This rubric evaluates student presentations on space and Earth science across four criteria: cooperation, originality, use of graphics/ICT, and overall comments. For cooperation, it evaluates how well groups delegate tasks and share responsibility. For originality, it evaluates the level of inventiveness and uniqueness in content and presentation. For use of graphics/ICT, it evaluates how well visual elements support the theme and are appropriately sized/colored. The comments section provides an overall evaluation.
This rubric evaluates student presentations on space and Earth science across four criteria: cooperation, originality, use of graphics/ICT, and overall comments. For cooperation, it evaluates how well groups delegate tasks and share responsibility. For originality, it evaluates the level of inventiveness and uniqueness in content and presentation. For use of graphics/ICT, it evaluates how well visual elements support the theme and are appropriately sized/colored. The comments section provides an overall evaluation.
This rubric evaluates student presentations on space and Earth science across four criteria: cooperation, originality, use of graphics/ICT, and overall comments. For cooperation, it evaluates how well groups delegate tasks and share responsibility. For originality, it evaluates the level of inventiveness and uniqueness in content and presentation. For use of graphics/ICT, it evaluates how well visual elements support the theme and are appropriately sized/colored. The comments section provides an overall evaluation.
This rubric evaluates student presentations on space and Earth science across four criteria: cooperation, originality, use of graphics/ICT, and overall comments. For cooperation, it evaluates how well groups delegate tasks and share responsibility. For originality, it evaluates the level of inventiveness and uniqueness in content and presentation. For use of graphics/ICT, it evaluates how well visual elements support the theme and are appropriately sized/colored. The comments section provides an overall evaluation.
Cooperation Group delegates Group delegates Group delegates Group often is not tasks and shares tasks and shares tasks and shares effective in responsibility responsibility responsibility delegating tasks effectively all of the effectively most of effectively some of and/or sharing time. the time. the time. responsibility.
Originality Presentation shows Presentation shows Presentation shows Presentation is a
considerable some originality an attempt at rehash of other originality and and inventiveness. originality and people\'s ideas inventiveness. The The content and inventiveness. and/or graphics content and ideas ideas are presented and shows very are presented in a in an interesting little attempt at unique and way. original thought. interesting way. Use of All graphics are Few graphics/visual All graphics are Choice of ICT is not Graphics/ICT attractive (size and supports are used, attractive (size and appropriate for colours) and but all support the colours), but do not presentation. support the theme/content of support the theme/content of the presentation. theme/content of the presentation. the presentation. Choice of ICT is Choice of ICT is appropriate for appropriate for presentation. presentation. Comments: