Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Information System Assignment B
Information System Assignment B
Information System Assignment B
Daniel Chun
Rema Hamdan
Kyungjin Kim
2
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
Contents
Executive Summary 4
Conclusion 14
Bibliography 15 - 16
3
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This report aim to seek an enterprise system architecture for De-Clear Pty. Key
business process issues will be demonstrate based on value chain and supply chain
analysis that are previously completed. With the issues, some required system
functionalities for De-Clear to optimise the business processes are presented. There are
detailed information about enterprise system architectures such as ERP, SCM and CRM.
Finally, this report compare SAP's products with ORACLE 's products based on scored
feature analysis and a high-level cost/benefit analysis.
The issues from the prior value chain and supply chain analysis shape the required
functionalities by De-Clear which are deconstructed and addressed accordingly. Supply
Chain Management has been broken down into demand forecasting and planning,
supply chain collaboration and supply chain analytics. For Customer Relationship
Management/Enterprise Resource Planning derived order management, master data
management and call centre software. By understanding functionality required by the
senior management team, a thorough investigation of SAP and Oracle Vendors was
undertaken. The following report is informed by De-Clears current situation and future
plans.
Business process issues
Supply chain Value chain
- Inaccurate demand forecast - Ineffective outbound logistics & Ordering
- Miscommunication with suppliers - Disparate information system
- Poor supply chain analytics - Poor customer service activities
1.1 De-Clear does not accurately forecast demand for its products. Therefore, when the
level of demand is higher than expected, De-Clear has insufficient inventory in its
warehouses to meet the demand, leading to customers being unsatisfied. Also, when
the demand is smaller than expected, De-Clear’s inventory is too great, leading to
unnecessary warehousing costs. Therefore, De-Clear must forecast demand and then
supply this forecast to its suppliers so that inventory will be at a minimum, but enough
to meet customer demand.
1.2 Furthermore, the method of communication between De-Clear and its suppliers is
problematic. De-Clear and its suppliers communicate via phone leading to
miscommunications which causes supplies arriving late or early. Late supplies have
created delays in production. And early deliveries have creating excess warehousing
4
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
costs unnecessarily. De-Clear must create a better communications system between its
suppliers, one which is less likely to create errors.
1.3 The managers of De-Clear do not evaluate the performance of the entire supply
chain. Therefore, the managers do not understand what aspects of the supply chain
require improvements in order to maximise the firm’s profitability. Hence, De-Clear
needs to address its inability to assess its supply chain.
2.1 De-Clear has no direct order-to-cash business process. Hence outbound logistics
focusing on distribution of end products to retailers within the order-to-cash process are
essentially inefficient and inconsistent. Ordering and payment procedures vary amongst
domestic and global suppliers/retailers. This is done manually through the Accounting &
Finance departments with the negative consequence of manual input of order
information causing errors. Additionally a standardised order-to-cash process becomes
of prime importance in light of De-Clears global expansion plans.
2.2 De-Clear currently maintains master data manually and on disparate applications,
leading to data inaccuracies and widespread disadvantages to daily operations. This
comprehensively affects the firms performance of key functions and reduces the value-
adding ability of crucial data and information Decision making by management and
users of the information is consequently hindered. Currently there is no enterprise-
wide data accessibility or control, leading to declining business process efficiency and
lack of integration. This poses further implications in a global environment.
2.3 De-Clear cannot effectively solve customer problems, issues or queries. There is no
current way or method for customers to communicate or provide feedback to the
company. The value-added from providing this support function enhances the customer
relationship in the medium to long term. De-Clear is currently failing to maintain
customer satisfaction and missing competitive advantages. Potential information gains
from two-way customer and business dialogue could shape business intelligence and
improve customer retention in domestic and global contexts.
5
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
The business process issues highlighted in section 1.1 requires system functionality that
can accurately forecast and assess future demand. If forecasts of demand is conducted
then suppliers will be able to ship components in the right amounts at the right time,
such that inventory will be maintained at optimum levels. Because customers will
receive products without extensive waiting periods they are less likely to choose
substitute products. Hence, customer retention will be improved.
