Strategic

Management
BALANCED
SCORECARD
Balanced Score Card

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 12

 Diffusion of a New Idea
•
“The Balanced Scorecard: Measures
that Drive Performance” (Robert S.
Kaplan and David P. Norton, Harvard
Business Review, February 1992)

•
About 35% of Fortune 2000 firms
have adopted a balanced scorecard,
55% of those firms are very satisfied
with it. (R. D. Banker, C. Konstans and S.
Janakiraman; January 2000)

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 2

 Balanced Score Card
•
A new approach to strategic management
was developed in the early 1990's by Drs.
Robert Kaplan (Harvard Business School)
and David Norton (Balanced Scorecard
Collaborative).
•
They named this system the 'balanced
scorecard'. Recognizing some of the
weaknesses and vagueness of previous
management approaches, the balanced
scorecard approach provides a clear
prescription as to what companies should
measure in order to 'balance' the financial
perspective.

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 3

 Balanced Score Card
•
Kaplan and Norton describe the innovation of
the balanced scorecard as follows:

“The balanced scorecard retains traditional

financial measures. But financial measures tell
the story of past events, an adequate story for
industrial age companies for which investments
in long-term capabilities and customer relation-
ships were not critical for success.
These financial measures are inadequate,
however, for guiding and evaluating the journey
that information age companies must make to
create future value through investment in
customers, suppliers, employees, processes,
technology, and innovation."
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 4
 Evaluation Methods
Balanced Scorecard – Four Perspectives
Financial Perspective
How should we appear
to our shareholders?

Internal Business
Customer Perspective Perspective
How should we Vision
And At what business
appear to our
customers? Strategy practice must we
excel?

Learning and Innovation

Perspective
How should we sustain our
ability to change and
improve?

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 5

 Balanced Scorecard
Financial Perspective

How do we look to our

shareholders?

Customer Perspective Internal Process

Perspective
How do we look to our Vision & What business processes
customers? are the value drivers?
Strategy
Learning & Growth
Perspective
Are we able to sustain
innovation, change and
improvement

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 6

 Balanced Scorecard for a 
Retailer
Financial Perspective

EVA (Residual Income)

Profit per square foot

Customer Perspective Internal Process

Perspective
• Customer satisfaction Vision & • Service quality
• Customer retention
• Market share • Product quality
Strategy • Inventory
management
Learning & Growth
Perspective
• Information systems
• Employee satisfaction
• Employee training

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 7

 Balance in the Scorecard
•
Balance between financial,
customer, internal process and
learning perspectives
•
Balance between financial and non-
financial measures
•
Balance between short-term and
long-term objectives
* Balance between hard, objective
measures and softer, more
subjective measures
*
Balance between different
stakeholders
* Balance between strategic and
diagnostic measures
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 8
 Horizontal Balanced Scorecard

Investors Lenders Customers Employees Suppliers

Financial Financial Customer Internal Process

Perspective Perspective Perspective Perspective Perspective

Balance between different stakeholders.

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 9

 Vertical Balanced Scorecard

Financial Objectives

Customer Objectives

Internal Process Objectives

Learning and Growth Objectives

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 10
BALANCED SCORECARD DESIGN
1. Identify strategic objectives for each perspective.
An objective is a statement of strategic intent. An objective states
how a strategy will be made operational. Application will allow
strategic objectives to be aligned with at least one perspective.
2. Associate measures with strategic objectives.
A measure is a performance metric that will reflect progress against
an objective. A measure must be quantifiable. Leading measures
are predictors of future performance, while lagging measures are
outcomes. Measure has to be linked with an objective.
3. Assign targets to measures.
A target is a quantifiable goal for each measure with a specified
time frame.
4. Link strategic objectives in cause and effect relationships (Theme).
Objectives are linked to one another through cause and effect
relationships. Application should be able to represent the linkages
graphically and should able to edit/change as appropriate.
5. List strategic initiatives.
Strategic initiatives are action programs that drive performance.
The application should allow for setting of strategic initiatives to be
linked to at least one objective.
6. View the strategy from four perspectives (Financial, Customer,
Internal and Learning).
A perspective is a component into which the strategy is
decomposed to drive implementation. Other perspective may be
added to the typical set or replace based on specific strategic need.
 Balanced Score Card

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 12

 A Balanced Scorecard
“Is a performance measurement system that translates
an organization’s strategy into clear objectives,
measures, targets, and initiatives.”
(Kaplan and Norton, Harvard Business Review, 1996)

”A method for the organization to

systematically develop a comprehensive link
between its strategy and a coherent set of
performance measures.”

