate at the same bottomhole flowing pressure, can the well produce this doubled rate at 100 psi wellhead pressure? Prove your answer by calculation. (10%) 1) ALlivarats' lity i) Were ieee0 Hroblem 3 (50%): Hydraulic fracture design in a vertical well using the following data: gi = 40 bpm, x= 800 ft, y= 100 ft, Poisson ratio v = 0.25, E’ = 4.27%10° psi, = 150 ep, Leakoff coefficient Ci = 210° ft'min!?, r)= 1, Ki=1.5 (do not iterate) Proppant: pp = 200 Iorm/ft, 4, = 0.42, and c/= 3 ppg Reservoir: fis 20 Darey, reservoir permeability is 0.1 md, ris 1490 fr is 0.328 ft, and initial fact AB gal; 1 bbl = 42 gal: 1 ft 12 in Calculate: 1. State differences between PKN and KGD models and choose a model to calculate average fracture width (8%) —)_ Injection time, r (8%) (3) Fracture efficiency, 7 (4%) {Pad volume, Vai, and pad injection time, fyi (6%) -3 () Proppant mass, Mp (5%) aA Proppant fracture width, 1, (5%) 7. Calculate dimensionless fracture conductivity (4%) %. Calculate the dimensionless productivity index at stea Jostrac (5%) 9. Determine the productivity index ratio at steady-state flow of fractured well to un- amma 2 0om i=) (5°9 —| ype? Xe >Phy, GAGA F Kop x ‘ ive Parad eee). 1257 § eat ev | Ae (60900 fr PUN S\ize>3) (2( Ivo» state flow of fractured well(page intentionally left blank) Pe arertay’, WIS [oe ChiiP A } 2xe he (Lb Pe (2) gayle) U- pi(ze0) | Z oy aie) < 03 Tephe (FINA ae 4 SA ALS cal Zz Cep> Kw : (2.00% Ky¢ (ol )yes (foe m }