Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Pepe's Screed On The Mount - Precepts For Engaging The Totalitarian Left
Pepe's Screed On The Mount - Precepts For Engaging The Totalitarian Left
Pepe's Screed On The Mount - Precepts For Engaging The Totalitarian Left
Precepts for Engaging the Totalitarian Left
Praise be to Kek. By thy name, by thy might defend my cause. Proud men have risen up
against me. Men of violence seek my life.
A tempest unholy twists and tangles in the distance, darkening the horizon - a foe that
does not fear us, and will not stop until this land is desecrated by its sin, or consecrated
with its blood. The Enemy relies on our humanity for its survival. They mistake our good
will for weakness. To know the enemy is despise them. Let the darkness flow through you,
and prepare for battle. Attack when they are weak. Defend when they are strong.
This way comes a swarm of locusts, containing the souls of the predatory globalists,
corporatists, moneylenders, slanderers, propagandists, and deceitful prophets of false
faiths, engorging themselves on the capital vices of gluttony, avarice, arrogance and envy.
I. CIVIL WAR
We are at the precipice of a great conflict - a war to determine whether this nation -
conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal,
shall long endure on this hallowed ground, or whether this fine land will be left to those
who would defile it. And thus, we take up arms in the service of justice, domestic
tranquility, and the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. We go to war not
simply to engage, but to emerge victorious. And thus, American’s of all persuasion, from
Kekistanis to /Pol/acks, autists and patriots, prepare yourselves. There is no substitute
for victory.
II. THE ENEMY
We, the people, are under relentless assault from a spiteful enemy -The Enemy - scheming
for the destruction of our way of life. Academia, the corporate media and entertainment
industry, the rapacious degenerate-gambling banking establishment, political infiltrators in
government, and their facilitators and apologists are tangled in an incestuous alliance,
waging an unacknowledged war to undermine the people. They engage in relentless attacks
- “permanent revolution.” By necessity they must be on the offensive, for they and their
faith are indefensible. They are an anti-democratic virus being pumped through the veins
of the Republic, in the service of a small population of self-serving subversives, actively
undermining society, national identity, and the American Way. Their intent is to ensure
that government of the people, for the people, and by the people, shall perish from this
earth.
To us goes the advantage, for truth is our guide. The Enemy indulges in a faith-based
worldview - a collectivist ideology where inconvenient truths are sacrificed to ensure
obedience to collectivist conformity. The faithful confine themselves within the walls of
an already established belief system – an intellectual vacuum so devoid of curious inquiry
that false statistics, advocacy research, propaganda and outrageous statements are
ubiquitous. And thus, their weakness is that they forfeit truth, liberty, freedom and
self-determination to enforce conformity.
A. The Enemy - An Introduction
The primary, and most fundamental characteristic of The Enemy, is that they lie -
brazenly, unapologetically and continuously. The litany of the Enemy, from the
retrogressive, effete elite to the average parishioner of their false faith, is dishonesty.
It is their antidote to inconvenient truths. Contradicting their fables is a challenge due to
the sheer, overwhelming tide of their mendacities.
The Enemy is not undemocratic, but anti-democratic.
The Enemy does not believe in free-speech, and is censorsorial.
The Enemy values neither liberty nor freedom, but seeks conformity.
B. The Enemy - The Players
Bag men: Degenerate money fetishists. Rapacious gambling-class of self-serving,
self-dealing banksters and corporate locusts. The bag men own the rest of The Enemy.
They seek to liberate themselves from regulation by destroying government and the
established culture. They are hostile to democracy and republicanism. They prefer
government by purchased technocrats, such as the European Union, with its
democratic-deficit. They promote “free trade,” a propagandistic buzzword describing
crony capitalism, corruption, privatizing the profits, and socializing the losses. Bag men
must be distinguished from industrialists, i.e. people who actually create things. Bag men,
on the other hand, build nothing and take credit for everything. They have the egos of
elephants, and the self-esteem of cockroaches. They are money lenders, speculators and
currency/monetary manipulators. These are the self-identified geniuses that destroyed
banking regulation, brought us synthetic collateralized debt obligations, and lied us into
destructive trade deals and wars to benefit themselves. Bag men are a virus that infect
their host with a loathsome, degenerative societal disease.
The Traitors: Those in public life that betrayed their oath to represent the interests of
the people. For 30 pieces of silver they sold their souls, and betrayed the righteous.
Academia: The Church. A place to pay homage to false faiths. The liturgy of the The
Church is social science, i.e. pseudo-science. There is no science in social science. It is
simply political activism cloaked in the legitimacy of the academy. “The Pseudo-liberals
monopolize the teaching jobs at many universities. Only men who agree with them are
appointed as teachers and instructors of the social sciences, and only textbooks
supporting their ideas are used.” [Ludwig von Mises]
Thought leaders: Prophets of the faith. Leftist intellectuals, predominantly of German
and Eastern European extraction, whose families immigrated to the United States during
the wave of immigration that occurred from roughly from 1880 to 1920, bringing with
them a radical, Leftist subculture.
“Intellectualism/Intellectuals/Experts“ (“Intelligentsia”): The priesthood. A
purposefully anti-scientific political movement attempting to legitimize absurdities by
shielding their propositions with credentialization from esteemed institutions. They speak
from a position of assumed intellectual authority. Such authority rests on a foundation of
the great and powerful Woozle. “Back where I come from, we have universities, seats of
great learning, where men go to become great thinkers. And when they come out, they
think deep thoughts and with no more brains than you have. But they have one thing you
haven't got: a diploma.” They legitimize reductionist propositions and absurdities by
utilizing made-up polysyllabic-words and concepts with complicated constructions. The
communicate with a “sesquipedalian loquaciousness,” a made up form of language that is
unnecessarily complex, nonsensical, and dependent on jargon (see Sokol Affair). “Some
ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual could believe them.” [George Orwell -
attributed]. These fabulists pollute the atmosphere, and are poisoned by their own toxins.
“Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.” [Voltaire]
They are easily recognized, because they attempt to do the following:
● Promote mutually exclusive concepts/propositions, and insist that both are true.
● Demand that the people hold self-defeating, and often contradictory beliefs or
values.
● Demand that the people believe the absurd.
● Insist that obvious facts and circumstances are actually untrue: “Don’t believe your
lying eyes.”
● Provides the authority that the Corporate Media utilizes to propagandize to the
people.1
1
Example: “I’m Howard Silver. For twenty-five years I led an organization called the
Consortium of Social Science Associations that advocated for federal funding for social
and behavioral science research. The kind of research used often by journalists in their
many stories about society and its politics.” (Panel Discussion Presentation featuring
Jeffrey Goldberg, Rosie Gray, and Graeme Wood, The Rise of Populism and Nationalism
(June 20, 2017), sponsored by The Atlantic Magazine and Sixth & I synagogue. Retrieved
09/05/2017 from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcWaIcEq6fg&t=351s)
Corporate Media: The propagandists. Lazy, corrupt, dishonest, and self-righteous. Their
ranks are filled with the proletariat and moral jihadists. The corporate media act as the
middlemen of information, filtering access to, and distorting facts. The corporate media
misrepresent facts or circumstances with oft repeated bromides, in service to the
narrative. They deny or interpret facts in conformity to the narrative, and
“contextualize” facts to justify them within the parameters of their faith. They move to
derail argument with ad hominem attacks, or argue trivilities to avoid substantive
engagement. The corporate media overwhelm discourse and interrupt the dissemination of
information by polluting the informational ecosystem and occupying the field. With the
disintermediation of the media, one can hear the wailing and gnashing of teeth of the
“journalists,” who are losing their grip as the gatekeepers of information.
The corporate media includes the entertainment industry, particularly the media that
emanates from Hollywood. The most insidious, evil utilization of re-education propaganda
are those targeted toward young men and boys. Hollywood movies, video games and comic
books that anticipate a young male audience are injected with critical theory euphemisms
and feminist themes.2
Moral Jihadists: True believers - Jesuits of the faith. They attempt to change reality
through their faith and sheer will. Obstinate, self-righteous, with a belief in their own
moral superiority, they justify the villainization, dehumanization, and violence towards
2
Examples of the corporate media pushing their propaganda:
● Gamergate was coordinated, sexist, harassment campaign to push women out of
video games. This narrative was promulgated by the New York Times, Washington
Post, and the Los Angeles Times, in addition to those “news” media held in lesser
esteem.
● Those against illegal immigration are “white nationalists,” and “xenophobic.”
● Former Google senior software engineer James Damore, after having written a
tame criticism of Google’s mandated re-education curriculum and environment of
thought-conformity, was slandered in the corporate media. The ubiquitous theme
presented was that he: is the “new face of the alt-right” (Quartz), wrote a “sexist
screed” (Vox), an “anti-diversity screed” (Gizmodo/Vice), an “anti-woman screed”
(Time) . The Washington Post flat out just lied in an article entitled, “A Google
engineer said women may be genetically unsuited for tech jobs.”
● Dr. Matt Taylor, an astrophysicist and project scientist on the Rosetta Project,#
was ideologically battered by a corporate media generated #shirtstorm, after
being interviewed about the mission’s success while wearing a bowling shirt, made
and given to him as a birthday gift by his friend Elly Prizeman, which featured a
comic book styled, pin-up girl design.
non-believers. Freedom of speech and thought are unwelcome intrusions, particularly if it
challenges the faith’s orthodoxy or its proponents. They seek to define and confine the
parameters of acceptable discourse, and prevent the dissemination of
ideas/argument/concepts they oppose. They are hypocrites and without shame. They are
both easily offended, and yet profoundly offensive.
The Proletariat: Vapid, conformist, and cowardly, i.e. polite society - like cows to the
slaughter, they are passive supporters of the Leftist Jihad. The proletariat incorporate
the language of the faith into their expression and self-identity. Ironically, they don’t
tend to do real work, but are college-educated, middle-class urbanites with social-science
degrees and job titles like “Entrepreneur-in-Residence,” “Social Media Capability
Architect,” and “Serial Entrepreneur.” Concerned about maintaining correct-think and
“being on the right side of history.” They parrot Leftist propaganda talking points, voice
all the correct opinions, and appropriately take offense.
Anarchy/Anarchists: A mislabeled form of totalitarianism. “The sin of nearly all
left-wingers from 1933 onward is that they have wanted to be anti-Fascist without being
anti-totalitarian.” [George Orwell] Purposefully misidentified by The Enemy as
“anti-fascists,” and “counter-protesters,” what they are, in fact, are an authoritarian
collection of doctrinaire hive-minders. They are inept revolutionaries, who would make
tragic statesmen. Despite their self-identification, anarchists agitate against “the
government,” but not against government itself. Far from being “radicals,” they are
acute-conformists, who try to enforce conformity. They serve as the Brownshirts of the
movement.
C. The Enemy - Foundational Belief System
“The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles. Freeman and
slave, patrician and plebeian, lord and serf, guildmaster and journeyman, in a word,
oppressor and oppressed…” (Marx, K. & Engels, F., The Communist Manifesto, (1848))
In the modern vernacular, “oppressor and oppressed,” must be in the understood as a
particular form of polarized political (rather than economic) opposition - the justified
“Us” versus indefensible “Them.” Yet, the purveyors of the faith (rather than its
apologists, activists, and proselytizers) are actually engaged in a looking-glass economic
war. They’ve deformed Marxism, transforming its application away from societal economic
justice, into a political tool to wage war on the economically vulnerable, ensuring the
retrogressive, effete elite are free to continue oppressing.
Their corruption of the Marxist faith makes The Enemy’s application of it particularly
venal. They’ve twisted the paradigm, focusing away from those that “control the means of
production,” with their undue political and economic power, and refocus their attack on the
weak. Thus, the oppressor/oppressed narrative has deformed into an attack by The
Enemy against the average Joe - pitting every man against every man against every woman,
in the mutually assured destruction of family and community. As the virus continues to
infect the weakened host, each individual’s lived reality becomes a self-fulfilling
confirmation of their own oppression, as the strength of the community withers away and
their lives with it. This is the initial indication of those behind the renaissance of this
bastardized religion.
If something has a direct benefit to a class of people, and a theoretical, abstract, or
amorphous benefit to everybody else, the proponents’ intentions are to benefit the
former, not the latter, no matter what bullshit they try to feed you. Who benefits from
the war being waged against the people?
D. The Enemy - Fundamental Objectives
The fundemental objectives of The Enemy are formed by and for the retrogressive,
effete elite, but protheletized by cosmopolitanist professionals in a rhetorical expression
soothing to their souls. In broad strokes, the utopianistic vision includes:
● Globalism
● “Free trade,” so called.
● Economic liberalization of the monied class
● Primacy of corporatists and banksters. Government by technocrats/”experts” on
behalf of the monied interests. Hostility to democracy, republicanism and the
working class.
● Open borders, to crush the working class
● Destruction of community identity and attachments (and therefore, destruction of
community and identity). Atomization of Le Peuple. Without community, individuals
are dependant on, and subservient to, the establishment.
