Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Gradfather Paradox
Gradfather Paradox
Gradfather Paradox
Grandfather paradox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The grandfather paradox is a proposed paradox of time travel first described (in this exact form) by the science fiction writer
Main page René Barjavel in his 1943 book Le Voyageur Imprudent (The Imprudent Traveller).[1] Nevertheless, similar (and even more mind-
Contents boggling) paradoxes had already been described, for instance by Robert A. Heinlein in "By His Bootstraps". The paradox is this:
Featured content suppose a man travelled back in time and killed his biological grandfather before the latter met the traveller's grandmother. As a
Current events result, one of the traveller's parents (and by extension the traveller himself) would never have been conceived. This would imply
Random article that he could not have travelled back in time after all, which means the grandfather would still be alive, and the traveller would
Interaction have been conceived allowing him to travel back in time and kill his grandfather. Thus each possibility seems to imply its own
negation, a type of logical paradox.
About Wikipedia
Community portal Despite the name, the grandfather paradox does not exclusively regard the impossibility of one's own birth. Rather, it regards any
Recent changes action that makes impossible the ability to travel back in time in the first place. The paradox's namesake example is merely the
Contact Wikipedia most commonly thought of when one considers the whole range of possible actions. Another example would be using scientific
Donate to Wikipedia knowledge to invent a time machine, then going back in time and (whether through murder or otherwise) impeding a scientist's
Help work that would eventually lead to the very information that you used to invent the time machine.
Toolbox An equivalent paradox is known (in philosophy) as autoinfanticide, going back in time and killing oneself as a baby.[2]
Print/export
The grandfather paradox has been used to argue that backwards time travel must be impossible. However, a number of possible
ways of avoiding the paradox have been proposed, such as the idea that the timeline is fixed and unchangeable, the idea that the
Languages time traveller will end up in a parallel timeline, while the timeline in which the traveller was born remains independent or the
Bosanski possibility of the time traveller saving his grandfather's life instead of killing him so that he could later be born and travel back in
Česky time so that he could save his grandfather's life, exactly the opposite of the original paradox.
Deutsch Another paradox similar to that was developed by Stephen Hawking in his TV Documents, Episode 2 in 2010 series, Into The
Español Universe With Stephen Hawking. According to the paradox, a young scientist travels into the past one minute with a time
ﻓﺎرﺳﯽ machine he just built. With him he took a gun and killed his past self that was loading the gun, instantly killing him. The question
Français is though, who fired the shot? The loop stays open with the person being dead who fired the shot. According to the theory
Italiano however, there is always a cause before an effect saying that the future man is a copy of the past man, meaning he killed a
עברית different person.
Lietuvių
Magyar Contents [hide]
Nederlands 1 Scientific theories
Polski 1.1 Novikov self-consistency principle
Português 1.2 Parallel universes/alternate timelines
Română 2 Theories in science fiction
Slovenčina 2.1 Parallel universes resolution
Suomi 2.2 Restricted action resolution
Svenska 2.3 Destruction resolution
Türkçe 2.4 Temporal Modification Negation Theory
Tiếng Việt 3 Other considerations
中文 4 See also
5 References
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
largely incomplete. One possible consequence of ideas drawn from M-theory is that multiple universes in the form of 3-
dimensional membranes known as branes could exist side-by-side in a fourth large spatial dimension (which is distinct from
the concept of time as a fourth dimension) - see Brane cosmology. However, there is currently no argument from physics that
there would be one brane for each physically possible version of history as in the many-worlds interpretation, nor is there any
argument that time travel would take one to a different brane.
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
An example of this would be for someone to travel back to observe life in Austria in 1887 and shooting five people, one of which
was one of Hitler's parents. Hitler would therefore never have existed, but since this would not prevent the invention of the means
for time travel, or the purpose of the trip, then such a change would hold. But for it to hold, every element that influenced the trip
must remain unchanged. This would void someone convincing another party to travel back to kill the people without knowing who
they are and making the time line stick, because by being successful, they would void the first party's influence and therefore the
second party's actions.
A humorous treatment of this issue occurs in an episode of Futurama, in which Fry travels back in time and inadvertently causes
his grandfather's death before he marries his grandmother. His distraught grandmother then seduces him, and upon returning to
his own time Fry learns that he is his own grandfather.
Consideration of the grandfather paradox has led some to the idea that time travel is by its very nature paradoxical and therefore
logically impossible, on the same order as round squares. For example, the philosopher Bradley Dowden made this sort of
argument in the textbook Logical Reasoning, where he wrote:
“ Nobody has ever built a time machine that could take a person back to an earlier time. Nobody should be
seriously trying to build one, either, because a good argument exists for why the machine can never be built.
The argument goes like this: suppose you did have a time machine right now, and you could step into it and
travel back to some earlier time. Your actions in that time might then prevent your grandparents from ever
having met one another. This would make you not born, and thus not step into the time machine. So, the claim
that there could be a time machine is self-contradictory. ”
However, some philosophers and scientists believe that time travel into the past need not be logically impossible provided that
there is no possibility of changing the past, as suggested, for example, by the Novikov self-consistency principle. Bradley
Dowden himself revised the view above after being convinced of this in an exchange with the philosopher Norman Swartz.[4]
Consideration of the possibility of backwards time travel in a hypothetical universe described by a Gödel metric led famed
logician Kurt Gödel to assert that time might itself be a sort of illusion.[5][6] He seems to have been suggesting something along
the lines of the block time view in which time does not really "flow" but is just another dimension like space, with all events at all
times being fixed within this 4-dimensional "block".
Another theory suggests that the time machine requires a receiving end machine and thus it is impossible to travel before the
time of the first invention of a time machine.[7]
References [edit]
1. ^ Barjavel, René (1943). Le voyageur imprudent ("The imprudent traveller").; actually, the book refers to an ancestor of the time
traveller not his grandfather.
2. ^ Horwich, Paul (1987). Asymmetries in Time. Cambridge, MIT Press. pp. 116.
When the term was coined[citation needed] by Paul Horwich, he used the term autofanticide.
3. ^ Deutsch, David (1991). "Quantum mechanics near closed timelike curves". Physical Review D 44: 3197–3217.
doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.44.3197 .
4. ^ "Dowden-Swartz Exchange" .
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com
5. ^ Yourgrau, Palle (2004). A World Without Time: The Forgotten Legacy Of Godel And Einstein . Basic Books. ISBN 0-465-09293-4.
6. ^ Holt, Jim (2005-02-21). "Time Bandits" . The New Yorker. Retrieved 2006-10-19.
7. ^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0390384/
converted by Web2PDFConvert.com