We have urban development. also looks like we have jungle conditions. This isn't exactly my idea of a tropical paradise you're talking about. So, that's another factor. But, given this complicated trauma landscape you've got going, how do you find things? What approaches are you using? >> Well we started off, and we still do, undertake intensive pedestrian survey. >> All right. So, essentially walking up and down, across the landscape, looking for things. >> In the jungle. >> The trouble with the jungle, is they're full of trees. And trees tend to lose, trees tend to lose their leaves. >> Right. >> so we quickly had to adapt some of our methods. >> Mm-hm. >> For Mediterranean style pedestrian survey. >> Mm-hm. >> to more flexible approach, depending on context. >> Mm-hm. >> in the. >> The intensive stuff is like what we do at Petra, where it's easy to do. I, please continue. >> In the, in the dense jungle, up in the Centre hills in the middle of the island. >> Mm-hm, mm-hm. >> We tend to take more extensive rambles. we've, some of our work. >> [LAUGH] I love that. >> Has been informed by, by LIDAR. >> LIDAR. >> Through which, we, we can see through the tree canopy, as it were, to historical plantation structures. >> Different form of remote sensing. >> Essentially, yes. A satellite bounces a laser to the ground off the ground. We can detect anomalies across the ground surface. We can use that to target our work as we hike up into the rain forest. >> Again this use of remote sensing to help you pick your targets. Okay. So we have survey, we have remote sensing. Describe how intense your survey is, in where you can actually do it properly. >> When we can do it properly we normally have very close spacing of walkers to try and maximize data generation essentially. The, the island is not entirely covered in jungle. There are some scrubby, more open patches, especially in the north where we've been working. Coastal regions also tend to be scrubby rather than thickly forested. And there we found our methods have been, have been pretty effective. Particularly, in discovering scatters of prehistoric artifacts and also noting historic structures. >> And in the jungle, you say your extensive rambles, are you macheteing your way through or do you just try to. >> We're macheteing a lot. The jungle isn't an actual macheteing setting because it tends to be a decent ground level, there's not much dense vegetation to hack through. Cassie Bush is a large prickly type of bush which covers the northern half of the island. >> Yes. >> We have to hack through that. When we're not macheting through that we're macheting through a poisonous plant known as manchineel. The sap of which will give you second degree burns if you get it on your skin. So that's wonderful. Aside from intensive survey. >> Don't ask. [LAUGH] >> We also had to take limited targeted excavation. >> Okay. >> In collaboration with the Montserrat National Trust to verify and ground truth our survey results and that's been very productive. >> So it's, you're in a situation where you can both do survey and do test excavations. That's, that's very good. But no big open, open air excavations. No large site explorations. >> Not, not yet. We see it as sort of a, a sort of inverse nested triangle of, of methodology. >> So on a very large scale we have island wide remote sensing. >> Okay. >> The LIDAR, that quick word imagery. >Then moving down pedestrian surveys, and it's like more focused fashion. And then, again down through the geophysics, down to the target excavation. And these generate different types of data, but we've found them to be very complimentary. >> Okay. And what's earliest to latest, what's your, excluding AIR studios. >> Excluding AIR studios. Well, last summer in 2012, we were very excited to discover what we think is a open quote archaic site close quote. An archaic in the Caribbean means from around 2000 to around 500 BC. So we're effecting, effectively pushing the colonization history of the island back by upwards of a, of a millennium. >> Oh, indeed? So no, when did, when, when did people used to think the island was colonized, about 500? >> Well, I mentioned that site Trants, which is now covered by volcanic deposits. That was radio carbon dated by David Waters of the Carnegie Institute to 500 BC and that was the earliest site for Montserrat. >> but we think, we have good evidence, for this new site to be archaic, so we're pushing it back again. And this is bringing Montserrat into line with islands such as Antigua and Nevis, which are both its neighbors. >> So it's really, it's, it's changing the whole landscape of Caribbean colonization, Caribbean. >> It is. We're, we're, we're changing Montserrat's archaeology, but also bringing it into line with broader patterns that we can see in the Caribbean and prehistory. >> So, this archaic stuff, what, pottery? What, what's the. >> No, actually, it's. >> What's the tip off? >> The archaic populations in the Caribbean where, as far we're, we're aware, entirely hunter gatherers. >> Okay. >> And the lithic, the chip stone industries, are very distinctive but also very dissimilar from later food producing lithic industries. So, we have good reason, we think, based on the stone tools and analysis, analyses of the stone tools. >> Mm-hm. >> to argue that these are indeed archaic in date. >> So you can't date the, the, the stone itself, per se? It's, it's the typology, it's the style of the artifact? >> Right, these, these are, these are surface finds generated from >> Okay. >> Our intensive pedestrian survey >> Okay. >> But with detailed topological analysis, a morphometric analysis. >> Mm-hm. >> Comparison to other known archaic assemblages, we can make a strong claim for these to be archaic materials. >> Big news. >> Big news on Montserrat. >> Yeah.