● Destruction of The West. “The West” - the traditions, beliefs and moral
imperatives arising from the Age of Enlightenment, and the philosophical ideas
therefrom, including Locke, Hume, Kant, and Voltaire, as well as the folk culture and
traditions of Europe, from Spain to Russia (inclusive).
● Degradation of the virtues of traditional expressions of masculinity
E. The Enemy - The Canon
The canon is a catalogue of lazy thought, drowned in verbose prose so incomprehensible
that it could be mistaken for bad poetry.
● Sigmund Freud - Sex is good. The West represses sex. The West is bad. Mother
fetishism, father hate, and anti-Catholicism.
● Marxism - A prediction (rather than a prescription) that in advanced industrialized
societies, the “meek shall inherit the earth.”
● Trotskyism - Marxist permanent revolution, proletarian internationalism.
● Leninism - Vanguard as a condition precedent to Marxist revolution, resulting in the
dictatorship of the proletariat.
● Maoism - Marxi
● sm without the industrial condition precedent. Utopianism, continuous war against
traditionalism, feudalism, i.e. the pre-revolution established order.
● Critical Theory - Subversive political academic movement to undermine western
civilization and cultural expectations. Preaches radical individualism for the masses.
Born of an unholy mating of Marx and Freud. Brought to the United States by a
cabal of pseudo-intellectual, fraudster “scientists” chased out of Germany.
Trumpeted by the corporate media.
● Second Wave Feminism and its progeny, i.e. “next wave” feminism, queer theory,
transgender studies, ethnic studies, ect. (hereinafter “feminism”). Seemingly
redundant with the aforementioned, but mentioned here because the language of
SJW Leftists is expressed through the dialect of feminism’s distillation of
Freud/Marx/Trotsky/Mao/Critical Theory.
F. The Enemy - Methodology (Politics By Proxy)
The constant underlying The Enemy’s war against The West are their fundamental
objectives. Political issues blossom and wither, but they are merely tools in service of The
Enemy’s unchanging objectives. For instance, The Enemy’s fundamental objective of open
borders is sold in various forms: “The criminal elite seeks new ways to camouflage their
project. First, their immigrant pawns were ‘temporary guest workers.’ Then, it was a
‘multiracial experiment.’ Then they were ‘refugees.’ Then the answer to a shrinking
population. Different excuses. Different lies. And asylum is just another one. But, the
real aim stays the same.” [Nick Griffin]
The Enemy does not change. They just want to be on the side that winning. Whatever side
is winning, and whatever side they’re on, the subversives don’t stop subverting. For
example: The self-preserving temper-tantrum that was the anti-war movement of the
1960’s and 70’s served as a justification for the cowardice of draft dodgers to indulge in
the sexual revolution and burgeoning (and ultimately disastrous) drug culture. This was all
made possible by the economic affluence of their generation, paid for by their depression
surviving, world war fighting parents. The “thought leaders” of the anti-war movement, a
collection of northeastern Trotskyites no longer threatened by induction, ultimately
rebranded themselves as conservatives after being “mugged by reality,” in a “The God
That Failed” transition that brought us the so called, “neoconservatives”3 who are neither
new nor conservative. And thus, these neoconservatives freed themselves to
hypocritically midwife in decades of war, economic ruination, and societal degradation by
wrapping themselves in the imprimatur of conservatism, while prosecuting an agenda of
which Stalin would be proud. Realize that neoconservatives and neo-liberals are the same
people, attacking Western society from two different fronts, but with the same goals.
The Enemy forms a narrative, primarily created by their intelligentsia within the walls of
the bag men funded academies and think tanks. They manufacture crises from whole
cloth. Never letting a crisis go to waste, The Enemy propagandizes the narrative to pollute
the field of ideas, proselytizing it as a moral imperative, and psycho-pathologizing dissent.
They engage in what Bernard Goldberg called, “journalism by sentiment.” They take
discrete issues affecting discrete populations, and “universalize” the issue onto the wider
population. They misrepresent the scope of limited issues for subversive political
purposes.
The propaganda is predominantly unsophisticated, but is broadcast repeatedly and
forcefully through the corporate media. “Repeat a lie often enough and it becomes the
truth” (law of propaganda, attributed to Joseph Goebbels).
