Comparison Between RC and Post Tentioned Slab

You might also like

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

Post-Tensioned vs.

Rebar Slabs
Reinforced concrete slabs have been used in buildings from the middle of the 19th century
while Post-tensioned concrete slabs have been used since the 1930’s.
Conventional (rebar) slab construction uses common bar reinforcing throughout the slab
distributed in two layers while the Post-tensioned slab construction uses a combination of
common rebar and high-strength tendon reinforcing, which is stressed after the concrete
is poured.
Post-tensioned slabs are thinner and lighter, which have trickle-down effects on the both
the building gravity and lateral-force-resisting systems, including columns, shear walls,
and foundations while Rc Slabs are thicker and heavier.
It is simpler to add, say, a stair opening in a rebar slab than a similar post-tensioned slab
Rebar slabs are simpler to build, and require less technical expertise than post-tensioned
slabs
Post tensioned slab reduces Concrete up to 25%, and rebar up to 65% as compared to
RC slab
Post-tensioned slabs typically have less cracking and less permeable as compared to the
RC slab
Post-tensioned slab is done by two methods, load balancing method and the equivalent
frame method.
Rebar slabs work well for odd column layouts or geometries
It is simpler to add a stair opening in a rebar slab than a similar post-tensioned slab.
Rebar slabs are simpler to build, and require less technical expertise than post-tensioned
slabs.
Rebar placement tolerances are not as strict as would be required for PT tendons
Rebar slabs are most economical for buildings with smaller bays and span lengths
While post tensioned slab are most economical for buildings with larger bays and larger
lengths
For span lengths over 20-22 feet, PT slabs are often more cost effective as compared to
RC slab.

You might also like