Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Materialistic World
Materialistic World
Materialistic World
adjective
1. excessively concerned with physical comforts or the acquisition of
wealth and material possessions, rather than with spiritual,
intellectual, or cultural values.
Some tribes were so confused by the colonists' insatiable desire for gold
that they believed that the metal must be a kind of deity with
supernatural powers. Why else would they go to such lengths to get hold of
it? When an Indian chief in Cuba learned that Spanish sailors were about
to attack his island, he started to pray to a chest full of gold,
appealing to the ‘gold spirit' which he believed they worshipped. But the
‘gold spirit' didn't show him any mercy - the sailors invaded the island,
captured the chief and burned him alive.
Modern Materialism
Our mad materialism would be more forgivable if there was evidence that
material goods and wealth do lead to happiness. But all the evidence fails
to show this. Study after study by psychologists has shown that there is
no correlation between wealth and happiness. The only exception is in
cases of real poverty, when extra income does relieve suffering and brings
security. But once our basic material needs are satisfied, our level of
income makes little difference to our level of happiness. Research has
shown, for example, that extremely rich people such as billionaires are
not significantly happier than people with an average income, and suffer
from higher levels of depression. Researchers in positive psychology have
concluded that true well-being does not come from wealth but from other
factors such as good relationships, meaningful and challenging jobs or
hobbies, and a sense of connection to something bigger than ourselves
(such as a religion, a political or social cause, or a sense of mission).
One of the problems with this theory is that there is actually nothing
‘natural' about the desire to accumulate wealth. In fact, this desire
would have been disastrous for earlier human beings. For the vast majority
of our time on this planet, human beings have lived as hunter-gatherers -
small tribes who would usually move to a different site every few months.
As we can see from modern hunter-gatherers, this way of life has to be
non-materialistic, because people can't afford to be weighed down with
unnecessary goods. Since they moved every few months, unnecessary goods
would simply be a hindrance to them, making it more difficult for them to
move.
Another theory is that the restlessness and constant wanting which fuels
our materialism is a kind of evolutionary mechanism which keeps us in a
state of alertness. (The psychologist Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi has
suggested this, for example) Dissatisfaction keeps living beings on the
lookout for ways of improving their chances of survival; if they were
satisfied they wouldn't be alert, and other creatures would take the
advantage.
But there is no evidence that other animals live in a state of restless
dissatisfaction. On the contrary, many animals seem to very slow and
static lives, content to remain within their niche and to follow their
instinctive patterns of behaviour. And if this is what drives our
materialism, we would probably expect other animals to be acquisitive too.
But again, there is no evidence that - apart from some food-hoarding for
the winter months - other animals share our materialistic impulses. If it
was necessary for living beings to be restless and constantly wanting then
evolution would surely have ground to a half millions of years ago.
In addition, our desire for wealth is a reaction to the sense of lack and
vulnerability generated by our sense of separation. This generates a
desire to makes ourselves more whole, more significant and powerful. We
try to ‘bolster' our fragile egos and make ourselves feel more complete by
accumulating wealth and possessions.