The issues addressed in section 1.2 requires a system which enables communication
between De-Clear and its suppliers in a manner which reduces communication errors.
Instead of phone communications, De-Clear should use a program which gives suppliers
access to De-Clear’s inventory levels. By using the program to view inventory levels, the
suppliers will know when to ship components without a directive from De-Clear’s
managers. This kind of collaboration will increase the efficiency of the supply network as
managers from different companies can spend less time communicating to discern
issues of procurement. Furthermore, inventory fallouts due to communication errors
will be rare so that customers will always be able to buy De-Clear products whenever
they want, improving customer satisfaction and retention.
The lack of information that is limiting the ability of managers to evaluate the
performance of the supply chain must be dealt with by providing managers with a tool
that allows access to key performance metrics about the supply chain. By doing so
problems within the supply chain can be quickly analysed and removed. For example, if
executives view key performance metrics on delivery times, they can quickly identify
and replace suppliers, which habitually fail to provide products on time. Obviously,
providing key performance indicators will increase the quality of management reporting
but it will also improve customer retention as bottlenecks within the supply chain can
be quickly removed such that customers can always receive products without waiting
periods.
2.1 From the ordering issue De-clear requires integrated billing and order management
functionality. The application should provide seamless integration of the sub-processes
involved in the order-to-cash process to the supply chain. Each stage of the ordering and
billing steps should be clear and consistent, adding value to the entire process. In doing
so, De-clear will gain efficiency and eliminate manual backlog and delay that is currently
present, creating a effective approach that improves supply chain activities. Retailers
6
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
will become more familiar and confident in the ordering function of the business,
improving customer satisfaction.
2.2 The operational data issue highlights the importance of a centralised repository of
information for De-Clear. The functionality required needs to be easy to use and
accessible by management, employees and suppliers for user-defined objectives.
Synchronisation is pivotal, particularly since the current disparate systems are
ineffective and may lead to loss in important data when shifted to a company-wide
application, causing operational delay and extensive costs. Ideally the disparate systems
should be unified across the enterprise, facilitating the sharing of information for
operations and decision-making.
2.3 The customer service issue identified reveals the need for a mechanism that fosters
business and customer communication. Since De-clear is a manufacturer and supplier, it
ought to consider both its direct consumers ,retailers and the end customers who
purchase the cosmetics from the retailers. Despite De-clear not directly dealing with end
customers, it has a duty to them in ensuring a standard of quality, product information
and assistance. Thus an application needs to be easily accessible to customers and
contribute real-time support services at point of contact, in the form of a contact centre.
7
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
Provide real time Supply network De-Clear’s managers are using phone
communication collaboration communications to make orders with
between company and module suppliers and this often leads to order
suppliers about errors. Therefore, supply network
inventory levels and collaboration modules are required. These
other data modules are typically online secure
services that automate electronic
document exchange with suppliers. By
using this module, suppliers will be able
to access real time data on inventory
levels via the internet, and therefore will
be able to send components based on pre-
determined inventory levels. Not only will
this module save managerial time spent on
communicating with suppliers, but it will
also automate all payment transactions
further increasing efficiency within the
8
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
supply network.
9
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
10
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
Oracle and SAP both being large vendors have similar capabilities in their Demand
Forecasting and Planning modules. However, Oracle is able to better create forecasts
based not only on historical data but also on seasonal models. This is important as De-
Clear being a cosmetic company will have sales fluctuate widely during particular
seasons such as Christmas time. Furthermore, Oracle is better able to adjust its
forecasts to reflect events and promotions and it can create forecasts which match the
product lifecycle from birth and growth to maturity and decline. Therefore, Oracle’s
forecasting demand module is likely to be better.
Oracle’s Supply Chain Analytics module is superior to SAP’s. Although, both Oracle and
SAP’s Supply Chain Analytics modules provide information about the performance of
suppliers by means of KPI’s. Oracle’s module takes it one step further by sending
automatic e-mail alerts to suppliers if their score falls below a specific threshold on a KPI.