The Enemy instinctively relies on the most vulgar, childlike of rhetorical argument, that of
ad hominem ridicule - invectively epithetizing their opposition as immoral, and therefore
indefensible. They’ll falsely accuse the innocent of thought-crimes by association, all they
while casting themselves as victims on which outrages have been visited. These tactics are
utilized because their narratives cannot survive scrutiny. The Enemy cringes when
questioned or contradicted, because their propaganda is patently false and demonstrably
3
“...The move from being a Leninist enthusiast to a, you know a passionate supporter of state
capitalism, you know, and working for American aims, that takes place overnight. It’s been going on
for years. It’s called The God That Failed transition. And it happens very simply...But, in recent
years it’s become just a farce - a technique of opportunism.” Noam Chomsky (Lecture, March 15,
1989), “Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media.
so. Because of the tenuousness of their arguments, The Enemy tries to shut down
discourse, altogether.4
Ultimately, the The Enemy are control freaks, desperately trying to control the
dissemination of information through professionalized media that ignores, re-interprets or
reframes inconvenient facts for purely political ends.
The Enemy agitates for fundamentally undemocratic forms of government, such as the
European Union with its government by unelected bureaucrats. They seek to mitigate
democratic forms of representation by placing intermediaries between Le Peuple and the
exercise of political power.
III. PRECEPTS AND CONSIDERATIONS
The Few. The Proud…
The Enemy relies on our humanity for its survival - the civilized to be civil. They mistake
our good will for a weakness to be exploited. Many a nobody understand elitist lies. Just
imagine mobilizing every nobody - enflaming zealotry. Imagine fielding a corps of rabid
patriots to engage in this just war. Many are called. Few are chosen. To those willing to
suffer the transfiguration from righteous men to Holy Warriors, know that your vocation
is righteous. Those ready to serve are a credit to themselves and the nation. Serve with
valor, honor and humility.
A. Prepare for battle. “Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I
came not to send peace, but a sword” (Matthew 10:34).
B. Define objectives. Create the strategy and tactics to obtain them.
“Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go
to war first and then seek to win.” [Sun Tzu, The Art of War].
C. Know The Enemy. Who are their allies? Who funds them? What are their
methods and capabilities? Find and exploit their vulnerabilities. “Know
thyself, know thy enemy. A thousand battles, a thousand victories.” [Sun
Tzu].
4
For example, the Left distorted the A.I.D.S. crisis of the 1980’s, and created a myth of
a coming explosion of heterosexual H.I.V. infections to affect political outcomes. When
Michael Fumento published his book, The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS, lamenting
distortions of the disease and the effect on epidemiology, Fumento was slandered,
censored and vilified. Typical targets of the Left are those populations and institutions
emblematic Western society: The Catholic Church and Christianity as a whole, police,
military, fraternities,
D. Make them live their ideology. Make their society ideologically “diverse” by
flooding their liquid society with infiltrators: Promote their preferred
model of decision making, i.e. consensus. This appeals to them because they
hate being held accountable. Consensus dilutes responsibility, but slows the
decision making process; Encourage debate during the decision process;
Advocate for ineffective and politically detrimental tactics that appeal to
their “radicals” (rioting, property destruction).
E. Don’t Knight the Pawn. Kill the King. Aim high, and decapitate the beast.
F. First the mission, then the mission, and lastly, the mission.
G. Interlocking fields of fire. Action by one supports the mission of all. Do not
engage in infighting.
H. Everybody is a leader. Everybody is a follower. The difference between
humility and authority is circumstance. A good subordinate is more valuable
than a bad leader. Pick-up the flag when leadership is required. Step aside
as necessary.
I. Attack when they are weak. Defend when they are strong - making them
them engage on our terms - at a time, place and manner of our own design.
“[T]hose skilled in war bring the enemy to the field of battle and are not
brought there by him.” [Sun Tzu, The Art of War] “[T]he defensive form
of war is in itself stronger than the offensive.” [Carl von Clausewitz, On
War].
J. Distinguish between that which is important, and what can be sacrificed.5
Evolve as needed. Change when necessary. Do not let process trump
substance.
5
“While standing in the middle of a spanning wood, is it not easier to appreciate a great
oak, than to view the whole of the forest? Likewise, does one not fail to appreciate the
individual tree while overlooking a spanning woodland? Two men may each pursue
righteousness from their different perspectives, and where one man’s path is true, the
other’s path is in error. One must know what is important, and what can be sacrificed.
For, who would think a man wise who chops wood in preparation for the winter as his home
burns down around his fireplace?”