Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila First Division

    Uploaded by

    Jayvee Balino
    This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila First Division

    Uploaded by

    Jayvee Balino
    8 views1 page
    This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.

    Original Description:

    zzzz

    Original Title

    Republic of the Philippines

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    8 views1 page

    Supreme Court: Republic of The Philippines Manila First Division

    Uploaded by

    Jayvee Balino
    This Supreme Court case involved a dispute between petitioners Cesar and Lolita Areza against respondents Express Savings Bank and Michael Potenciano. The petitioners took out a loan from the bank but later defaulted on payments. The bank foreclosed on the property used to secure the loan. The petitioners argued the foreclosure was unlawful but the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the bank and Potenciano, upholding the foreclosure.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Republic of the Philippines

    SUPREME COURT
    Manila

    FIRST DIVISION

    G.R. No. 176697 September 10, 2014

    CESAR V. AREZA and LOLITA B. AREZA, Petitioners,


    vs.
    EXPRESS SAVINGS BANK, INC. and MICHAEL POTENCIANO, Respondnets.

    You might also like