This helps suppliers understand how you are measuring their performance and gives
suppliers a chance to readjust their service. Having underperforming suppliers increase
their service quality is always better than finding a new supplier given the difficulties
involved in creating new business relationships. Furthermore, Oracle has an extensive
range of over 80 pre-defined KPI’s which allows very detailed analysis into suppliers.
Obviously, supply chain analytics apply to evaluating individuals within the company.
Oracle has an advantage over SAP in evaluating employees, as non-technical managers
can create a dashboard of KPIs that matter to them to evaluate employees beneath
them by using only a simple three-step procedure. All the KPIs are presented in very
easy to view forms such as graphs and tables.
Both Oracle’s Supplier Network Module and SAP’s Supply Network Collaboration
module are effective. It is difficult to state whether Oracle’s module is better or worse
than SAP’s module. Both modules support key procurement and payment transactions,
including purchase orders, advance ship notices and invoices. Both modules gives
suppliers a clear idea of inventory levels with real time data, such that suppliers know
when to ship components. Both modules allows companies within the supply chain to
communicate by means of one program which avoids the cost of supporting individual
communications between firms. Oracle and SAP’s modules Supplier Network Modules
also tracks the successful deliver of all messages, such that managers can be assured
that crucial messages will be read by suppliers.
For order management Oracle and SAP have captured the important elements of the
order-to-cash process (SAP, n.d.). However it is Oracle’s Order Management Module
that is recommended. De-Clear’s problematic manual errors by the Accounting and
Finance departments can be eliminated by the flexible defaulting capability (ORACLE,
11
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
2003). This automatically populates order data to reduce the likelihood of data entry
error. This validation also supports order modifications, cancellations and returns.
Oracle is architecture to synchronise orders from multiple systems (web stores, third
party systems and call centres).The module can integrate seamlessly with financial and
supply chain operations, being individually implemented or part of Oracles E-Business
Suite.
The SAP Netweaver Master Data Management Module provides a single, user-defined
location for master data (SAP, n.d.). Although it has many advantages, Oracle MDM
Module can be more easily integrated though Oracle’s EBS. It provides an internal
triggering mechanism that creates and deploys change to all connected systems,
increasing adaptability and responsiveness (ORACLE, 2011). Duplication is eliminated
through data quality functionality. Additionally its user interface is supportive of familiar
and casual users, promoting wider management reporting and more informed decision
making.
For contact and support services, SAP CRM call centre software is compared against
Oracle contact centre anywhere module. The SAP module provides required customer
service and call centre analytics while the Oracle module goes further in providing multi
channel solutions enabling routing, queuing, and distribution of phone calls, e-mail, chat,
fax, and web (SAP, n.d.). This is important in light of De-Clear’s customer communication,
particularly in the global context to ensure global customers can deal with the business
in various mediums, overcoming time and distance constraints. Additionally Supervision
tools are integrated by design to include real-time dashboards, historical reporting and
powerful quality management capabilities.
Scoring Analysis
In weighting the Scoring Model, more weight was given to demand forecasting and
communications with the suppliers criteria. The reason being for this is that De-Clear
being a manufacturer requires very good forecasts of demand to know how much
inventory is required in their warehouses otherwise customer demand may not be met.
Communications with suppliers is also highly important given the fact that as a
manufacturer, clear communications with suppliers is required to ensure production can
occur smoothly without delays caused by late shipments of components. The
percentage ratings we gave to SAP and Oracle for each module is based on the analysis
provided immediately above.
12
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
Therefore, we can clearly see that from this scoring model, Oracle clearly
seems to be the better choice.
Advantages Disadvantages
13
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
CONCLUSION
14
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
APPENDIX
15
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)
lOMoARcPSD|1304285
BIBLIOGRAPHY
16
Distributing prohibited | Downloaded by ying feng (francesfengy@gmail.com)