“A method for the organization to systematically develop

a comprehensive system of planning and control”.
(Kaplan and Norton, Harvard Business Review, 1992)

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 13

 Balanced Scorecard
§
The balanced scorecard (BSC) provides a
framework for selecting multiple performance
measures focused on critical aspects of business
(Kaplan and Norton 1992).

§
The essence of the BSC is the articulation of
linkages between performance measures and
strategic objectives (Kaplan and Norton 1996).

2
 Translating Strategy Into Initiatives
For each perspective:

Strategy

Key Success Performance

Factors Measures

Targets Initiatives

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 15

 A Strategic Scorecard
•
Should include leading indicators
q Leading indicators: Drivers of long term

value
q Lagging indicators: Feedback measures

on current performance
•
Should include outcome measures as well as
measures of the drivers of those outcomes
•
Should link all measures with the overall
strategy
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 16
 Diagnostic vs Strategic Measures
Diagnostic measures
§ Monitor whether the business remains
“in control”
§ Signal when unusual events occur that
require immediate attention
§ Necessary, but not sufficient, for
achieving long term goals
Strategic measures
§ Articulate a strategy designed for
competitive excellence
§ Evaluate strategies based on new
information about competitors,
customers, markets, technologies &
suppliers
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 17
 Financial Perspective
Customizing Measures for the Growth Stage
•
Sales growth rate
•
Sales in new markets
•
Sales to new customers
•
Sales from new products
•
Investment in product development
•
Investment in information technology
•
Investment in employee skills
•
Investment in new distribution channels

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 18

 Financial Perspective
Customizing Measures for the Sustain Stage
•
Return on capital employed
•
Economic Value Added (EVA)
•
Operating income/Gross margin
•
Discounted cash flows
•
Asset utilization rates
•
Cost reduction rates
•
Cost benchmarked against competitors
•
Customer and product line profitability
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 19
 Financial Perspective
Customizing Measures for the Harvest Stage
•
Current cash flows
•
Payback period
•
Spending ratios
•
Throughput ratios
•
Product line profitability
•
Negative cash flow customers

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 20

 Customer Perspective:
Strategic Outcome Measures
Financial Objectives

Customer Outcomes
Market
Share Customer
Account Profitability
Share

Customer Customer
Acquisition Retention

Customer
Satisfaction

Internal Process Outcome Drivers

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 21

 Customer Perspective:
Unique Value Proposition
Customer Customer
Acquisition Retention

Customer
Satisfaction

Product/Service + +
Value = Image Relationship
Attributes

Uniqueness Functionality Quality Price Time Brand Equity Convenient Trusted

Responsive
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 22
 The Internal Perspective
Generic Service Value Chain Model
Post-Sale
Innovation Cycle Operations Cycle
Service Cycle
Identify Satisfy
Create
Customer Identify the Produce Deliver Service Customer
Needs the Service the the the Needs
Market Offering Services Services Customer

Efficiency

Effectiveness

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 23

 Learning and Growth Perspective
Objectives Capability Measures

Employee Skills

•
Real-time availability
Long Term Information •
Accuracy
Success Systems •
Pervasiveness

•
Satisfaction •
Alignment of incentives with key
•
Retention
Organizational success factors
•
Training
Processes •
Improvement in key customer
•
Capabilities and internal processes

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 24

 So, A Balanced Scorecard…

•
Is much more than a collection of indicators
of key success factors.
•
Is a flight simulator, not a dashboard of
instrument dials.
•
Integrates performance measures with a
unique strategy.
•
Incorporates cause-and-effect relationships,
including leads, lags and feedback loops.

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 25

Linking the Balanced Scorecard to Strategy
A Strategy Is a Set of Hypotheses About Cause and Effect

Return on
Financial
Capital Employed

Customer Customer Loyalty

Customer On-time Delivery

Internal Process
Process Quality Process Cycle Time

Learning & Growth Employee Skills

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 26

 Link to Financial Objectives
•
Balanced scorecard retains a strong
emphasis on financial outcome measures.
•
Ultimately, causal paths from all
performance measures should be linked
to financial objectives.
•
Failure to link improvement programs
(e.g. TQM, cycle time reduction,
reengineering, and employee
empowerment) results inevitably in
organizations becoming disillusioned
about lack of tangible payoffs.
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 27
 The Balanced Scorecard for The Women’s Store Employed in the Experiment
Measure Target Actual Percent Better
than Target
Financial:
1. Sales margins 60% 67.02% 11.70%
2. Sales growth per store 15% 16.75% 11.67%
3. Inventory turnover 6 6.59 9.83%
4. Debt-to-assets ratio < 20% 18.07% 9.65%

Customer:
1. Price relative to competitors’ price +7% 7.79% 11.29%
2. Customer satisfaction rating 80% 88.44% 10.55%
3. Sales per square foot of retail space $30,000 $33,090 10.30%
4. Number of credit card customers per store 8,000 8,911 11.39%

Internal Process:
1. Brand recognition rating 80% 87.60% 9.50%
2. Number of stock-outs < 3 times 2.66 11.33%
3. “Mystery Shopper” audit rating 85% 93.47% 9.96%
4. Time to process customer returns < 4 min. 3.54 11.50%

Learning and Growth:

1. Employee satisfaction 80% 87.96% 9.95%
2. Employee suggestions per year 2.5 times 2.74 9.60%
3. Store computerization 60% 66.24% 10.40%
4. Hours of training invested in brand managers each 80 hours 89.10 11.38%
 Metropolitan Bank’s Strategy
•
“We must increase our income and revenue by
broadening the services sold to a targeted
group of customers.”
•
“We cannot continue only
receiving deposits and
processing checks.
Competitive pressure implies
that we develop and
sell new services such as
mutual funds, credit
cards and financial advice.”
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 29
 Metropolitan Bank: Cause and Effect
Financial
Increase Return to
Perspective
Stockholders

Broaden
Revenue Mix

Customer
Increase Customer Satisfaction Perspective
With Our Products

Understand Develop Internal Process

Cross-Sell Perspective
Customer New
Products
Needs Products

Instill a Learning
Selling Culture Perspective

Develop Access to Align

Selling Strategic Personal
Skills Information Goals

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 30

 Metropolitan Bank’s Balanced Scorecard
Strategic Objectives
 Improve Returns to Stockholders
Financial
 Broaden Revenue Mix
 Increase Customer Satisfaction
Internal Customer
q Knowledgeable People
q Convenient Access
q Superior Service
 Understand Our Customers
 Create Innovative Products
 Cross-Sell Products
 Instill a Selling Culture
o Build Strategic Information
Learning
o Develop Strategic Skills
o Align Incentives
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard
Strategic Measures
Lag Indicators
 Return on Investment
 Revenue Mix
 Revenue Growth
 Customer Retention
 Depth of Relation (Sale of
Multiple Products to a
Customer)
 Share of Segment
 Revenue from New
Products
 Cross-Sell Ratio
 Revenue per Employee
 Employee Satisfaction
Survey
Lead Indicators
 Customer Satisfaction
Survey
 Product Development
Cycle
 Hours with Customers
 Strategic Information
Availability
 Strategic Job Coverage
 Personal Goals Alignment
31
 Why Do We Need a Balanced Scorecard?
To Implement Business Strategy!
“Business Strategy is now
the single most important
issue… and will remain so for
the next five years”
Business Week

“Less than 10% of

strategies effectively
formulated are effectively
executed” Fortune

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 32

 Scorecard Structure

• Scorecard is very context-specific

q Industry and competitive factors
q Life-cycle of business unit
q Business strategy

• It is important to validate cause-effect

relationships for each individual business.

IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 33

 To Implement a Balanced Scorecard
The organization must
•
Define and develop measures for its
primary strategic objectives.
•
Understand how different business
processes contribute to its strategic
objectives.
•
Identify the drivers of performance on
strategic objectives.
•
Develop a set of measures to monitor
drivers of strategic objectives.
•
Communicate its beliefs about how
processes create results.
IHW 2005 Balanced Scorecard 34